<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Craig Crawford&apos;s Trail Mix</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2007-10-24:/trailmix//7</id>
    <updated>2008-05-17T15:31:21Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Obama Accepts Debate Challenge?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/obama-accepts-mccain-debate-ch.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2254</id>

    <published>2008-05-17T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-17T15:31:21Z</updated>

    <summary>Other than getting Hillary Rodham Clinton out of the race, there is not much left to be done for John McCain and Barack Obama to schedule debates this summer. Obama on Friday seemed to accept an idea first proposed by...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Other than getting <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong> out of the race, there is not much left to be done for <strong>John McCain </strong>and <strong>Barack Obama</strong> to schedule debates this summer. </p>
<p>Obama on Friday seemed to accept an idea first proposed by McCain for freestyle debates before the party conventions. "If John McCain wants to meet me anywhere, any time to have a debate about our respective policies ... that is a conversation I am happy to have."</p>
<p>Even though Obama made it sound as though he was the one issuing the challenge, McCain has already said he wants pre-convention forums or un-moderated debates. Obama's words in his South Dakota speech on Friday could serve as an apparent acceptance of the presumed Republican nominee's recent proposal for face-to-face sessions.</p>
<p>Originally, Obama had only indicated that he would consider McCain's idea, perhaps out of deference to Clinton. But Obama appears more willing now that he plans to claim victory in the Democratic nomination battle after next week's primaries in Oregon and Kentucky.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p dir="ltr"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><strong><em>Coming Tomorrow: </em></strong>Trail Mix "Summer of Love"<br />Two of our most fierce supporters of Clinton and Obama (<strong>Jamie</strong> and <strong>Brian</strong>)&nbsp;each tell us what they like most about the other's candidate.</font></p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Mississippi Mixed Blessings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/mississippi-mixed-blessings.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2239</id>

    <published>2008-05-16T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-16T08:34:04Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Produced by CQ's Andrew Satter Now on Video Trail Mix: The Democratic victory in a Mississippi congressional special election on Tuesday&nbsp;is good news for the party, but not necessarily for Barack Obama.(Click PLAY VIDEO&nbsp;in screen) &nbsp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Video Trail Mix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="javascript:var target=window.open('http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1377935580/bctid1556133755','CQPoliticsVideoArchive','scrollbars=no,resizable=no,status=no,width=790,height=620');"><img style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none" src="http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/free_site_photos/cc_childers_thumb.jpg" /></a> 
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Produced by CQ's Andrew Satter</font></p>
<p><em>Now on Video Trail Mix: </em>The Democratic victory in a Mississippi congressional special election on Tuesday&nbsp;is good news for the party, but not necessarily for <strong>Barack Obama.<br /></strong>(Click PLAY VIDEO&nbsp;in screen)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Kentucky to Test Edwards Factor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/kentucky-to-test-edwards-facto.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2233</id>

    <published>2008-05-15T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-15T03:15:18Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The impact of John Edwards endorsing Barack Obama on Wednesday&nbsp;can be measured in next week's Kentucky primary. The Obama camp surely hopes to deny Hillary Rodham Clinton the chance for another blowout like what happened on Tuesday in West Virginia....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The impact of <strong>John Edwards</strong> endorsing <strong>Barack Obama</strong> on Wednesday&nbsp;can be measured in next week's Kentucky primary. The Obama camp surely hopes to deny <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton </strong>the chance for another blowout like what happened on Tuesday in West Virginia.</p>
<p>Edwards has spent more time among Appalachian voters than anyone in this presidential campaign. His poverty tours and tireless championing for working-class voters in the region might encourage those voters to listen to Edwards if he goes on the road in Kentucky.</p>
<p>Proving strength among voters who are not warming to Obama could give Edwards a shot at running mate, or at least indicate how he can be best used in a general election campaign.</p>
<p>Obama does not need to win Kentucky on May 20 to go forward with his plans to use an expected Oregon win&nbsp;on the same day to officially claim victory in the Democratic race. But a stunner in Kentucky like his 41-point loss in West Virginia would be most unwelcome -- and Edwards could at least help narrow the margin.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig </font></font><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">on &nbsp;"Imus in the Morning"<br />Thursday (5/15) 6:30 AM EST<br /></font><a href="http://www.rfdtv.com/Press/Releases/HTML/Don_Imus_Returns.asp"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">RFD-TV</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">&nbsp;/ </font><a href="http://www.wabcradio.com/article.asp?id=531472"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">WABC-AM</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"> / </font><a href="http://www.trueoldies1059.com/"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">WJZW-FM</font></a></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="right">&nbsp;</p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Huckabee Beats Rice in VP Madness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/huckabee-beats-rice-in-vp-madn.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2230</id>

