Barack in Charge

| | Comments (516)

Make no mistake about it. The decision rendered today by the Democratic National Committee's rules panel showed that Barack Obama has displaced Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as boss of the party.

The DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee gave Obama exactly what he wanted - a firm decision on seating Florida and Michigan delegates. Even though Clinton wins a small net gain in nominating delegates, it is not enough to seriously boost her chances for the nomination.

No decision would have best served Clinton today. Her nomination hopes are dependent on a chaos theory, which would have been best supported by keeping the status of Florida and Michigan in limbo.

Losing what they needed today proves that for the first time in 16 years the Clintons are no longer in charge of the Democratic Party. There is a new boss in town.

Democrats Compromise, Will Seat Florida and Michigan Delegations (CQ Politics)

 

    Comments

  1. Lardass wins the race?

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:40 PM

  2. 8~(

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:41 PM

  3. LushIs...let's s call it a tie...cuz we like each other so much and were holding hands across the finish line!

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:42 PM

  4. Wow...Craig,

    Not having seen it, what does this actually mean? I mean are they still going to apeal?

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:43 PM

  5. ohhhhhhh..LaL...I am happy you are first(XOXOX)!!

    I am frowning over Craig's post 8~(

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:44 PM

  6. Hi Sheila...

    It looks like Hillary wants to take this to the convention.

    I believe that Obama will have the 2118 delegates needed by Wednesday night to secure the nomination.

    At that point if Hillary decides to go Nuclear it will be the finish of her in the party.

    I sincerely hope she don't as she could still be a force to be reckoned with in the Senate or elsewhere for the Democratic Party.

    God Bless.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:48 PM

  7. Harold Ickes said they are going to the convention.
    Good!
    Ruth

    Posted by: painter Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:48 PM

  8. What is a sock puppet?

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:50 PM

  9. At that point if Hillary decides to go Nuclear it will be the finish of her in the party.


    oh, freakin' spare me.............if hillary decides to go nuclear you goobers better get out of the way...........

    lol

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 7:50 PM

  10. sturgeone...

    I respectively disagree with you.

    God Bless.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:51 PM

  11. I think WHEN this run wears off of Senator Clinton, she is probably going to take over Ted Kennedy's place. She has proven her metal again and again. it doesn't take and elder to become the watch dog of the party.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:52 PM

  12. sock puppet......look up shari lewis on you tube

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 7:53 PM

  13. Sheila...

    Catch you another day.

    Take care and ...

    God Bless.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:53 PM

  14. I have a great idea then. I'll make sure you don't have to ignore anything.

    Posted by: Patsi | May 31, 2008 7:38 PM

    Posting frrequently is the best revenge
    Ignore the hypocrites

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | May 31, 2008 7:55 PM

  15. mettle.

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 7:57 PM

  16. Hi Anon-p~!

    Good to see you again. I am still out on the VEEP thingy. I think if Obama and Clinton get together, it will be up to them and I will accept it as a wise thing.

    If they don't, then that's wise too. they are the only ones who know what they can take together. It may be that Clinton is strong in the senate than in the second spot.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:57 PM

  17. I think the election was just handed to McCain due to the 'Reagan Democrat' swing voters. Obama's best hope is the fear of a Republican picking, perhaps 3, Supreme Court justices.

    Posted by: Warren G in CT | May 31, 2008 7:58 PM

  18. Hi Craig and everyone,

    I just saw the news that Obama has announced that he is resigning from his church. The timing of the priest's mysogiistic and vicious attack on Hillary at Trinity last week now seems somewhat suspicous. Lynn Sweet, a longtime Chicago journalist, said the father is very politically savy and a longtime friend of Obama's. She was very surprised that he would make such a spectacle knowing full well that the cameras were rolling.

    Does anyone else think that the event was timed so that Obama would have an excuse to break from the church in preperation for the general election and also to minimize the amount of coverage?

    P.S. Congratulations to the Obama supporters.

    Posted by: katie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:58 PM

  19. Hillary need not do anything -- positive or negative between now and Denver. She can just kick back and relax. She deserves it.

    In fact....she could say this week that she will back Obama with all her might...and that won't cost her a thing. There is no "legal" threshhold that needs to be crossed or acknowledged. She can implicitly "drop out" without losing a bit of leverage should she eventually need to get "back in."

    Because the only way she can win the nomination at this point is a bombshell gamechanger that will convince SDs to change their minds -- and if that happens, Obama will bring it on himself. Hillary will be there to pick up the pieces for the party.

    That's all folks. The discussion need not be any more complicated than that. We all knew this was coming. Today should be no shocker to anyone on either side.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 7:59 PM

  20. Sheila:
    I respectfully disagree with your prediction about Hillary. Had she originally asked to join the Labor, Health, and Education Committee -- which is where her true interests were -- she would now be sitting pretty. Instead, she went on Armed Services, in order to learn what it took to be Commander in Chief and establish her bona fides with the military types. By all accounts she did a good job ... but that committee is so hidebound that she has not moved up in seniority even a little.
    If she were to switch committees, she would be back at the bottom of the barrel.
    By the time Teddy lost his bid in 1980 he had been in the Senate for 18 years, building up seniority.
    I wouldn't be at all surprised if she actually chose not to run again.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:01 PM

  21. For the Senate, I mean.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:01 PM

  22. Thanks Katie...

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 8:02 PM

  23. You know, I still think Hillary would be a great Supreme Court justice, but I'm not sure she's ever been asked about it.

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 8:03 PM

  24. Sheila...

    I don't know if Obama would offer the V.P. spot to Hillary or not.

    I do know that there are many who do not want to see her as his V.P. though after she brought up the RFK incident and would feel very uneasy if she was.

    I leave that up to Obama as its choice to make and no one else's.

    I'm going off line for awhile and if I get back on it will be only to lurk.

    Hope you have a good weekend, well what's left of it anyway and I'll catch you another time.

    Take care and ...

    God Bless.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:03 PM

  25. Maybe, I have reservations. Ever see "A Face in the Crowd".

    Posted by: Warren G in CT | May 31, 2008 8:03 PM

  26. Katie: I think you are quite right about the church resignation thing ... all along, I have found the incremental nature of these various "events" to be suspect ... particularly in view of Rev Wright's quoted comment that at some point Sen Obama would have to break all ties with the group of people that "groomed him" ...

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:04 PM

  27. This is the most effed up primary I have seen......it is kind of like a really bad relationship where two fight and fight so much that when the fight is over and there is absolutely nothing left to fight about....they have "make up sex."

    eeewwww---- scarey----- but very possible..

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:05 PM

  28. Love that movie, but Obama ain't Lonesome Rhodes.

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 8:05 PM

  29. will robert jr kind of become the head of the family?

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:06 PM

  30. Sheila: Someone will emerge,
    My instinct is that the leadership itself will change... I see Dick Durbin as hungry to take over from Harry Reid, who is not an entirely well man.
    If Hillary were the senior Senator from New York, it might be different, but she is not ... and Senator Schumer will hold that position for as long as he wants it.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:08 PM

  31. Ted Kennedy took over as surrogate father for all those fatherless neices and nephews. I don't think any of them will take his place. I think the dynasty will really be bygone when he passes.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:09 PM

  32. ha ha ha ha ha .....obaman had to resign from his stupid church........what a goober...........

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:10 PM

  33. burrito: All I have to say on the subject is that Harold Ickes Jr is my new hero and that the decision made about the Michigan delegation was the most anti-democratic, outrageous decision I have ever seen. And for what? To deny Sen Clinton six delegates?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:10 PM

  34. Katie, Maggs...
    That's an interesting theory about Trinity...but I honestly think Obama didn't need another uproar for an excuse to leave the church. I think enough has happened already. And honestly, I don't think resigning at this late date really will have the effect of distancing himself from a church where he belonged 20 years.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:11 PM

  35. Good that this happened - it was predictable. Now maybe the Clintons will finally go after Obama. They owe the DNC nothing. Either they do so much damage to Obama that the SDs desert him or they cause him to lose to McCain. Either way, the country would be saved from the gang that has hijacked the Dem Party. Wonder how long before we start hearing "commie Obamie" on Fox News.

