With tonight's launch of the two-day Clinton mini-convention, will this mark the Democratic couple's last hurrah or the birth of new political wing?
There are too many unknown variables going forward to know the answer for sure, but Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech tonight - followed by Bill Clinton on Wednesday - present the first clues.
Of course, considering that the Clintons once ruled the entire party, even birthing a new wing would be a step down for them.
While there are no historical parallels in either party for a nomination runner-up who won 18 million votes, there are past losers who went on to become powerful forces within their parties. Ted Kennedy converted his 1980 defeat into a liberal movement that is now as strong as ever among Democrats. In 1976 Ronald Reagan's conservative revolution lost the GOP battle but went on to propel him into the White House four years later.
One admittedly superficial way to measure the predictive utility of the Clinton convention speeches might be to simply count the number of paragraphs in which they talk about themselves - and contrast that with how much text they devote to talking about Barack Obama.
The more that the Clintons talk about themselves and defend the record of their White House years, the more likely they are aiming to nurture and grow a Clinton wing within the Democratic Party.
If the bulk of their speeches are specifically dedicated to Obama, the more likely that they are prepared to step aside for a new generation.
Comments
woo woo
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 2:02 PM
Craig,
How are the Rocky Mountain Oysters?
Posted by: Bear
| August 26, 2008 2:05 PM
"One admittedly superficial way to measure the predictive utility of the Clinton convention speeches might be to simply count the number of paragraphs in which they talk about themselves - and contrast that with how much text they devote to talking about Barack Obama."
Craig.... well.... at least you admit that it's superficial..... I would call counting paragraphs the ultimate in nerdiness!..... lol....
I am going to watch the convention tonight..... not only for Hillary's speech, but for Mark Warner's too..... and I will be giving up a Red Sox/Yankees game in order to do so.....
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 2:07 PM
Craig -- for the greatest breakfast in Denver try Pete's Kitchen on East Colfax.
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 2:12 PM
Renee, I'll also be watching Hillary's speech. Likewise Bill's. That's about it. If there is a Clinton wing to the party, I'm already in it.
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 2:13 PM
jamie,
But the truth is, which you can not deny, HRC is the more qualified candidate, and she will be sitting on the sidelines because you, Hillary supporters, let the DNC, MSM and Team BHO roll you. You all talk a good game, but in reality your gutless to do anything about it. You could do something, but you won't, you'll just sit there and take it. Sort of like the abused wife who keeps returning home only to get beat just one more time by the person who is suppose to love them, to care for them. So once again the female has been kicked to the curb. Helloooo
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:16 PM
There will be no clinton wing of the party, the way Obama ran his campaign should make that very clear and how he'll run the party for the next 8 years. Also there are just too many of the powerful who want the party to move on, namely Nancy, and Howard.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 2:17 PM
Couldn't you argue the DLC IS the Clinton wing of the Democratic Party?
http://www.dlc.org/
Posted by: spike | August 26, 2008 2:17 PM
Responding to Patsi, who has been on a whine about "morally unfit"
Patsi: you seized on one line in a carefully written and sincere post I put up Sunday. You do that a lot -- fight around the fringes and ignore the substance.
You know what the stakes are in this election.
Thinking on it: if you passionately share Hillary Clinton's view of all that needs to change in this country, and choose to enable a third Bush-Cheney term by using or withholding your vote to punish a third party or entity -- I leave it to individual conscience to decide if that is morally unfit.
We all have a free vote; you will do what you like.
Morally unfit or not, voting for that reason above all strikes me as "vindictive, short-sighted, against self-interest and going to take the chance of punishing a lot of people for the perceived sins of a few."
You happier with that description?
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 2:22 PM
"You all talk a good game, but in reality your gutless to do anything about it. You could do something, but you won't, you'll just sit there and take it. Sort of like the abused wife who keeps returning home only to get beat just one more time by the person who is suppose to love them, to care for them. So once again the female has been kicked to the curb. Helloooo "
BS, Fry. You sound like the flip side of the O-team. Stop it!
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 2:27 PM
I think Hillary and Bill have a future in the party. In addition to whatever she does with her career, maybe she could found or support an organization that finances and enables women running for national office. Use that email list to get it started.
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 2:30 PM
"you seized on one line in a carefully written and sincere post I put up Sunday. You do that a lot -- fight around the fringes and ignore the substance."
No, dog. What I do is read your posts for what they are, carefully worded slams. Digs couched in seemingly innocuous commentary. I've never been one who appreciated passive aggressive tendencies. But I sure as hell know 'em when I see 'em.
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 2:30 PM
Craig I think you fail to give credit to just how much of a desire by many in the party to move away from Clinton style politics and their lack of an ideological core. People get really tired of being thrown under the bus for the good of the Clintons. Just ask the Speaker!
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 2:32 PM
The way Obama is running his campaign. The Clinton's will be the Democratic Party after November.
McCain now ahead in the daily Gallup --the Biden Bounce?
PRINCETON, NJ -- It's official: Barack Obama has received no bounce in voter support out of his selection of Sen. Joe Biden to be his vice presidential running mate.
Gallup Poll Daily tracking from Aug. 23-25, the first three-day period falling entirely after Obama's Saturday morning vice presidential announcement, shows 46% of national registered voters backing John McCain and 44% supporting Obama, not appreciably different from the previous week's standing for both candidates. This is the first time since Obama clinched the nomination in early June, though, that McCain has held any kind of advantage over Obama in Gallup Poll Daily tracking
Posted by: sock drawer open | August 26, 2008 2:33 PM
Patsi/Saucy Goose,
You're a very angry person.