    <published>2008-05-14T20:10:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-14T20:19:33Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[In a somewhat surprising upset, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee soundly beat Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice in the 2d Round of VP Madness on CQ Politics. Although perhaps it is not so surprising, given the latest buzz that Huckabee&nbsp;tops...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a somewhat surprising upset, former Arkansas Gov. <strong>Mike Huckabee </strong>soundly beat Secretary of State <strong>Condoleeza Rice </strong>in the 2d Round of <a href="http://innovation.cq.com/vpmadness">VP Madness</a> on CQ Politics. Although perhaps it is not so surprising, given <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/5/12/source-huckabee-tops-mccains-veep-list.html">the latest buzz</a> that Huckabee&nbsp;tops <strong>John McCain's </strong>short list for Republican running mate.</p>
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Round Three Pairings in<br /><a href="http://innovation.cq.com/vpmadness">VP Madness</a> (GOP Edition):</font></p>
<ul>
<li>Huckabee vs. Sanford</li>
<li>Pawlenty vs. Hutchison</li>
<li>Palin vs. Jindal</li>
<li>Portman vs. Crist</li></ul>
<p><strong>Round&nbsp;Three voting is open until tomorrow, May 15</strong> (Round Four begins Friday, May 16). Democratic version coming once a party nominee is set.</p>
<p>Watch Craig's <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1377935580/bctid1532911197">Video Tour of VP Madness</a>.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"></font></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="left"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig on "Verdict with Dan Abrams"<br />Tonight (5/14) MSNBC 9:00 PM EST</font></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="left"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><br />&nbsp;</p></font></font>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt" align="right"><font color="#000000" size="3"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">. . .&nbsp;and on &nbsp;"Imus in the Morning"<br />Thursday (5/15) 6:30 AM EST<br /></font><a href="http://www.rfdtv.com/Press/Releases/HTML/Don_Imus_Returns.asp"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">RFD-TV</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">&nbsp;/ </font><a href="http://www.wabcradio.com/article.asp?id=531472"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">WABC-AM</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"> / </font><a href="http://www.trueoldies1059.com/"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">WJZW-FM</font></a></font></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Clinton Wins Center but Loses Base</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/clinton-wins-center-but-loses.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2221</id>

    <published>2008-05-14T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-14T20:04:49Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Edited by CQ's Andrew Satter ("Fabulous Moolah" provided by Barbara B.) &nbsp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Video Trail Mix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="javascript:var target=window.open('http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1418511633/bctid1552650579','CQPoliticsVideoArchive','scrollbars=no,resizable=no,status=no,width=790,height=620');"><img style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none" src="http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/free_site_photos/cc_wv_thumb.jpg" /></a> 
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Edited by CQ's Andrew Satter <br />("Fabulous Moolah" provided by Barbara B.)</font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Mountain Mama Wins Big</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/mountain-mama-wins-big.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2220</id>

    <published>2008-05-14T00:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-14T00:30:09Z</updated>