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 8:12 PM

  36. i will leave the democratic party now...i will write Hillary in.....i will be independent from now on....

    Posted by: emmy | May 31, 2008 8:12 PM

  37. I have always had an issue with the way the democrats nominate... I'm an independent because both parties stink it up to some level.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:14 PM

  38. I hope not but his opportunism (nothing wrong with seizing opportunity though) typified by his use of signature 'rules' to remove opponents from the ballot in his first campaign are troubling. I am afraid he will be savaged by the 527's and one "Listen junior, I was keeping my fellow soldiers alive while you were in prep school in Hawaii" debate moment will end the contest.

    Posted by: Warren G in CT | May 31, 2008 8:15 PM

  39. Unlikely...no need for details, but I just want to know how things are going on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being horrible. Anything below a 5 means things are getting a bit better.

    Glad you got the book, too.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:16 PM

  40. I glad I have a good book for the summer. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:16 PM

  41. Gordo: All I can say about the DNC is that I am totally and completely amazed about the Michigan decision. On the one hand, they're going to allow the vote (at 50%, as the rules say), but on the other hand, they're going to decide what the vote might have been if things hadn't been as they were ... and then they all cry unity. That crowd was really unified, wasn't it?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:17 PM

  42. Would Chuck Schumer have any interest in becoming Governor of New York?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:19 PM

  43. Warren G: Looks as if the Obama faction just did the same thing to Michigan that he did to his opponents in the State Senate race. And for anyone who thinks what he did was fair play, he was working off a newly purged voter list to which the other candidates did not have access, and which had not yet been challenged. Purged voter lists .... isn't that one of the things that cost Al Gore the election?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:19 PM

  44. Lardass Liberal, Maggie,

    I know Obama's resignation from Trinity will not allow him to completely undo the political damage from Reverend Wright, but I do think breaking now helps minimize the damage and makes it much more difficult for Republicans to raise the church as a relevant issue. It's sort of like his slipping the flag pin back on when no one was paying attention.

    I've learned from watching this campaign closely that Axelrod et al do very little by accident.

    Posted by: katie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:19 PM

  45. unlikely_burrito

    What book are you reading?

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:20 PM

  46. There has been no response, on a scale I would say I am up....meaning if they had anything they would have responded...
    I'd like to take them down...but still waiting. final tally "8"

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:20 PM

  47. Maggs...the few snippets of today's meeting that I bothered to watch rather disgusted me. I could not believe the chairman running a meeting under Robert's Rules was allowing the partisans in the crowd to cheer every question and cheer ever answer. It was totally amateur. The chair should have established authority up front and warned that any outbursts would be punished with ejection from the room.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:20 PM

  48. War and Peace - recent translation

    On the rec from many here, however, I just got it the other day.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:21 PM

  49. oops LL i thought 10 would be good....2 final answer

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:22 PM

  50. Jamie...being Governor of New York would actually involve heavy lifting, which has not been Chuck Schumer's MO. He's basically a show horse in the Senate -- always has been sort of the prime example of that phenom, since he first ascended.
    I don't think you can be a "show horse" as a governor of a major state.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:22 PM

  51. Unlikely.
    2 is good.
    2 is good anytime.
    I'm so happy.
    Great.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:24 PM

  52. Obama gee how will he prove he is a Christian now

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | May 31, 2008 8:24 PM

  53. I kinda expected this today, but I think it is probably just another step in the process If this settles this way, I see the beginnings of true re-alignment of both parties.

    I don't think the extremes of either party will ever be populated enough to be a real majority in congress and will have to rely on their more moderate members. The dems in congress for the last two years were dependent on the extremes and didn't get anything done, so it's just turned around and the extremes will need help from moderates. In order to do that, extremes will have to compromise because they will not ne able to change enough moderates.

    That is the nature of extremes. they eventually blend with moderates and soon new extremes rise up. Lenin's extremes are not there in viable forms today. They have been modified because they were always a small group, which they tried to hide by calling themselves 'majority' or 'bolshevik'. The real 'majority' got stuck with the name 'mensevik' or 'minority'. Whatever the name, the extremes, the smaller group, were subsumed into the majority, the moderates.

    Add to that the fact that the dems are divided in equal halves, and there are bad feeling on both sides Right now it seems that fully one half will be dumped. There might be a struggle for control of the party and it might be bloody but when it's over, it will be a different party. As bleeding heart liberal as I am, I never had any respect for the party and it's proving me right. It has created a real mess and the bullying has been out in the open and it is truly ugly. I just hope it doesn't turn out to be a sea anchor to progress. What we really didn't need was a fight between these two factions.

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:26 PM

  54. big whip he left the church he already used for his own benefit.

    Next!!

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:26 PM

  55. yikes...that's some serious summer reading!!

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:26 PM

  56. LL: I expect to see Andrew Cuomo give the governor's race another try.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:27 PM

  57. Maggiad, And, it was Obama's men in the MI State Legislature that blocked a revote.

    Posted by: Warren G in CT | May 31, 2008 8:28 PM

  58. yeah, I thought i should accomplish something this summer other than the usual : )

    I was sick of spending my time reading crappy books, so I asked for suggestions here, and that is where I landed...

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:30 PM

  59. Warren: As well as the campaign itself. Both MI and FL officials said that they would not go ahead unless both candidates agreed. It's widely reported that the Obama campaign would not agree to a re-vote in either state. Probably because, even though he might have lost by a smaller margin, Obama still would have lost ... and losing two more big states so late in the campaign would have been a serious blow to his momentum.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:30 PM

  60. Maybe we could all change our party affiliation from Democrat to Independent on the same date.

    Posted by: jean | May 31, 2008 8:31 PM

  61. goober belongs to a church for 20 yrs......runs for president and has to quit the church......oh my.........

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:32 PM

  62. h

    Posted by: painter Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:33 PM

  63. burrito: War and Peace .... aarrgh! I just read your post. Endless discussions of the plight of the Russian people. You might like it ... many do. Consider Anna Karenina instead (I hope I spelled that correctly).

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:33 PM

  64. Sturge...I'll be in your neck of the woods for the next couple days.
    Chawlston.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:33 PM

  65. stop on by, we'll barbecue some ice cubes......

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:34 PM

  66. I read W&P years ago(for about a year)...LOL!!

    Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:36 PM

  67. I've got a longtime friend and mentor who lives there...usually make the trek about twice a year for two fun days of golf and Budweiser. It's an easy 5.5 hour drive from where I am.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:36 PM

  68. good idea Jean...make it a national movement : demsLEFTme: DemNoMore: DEMnotME: nothingleft : indieNOW:

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:37 PM

  69. 2 hrs south of Jax?

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:37 PM

  70. Yup. I-95 in all it's glory until Hardeeville. (or I guess a few miles past there is the 17 exit)

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:38 PM

  71. I also own Anna Karenina, will read that next.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:38 PM

  72. Maggi,
    Part of the MI application was in consideration for the voters, who did nothing wrong. Plus, 44% were uncommitted and Dems have a decent chance there in November. Like a good MI politician Levin was threatening to fight it. Hillary has an uphill battle fighting the MI party now.

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:40 PM

  73. 9 referenced that first sentence in Anna Karenina.....great sentence.......Happy families are all alike......unhappy families are each uniqe in their ......etc......I forget......

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 8:40 PM

  74. Maggs...
    A total 10-4 on your last post.
    That's the whole point, and the ONLY point, of today.
    "Rules? There ain't no stinkin' rules!"

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:40 PM

  75. This is an update to my post from the previous thread:

    Intimidate 08 [IMAGE UPDATE + 2nd Update at end]

    "Per usual, Barack Obama’s people have SCRUBBED the site of this offending THREAT OF VIOLENCE at the National Democratic Convention. NEVER FEAR, however. We have a SCREENSHOT, thanks to D. It is here. Simply CLICK on the image to see it in full view:

    Clearly Obama ‘08 is using the threat of protests — and even riots — to intimidate superdelegates. The last thing superdelegates want is chaos at the convention, but creating chaos is the name of the Obama campaign’s game. Hillary’s media surrogates must highlight this disturbing and increasingly apparent element of Obama’s superdelegate strategy every chance they get."

    http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/31/intimidate-08/

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 8:43 PM

  76. ". . and caucuses where no one casts a recorded vote"

    Maggi,

    In our WA caucus I can tell you how Dems voted in whichever precinct you like. It's all recorded and reported.