Posted by: Mr. Democrat | August 26, 2008 2:34 PM
dog,
I am glad you are not a referee, you would end-up having to be escorted out of the arena by the police, because by trying to please everyone with your decisions, you actually have alienated everyone. You can't proclaim victory when the game has been fixed, by the DNC, MSM, and team BHO.
When Bill Clinton was tarred and feather by Team BHO and the MSM because they propelled his SC remarks as racist, should have been a wake-up call to all HRC supporters that the fix was in for BHO.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:37 PM
frydaddy,
you happen to know anything about how to retension a cable for an overhead garage door?
Posted by: Bear
| August 26, 2008 2:38 PM
Read that, Bear. May be a dangerous job, btw.
http://www.homerepairforum.com/forum/garage-doors-openers/4287-retensioning-garage-door-spring.html
Posted by: champ | August 26, 2008 2:42 PM
"Affirmative action has nothing to do with Obama's winning the nomination"
KGC
It has a little to do with it in that he got the backing to run sooner with less experience than would be the norm, but he made the race and won on his own. Got lots of help, but he attracted the votes. As with any affirmative action. It got the foot in the door. After that he had to make things happen.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:44 PM
JM 2 pts up over BHO.
So much for Biden, Teddy's appearance or Michelle's speech.
Talking about abused wives, what is this story about blaming poor Elizabeth Edwards for John Edwards screwing around. Democrats blaming Elizabeth Edwards, when will the madness stop.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:45 PM
FD
I didn't have a lot of respect for McCain way back when he was operating in the Maverick edition with the whole Straight Talk Express. Straight Talk only works when you are saying something worth hearing.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:45 PM
"There are many people that vote by likability alone forget facts.......just people I know tend to be more pragmatic....I guess I was referring to those voters who attempt to make an informed vote."
UB..... I think that both candidates will have their share of informed and uninformed votes.....
I will be voting for Obama.... but I don't see people who would vote for McCain as necessarily being uninformed..... I see them as just thinking differently than I do..... I have many friends that regularly vote Republican.... and I have a hard time being with stupid people.....
here's to hoping that Clinton and Warner kick some Republican butt tonight!
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 2:46 PM
"Also there are just too many of the powerful who want the party to move on, namely Nancy, and Howard. "
Well that is a totally lousy endorsement.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:47 PM
but can you spot the relentlessly angry aggressive bitch, when you see 'em ?
Posted by: mirror | August 26, 2008 2:48 PM
Patsi: you excel at finding insults and slams where none are intended. Were the women who commented on my post stooges and dupes? CatBalu realized it was sincere. She did not find it persuasive, but that's fine.
You bore me Patsi. You evaluate things through the narrowest and meanest possible prism and your comments are often one long angry scream.
Of course, there is also your better side, the writer/mother/cook/country music scene insider, which is clever and funny. I always read your comments and enjoy when the better person shines through.
Getting sick of the moray eel on steroids, though.
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 2:49 PM
"Talking about abused wives, what is this story about blaming poor Elizabeth Edwards for John Edwards screwing around. Democrats blaming Elizabeth Edwards, when will the madness stop." fry
Fry the Freepers are not Democrats.
Care to post a link to Democrats saying anything of the kind about Elizabeth Edwards?
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 2:49 PM
FD
"what is this story about blaming poor Elizabeth Edwards for John Edwards screwing around. Democrats blaming Elizabeth Edwards, when will the madness stop."
When did Rash Limpballs become a Democrat. He was the one accusing Elizabeth of not keeping hubby home with a blow job.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:49 PM
Bear,
I know this about garage overhead door springs. If you don't know what your doing, you can get killed messing with those things. Last year our door came off track, guide wires spiraled all over the place, so I called a guy who put the correct tension back on the springs. Learned that these springs only have a life span of about 12 years. This year we had to replace both spring as one cracked in half.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:50 PM
One year ago I held Obama in high esteem and my main impression of him was from his address at the last democratic convention. My favorites this year were Hillary and Biden and though I liked BO it was held in check by his thin resume. Since last summer I have learned more about Obama and my opinion of him has steadily diminished.
Had the DNC and the MSM not acted so egregiously to Hillary, their Clinton hatred so palpable that historians will refer to it as "the Olbermann/Matthews Dark Age. Having only voted for Dems I have taken M.Obama's comment to heart and "give serious thought" before voting, I am voting for McC because I could not sanction the behavior of the media, Dean, Pelosi, and my hero J. Clyburn.
Brian's landslide:
National Gallup Tracking Obama 44, McCain 46 McCain +2
PUMA/Clintons4McCain
toast
Posted by: Milquetoast | August 26, 2008 2:51 PM
Dog
The sermons get a little hard to take at times. How about sticking to subjects where there is agreement.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:51 PM
Jamie,
But this story is coming from your side. Always blame the victim, isn't that right jamie.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:51 PM
RR, my point is that most people I know, talk about issues and their beliefs and they match themselves up with the closest party...it wasn't meant to be a statement about one party or the other - just in general how people lean, and make voting decisions....sorry if I was too vague.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| August 26, 2008 2:53 PM
Gee you all act so surprised at Fry posting scummy lies about Dems. Why?
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 2:54 PM
Champ, Fry,
Thanks for the info...How much did that repair cost you Fry?
Also, did anyone who watched the convention see any "Bring back Pepsi Clear signs?"
Posted by: Bear
| August 26, 2008 2:55 PM
FD
No one from my side is blaming Elizabeth. That particular figment is a Republican nightmare.