    <summary>Hillary Rodham Clinton’s massive win in West Virginia tonight should give pause to the Democratic superdelegates. But, apparently, it won’t. This is not the first time that the Democratic Party’s liberal base has placed a sizable bet -- that the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton’s</strong> massive win in West Virginia tonight should give pause to the Democratic superdelegates. But, apparently, it won’t.</p>
<p>This is not the first time that the Democratic Party’s liberal base has placed a sizable bet -- that the country has changed to its benefit. This has been the essential presumption of liberal Democratic strategy since <strong>George McGovern’s</strong> ridiculous campaign in 1972.</p>
<p>Thirty-six years later -- and many losses in between -- Democrats find in <strong>Barack Obama </strong>the next big play to move the nation leftward.</p>
<p>West Virginia voters showed tonight that they are not changing. And yet, the Clintons, who happen to be the only Democrats alive who twice won the White House, are getting the boot from their own party.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>West Virginia -- Anomaly or Bellwether?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/west-virginia-anomaly-or-bellw.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2207</id>

    <published>2008-05-13T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-13T07:12:55Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[As Hillary Rodham Clinton prepares to savor an expected win today in West Virginia's primary, the question is whether her late-in-the game victories represent the usual last-minute rallying for a failing challenger or an ominous&nbsp;sign&nbsp;of Barack Obama's troubles reaching voters...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton </strong>prepares to savor an expected win today in West Virginia's primary, the question is whether her late-in-the game victories represent the usual last-minute rallying for a failing challenger or an ominous&nbsp;sign&nbsp;of <strong>Barack Obama's </strong>troubles reaching voters outside his&nbsp;demographic base. While the Mountain State is almost a laboratory for rural and&nbsp;working-class voters who often elude Democrats in general elections, Obama is banking&nbsp;on building an unprecedented party coalition of&nbsp;new voters around the country who&nbsp;could change history and propel&nbsp;the first&nbsp;Democrat since 1916 to win the White House&nbsp;in November without&nbsp;West Virginia.</p>
<p><a href="javascript:var target=window.open('http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1418511633/bctid1551027642','CQPoliticsVideoArchive','scrollbars=no,resizable=no,status=no,width=790,height=620');"><img style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none" src="http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/free_site_photos/morgantown_wv_thumb.jpg" /></a> <br /><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"><strong>The Trail Less Traveled </strong>was in Morgantown, W. Va., where locals are excited to vote in today's Democratic primary despite the fact that many political experts say the outcome won't matter. <br />(<strong>Jonathan Allen</strong> and <strong>Andrew Satter</strong>, CQ Politics)&nbsp;</font></p>
<p><a href="javascript:var target=window.open('http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1418511633/bctid1551055612','CQPoliticsVideoArchive','scrollbars=no,resizable=no,status=no,width=790,height=620');">VIDEO INTERVIEW: Clinton Stronger Than Obama in W. Va. General Election</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama Eyes Big Loss in West Virginia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/obama-eyes-big-loss-in-west-vi.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2205</id>

    <published>2008-05-12T19:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-12T19:28:29Z</updated>

    <summary>If Barack Obama’s cursory campaigning for West Virginia’s primary was motivated by some sort of graciousness toward Hillary Rodham Clinton, as some in his camp suggest, why is he campaigning hard for Oregon? The answer is obvious -- he can...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If <strong>Barack Obama’s</strong> cursory campaigning for West Virginia’s primary was motivated by some sort of graciousness toward <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong>, as some in his camp suggest, why is he campaigning hard for Oregon? </p>
<p>The answer is obvious -- he can win Oregon on May 20, but seems to have no chance for victory tomorrow in West Virginia. Obama clearly has no plans to cede Oregon in order to allow Clinton a graceful exit, nor should he.</p>
<p>But Obama began and ended his Mountain State campaign with today’s rally in Charleston. You would think someone on the verge of clinching&nbsp;his party's&nbsp;presidential nod would want to make more of an effort in a state won by every successful Democratic nominee since 1916.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&amp;docID=news-000002827079">For West Virginians, the Race is Still On</a> (Jonathan Allen, CQ Politics)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002826695">Clinton Headed for Popular Vote and Delegate Win in W.Va.</a> (Greg Giroux, CQ Politics)</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/polltracker/2008/05/clinton-way-ahead-in-w-va-and.html">Clinton Way Ahead in W. Va., and That Raises Questions About November</a> (Poll Tracker)</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Doubt Serves Clinton in Party Feud</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/doubt-serves-clinton-in-party.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2196</id>