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:44 PM

  77. Rezdog: I understand the numbers. I get what happened. The MI delegation knew that without the support of the Obama campaign they would get no representation at the Convention until the last possible moment.
    I simply state that what Michigan did was antithetical to the democratic process, and the only point of the exercise was to grind Sen Clinton down a little bit more than was needed. Those four delegates don't help him one little bit ... but by removing them from her total and giving them to him they basically told the ordinary voter that they (the big shots) were taking back the party.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:45 PM

  78. Maggis, Betty: "Pushing Hillary's face in the dirt" and "bullying" has been especially gratuitous lately. It really bothers me that at a time when it is necessary to pull the party together the Obama campaign promoted the RFK remark just to give them another excuse not to put Hillary on the ticket.

    The disconnect between Obama's message and campaign tactics reminds me of W.

    Posted by: katie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:45 PM

  79. Rezdog: I would expect nothing less from Washington. But that is unfortunately not true of all caucus states ... I mean, I know we all joke about the Democratic Party not being organized, but do we have to go out of our way to prove it all the time.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:47 PM

  80. Is someone saying democrats are not democratic? Would that not be the height of hypocrisy?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:47 PM

  81. Night all. Dinner calls.
    Sturge, Jamie and WhiskeyJack have my proxy vote for the next few days.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:48 PM

  82. Rendell and McCaskill on Face the Nation.

    How do I black out half the TV screen to avoid the puppy killer?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:49 PM

  83. "....drag the matter to the party's convention in August."

    "Shut up!" one woman shouted at another.

    "You shut up!" the second woman shouted back.

    ......Lipstick on a pig!" one shouted.
    "We just blew the election!" a woman in the audience shouted. The crowd was divided between cheering Obama supporters and booing Clinton supporters.

    "This isn't unity! Count all the votes!" .........

    "We just blew the election!"
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080531/ap_on_el_pr/primary_scramble


    Just had to bring over a few choice words from the article I read. Sounds like us here at times.

    Not now though, but other times.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:49 PM

  84. How do I black out half the TV screen to avoid the puppy killer?
    Posted by: Jamie

    Jamie, turn the channel. That's what the remotes for.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:51 PM

  85. Who would support that sh*t? I mean really; if you look at the process objectively is it not a democratic process.

    It has been exposed to get lengths this primary, and if you still support it, then you support a flawed system. ( imo )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:54 PM

  86. Given the givens, the compromise seems fair to me.

    The biggest disappointment for me was the lack of civility and maturity toward the end, as Senator Clinton's representative slunk into an unsuitable, bullying "you bet your ass" diatribe that attempted (in the manner of Mr. Bush) to use the fear factor, specifically using the term "hijacking" several times to link the 9/11 perpetrators to those who were trying to find common ground.

    We don't need another W clone; we need to get beyond the horrors of the last eight years.

    Posted by: benjaminblue | May 31, 2008 8:55 PM

  87. "scrub the board of your opponents, grind them down, make them eat dirt." Posted by: maggisd

    Yes!

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:55 PM

  88. Slow down Maggi, you're spinning out of control so much you have many here believing it! lol

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:57 PM

  89. benjaminblue: The Michigan deal was not a compromise. How is it a compromise to take delegates away from one candidate and award them to another? Because that is what happened. And, the odd thing is that it wasn't enough delegates to make a difference to anyone ... it just allowed the Obama campaign to display its muscle.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 8:58 PM

  90. and Ohio doesn't matter....lol

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:00 PM

  91. the only thing that matters is rules and interpretations of the rules....and as for the people who take time out of their day to vote.....well, "f" them....that's what I am saying.....

    It's all about us and the rules, not the little people and their votes...

    didn't you get the memo?????

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:02 PM

  92. Maggi,

    It was unjust, but we knew it was going to happen this way.

    And even if it hadn't, Obama would have still have been ahead in delegates. So Hillary wouldn't have caught him in delegates anyway. But now she can rightly point out that she's ahead in the popular vote. So that part worked in her favor.

    Her only chance of getting the super delegates anyway is for the unexpected to happen. She already knew that. And the unfairness of Michigan has just added credibility to them taking this to the convention. So, in a way, it's ok.
    And CNN didn't think it is over by any means.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:04 PM

  93. I will NEVER again complain about the Repubs stealing FL in 00 and OH in 04. The best thing the Clintons could do for the country is to "explode" what is now referred to as the Dem Party.

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 9:04 PM

  94. I will never call myself a Democrat again.

    Barack Obama is an arrogant prick and so are his supporters.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:05 PM

  95. Let's face it; she signed off on the 4-state pledge. You can't change horses in midstream. And as much as I am suspicious of her, I think she will wind up on the ticket. Realpolitik requires it. How else are you going to shut up her most rabid supporters? And I do think it would guarantee the Democrats the election.

    Posted by: Richard Bentley | May 31, 2008 9:05 PM

  96. 9/11 -

    just caught your comment re Rod Taylor, and no, I didn't know his daughter had ever been on tv. He was one of my favorites. If I can find a way to get the cd of my mom on this, I'll do it. The theme from Hong Kong is gorgeous and I'll bet you recognize it. My mom finally jumped up from the couch one night after watching the show and said, Okay, I've got to get it. Then she sat down at the piano and played it. Need I say we three girls took it for granted.

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:06 PM

  97. Michigan was a compromise because many voters -- told the election would not count -- stayed home or voted for a second-choice or third-choice candidate, as their first-choice candidate was not on the ballot.

    So Senator Clinton's "win" really robbed those who were misled and were unable to vote according to their specific interests.

    The compromise is that both Senator Clinton's supporters and Senator Obama's supporters are seated, and there can be 50-state representation and a unified move forward.

    Posted by: benjaminblue | May 31, 2008 9:07 PM

  98. GAKaren - Good for you!!

    Independents welcome you. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:07 PM

  99. Chloe: I agree with much of what you say. I guess that's what makes me so angry ... that there was no real benefit to him and no real harm to her in the Michigan decision .... it was just petty and gratuitous. Just standing up and saying "I'm taking four of your delegates because I can."
    The principle, however, remains anti-democratic. Either they disallow the delegates altogether (which they have the power to do), or they allow them in full, or at 50%. But to just invent numbers because they did polls after the fact ... that's egregious beyond belief.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:07 PM

  100. Craig, it's about time! : )

    Woohoo! It's only a matter of days now. Soon we can all breathe easy again.


    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:07 PM

  101. Rich.......change horses in mid-stream.......kind of like resigning from a church? oh, yes......let's not change horses......................

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:08 PM

  102. "All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."

    How many here could write a novel based on the latter part of that sentence.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:08 PM

  103. BenjaminBlue: That analysis is speculation and supposition. Like the Republicans saying that the early call of the election in Florida means people who would have voted didn't vote.
    Delegates are supposed to be based on the actual vote ... not what the vote might have been if only the phase of the moon had been different.
    This is the type of maneuver that empowers those Republicans who continue to claim that Democrats commit election fraud ... stuff ballot boxes and the like.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:12 PM

  104. .... it was just petty and gratuitous. Just standing up and saying "I'm taking four of your delegates because I can." maagisd

    Maggi, he was just staying in character. And the people there sure let him know what they think about it. And you and I and the 17 million or so other Clinton voters all know the same thing.

    She is ahead in popular vote, which may be worth something at some point. That buys her a lot of leverage. And Ickes said he was authorized by Hillary to take this to the Convention. And now that she has been treated unfairly in the eyes of many of us, taking it to the Convention will be all that more powerful. And the anger helps.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:13 PM

  105. The primary system is anti-democratic by its very nature. MI & FL violated the rules. I don't like it, but we all need to recognize that the primary election is driven and controlled by arcane party rules and elites, not voters.