No one on our side is returning his phone calls begging for forgiveness. Maybe he should call McCain. He knows all about deserting sick wives for a younger model.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 2:56 PM
Sad. Dr Dre's 20 year old son and namesake has been found dead. Returned from a night out and found unresponsive by his mother.
Very sad.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dreson27-2008aug27,0,5839535.story
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 2:56 PM
KGC,
I'm going to pull a jamie, "Do your own research". Hey if it is good for jamie, it is good for me.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 2:56 PM
No Jamie. That would be silencing a woman's voice, wouldn't it?
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 2:58 PM
I took a look Fry and no Democrat has said anything of the kind
I would call you a concern troll but you are doing more you are lying.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 2:58 PM
Bear,
To adjust the springs, about $125, but that was on a Friday after 7:00 PM. To totally replace both of them, the guide wires $250.00. Other than the door itself, just about everything has a 12 year life expectancy.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:00 PM
FD
That is not something where I would use that phrase. You made the accusation. You prove it is true.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:00 PM
Dog,
Not telling you to keep quiet just saying it was boring.
You have done nothing but beat up on Clinton for months. Nothing has changed.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:02 PM
UB.... same with me..... I love sharing my believes with others.....
thanks for the exchange......
Fry.... it feels like you're trying to get us to vote for McCain..... not gonna happen for me..... I may not be in love with Obama.... but the Republicans don't deserve my vote, IMO......
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 3:03 PM
Jamie and KGC,
"Two weeks after a devastating revelation sent her husband into political exile, Elizabeth Edwards isn't getting the steady sympathy usually afforded to a woman scorned.
Instead, she's faced criticism from dedicated Democrats who think she was too willing to keep the affair a secret to help John Edwards' political ambitions."
Sorry girls but since you couldn't find it I did. Sad blaming Elizabeth for keep the story quiet. I thought it was a personal matter. Now she is being blamed for keeping it quiet. Not only did John Edwards screw her over other D's are trying to screw her. Just more of the same, kick the girl when she is down.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jfOq80s0bbfh1UP_b8x29EsWTXAwD92PR9500
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:07 PM
Dan Balz of WaPo being interviewed on C-APAN
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:08 PM
FD
One AP release quoting two political consultants and a commenter from the Daily KOS. Probably not a wholesale drawing and quartering by the Democratic party.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:15 PM
RR,
No not at all. As I told one of your crew this yesterday. Don't feel like you have to vote for JM, you can write in HRC, or not vote the Presidential part of the ticket, you can still vote for your local representatives. RR I am an R, but you know and I know this isn't right what they did to HRC. If HRC was the candidate I would bet you all your green ware she have have a 10 pt margin in her favor. By voting for BHO you are condoning what they did to HRC, you are enabling their actions.Now after the Europe swing, Biden, having Teddy there last night, Michelle presenting herself as a common person, the best Team BHO can do is tie. JM will win this election, no one votes for the VP, and BHO with all his charm is just an empty suit who needs people in every phase to prop him up.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:18 PM
UhOh. Biden cried today. Was he just playing it up for votes? Or is it a sign of weakness? Is he just being over-emotional due to some hormonal thing? Maybe he's in over his head and reacting to the stress? Oh dear, dear, dear.
What's that again, flaming tildes of sarcasm? ~~~~~
Posted by: Alicia Knight
| August 26, 2008 3:21 PM
Gee Mark Penn is helping Bill write his speech for tomorrow. That must make you feel proud Jamie. Good to know despite still being owed millions he's not holding back on providing his services to the Clintons.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 3:22 PM
Jamie new set of rules. When you ask for proof and then are shown the proof, but you don't like the proof, just deny the proof. I never knew you were such a mushroom.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:22 PM
Does anyone know what time Hillary speaks tonight.Her's and Bill's are the only one's I want to see.Can't waste time with any of the others.Would rather play mahjong
Ruth
Posted by: painter
| August 26, 2008 3:22 PM
Jamie: I am disappointed in you.
And surprised.
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 3:26 PM
Now that is scary. A computer failure in the FAA that processes flight plans. Lots of people sitting on the ground staring at the tarmac. At least they know where the almost 6,000 up in the air are located.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:27 PM
Bill Clinton is a 62 y/o professional politician what is all this crap about his hurt feelings?
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 3:28 PM
I reregistered my phone no. on do not call list.Could not believe that time has run out on the first registration.Have n\been getting bombarded with robo calls for the last couple of weeks.
Anyone need to reregister the number to call is 1-888-382-1222 or on line at donotcall.gov.
Ruth
Posted by: painter
| August 26, 2008 3:29 PM
jamie,
"
That is not something where I would use that phrase. You made the accusation. You prove it is true."
Oh yes you did and you know you did. You have a convenient memory loss when you want to, or maybe you are having one of those senior moments. :-)
But to answer the 2nd part, I have, you just don't like what it had to say.
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:31 PM
FD
I didn't deny the proof. I said it had little import. You were maintaining that the Party was blaming her or Democrats were blaming her. I just don't see any banket condemnation in that article.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:31 PM
if the clintons are the old dem party---what is ted kennedy??
and, i've been wondering..are some of these bho folks the same folks that voted for nader?
i will vote in nov. for my state and local dems. that's it.
i can't vote for someone that i truly believe is not ready for the job.
Posted by: NelsonDecker
| August 26, 2008 3:33 PM
Dog,
Sorry to disappoint you, but you do have a tendency to lecture from a stand of injured nobility, and you have been letting the Clinton supporters know at length how disappointed you were that they just couldn't somehow see the light.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:34 PM
No one blames Mrs. Edwards for the affair --just for not making it public or for remaining silent. And three people who claim to be Democrats out of millions. Hardly proof of the blanket statement you made.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 3:34 PM
I have to run, but it has been fun. Don't be a victim, or an enabler, vote HRC!