    <published>2008-05-12T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-12T12:48:13Z</updated>

    <summary>While dealing from a position of obvious weakness in the Democratic presidential race, Hillary Rodham Clinton has put the party’s rulers in a bit of a box when it comes to the thorny question of what to do about Florida...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>While dealing from a position of obvious weakness in the Democratic presidential race, <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong> has put the party’s rulers in a bit of a box when it comes to the thorny question of what to do about Florida and Michigan.</p>
<p>When the Democratic National Committee’s rules panelists meet on May 31 to hear advocates for the renegade states they would probably rather do nothing in hopes that once <strong>Barack Obama</strong> gathers the winning majority he will seat the contested delegates and end the matter.</p>
<p>But doing nothing helps Clinton the most -- if she wants to keep the party nomination in official limbo until the convention. </p>
<p>Even giving Clinton everything she claims to want would not help her as much. Seating her majority of delegates from both states would still not put her ahead. Counting Florida and Michigan in popular vote evaluations and adjusting upward the number of delegates required to clinch the party nod also would not close the gap for Clinton.</p>
<p>For Clinton, in this case doubt trumps certainty.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p align="right"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig on MSNBC "Morning Joe"<br />Today (5/12) 6:30 AM ET<br /><a href="http://boards.msn.com/MSNBCboards/thread.aspx?threadid=662027">MSNBC Message Board</a> on this segment</font></p>
<p align="right">&nbsp;</p></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Clinton Runs Out of ‘Metrics’</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/clinton-runs-out-of-metrics.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2195</id>

    <published>2008-05-11T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-11T14:50:23Z</updated>

    <summary>There goes another “metric” for Hillary Rodham Clinton. Her yearlong lead in declared superdelegates vanished with the latest wave of endorsements for Barack Obama. Clinton’s best hope now is to somehow take heart in knowing that the nation is not...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There goes another “metric” for <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong>. Her yearlong lead in declared superdelegates vanished with the latest wave of endorsements for <strong>Barack Obama</strong>. </p>
<p>Clinton’s best hope now is to somehow take heart in knowing that the nation is not on the metric system, even though adding up the campaign “metrics” is the hottest new buzz word in politics. She is now behind in number of states won, popular vote, elected delegates -- and she lost the pundit vote months and months ago.</p>
<p>Indeed, Clinton must pivot away from any numerical evaluation of the race. No more new math. Instead, why not shift from mathematics to metaphysics? Perhaps a bit of abstract thinking will yield results.</p>
<p>Or she could just hang on for the only&nbsp;"metric" that really counts -- the roll call of the delegates&nbsp;at the Democratic National Convention in August.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p align="right"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig on MSNBC “Morning Joe”<br />Monday (5/12) 6:30 AM EST</font></p>
<p align="right">&nbsp;</p></blockquote></blockquote>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Obama&apos;s Change Means Losing WV?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/obamas-change-means-losing-wv.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2191</id>