    So no more of this anti-democratic stuff. It's really beneath Ickes and it's definitely beneath the smart people on this blog.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:13 PM

  106. Jamie: It's the only type of novel worth writing. Very few successful novels about happiness ...

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:13 PM

  107. "Soon we can all breathe easy again. "

    No soon we can accept another arranged by an autotocracy undemocratic inevitable.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:13 PM

  108. Okay, she takes it to the credentials committee, escalates it to a committee of the entirety, and ends up winning the nomination on the third ballot.

    That's if, he self-destructs before then--he's juggling a whole bunch of balls right now and he's pissed a bunch of people off--they may be smiling, but...

    That's politics.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:14 PM

  109. jamie.....i could write one but it would be totally different.........

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:14 PM

  110. I thought religion was ment to more then a passing phasefor people......more like a "core" belief building block......opps....my "block" is losing me votes....time to jump ship........picture Obama jumping away from his mentor, his path, his uncle....his newly found christianhood.....into a limo with secret service agents and interns.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:14 PM

  111. chloe,

    The notion of bringing up the popular vote is INSANE. Not only does HRC not have the popular vote, but in a primary system that is tabulated by delegates and caucuses it is an inappropriate metric. In a general election, sure, but not when only *40* states actually voted.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:14 PM

  112. How many here could write a novel based on the latter part of that sentence. Jamie


    Jamie, I could.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:15 PM

  113. Hey
    Headline
    "Democrats commit suicide"

    Love it
    What a bunch of idiots.
    Wonder
    who will be in charge
    Next year.
    No Obama
    No leader

    LOL
    Big blood bath
    Now that's entertainment

    Friends don't let friends vote a straight ticket
    Vote divided government
    Vote McCain

    Posted by: Pugnacious Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:15 PM

  114. Utopia: I do most respectfully disagree with you. In my opinion, nothing could have been more damaging to the Democratic Party than the Michigan compromise. What is so very stunning is the small number of delegates involved ... for four lousy delegates, the DNC allows the whole world to see that it is willing to make things up as it goes along? Because that's what they did. It was the worst of backroom deals for no purpose at all....other than for the Obama campaign once again to let the Clintons know that there is no longer a place for them in the Democratic Party.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:17 PM

  115. Jamie,

    Even if you're going to persist in talking about this anti-democratic nonsense, you do realize that HRC has never really had a chance, and that the FL & MI issue was only used as a means to give her the perception that she was still in the race. And I saw it over and over on this board, but she really does take advantage - deliberately, I might add - of voter ignorance, people who don't understand how the primary system works.

    Even if FL & MI had been seated in full, she would have still lost.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:17 PM

  116. He'll probably be an Episcopalian by the end of next week.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:18 PM

  117. I have been watching the hockey game and just got a call from someone who thought they heard Hillary was going to have a news conference around 9ish. Does anybody know anything about this.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:18 PM

  118. He can't pick Hillary after the whole assassination comment.
    Plus it will ruin his brand it would be like if Apple started running windows vista.

    Posted by: patrickbellon | May 31, 2008 9:18 PM

  119. The notion of bringing up the popular vote is INSANE Utopia

    So I'm insane. It's not the first time I've been called that. But I stand by what I said. I said the popular vote could give her political leverage, not necessarily the nomination. Unless he steps in a big pile between now and August. And there she is, his loyal understudy. That could play the part a lot better than him, in this critics opinion,.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:18 PM

  120. Thanks UB!

    I was so relaxed after my vacation and now this crap.

    I have been voting for every stiff the Democrats have run for President since 1980 and in all honesty I can say that I never hated any of the candidates. 1992 and 1996 were the exceptions as Bill Clinton is the only Democratic presidential candidate I've ever liked that I voted for. In most cases I was ambivalent about the candidates (Mondale and Dukakis come to mind) but this time I can say without hesitation that I hate yes I've said it, hate the candidate.

    I will not vote for John McCain but I will not vote for Obama either and I will not give one red cent of my money to the Democratic Party. They've screwed the pooch this time. Bastards.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:18 PM

  121. pug......youre calling for votes for mccain and in the same breath call democrats idiots?

    LOL

    o tempora, o mores

    --cicero

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:19 PM

  122. maggisd,

    The notion that she got any delegates from either FL or MI is absurd to begin with. What's the problem with losing 4? These states violated the rules. They should have been punished. The committee basically set themselves up for future violations today by being so lenient with HRC and Obama.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:19 PM

  123. Sturgeone

    By their nature in order to be worthy of a novel the stories must be different.

    I even wrote the first couple of sentences of mine. : )

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:19 PM

  124. He'll probably be an Episcopalian by the end of next week.
    Posted by: Flatus

    Flatus,

    He'll have to take a poll first.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:19 PM

  125. chloe,

    I was not implying that you are insane; however, the popular vote is an inappropriate metric as I explained in my post.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:20 PM

  126. As if things could get any worse. These people are serious.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:21 PM

  127. PU

    I accepted that fact several days ago. I am not talking about the candidates. I'm talking about a system that disenfranchises the voters. The complaints will hold true for all future elections until the system is changed.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:21 PM

  128. "So no more of this anti-democratic stuff. It's really beneath Ickes and it's definitely beneath the smart people on this blog."
    -Politics of Utopia

    Here's something for you to consider Politics of Utopia:

    "Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character."
    ~ Margaret Chase Smith

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:21 PM

  129. Jamie..........
    "All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way."

    i could write one but it would be totally different.........

    zip zip zoom.

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:22 PM

  130. Jamie,

    Ok, now I understand your position. Somehow I thought you were blaming Obama for the rules set up long ago by the DNC.


    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:23 PM

  131. "I was not implying that you are insane; however, the popular vote is an inappropriate metric as I explained in my post."- Politics of Utopia

    You sound like James Baker and Bush's bastards in 2000. You should be very proud of yourself. If this is your idea of utopia you must have loved the last eight years.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:23 PM

  132. Chloe,

    I goofed on that one. It should have read, "He'll probably be a lifelong Episcopalian by the end of next week."

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:23 PM

  133. I was not implying that you are insane; however, the popular vote is an inappropriate metric as I explained in my post.
    Posted by: Politics of Utopia

    I was just kidding about the insane thing. I knew what you meant. But as for the inappropriate metric you talking about, I guess I'm just an inappropriate sort of person. Because I see the popular vote as powerful, as something to brag about. It may not get her the nomination, but it is meaningful. Just ask Al Gore.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:23 PM

  134. GAKaren-Right on! It doesn't matter here anyway. They think Obama will win our state-what a joke. You and I know it will be red. I , like you have dutifully voted for all the Dems but the only one I was truely excited for was WJC. I will not vote for Obama. And how about that lame "lambasting" Dean made about all the sexist comments? Too little,too late.

    Posted by: Melanie | May 31, 2008 9:24 PM

  135. Utopia: I am not arguing about delegates per se. Had the DNC refused to seat MI & FL I would not have been pleased, but that would have been their right. Just as the rules allowed them to seat the delegations at 50% (in fact, that's what the rules recommend).
    I'd be absolutely thunderstruck if the DNC rules say anything about delegate allocation being decided by 19 of the 27 people present at a DNC meeting.
    A compromise would have been to seat the delegation at 50%....not at 50% of some arbitrary number plucked out of a hat. Don't you see what the appearance is?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:26 PM

  136. "Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character."
    ~ Margaret Chase Smith

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito

    I'm sorry, dude, that's pretty pathetic. There's a big difference between standing up for what's "not always popular" and believing the chump change ideology fed to you by the Clinton camp.

    Come on, I mean, really?

    Oh, that's right, I guess denial is the first stage.

    Somewhere, I hear the world's tiniest violin...

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:26 PM

  137. Melanie: Re Dean and his comments....where was he six months ago?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:27 PM

  138. So oneone heard anything about a Hillary news conference tonight

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:27 PM

  139. We're don't think we're really blaming Obama.

    We're blaming the DNC. This thing was doomed since the beginning. And our cheering for Hillary to do what she deems best does not mean we hate Obama. It means we want Hillary to do what she has to do, so we can all feel at the end of this thing that she gave it her all. Just put yourself in her place.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:27 PM

  140. So oneone heard anything about a Hillary news conference tonight.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:28 PM

  141. chloe,

    Again, you're not getting it. The 2000 election was different because there were no caucuses. EVERY state voted.