Posted by: FryDaddy
| August 26, 2008 3:35 PM
Dog, Sorry to disappoint you, but you do have a tendency to lecture from a stand of injured nobility, and you have been letting the Clinton supporters know at length how disappointed you were that they just couldn't somehow see the light.
=================
Jamie: interesting comment.
It is a mirror image of your behavior.
I see that. Do you?
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 3:37 PM
Dog
Actually I do. When I get intense, I press too hard on people to try to convince them rather than just presenting my position and letting them decide.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 3:39 PM
Hey Ruth -- I hope you will stay tuned for Mark Warner's speech tonight. I would like to know what you think. He could have run for Pres this year, but decided to stay out of it for now because of his family. He's running for Senate in VA instead.
I know and like Mark, but he's not always been the best public speaker. He has done a lot of work on his public speaking ability since he first started on his political career and he's gotten much better.
Mark has his own log cabin story -- he is he first of his family to go to college, he's a self-made millionaire, but very down to earth. His mother suffered from Alzheimers and I remember how he described how hard it was for him to find care for her -- and while he acknowledged that he has a lot of resources -- it was still hard -- so he could really understand how difficult it is for families who don't have the same resources. Mark is a huge reason why Virginia is even within shooting distance of turning blue -- even the GOP in VA love Mark.
Renee -- I don't think Mark is going to kick too hard on GOP butt -- he will criticize their upside down economic policies -- but I don't think he will get personal about it.
Posted by: Alicia Knight
| August 26, 2008 3:41 PM
Bear,
With the door in the up position the tension should be fully released. Remove the springs, and then get the weight of the door. The door weight is important when selecting replacement springs. Replacement springs have the weight rating on the package, Install the replacement springs and make sure that you have the safety cable running on the inside of the spring coil and secured to the frame, allowing the sping to extend when the door is closed. Safety cables are EXTREMELY important. If those springs ever break (and they do) those cables keep them from flying in any random directon destroying what ever they come in contact with. They have so much potential energy when extended they can kill.
Posted by: Bowmanc
| August 26, 2008 3:42 PM
"Getting sick of the moray eel on steroids, though."
Posted by: dog's eye view
well then either stop poking her with your verbal sticks or learn to ignore the consequences
Posted by: patd | August 26, 2008 3:51 PM
Thanks y'all. Now I have a paralyzing fear of my garage door.
Posted by: Alicia Knight
| August 26, 2008 3:52 PM
Fry....
anyone who knows me would NEVER call me a "victim"..... lol....
I ALWAYS make up my own mind and will vote for the candidate of my choice....
I do, however, respect other's right to their own choices....
and as for McCain winning this election..... as someone who's always voted Democratic for president starting in 1972 and a life long Red Sox fan, I've learned to get over losing and disappointment very quickly..... (although it sure is nice to have the Red Sox recently change their losing ways..... )
Alicia.... I will forgive Mark Warner if he can't get too negative on Republicans as long as he gives us an impassioned reason why he is a Democrat......
too much was bland,IMO, last night.....
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 3:55 PM
The new wing already exists. It includes the Centrists and Moderates. It already has enemies aka The Liberal Wing of the Party. I hope -- in vain, probably -- that the Dems see what happened to the Republican Party when the Religious Right was perceived as controlling their Party. The Death of cooperation, moderation, civility and compromise.
Posted by: John Hogue | August 26, 2008 3:58 PM
Don't know who said it, because just heard in passing on CNN, but one of the movers and shakers said that in the long run 90% of the Clinton voters would "cast a tepid vote for Obama", but they didn't care ... tepid still counted as a vote.
I think that is pretty well what it is going to be on election day. If the "tepid" vote and the young, newly registered vote, then Obama wins.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 4:06 PM
Renee -- As a preview -- Mark Warner spoke in 2003 about why he is a Democrat:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2253608
Posted by: Alicia Knight
| August 26, 2008 4:10 PM
Bowman,
My issue is that the door slipped a rail and in the process of putting it back, one of the tension cables came off.
The door has a center spring and it seems to be ok...I'm trying to figure out if I can reset the cable with one side of the door under tension...
Can someone tell me if you think this is funny? I went to high school with him so I am not a proper judge...
http://crackle.com/c/Comedy/McCain_Vlog_1_Welcome/2364788/#ml=fi%3D%26fu%3D2446437
Posted by: Bear
| August 26, 2008 4:13 PM
I agree with milquetoast and john hogue
Posted by: elaine fernandez | August 26, 2008 4:14 PM
http://mediamatters.org/items/200808260015
On the August 25 edition of MSNBC's Hardball, when asked by host Chris Matthews about "this civil war" between "the PUMAs, the holdouts ... and the majority, apparently, of [Sen.] Hillary [Clinton] people who really want [Sen.] Barack Obama and the Democratic Party to win this November," NBC News political director Chuck Todd said of the story, "I kind of think we're hyping it up a little bit. It's getting a little overheated. ... And I wonder if in three days, we look back and say, 'Why did we waste all of our time with that?' " Notwithstanding Todd's comments, during MSNBC's August 25 coverage of the Democratic National Convention, in interviews with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), former President Jimmy Carter, and Obama communications director Robert Gibbs, 18 of the 20 questions asked by NBC and MSNBC correspondents and anchors dealt with Clinton, her supporters, or former President Bill Clinton.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 4:16 PM
Mr. Hogue,
I do not see the centerists and moderates as a new wing of the democratic party. I see them as the old core of the party which has been eviscerated
Reminds me of a song that was written by David Grisman
Old and in the way
That's what I heard him say
They used to heed the words he said
But that was yesterday
Coal will turn to gray
And youth will fade away
They'll never care about you
Cause you're old and in the way
As I hear tell he was happy
He had his share of friends and were kind
Now those freinds have all passed on
He don't have a place called home
Looking back to a better day
When you're old and in the way
When just a boy he left his home
Thought he'd have the world on a string
Now the years have come and gone
Through the streets he walks alone
LIke the old dog gone astray
He's just old and in the way
They'll never care about you
Cause you're old in the way
Posted by: Bowmanc
| August 26, 2008 4:17 PM
Right on KGC!