    <published>2008-05-10T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-12T12:40:39Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[West Virginia might not matter to Barack Obama’s tightening grip on&nbsp;his party's&nbsp;nomination, but no&nbsp;Democrat has been elected president without the Mountain State since Woodrow Wilson's narrow reelection in 1916.&nbsp;Obama’s snub of the state for Tuesday’s primary&nbsp;could&nbsp;endanger&nbsp;his party's hopes for West...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>West Virginia might not matter to <strong>Barack Obama’s</strong> tightening grip on&nbsp;his party's&nbsp;nomination, but no&nbsp;Democrat has been elected president without the Mountain State since <strong>Woodrow Wilson's </strong>narrow reelection in 1916.&nbsp;Obama’s snub of the state for Tuesday’s primary&nbsp;could&nbsp;endanger&nbsp;his party's hopes for West Virginia in November, unless his message of winning the general election by breaking from the past includes breaking the state’s near 100-year record of backing the White House winner.</p>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"><a href="http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/05/09/wva.aspx">Why Obama Is 'Skipping' West Virginia</a></font><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"> (Newsweek)</font></li>
<li dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-race10-2008may10,0,7579273.story"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">West Virginia Could Spell Trouble for Obama</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"> (Los Angeles Times)</font></li>
<li dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-08-westvirginia_N.htm"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Mountain State's an uphill climb for Obama</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"> (USA Today)</font></li>
<li dir="ltr"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"><a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/polltracker/2008/05/runaway-for-clinton-in-west-vi.html">Clinton Leads by Almost 3-to-1 in WV</a> (Poll Tracker)</font></li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Going Nuclear Means All or Nothing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/going-nuclear-means-all-or-not.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2189</id>

    <published>2008-05-09T20:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-09T21:30:26Z</updated>

    <summary>If Hillary Rodham Clinton is unable to persuade undeclared superdelegates to her side, will she try to frighten them into submission? Evidence is mounting that Clinton is at least toying with the so-called nuclear option against Barack Obama. Clinton herself...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton </strong>is unable to persuade undeclared superdelegates to her side, will she try to frighten them into submission? Evidence is mounting that Clinton is at least toying with the so-called nuclear option against <strong>Barack Obama</strong>.</p>
<p>Clinton herself is more forcefully disparaging Obama’s chances to win in November, asserting that his support "among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again." Her friend and unofficial adviser <strong>Paul Begala</strong> went further, bluntly charging that Obama’s coalition of "eggheads and African-Americans" spells defeat for Democrats. </p>
<p>Is such talk the product of fatigue and disappointment, or is there a strategy at work? If it is a strategy, Clinton will have to go all out to make it work. If not a strategy, she should quickly back off to higher ground.</p>
<p>Going nuclear against Obama cannot be done halfway. It would yield the worst of both worlds for Clinton. Subtle insinuations will still backfire against her, but without scorching the earth under Obama’s feet.</p>
<p>Only a direct and convincing assault of overwhelming force against Obama’s electability offers Clinton any hope for grabbing the nomination at the last minute.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip">Clinton Makes Case for Wide Appeal</a> (USA Today)</li>
<li><a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/clinton-touts-white-support/?hp">Clinton Touts White Support</a> (New York Times)</li></ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Dream Ticket Chatter</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/dream-ticket-chatter.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2181</id>

    <published>2008-05-09T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-09T04:12:00Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[ Produced by CQ's Andrew Satter Better the No. 2 Spot...or Going Back to the Hill? (Jonathan Allen, CQ Politics) &nbsp;...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Video Trail Mix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<a href="javascript:var target=window.open('http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1418511633/bctid1544553264','CQPoliticsVideoArchive','scrollbars=no,resizable=no,status=no,width=790,height=620');"><img style="BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none" src="http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/free_site_photos/cc_dreamticket_thumb.jpg" /></a> 
<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Produced by CQ's Andrew Satter</font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002713426"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Better the No. 2 Spot...or Going Back to the Hill?</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"> <br />(Jonathan Allen, CQ Politics)</font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>VP Madness 2d Round Begins</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/vp-madness-2d-round-begins.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2175</id>