    For the primary system, only 40 states vote. It has a very different logic to it, and the popular vote is inappropriate, or perhaps irrelevant would be a better word, simply because it can't be accurately tabulated.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:28 PM

  142. standing up for what's "not always popular" and believing the chump change ideology fed to you by the Clinton camp.

    sorry.......dude......but it's obama offering up the chump change..........

    never give a sucker an even break, nor smarten up a chump.

    -wcfields

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:28 PM

  143. “Denver! Denver!” is an ancient indigenous phrase meaning, “Obama is the nominee.”

    Posted by: Christi | May 31, 2008 9:29 PM

  144. maggisd,

    I guess I can understand where you're coming from, but I've always viewed this whole process as profoundly anti-democratic. Hopefully the Dems will reform the primaries after this and get rid of the super delegates.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:29 PM

  145. Utopia: I understand that you are rightly pleased that your candidate seems to have won every battle ... but I am asking that you look at the broader picture. It isn't just politics, it isn't just a game. We are meant to be choosing the person who will lead this country for at least the next four years. And, regardless of whom you feel is the best choice, the manner in which the choice is made must be above board and beyond reproach. The manner in which the MI delegation was apportioned had all the trappings of a cynical backroom deal ... the only purpose of which was to grind Hillary Clinton beneath Sen Obama's heels.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:30 PM

  146. sturgeone,

    So, like every other desperate Clinton fan, you can't actually disprove what I'm saying, you have to hide behind some oldster quote. Ad hominem attacks are for the desperate.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:30 PM

  147. I disagree that Obama is now the DNC "boss". The whole point of his campaign is to give our country and our government back to the people. I was a Hillary supporter and still feel that she has a strong place w/n the party that she can serve. She has done herself no dishonor and as a woman, I like the tenacity that she has shown. She is intelligent, well-informed and crafty as hell. I will vote for Barack in the general and do my best to ensure that a democrat occupies the white house. I believe that only if Democrats take control can we hope to right some of the wrongs that have occurred within the Bush administration (and I am a registered Independent voter).

    I am proud, too, that this nomination contest - for the first time, has included EVERY state... EVERYone mattered! I'd like to see a reform, though, so there is not as much dissention and divisiveness. Perhaps we can limit the months of the primary contest and have more states vote on the same day. If this works during the general election, why can't it be done for the primaries? Everyone's voices can be heard and we will have a nominee decided earlier.

    Posted by: Inspired | May 31, 2008 9:31 PM

  148. Melanie: Re Dean and his comments....where was he six months ago? maggisd

    Maggi, six months ago Dean was busy figuring out how to set up the playing field in order to muscle Hillary out of this race and get his guy the nomination. There's no doubt in my mind this was headed in this direction since the beginning. They just didn't know it would take so long.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:31 PM

  149. maggisd,

    I don't think it was a backroom deal. I guess that's the difference between us. She got more delegates than she deserved. They violated the rules, so I have no sympathy for the 4 delegate loss complaint. But, let's agree to disagree, I don't think you'll be won over on this one.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:32 PM

  150. "For the primary system, only 40 states vote."

    Which of course explains why I think the caucus states are nothing but popularity contests run by the most powerful influence pedlers and money changers rather than an expression of democracy.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:32 PM

  151. Hey Utopia, if you are so righteous, why don't you use your real name?

    Troll.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:32 PM

  152. Ute.....I'll set about disproving the crap you output right soon after you set about PROVING it.......all righty?

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:32 PM

  153. Politics of Utopia,

    I am sorry you did not understand the intent of the quote. It was in reference to a much larger scale picture. Next time, I will attempt to stay within your range, so that you can understand.

    Oooops, I almost forgot to call you "dude".

    There that's better. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:32 PM

  154. Utopia: Nothing wrong with the idea of the Super Ds ... but weighted delegate apportionment is profoundly anti-democratic, as are caucuses where no votes are recorded. We scream and scream about paper trails in the GE but can't bother to have recorded votes in our own internal process. Makes us look like chumps and cheaters.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:33 PM

  155. A new way of getting votes, pull your name off the ballot. Remember we had a candidate lose to a dead guy, so anything can happen.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:33 PM

  156. Chloe

    By George I think you've got it!!!

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:33 PM

  157. Obama supporters are the biggest bunch of hypocrites on the planet. If Obama was in the same spot as Clinton is in now, they would be foaming at the mouth and threatening riots in the street.

    What sad deluded children they are.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:34 PM

  158. . Ad hominem attacks are for the desperate.
    Posted by: Politics of Utopia

    That's not hiding. That's words of wisdom.
    And it's you that's attacking. So why not be a little more straight forward about it. And not tell us what methods of communication are acceptable to you and which are not.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:34 PM

  159. GAK,

    So that's it? You ask me why I don't use my real name? Really? That's all you've got?

    I have always preferred using an alias on the interwebs, it just makes more sense to me. But if you must know, it's Aaron.

    There, are you satisfied? Ok...

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:35 PM

  160. Utopia: Did you watch the whole thing? They go off for a one hour lunch and come back three hours later ... they have a little discussion about Florida and a unanimous vote. Then a woman presents a beautifully written proposal about Michigan in which the number of delegates is stated and it reflects nothing .... a made up number based on supposition and polling data. And the first man to speak is an ardent Hillary supporter who pleads with his fellow Hillary supporter to just accept the motion .... because why? because he knows the deal is done and that's that.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:37 PM

  161. maggisd,

    I dislike the whole primary system. I understand the winner-take-all approach is problematic, but I wouldn't totally support getting rid of the caucuses and the super delegates.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:37 PM

  162. But if you must know, it's Aaron.

    There, are you satisfied? Ok...

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia


    Is he serious? Jamie, tell me.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:38 PM

  163. Well, I suppose I should be selfishly philosophical. With that in mind, I can honestly say that my vote in the general election is absolutely meaningless because I live in South Carolina.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:38 PM

  164. Utopia: What you've got is a tragically flawed candidate that is going to hand the Democrats one of their biggest losses on record in November.

    So pat your smary self on the back and enjoy the McCain administration. You will have earned it.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:38 PM

  165. That should be: I * would* totally support getting rid of the caucuses and the super delegates

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:38 PM

  166. That should read "smarmy."

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:39 PM

  167. Flatus: As is mine, because I live in California. I can vote for Sen McCain with an absolutely clear conscience.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:39 PM

  168. DING DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD....THE WICKED WITCH IS DEAD DEAD DEAD.....Free at last of the Clinton Skull drudgery. Thank you lord.

    Posted by: Christopher London | May 31, 2008 9:40 PM

  169. GAK,

    I hope not. But we don't know what's going to happen yet. I don't like HRC. I don't like her campaign. I don't like what she stands for as a politician. It's not personal, and I don't dwell on the negatives.

    I can't promise you that Obama will win, but I do firmly believe that it's likely. He's a far stronger candidate that McCain.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:40 PM

  170. Ramparts magazine, c. 1968......article by kurt vonnegut jr........."there is only ONE party" THE FIX IS IN.......

    and goobers rush thither and yon.....a bit more gas and we'll be ok for the weekend..........

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:40 PM

  171. Utopia: If there is a silver lining in all of this, perhaps it will cause the Democrats to overhaul their primary system. I won't hold my breath though.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:41 PM

  172. GAK,

    I sure hope so. But my guess is that they won't. After 2000 I was hoping they would eliminate the electoral college. : (


    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  173. Sorry to hear that Flatus,

    I happen to live where my vote counts, Ohio, and I have not heard one good reason to vote FOR Obama.

    Please understand, voting against McCain does not qualify as a reason to give my vote to Obama.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  174. pssst......chris......the witch aint dead yet........watch yer adze.........

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  175. Chloe

    As far as I know, unlike many others, Politics of Utopia has always posted under only that name.

    He might confirm that.