Posted by: elaine fernandez | August 26, 2008 4:18 PM
Bowman you are full of it
Posted by: elaine fernandez | August 26, 2008 4:20 PM
Are you a handy guy, Bear? If not, call a pro. Not worth getting your hand (or head) cut off. I almost lost a finger screwing with my garage door.
Posted by: champ | August 26, 2008 4:21 PM
" there is also your better side, the writer/mother/cook/country "
ROFL. The one that's not quite so feminazi?
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 4:21 PM
Well Bear I can't help you with that one, do you have any neighbors with similar doors that are competent mechanically? You might ask them.
If you don't know what you are doing, my advice is don't.
And that is coming from me wearing my Safety Supervisor hat. Just ask yourself, is saving a few bucks worth a potential emergency room visit.
Posted by: Bowmanc
| August 26, 2008 4:24 PM
Brian called Allred an ambulance chaser? Funny, isn't that what people used to call John Edwards. Now, he's just a skirt chaser.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:28 PM
So true Elaine, glad you could figure that out.
Posted by: Bowmanc
| August 26, 2008 4:29 PM
"The new wing already exists. It includes the Centrists and Moderates. It already has enemies aka The Liberal Wing of the Party. I hope -- in vain, probably -- that the Dems see what happened to the Republican Party when the Religious Right was perceived as controlling their Party. The Death of cooperation, moderation, civility and compromise."
John H -- I so agree with you. People keep saying this is a new progressive era. But the Democrats being elected through the South are conservative by comparison to most Democrats. And Obama has promised to be a conciliator.
Posted by: Patsi
| August 26, 2008 4:29 PM
"The new wing already exists. It includes the Centrists and Moderates. It already has enemies aka The Liberal Wing of the Party."
john hogue, like bowman sez it's not new, but you're right about the antagonizm of the more liberal wing which has done damage to the centrist wing. the party now is a lame bird that can barely get off the ground.
it needs both wings before it can soar again.
Posted by: patd | August 26, 2008 4:31 PM
Likeability counts at this blog too, Renee. At least for the people here.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:31 PM
Yep
the new wing does already exist, It calls itself the DLC as I remember
All the bruising of the Clintons did was remind more people they belong to that wing.
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack
| August 26, 2008 4:33 PM
The convention speeches would be more fun if they did them in the style of those Dean Martin celebrity roasts.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:34 PM
KGC,
It was fairly obvious that CM and Co. had an agenda to drum up controversy . Both "Baghdad Bob" MaCauliffe anf Debbie W-S was adamantly fighting back about going into that line of questioning; which even Chris found a little odd.
Posted by: Rezdog
| August 26, 2008 4:34 PM
"I do not see the centerists and moderates as a new wing of the democratic party. I see them as the old core of the party which has been eviscerated"
Right on, it's time for Dems to start acting like Dems again, the iron is hot, time to strike!
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 4:36 PM
Rezdog
The worst interview was the Ann Curry -President Carter
in which he told her she was full of it but she soldiered on with the MSNBC line of crap.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 4:37 PM
it's time for Dems to start acting like Dems again, the iron is hot, time to strike!
wasn't time for that during the FISA vote
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 4:38 PM
Regarding garage doors: Professionals are best at that kind of thing. My brother-in-law tried for a few days to get his installed. My sister finally called 2 professionals and they had it up and running in an hour.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:39 PM
Corey
Half loaded, with a cigarette in one hand and a drink in the other?
You do realize they don't even let these people eat fried food. That is what the real problem is for the Big Dawg, No cheeseburger and fries.
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack
| August 26, 2008 4:40 PM
Thanks...found a quote for labor only since I have the parts still...
Posted by: Bear
| August 26, 2008 4:42 PM
Well, my sister's neighbor used hire every thing done, because she wouldn't let her husband do any home improvement work.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:42 PM
Oh, the roast! Yeah! Bring on the funny! No fried food in Denver?
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 4:44 PM
KGC,
I missed that one but DearWife had a good chuckle apparently.
Terry was really stressing the point that "If HRC had money woes, he'd be the first to get out in front on it." but he wasn't going anywhere with the questions about debts. He kept repeating that this event wasn't about HRC. I was even shocked because I like his attitude just not his candidate.
Posted by: Rezdog
| August 26, 2008 4:45 PM
FYI: Here's the link to Tuesday's schedule:
http://www.demconvention.com/tuesday-schedule/
Posted by: Rezdog
| August 26, 2008 4:53 PM
Nobody should write off the Clintons. If Obama loses this election, he's basically history. If he wins, he'd better do a really really good job, or he's basically history. Remember, I'm voting for Obama but do not see anthing as certain.
If he doesn't get a different act together after the convention, he will lose. He's got to ditch that machine because it's losing him votes.
When you dismiss Hillary supporters as whiners and old in the way, you are asking for trouble.