    <published>2008-05-08T10:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-08T12:12:18Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Here are&nbsp;your pairings for&nbsp;Round Two&nbsp;ofVP Madness (GOP Edition): Rice vs. Huckabee Sanford vs. Romney Pawlenty vs. Powell Ridge vs. Hutchison Palin vs. Brownback Steele vs. Jindal Portman vs. Lieberman Thune vs. Crist Voting is open until May 12 (Round Three...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Here are&nbsp;your pairings for&nbsp;Round Two&nbsp;of<br /></font><a href="http://innovation.cq.com/vpmadness"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">VP Madness (GOP Edition)</font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">:</font></p>
<ul>
<li>Rice vs. Huckabee</li>
<li>Sanford vs. Romney</li>
<li>Pawlenty vs. Powell</li>
<li>Ridge vs. Hutchison</li>
<li>Palin vs. Brownback</li>
<li>Steele vs. Jindal</li>
<li>Portman vs. Lieberman</li>
<li>Thune vs. Crist</li></ul>
<p><strong>Voting is open until May 12 </strong>(Round Three begins May 13).<br />Dem version coming once a party nominee is set.</p>
<p>Watch Craig’s <a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1377935580/bctid1532911197">Video Tour of VP Madness</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid1374481205/bclid1377935580/bctid1532911197"></a>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p align="right"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig on "Decision '08"<br />MSNBC Today (5/8)<br />9:05 / 10:00 / 10:45&nbsp;AM EST <br /></font></p><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">
<p align="left"><br /></p></font></blockquote>
<p dir="ltr"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"><strong>Craig to Speak and Sign Books in Orlando<br /></strong>WHEN: Friday, May 9 at 6:00 PM EST (Free to the Public)</font><a href="http://www.drphillipsrotary.org/"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em"><br /></font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">WHERE: Orange County Library, </font><a href="http://www.ocls.info/locations/Southwest/southwest.asp?bhcp=1"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">Southwest Branch<br /></font></a><font style="FONT-SIZE: 0.8em">7255 Della Dr. Orlando, FL 32819 / (407) 835-7323<br />Sponsored by the <a href="http://www.drphillipsrotary.org/">Dr. Phillips Rotary Club</a></font></font></p>
<p dir="ltr">&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Superdelegates Can End This Now</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/05/superdelegates-can-end-this-no.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.cqpolitics.com,2008:/trailmix//7.2168</id>

    <published>2008-05-07T19:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-07T21:57:59Z</updated>

    <summary>If Democratic superdelegates truly want Hillary Rodham Clinton to quit the nomination race, why don’t they just publicly endorse Barack Obama and get it over with? There are more than enough of them to make up the difference needed to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Craig Crawford</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If Democratic superdelegates truly want <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong> to quit the nomination race, why don’t they just publicly endorse <strong>Barack Obama</strong> and get it over with? There are more than enough of them to make up the difference needed to give him the winning majority.</p>
<p>Until she officially loses, Clinton has no reason to drop out. And if this fight goes all the way to the convention floor because Obama doesn't have the required number of votes on record&nbsp;to formally claim the nomination, the blame falls on wimpy superdelegates -- not her.</p>
<p>Ever since losing the Ohio Primary two months ago, the Obama campaign has been fanning the vapors that a&nbsp;victory-clinching mass of superdelegates are waiting in the wings to endorse him. Now would seem to be the time to prove it -- before Clinton wins lopsided majorities in upcoming states like West Virginia next week and again revs up her momentum.</p>
<p>If the argument to Clinton is that she must leave the race for the good of the party, then the same case can be made to superdelegates who hold the power to force her out by giving Obama the victory right now.</p>
<blockquote dir="ltr" style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<p align="right"><font style="FONT-SIZE: 1.25em">Craig on "Verdict with Dan Abrams"<br />Tonight (5/7) MSNBC 9:00 PM EST<br /><br />... and on MSNBC&nbsp;"Decision '08"<br />Thursday (5/8) 9:00-11:00 AM EST</font></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