    Now, I wish he would pick a slightly friendlier alias.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  176. Great hockey game. Go Pens! Better than crying over the decision.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  177. Utopia: I don't think it would be right to force a state to hold a primary nor a small Democratic party within that state to do so. I have no real problem with caucuses except for the way they are run .... the GOP uses recorded votes. Some states ... Washington may be one... caucus for more than an hour late at night in some remote location.
    And, there is nothing democratic about weighted delegate apportionment. Sounds like something out of Animal Farm.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:42 PM

  178. For those who insist that Senator Clinton was cheated out of something, here is a countering thought (courtesy of Daily Kos):

    Yesterday, Obama needed 41 delegate votes to clinch the nomination; Clinton needed 244.

    Today, Obama needs 64 votes; Clinton needs 240.5.

    There are 291 delegates remaining.

    Posted by: benjaminblue | May 31, 2008 9:43 PM

  179. Oh and get a little blue key so that he is always the same person.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:43 PM

  180. GAK,
    They like it the way it is because this way they can control the outcome.
    Please do not hold your breath .....it would not be healthy.

    : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:44 PM

  181. Ben......you mean he aint won yet, right?

    Right?

    C'mon......say it along with me......NOT OVER

    lol

    Posted by: sturgeone | May 31, 2008 9:45 PM

  182. Utopia: The Democratic Party can change the primary and caucus rules all by its lonesome.
    The electoral college is embedded in the Constitution and takes 3/4 of the states to ratify .... good luck getting Wyoming, Idaho, Utah, Rhode Island, Nebraska (I could go on) to diminish the influence of their citizens.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:46 PM

  183. Sturgeone

    Vonnegut was right. What happens to the country when all the voters catch on?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:46 PM

  184. Jamie,

    Haha, thanks. You don't like the name? I don't think it's unfriendly. I do much of my research and scholarship over late19th/20th century American literature through the analytical framework of literary criticism and marxist/socialist notions of utopia. I *could* change it, but it has sentimental value for me because utopia is that which always points toward the unknown, the future. It's both a thing of promise and great fear.

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:46 PM

  185. By George I think you've got it!!! Jamie

    Jamie,
    From one of my favorite movies...Rex Harrison...Thank you

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:46 PM

  186. Another problem is the Democrats have effectively set adrift a solid voting bloc. Older women do a lot of the stuffing envelopes, getting people to the polls, making phone calls etc.

    Dean may have deluded himself into thinking that the kids will make up the difference, but Democratic women have been through presidential elections before and know the drill. After all, it looks like Obama can't win big states with a traditional approach to elections and as we've stated on this blog many many times the GE is not a caucus and Obama's army can't bully people into voting for him.

    The fact is the Democrats are running a candidate that can't get blue collar white people to vote for him so I fear we have quite a disaster in the making.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:48 PM

  187. benjaminblue: It's not about how many delegates either candidate needs. It's about the DNC accepting the Michigan proposal to arbitrarily assign delegates after the fact, based on their notion of how people might have voted if they hadn't voted the way they did vote.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:48 PM

  188. BREAKING NEWS: Michelle’s Whitey Problem

    "New and dramatic developments. This is a heads up. I’ll post the news Monday morning by 0900 hours. Now I know why people who have seen the videotape say it is stunning. Barack’s headaches are only starting."

    http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/31/breaking-news-michelles-whitey-problem/

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 9:48 PM

  189. Gotta check out for the night, folks. Take care!

    Posted by: Politics of Utopia Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:50 PM

  190. UB: LOL! I don't hold my breath for too long because I'm always talking.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:50 PM

  191. "There is a new sheriff in town, [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi," said Democratic media specialist James Duffy. "In my mind she is driving the bus, and she will drive it right over the Clintons and if they miss the fact they got run over, she will back up and run over them again."

    Posted by: Wizardly | May 31, 2008 9:51 PM

  192. GAKaren: It just now occurred to me why the Obama campaign was so "gracious" with Florida and so petty with Michigan ... he is running behind in Florida and, unlike some other states, Florida has been getting more Republican rather than less in recent years. But I'll bet their internal polls show that Michigan is going to go solidly Democratic again ....

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:51 PM

  193. "I do much of my research and scholarship over late19th/20th century American literature through the analytical framework of literary criticism and marxist/socialist notions of utopia"

    Oh oh. We have another researcher in the crowd. Be careful PoU (I'll stick in the little "o"). You may end up getting tasked regularly to go find out stuff.

    When things calm down, shall we discuss The Amana Colony?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:51 PM

  194. The word I have heard is that many "blue collar" people think Obama can not win period. End of story. They are not even giving it a second thought, just not going to happen in their minds. - Just reporting what I have heard, from the union people, and blue collar managers, and comment I have heard second hand.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:52 PM

  195. Thanks, Jamie!

    Ya know, most have strong opinions, but hasn't this been the most invigorating campaign of recent memory? Now... if the democrats can only unify when this is done and #1 understand the candidate's platform and message; and #2 support whole-heartedly the quest to the white house rather than eating sour grapes

    Posted by: Inspired | May 31, 2008 9:53 PM

  196. I wonder if the BREAKING NEWS: Michelle’s Whitey Problem is what Hannity has been teasing us with.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:53 PM

  197. Could it be releated to Obama leaving his church today. If this is the October surprise then Hillary won't be quitting yet.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:54 PM

  198. The new BOSS. He cut a deal for party unity on his terms. He even got in on the action with a percentage of the Michigan delegates even though he wasn't on the ballot. What a coup! All the capos in Chicago must be proud! All in the great Daley party machine tradition. And the pundits weren't sure he could do back room deals with the big boys.

    Posted by: Carl | May 31, 2008 9:57 PM

  199. Maggi: Obama, Axlerod, Pelosi, Dean et. al think that this is all going to go away in time for the general election. Problem is Obama is an arrogant little shit (think George W. Bush) that thinks he truly does walk on water. People aren't going to forget this. Even if Michigan is leaning Democratic I still think that Obama's negatives (which are increasing) will make that state closer than we think.

    It's interesting, everyone talks about Hillary Clinton's negatives but the closer we get to the convention and the general election, the more distasteful Obama gets.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 9:59 PM

  200. Politics of Utopia:

    I guess you don't go to church very often. Resigning from a church is not the same as going back on an agreement you signed. Stop reaching.

    Posted by: Richard Bentley | May 31, 2008 10:01 PM

  201. Dog,
    I do not think I have ever said anything about Obama and cult mentalities....I really stay away from commenting on Obama supporters....If I said it ages ago, I am sorry. Everyone can support whom ever they choose.

    The intent of the quote was directed to individuals ( as in "we the people" and our rights as voters)...not the candidates....sorry again. I thought it was clear enough.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:01 PM

  202. And the pundits weren't sure he could do back room deals with the big boys. Posted by: Carl


    He's not the brains. He's the pawn.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:01 PM

  203. Burrito, I can just see him getting a brand new set of Sears work clothes and heading to a job site to press the flesh. He'll be as genuine as whats-his-name was with his head sticking out of the tank.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:04 PM

  204. It this is a big story then why wait until Monday. It would be a perfect time to release it. If there is a tape out then some other network has got to have it too. Each networks wants to outdue the other. Also they don't want the bloggers to beat them to the punch. CNN first reported Obama was leaving the church by saying it was out on the blog.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:04 PM

  205. Chloe: Amen. Perhaps we should elect David Axelrod.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:04 PM

  206. People aren't going to forget this. Posted by: GAKaren


    That says it all.
    I couldn't if I tried.
    And I don't feel forgiving.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:05 PM

  207. PoU: In your studies of Utopia, have you ever read about New Harmony Indiana?

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:06 PM

  208. Chloe: What's to forgive? The man of Change, the man who brings us the politics of Hope, the Uniter has once again demonstrated that he knows how to play hardball ... just like your average run of the mill Chicago politician.

    Posted by: maggisd Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:08 PM

  209. Obama is an arrogant little shit (think George W. Bush) that thinks he truly does walk on water. GAKaren

    You can say that again.

    That's how I've seen him for a long time.
    I tried to like him, but his arrogance kept getting in the way.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:09 PM

  210. Hey I like a good tinfoil hat story as much as anyone but I'm really skeptical about the Michelle tape.

    If it truly does exist I doubt this tape will ever see the light of day and in all honesty why would the Republicans want to see it released now instead of October?

