Obama and the Billionaire

| | Comments (2)

New national polls of Democrats show Senator Barack Obama is the frontrunner for the presidential nomination. The New York Times/CBS News and USA Today/Gallup polls put his lead in double digits.

But a new headache for Senator Obama has surfaced that could have devastating impact on his presidential campaign. According to the The Times of London a British-Iraqi billionaire lent millions of dollars to Obama’s fundraising effort only weeks before an imprudent land deal.

The Times reports: “The money transfer raises the question of whether funds from Nadhmi Auchi, one of Britain’s wealthiest men, helped Senator Obama buy the mock Georgian mansion in Chicago where he lives. A company related to Mr. Auchi, who has a conviction for corruption in France, registered the loan to Mr. Obama’s bagman, Antoin ‘Tony’ Rezko on May 23, 2005. Mr. Auchi says the loan, through the Panamanian company Fintrade Services SA, was for $US 3.5 million.”

“Three weeks later, Senator Obama bought a house on Chicago’ South side, while Mr. Rezko’s wife bought the garden plot next door from the same seller on the same day, June 15….

“Ms. Rezko, whose husband was widely known to be under investigation at the time, sold a 3m strip of her property to Senator Obama seven months later. Senator Obama says his involvement in the land deal was a “boneheaded mistake,” and he paid $US 150,000 to charity as a public atonement….

“Ms Rezko, whose husband goes on trial on unrelated corruption charges in Chicago on March 3, refused to answer questions about the case when she spoke to The Times…. Mr. Rezko has been indicted for allegedly scheming to pressure companies seeking business with the state of Illinois for contributions to the campaign of Governor Rod Blagojevich.”

Obama’s Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, has sought to make Mr. Rezko – who has bankrolled Obama’s political career since his first run for the Illinois state Senate in the mid-1990s – an election issue by calling him a “slum landlord” in a televised debate. Clinton has repeatedly suggested that Obama has not been “vetted” by media scrutiny and will not withstand “the Republican attack machine.”

We know less about Barack Obama and his political connections than we have known about any other candidate for the presidency in the past half century. In their final debate, Clinton wanted everyone to know that she believes the press is tougher on her than on Barack Obama. According to the New York Times “She made her case by citing a sketch on last week’s Saturday Night Live that showed mock debate moderators grilling her stand-in….but fawning over the Obama character.”

Obama’s media honeymoon may be over. A veteran journalist who covers Obama regularly provides this snapshot: “He’s not at all as he appears on television. He’s cold, distant and tightly wound. But when the red light goes on the TV cameras, he’s all charm and self-discipline in his choice of words.”

This story is not going away. The Rezko-Auchi connection is sure to trigger overdue press scrutiny when Rezko’s trial begins on March 3. Obama’s name could figure in the trial although he is not accused of any wrongdoing.

    Comments

  1. This is the latest in a series of teriffic reports by Richard Whalen. It is becoming more and more clear that the myth about Barak Obama conceals more than it reveals, and that the Republican "Swiftboaters" are now confident that Obama can be defeated by the same kind of attacks that sank John Kerry in 2004. Having looked a bit into the Rezko-Auchi story, I am convinced that there is lots of fire, as well as smoke, and that this could be the kind of scandal that sticks. If Obama emerges from March 4th primaries in Texas and Ohio as the clear Democratic frontrunner for the nomination, I expect the GOP attack dogs to go wild. It is a long way from March 4 to the Democratic convention in Denver in August, and an even longer road to November elections. One way or the other, we are likely to see what Obama is really made of, and I expect that the mania and mythology will be put to the test very soon. Mr. Whalen's incisive commentaries are a welcome contribution to this electoral season, which I look forward to every day. It is refreshing to read the thoughts of someone who has a deep appreciation that the U.S. and world economies are in a grave crisis, and who sees the clear linkage between these unfolding developments and the selection of the next President of the United States.

    Posted by: eureka Author Profile Page | February 28, 2008 10:07 AM

  2. What a load of baloney. Circumstantial evidence with no connection to what really happened. Obama's Senate financial disclosures and income tax returns show that the home was bought with a mortgage that he's paying off now, like most people and not with money from some billionaire. Give me a break.

    Posted by: JimmyJack | February 28, 2008 1:12 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)