Posted by: bethyboo
| August 26, 2008 4:55 PM
Can Obama Dems, The Media And The Left Blogs Get OverThe Clintons?
By Big Tent Democrat, Section Elections 2008
Posted on Tue Aug 26, 2008 at 12:17:01 PM EST
John Harris pens an article titled Can Clintons Get Over It? I think the question is can Obama Dems, the Media and the Left Blogs get over it?
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/8/26/13171/5785
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 4:57 PM
I don't think Obama will be history if he loses. He is a gamechanger and a different approach.
I hope and pray that he will win, think it's marginally his to lose, but his future is bright no matter what.
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 5:00 PM
Corey..... what?!!.... no fried food at the convention..... well in that case I'll have to have some fried chicken for supper tonight in sympathy for those poor souls......
Rez..... thanks for the schedule..... all those politicians.... and all of them "honorable"..... who knew.....
Posted by: RebelliousRenee
| August 26, 2008 5:01 PM
Yeah but KGC you've swigged so much Clinton-aid you're sweating it out already. Lord knows you sold your moral soul to the clintons when you started posting links about Obama, drug use, and gay sex.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:01 PM
Someone should forward this to that Clinton delegate that appeared in the McCain ad. I heard she later said in an interview that she did not think McCain supporting overturning Roe v. Wade:
"Apart from opposing a constitutional amendment to ban abortion, [McCain] is against most abortion rights and says he would favor overturning the Supreme Court decision affirming those rights."
And the platform the GOP will adopt is even more extreme:
"Conservatives succeeded in removing a line from a platform draft urging a reduction in abortions — underscoring their point that abortion should be eliminated."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080826/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_gop_platform
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:03 PM
Jack: a lot of DLC types supported Obama this time.
I am hardly a liberal. (It took me months to post here once I discovered Craig's blog in an earlier incarnation, because I was so much to the right of most of the others!)
Jamie and I are fairly similar in outlook and approach to a lot of things.
Where would you place Jamie on the spectrum?
Posted by: dog's eye view | August 26, 2008 5:04 PM
"Also there are just too many of the powerful who want the party to move on, namely Nancy, and Howard. "
Well that is a totally lousy endorsement.
Posted by: Jamie | August 26, 2008 2:47 PM
OMG, I have to admit that was totally my reaction as well re the endorsement...
Posted by: EuroTom
| August 26, 2008 5:05 PM
Brian
all you care about is winning and you don't care how it happens and now it turns out you've backed a loser and you are lashing out ...
your candidate needs you in the real world
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:08 PM
KGC
I agree it's more of the same. From all the gnashing of teeth, pulling of hair, and general whining, you would think the Obama group lost. It's almost as if they can't stand the idea that there are still Democrats in the world who don't think the sun rises and sets in Sen. Obama.
Maybe they should just machine gun the New York delegation and hope it helps their self centered, belly button lint gazing fixation.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:08 PM
Tom well that's just too bad, those are people who now hold the power in the party, and they are there because a MAJORITY in the party want them, two solid liberals, who saw the legacy of the Clintons triangulations, and just what it cost the party. It might have kept Bill in power, it did nothing for the party.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:08 PM
Hey Dex,
I heard Randi Rhodes on the air today and she was good. When you first brought her up - I had her confused with Stephanie Miller - who has far less substance and can be annoying.
But any liberal talk show host that has journalistic integrity and a desire to present the truth is at a severe disadvantage when going against the likes of Rush and Hannity.
I was listening to Rush today and that guy really knows how to slant the truth in a convincing way. To listen to him, America will fall off the face of the earth if Obama gets elected. Even though it is the Republicans that got us into the current mess.
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:09 PM
And people wonder why Sturge and I discussed what we discussed this morning.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:10 PM
Backed a looser my ass, your candidate couldn't even take Iowa for god's sake. Remember Iowa? Remember Super Tuesday?
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:10 PM
Ruth, Appreciate the heads up on donotcall.
Posted by: Boss Tweed | August 26, 2008 5:11 PM
Obama: Sounding Like Thomas and Scalia?
July 04, 2008 12:34 PM
The Supreme Court fired a shot last week that ricocheted into the political campaign when it struck down a Washington DC law that banned people from owning handguns. For the first time in history, the justices said the Constitution's 2nd Amendment protected an individual's right to keep and bear arms.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/legalities/2008/07/obama-sounding.html
I did not know Scalia and Thomas were Democrats.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:12 PM
Brian
Just a little reminder that you were not supporting Obama during the Iowa caucuses..you were supporting the man who dissed his sick wife...the man who couldn't keep it in his pants .
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:14 PM
I was thinking...
It is possible that McCain's push to attract HRC supporters will backfire? Can the Republicans actually help the Dems unify?
My thinking is that aggressive push - which is so transparent - might remind some of the Hillary supporters who the real enemy is. Especially after they have trashed her and her husband for the last 16 years - with attacks that make the 2008 primary look like an election for the student body in high school.
It is kinda like when family members are fighting. They could be going at it tooth and nail. But then an outsider steps in - and it drives the two back together.
We'll see...
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:15 PM
"When Bill Clinton was tarred and feather by Team BHO and the MSM because they propelled his SC remarks as racist," **"should have been a wake-up call to all HRC supporters that the fix was in for BHO"."** FryDaddy | 2:37 PM
It was a wake-up call Fry. That's when I first understood, for sure, what was going on. But I kept thinking they could overcome it. By the time they figured out how, it was too late.
...........................
"For those of you who believe that the Hillary Clinton Uprising is a fairy tale concocted by a press in search of convention controversy, think again.