    If the tape does surface before the convention one would think it is coming directly from the Clintons. I think that would be political suicide for Senator Clinton at this point.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:09 PM

  211. "You know if Jamie's kids or grand children had such a gutter mouth she'd wash their mouths out with soap"

    ABsolutely not. Their vocabulary is good enough they don't need to use four letter words as adjectives.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:11 PM

  212. vadaryl ----------------------

    Yes. I hope this is REALLY coming from the Clinton campaign and Larry Johnson is using the Repubs as a cover. Maybe the DNC's actions a few hours caused Hillary to give LJ the "attack and destroy" signal.

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 10:11 PM

  213. ... just like your average run of the mill Chicago politician.
    Posted by: maggisd

    Maggi, that's how I've seen him for a long time.
    But with what's behind him, how can you fight it.

    Hillary is doing the only thing she can. And I think she knows this is all she can do. Don't let anyone tell you that popular vote doesn't give her bragging rights. We can all brag now.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:12 PM

  214. Most of these Hillary supporters of the ilk that were protesting and disrupting proceedings today, are borderline republicans anyway. For the last several months they have been spouting Fox News, Limbaugh and other bastions of right-wing propaganda like it's FACT instead of fiction meant to manipulate you into doing what they want you to do...namely, VOTE FOR MCCAIN. Which is exactly what they are all planning to do despite his vow to overturn Roe v. Wade and continue the war.

    Fox got you by their sympathetic reporting on Clinton. Do you think they LIKE her? RESPECT her and genuinely want to see her succeed against the "boys club? They are using you to do their bidding and elect the republican candidate in a year when the republican candidate SHOULD have been unelectable.

    You'll realize this in a couple of years when the damage is done and think "why did I ever think that I had to vote for McCain??" YOu should wake up before it's too late.

    Posted by: Andrea | May 31, 2008 10:12 PM

  215. Dog,
    The stories I have heard- they do not even follow the race, or read the news at this point. They just do not believe for one second that Obama will ever win. I told you, these are people who have expressed their opinions, they are not expressing them to debate you.....they are just speaking their minds.
    That's all - nothing more.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:13 PM

  216. Election tomorrow.
    see you then

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:13 PM

  217. Denver! Denver!..Old indian chant LOL good one Christi.

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:16 PM

  218. Karen,

    Suicide?

    I think she's at the point where getting even is looking pretty good. I bet she can make a lot of disloyal people pretty uncomfortable.

    She obviously enjoys her day job in the Senate, her seat should be safe by now, and she can lean back and pontificate. So, that gives her something to fall back on after she tires of getting even.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:16 PM

  219. I hope the deal closes soon.

    Then maybe someone can tell me why Obama deserves my vote.

    If anyone can tell me early , go for it.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:17 PM

  220. Chloe: Thanks. I'm using colorful language today because I'm quite upset.

    I know people like to get all sanctimonious about "gutter" language, but sometimes they are the right words for a particular situation.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:18 PM

  221. Whatever Dog,
    They are not particular well informed, nor do they care. They vote, and hopefully their votes will counts just as much as yours and mine.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:20 PM

  222. This would have been bittersweet for me, as an Obama supporter (and former Clinton supporter) had the Clintons ran a different kind of campaign. Now? I'm just glad to leave the past in the past and move on with Sen. Obama as the party's future.

    The past 16 years have benefited the Clintons, but it's done little for the Democratic Party. Gore, Kerry, 1996, etc, etc, etc.

    Posted by: Denni | May 31, 2008 10:20 PM

  223. "I've had my own friends sadly tell me they do not think "other people" will vote for a black man for president in 2008."

    Dog, that's too bad. I think the country has been ready for at least a dozen years to readily accept a person of color as president.

    Are your friends in one of the professions?

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:20 PM

  224. Hillary won't have to get even. Obama's loss in November will change things dramatically.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:23 PM

  225. GAKaren,
    What th f*ck are you talking about? If words did not have purpose they would not exist.....would they?

    j/k : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:25 PM

  226. Unity--difficult to imagine

    As per abcnews--Obama won't wait for Clinton Concession.

    Obama's camp expects to win about 38 delegates in 3 upcoming primaries, he would need appr. 30 sd's to win the nomination.

    "Asked if Obama would wait to get a concession call from Clinton before claiming the nomination an Obama advisor Anita Dunn said the onus was on Clinton now that the Dem. Pary has firmed up the # of delegates to claim the party's nod.

    "He's not going to wait by the phone like a high-school girl waiting for a date. That's not Barack Obama."

    "After Tuseday, Clinton can decide how united she wants this party to be."

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/05/obama-wont-wait.html

    Posted by: Coreen | May 31, 2008 10:27 PM

  227. I am so tired of this racial nonsense.

    I don't like Barack Obama. It is not the color of his skin, it is his behavior. It is my right to not like a candidate. That is why we have elections.

    I truly liked Obama when the primary began. IMO, the primary has revealed his true nature and a definite lack of character. There is nothing sinister about it, he is not my choice for President no matter what his ethnic/racial background is.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:28 PM

  228. Oh that is so Obama camp ....to equate Obama to someone in highschool.....next Hannah Montana will be having Obama's baby.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:29 PM

  229. Lotta Obama haters on this site.
    Go Barack!
    Rest of you haters, vote for McCain.
    Morons.

    Posted by: stereolabb | May 31, 2008 10:29 PM

  230. Coreen: Thank you for the link. My the "new" politics of change. Obama is so different.

    What a joke.

    UB: LOL.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:30 PM

  231. I think that the Obama people want us to vote McCain. I have asked for reasons to give my vote to Obama....but no one has provided any....not a single one....

    (Voting against McCain doesn't qualify)

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:32 PM

  232. Yes, Dog, getting even is worthwhile. I view people who are disloyal to the extent that many of her SDs were, as nothing more than camp followers who should be run out of town.

    Right or wrong, people have to be trusted to have your back and vice versa.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:32 PM

  233. HRC and Obama both knew the rules before the primaries started. She chose the "big state" strategy and he the 50 state strategy. He and his team new the rules, understood them, and used them to their advantage.

    HRC has worked hard to prove that she is just as worthy of the nomination as any man. The problem is when she started losing she started whining and calling it sexism. Did you hear Obama whine when over 20% in WV and KY said they voted AGAINST him and FOR HRC based on his race. No. He said he had more work to do to try to convince the people to vote for him.

    Over the past few months HRC has proven herself to be unworthy of the Presidency based on her actions and statements. She is like the current President, unable and unwilling to admit to her mistakes and blaming others for them.

    The display of her supporters today in Washington was a sad reflection of HRC and her campaign. Ickes and the rest of HRC supporters are crying foul over MI and FL when they should be happy they got anything at all. The FAIR result would have been to uphold the previous DNC ruling and give them zero votes for the convention. Then where would HRC be now. I suppose still crying over her "sexist" and unfair treatment. The members compromised so that never state would feel they did not have a voice in the election process and still HRC supporters whine. Obama was gracious to allow the seating of the delegates when the fair and honest thing to do was to not seat them all per the DNC rules that Ickes along with other HRC supporters on the committee who complained voted for.

    The election was stolen from HRC. She lost it fair and square.

    Posted by: jay | May 31, 2008 10:33 PM

  234. Dog

    Andrea's comment is just more of the same. I doubt that many of the Clinton supporters will vote for McCain. They are much more likely to either not vote or vote 3rd party. The effect might be the same, but they aren't borderline Republicans. They are moderate Democrats finally pushed out of the party by the losing leftists who would rather have talking points than Presidents.

    Unfortunately for them, Sen Obama is not a true leftist. He is the bought and paid for pawn of the power players like Axelrod.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:35 PM

  235. Stereo: Don't tell me whom to vote for, who do you think you are, MSNBC?

    I'm sorry if you're not mature enough to accept the fact that not EVERYONE loves your candidate.

    I have no intention of voting for either Senator Obama or Senator McCain.

    Grow up, goofy, this isn't class president we're talking about.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:35 PM

  236. Hi Craig;
    It's time to concentrate on McBush now. His free ride on Nancy's Bus is over. He should assume his new position UNDER the wheels.