"Hillary Clinton's seductive charms lay heavy over Denver. Defiant supporters can be seen citywide, sporting Hillary pins and T-shirts in direct defiance of Unity."
"Most observers say Biden is the "safe" pick. Maybe. But there is one thing for certain: Picking Biden over Clinton helps a presidential candidate. And that candidate is not here in Denver."
"
http://www.denverpost.com/harsanyi
Posted by: chloe
| August 26, 2008 5:18 PM
Brian, I understand where you are coming from. I just don't respect Dean or Pelosi. I would have had they remained neutral until the process was done, but they were using their power to build up Obama and tear down Clinton and I didn't think that was correct from two of the highest party leaders. Had they worked hard equally for both candidates I think a lot of the bruised feelings would not exist.
Warren, it is good to see you on the blog again.
Posted by: EuroTom
| August 26, 2008 5:19 PM
I don't know why the delicate Obama and his surrogates think it is encumbered upon Hillary to bring in her supporters. Why the hell should she? He's the nominee-he's "The One." Perhaps at BO's supercilious best he can restate that, "a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany ... and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama." I haven't seen the light.
Although I am supporting McCain I am voting for the safety of divided government.
PUMA
toast
Posted by: Milquetoast | August 26, 2008 5:20 PM
I think Bear's friend is scheduled to be on C-SPAN in a few minutes. Didn't he say 3:30 mountain time?
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:22 PM
"But then an outsider steps in - and it drives the two back together."
Interesting analogy Warren.
I've had to "try" and separate many feuding couples back in the bar days and damn if I didn't get cussed and threatened most of the time. lol If it was both men, forget it. I had a bouncher and the cops on speed dial.
Posted by: Rezdog
| August 26, 2008 5:24 PM
BTW,
MO and HRC were at an Emily's List breakfast together this morning. Getting along just fine thank you.
Not to worry, Tweety will find something to complain about.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:24 PM
KGC i know you and some of the others borg think bringing up Edwards is suppose to be some of kind of wound for me, nothing could be further from the truth. When he dropped out my loyalties transferred completely, my only feelings about the Edwards matter is just how hard this must be for his wife. Unlike you I don't over personalize my candidates, unlike you I don't feel supporting my candidate justifies crawling in the mud. The day you posted that link to that story you showed yourself for the low life you really are.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:24 PM
Milque, respectfully I disagree. There are so many problems in our country right now and the last thing we need is gridlock. The Dems, IMHO, offer the best solutions (of the two major parties) to these problems. Don't forget that even if the Dems hold the Senate, House and Presidency, they will still have major difficulties due to the variants of the various Congressional members, from ultra liberal to ultra conservative and every stripe in-between. I'd rather they have full reign and, if I were "king", I'd like to see an activist government in the model of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's "New Deal", Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey's "Great Society" (not to mention the Humphrey-Hawkins Act.
Posted by: EuroTom
| August 26, 2008 5:25 PM
hey warren, good to see you.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:26 PM
ET both Dean and Polisi know who's covering their backs, there is no such thing as neutrality in partisan politics.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:28 PM
Brian
No one personalizes more than you.
I'm sorry I ever engaged you.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:28 PM
MO and HRC were at an Emily's List breakfast together this morning. Getting along just fine thank you.
Posted by: Jamie | August 26, 2008 5:24 PM
And that is very good news. Perhaps the message of these two women should be by their example that "unity" is more than just a buzz word, but a goal and ideal of the Democratic Party. At some point have to see beyond our hurt and really analyze who is best to lead our country in the next 4 years. I sure can't see McCain coming in the preferred slot. Hey, it is a pity that Obama skipped over Hillary, but what is done is done. There's more important issues and problems ahead and I follow Hillary's call for unity and support of Barack Obama. I am not going to allow myself to be so angry that I will support the other major party. To me, that runs against my own values, needs and well-being.
Posted by: EuroTom
| August 26, 2008 5:30 PM
ET both Dean and Polisi know who's covering their backs, there is no such thing as neutrality in partisan politics.
Posted by: BrianInNYC | August 26, 2008 5:28 PM
Hi Brian... Can you illuminate a bit on this?
Posted by: EuroTom
| August 26, 2008 5:31 PM
Pogo, Looks like you're not around today, but this reminded me of what you were talking about yesterday.
Please, Democrats, Attack
By Paul Begala
"If the Democrats do not spend the remaining days of their convention -- hell, the remaining days of the campaign -- in an all-out assault on the ruinous Bush-McCain policies, they will lose."
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/08/please_democrats_attack.html
Posted by: chloe
| August 26, 2008 5:32 PM
"I'm sorry I ever engaged you."
You and me both!
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:33 PM
I miss Sturge.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:34 PM
Milque:
You divided government theory may make some sense for domestic policy - but it does not hold much water with respect foreign policy.
That is the area that the President has the most control over. And if you think Congress will act as a check after McCain turns up his hawkish rhetoric to Iran and Russia - I believe you will be proven wrong.
McCain is the perfect candidate to stir up tensions to such a degree that Congress will be forced to act - or there will be no need because one of our enemies will strike us or one of our allies.
We need a smart President. Our millitary is strong enough and we do not need some blowhard or hot head in the White House to try to overcompensate with his mouth.
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:35 PM
Emily's list afternoon gala
http://emilyslist.org/candidates/gala_stream/
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:36 PM
ET Pelosi and Dean, especially Dean are where they are because they are the heads of the anti-Clinton wing of the party. I wrote about his on the BackChannel a while ago, I really feel that the beginning of the end of Hillary's White House ambition started when Dean was elected chairman.
http://clistersbackchannel.wordpress.com/2008/06/29/the-dean-obama-party-how-we-got-here/
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:37 PM
"I think the question is can Obama Dems, the Media and the Left Blogs get over it?"
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/08/clinton-swan-song-or-birth-of.html#comment-133840
Katherine, If you ever figure out what that's all about, could you please clue me in too?
Posted by: chloe
| August 26, 2008 5:39 PM
Brian
" I don't feel supporting my candidate justifies crawling in the mud. "
Your ability to totally forget any loathsome thing that you have ever said or done never ceases to amaze me. You must have God giving absolution on speed dial.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:40 PM
fwiw---(CSpan)
Our friend David Gipp just got to the dais. Hope he doesn't get stage fright! lol
BTW Carol. . I think he gave up yard work years ago :)
Posted by: Rezdog
| August 26, 2008 5:40 PM
David Gipp on now
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:40 PM
Milque:
It also totally falls apart in terms of the S. Ct. If the GOP is able to replace a liberal Justice with a conservative one - the balance will be lost and the conservatives will control a very powerful branch of government.
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:40 PM
"with the door in the upright position the springs should be released".........
i thought he was talking about the convention!!!!!
i gotta pay more attention, and try not to read so fast
Posted by: NelsonDecker
| August 26, 2008 5:41 PM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/
The post convention bounce better be ENORMOUS
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| August 26, 2008 5:41 PM
Obama Lawsuit -- "Hidden Past"
=======================
Obama Citizenship Lawsuit Info Sheet
"Obama Campaign claims that the lawsuit has been dismissed are false. The lawsuit is proceding through the federal courts.
Obama's eligibility must be resolved immediately. If Obama's citizenship isn't resolved now, the Republicans will use it for an October surprise. If Obama doesn't meet the constitutional requirements, we need to know it now so the Democrats can nominate a candidate who is eligible and can win in November - before it is too late to do any good."
http://obamacrimes.com/index.php/component/content/article/1-main/8-obama-citizenship-lawsuit-info-sheet
Posted by: GORDO | August 26, 2008 5:43 PM
Warren..if you listen to horrible Randi Rhodes more you will discover:
1. She is crude
2. She is often dismissive of her callers
3. She often usws slurred speech on mike
4. She is vulgar
5. She has championed 911 conspiracy theories on the air
6 She is talk radio at its worst
7. She used to fawn over Hillary Clinton until Hillary did not reappear on her show.
Posted by: Oregon Democrat | August 26, 2008 5:43 PM
Jamie I have never slandered a candidate with anything that wasn't truthful, I never invoked racism and homophobia to further the cause of any candidate I supported. Think of me what you want, but you can't point to any post of mine that was slanderous.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:44 PM
Randi Rhodes had 2 offices at Air America. I saw 'em in person. Very impressive.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:44 PM
I think maybe she means what you say towards other bloggers here, Brian.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:46 PM
The bounce won't be big at all. The Dems better pull it together and get ready for a tough fight.
Anyways, I like the polls being close or even having Obama slightly behind.
America loves an underdog.
And he is the underdog. And yes it is because he is black. And also because he is not a Washington insider. And finally because he is a Democrat - and the Democratic party is not as loyal as the Republicans. (Which might actually be a good thing in theory - but not good in terms of winning elections...)
The goods news is that the GOP also usually out-organizes the Dems - but Obama has show great skill in this area.
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:47 PM
Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | August 26, 2008 5:44 PM
You don't remember what you have posted.
Posted by: Bong Hits for Obama | August 26, 2008 5:48 PM
Rasmussen is tied today..With McCain's 2 pt. Gallup lead, it might be wise for ALL Obama supporters to show a little respect for the Clintonsand their supporters.
Gallup: 80% Demo.favor rating for Hillary
75% want her to run for President again.
The Clintons and their army are not going away.
Posted by: Oregon Democrat | August 26, 2008 5:49 PM
Warren, is Biden a Washignton outsider?
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:49 PM
OD:
I listen to talk shows more to get a sense of what people are saying out there - including Rush, Glen Beck, etc.
Plus - I am probably guilty of the first 4 things you listed...
Posted by: warren | August 26, 2008 5:50 PM
Warren, is Biden a Washington outsider?
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:50 PM
"but you can't point to any post of mine that was slanderous. "
I thought you did fairly well in that department with "incontinent, basement dwelling, ancient, racist hag" but you may have been loaded that night and are suffering from blackouts.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:50 PM
Corey
The question is, outside of what?
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack
| August 26, 2008 5:51 PM
But, not to the candidates, Jamie.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:52 PM
Corey
He got off some equally foul descriptions of Clinton.
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:53 PM
I never said that about a candidate Jamie. And that was an insult, not a slander.
In law, defamation (also called calumny, libel, slander, and vilification) is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government or nation a negative image.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
Hell I even defended Rudy when the mindless clucks around here were accusing him of being corrupt because he had a city car driving his then mistress around.
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:53 PM
That's the thing, Jack. Obama's appeal was that he is a Washington outsider. Biden has been there for 35 years. Not in keeping with Obama's outsider appeal. I'm just saying that doesn't totally apply right now.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:53 PM
I thought Senator Clinton was a candidate.
Posted by: Bong Hits for Obama | August 26, 2008 5:54 PM
It's okay to insult people, just don't defame them.
Posted by: Corey
| August 26, 2008 5:55 PM
Jamie you do understand the difference between opinion and slander, yes?
Posted by: BrianInNYC
| August 26, 2008 5:55 PM
"communication or a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual"
So you think the statement made about me was factual?
Posted by: Jamie
| August 26, 2008 5:55 PM