    Posted by: libertyanne | May 31, 2008 10:35 PM

  237. Correction to my last line:

    The election was NOT stolen for HRC. She lost it fair and square.

    Posted by: jay | May 31, 2008 10:37 PM

  238. The only people under the bus are granny and Jermiah and now Fr. Phlegler

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/mccain_seen_as_candidate_most_likely_to_reach_across_party_lines

    McCain is the candidate likely to reach across party lines.

    Posted by: POLLCAT | May 31, 2008 10:38 PM

  239. And now for something completely different...

    http://essence.typepad.com/news/2008/05/clinton-support.html

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 10:39 PM

  240. I don't understand, unlikely_burrito, why anyone has to give you a reason to vote for Obama. Either you believe he has your interests and the best interest of this nation at heart, or you don't.

    Either you believe he's a better option than McCain, or you don't.

    What are you looking for?

    Posted by: Denni | May 31, 2008 10:39 PM

  241. Obama needs bigger wheels for his bus. Like a monster truck.

    He can let Pelosi drive and hit reverse whenever she wants.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:40 PM

  242. Obama is an arrogant little shit (think George W. Bush) that thinks he truly does walk on water. GAKaren

    You can say that again.

    That's how I've seen him for a long time.
    I tried to like him, but his arrogance kept getting in the way.

    Right. And HRC is a poor, humble, working-class gal. She'll win SD though, we are proud of the fact that we are poor, uneducated, and spend all of our time trying to make abortion illegal.

    Posted by: South Dakota | May 31, 2008 10:41 PM

  243. Who are we to try and reason with HRC supporters who want to vote for McCain because they are pissed off that their candidate didn't win? Because CLEARLY politics is the same as getting pissed off at the service you get at Macy's and crossing the street to Bloomingdale's in protest. Except here's the thing, ladies...in this case, THEY DON'T ALL SELL THE SAME BLOUSE. You are buying into a party of impossible wars and limited reproductive rights, not to mention fiscal irresponsibility and no education policy. Do you like having an environment? You can kiss that goodbye too.

    But you go right ahead and throw your hat in with the people who have "been nice" to Hillary Clinton. Maybe McCain will thank you in his acceptance speech for falling so nicely in line.

    Posted by: Andrea | May 31, 2008 10:42 PM

  244. CT: I feel the same way. I use to have such passion for this stuff. It's gone now and I think I'll be better off.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:44 PM

  245. Carol

    Stick around. It's much more interesting around here when we're not fighting. Besides there better be something interesting on the WA ballot other than president, or I will be getting a nice day of rest as well.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:44 PM

  246. Interesting timing by Larry Johnson at NO Quarter - posted at 7:59 PM tonight, just after that disgraceful display by the DNC. This is following a pattern which would be expected before the dropping of devastating "scandal" bomb - it's best to make preliminary preparations by putting out some hints over a few weeks. Seems like LJ must know something to write "new and dramatic developments".

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 10:45 PM

  247. is this the way you want you children to act when they happen to lose a contest? Is this how you taught your children to behave? Please, you people are as big a loser as Hillary is tonight. Good grief, grow up.

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:45 PM

  248. I think there are many people who would normally vote for a democrat that will be voting for McCain because of his military experience and knowledge. I find this to be the case with my friends who have family members in Iraq or enlisted.

    Jack, I wish I knew the answer. I think as time goes on there is going to be a great shift.....I do not think this will be a close GE. not at all.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:46 PM

  249. People, it's over. O V E R, over.

    Barack Obama will be the next US President. Hillary will have to wait 4 years. If she chooses to take this decision to task, she may as well hang up her hat and forget about ever having a voice. She will be treated like the "disgruntled" politician she is being.

    No one likes to lose, but there's a point where you have to save face and bow out gracefully.

    Good night, and good luck.

    Posted by: Rob | May 31, 2008 10:46 PM

  250. is this the way you want you children to act when they happen to win a contest? Is this how you taught your children to behave? Please, you people are as big a loser as Obama is tonight. Good grief, grow up.

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | May 31, 2008 10:48 PM

  251. Horse: It's Obama's supporters that have been threatening riots in the streets if they don't get their way.

    Be careful with those stones when you live in such a big glass house.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:48 PM

  252. Didn't Johnson have to post a warning to his posters about not sending death threats to the Obamas and that several cases were already under investigation by the Secret Service? There have been nothing BUT threats from the 'No Quarter' crowd. It's what they do best, make threats against the Obamas.... a few of them finally took it to far, but I see it's not enough to stop the hate train from rolling.

    Posted by: Denni | May 31, 2008 10:49 PM

  253. I would vote for a rock before I vote for McCain. Seriously, after the past eight years Clinton supporters are going to pout, stay home, or vote for McCain???

    Maybe if Bill kept it in his pants and didn't get impeached Al Gore could have used him to campaign for him in 2000. Ever think about that?

    Posted by: South Dakota | May 31, 2008 10:50 PM

  254. "Rob" - It would make more sense if you would call yourself Keith. For the record, though, neither you or Olbermann are Edward R. Murrow.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:50 PM

  255. Did that Larry Sinclair cause any stir today?

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:51 PM

  256. McCain doesn't know the difference between the Shia and the Sunni. He doesn't know how long we've had diplomatic relations with Iran. When called on the belief that Americans would tolerate a hundred years of war if necessary, he conveniently wittled it down to about 'four' years. Why would anyone select McCain because of his military experience?

    DANGER!

    Posted by: Denni | May 31, 2008 10:51 PM

  257. please site some sources Karen because I really don't believe you

    Listen to your compadres here on Trail Mix didnt you call Obama a little shit? how respectful is that. do you kiss you children with that mouth?

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:51 PM

  258. I actually think that Sen. Obama will become President. I also think that he will be a very bad one. The only saving grace, McCain would be worse.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:53 PM

  259. Denni,
    I was just looking for any indication that Obama was a better candidate for the POTUS then McCain.....that's all, I wasn't asking for much......

    I guess, I should just admit HRC lost and vote McCain. It seems everyone wants us( HRC supporters) to shut up, especially when we ask questions, that apparently no one can answer.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:55 PM

  260. Horse: Yes, I did call Obama a little shit which is nothing compared to what you and your compatriots have been calling Hillary Clinton during this primary, so stuff your sanctimony!

    It's called google. If you're too lazy to look for yourself, don't ask about it.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:55 PM

  261. Jamie,

    he could be the best president that this country could have ever had and you would say he was the worst.

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:55 PM

  262. Horse: You can start with Jesse Jackson, Jr.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:56 PM

  263. Vadryl: Nothing from Larry Sinclair but Monica called. She's still waiting for the $12 it cost her to get her dress cleaned.

    Posted by: jay | May 31, 2008 10:56 PM

  264. What a lousy day, the Pens just lost, Obama left his church.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:58 PM

  265. "first time in 16 years the Clintons are no longer in charge of the Democratic Party."
    What about Kerry in 04?

    Posted by: kevin | May 31, 2008 10:59 PM

  266. Burrito!

    I didn't see your request...here's a reason...the Supreme Court!!! The next president will have the opportunity to nominate two, and perhaps three, justices. No one on this list will live long enough to see us come out from under rigid conservative rule if the next president is not a Democrat. If that's not a reason to vote for Obama, I don't know what is!

    Posted by: harborwoman Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 10:59 PM

  267. then don't expect me to believe anything you ever say. I have NEVER said anything like that about Hillary but you don't care I have always said I was voting for whomever the Dems put up Unlike you I vote for the party and not because of my plumbing

    stuff it up your sanctimony yourownself you are the loser here and don't forget it.

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:00 PM

  268. Take a few deep breaths everyone. Calm down and quit being so hateful and angry.

    You speak of a confident BI-RACIAL young man as being arrogant? What about the arrogance projected by Hillary for thinking she was and still is entitled to the nomination?

    If she was a woman by another name, she would not be in this position in the first place b/c Obama ran a great campaign and always stayed positive w/o slamming Hillary's gender or race, unlike Hillary. Her name alone garnered many votes. The fact that she had a leg up on every candidate in the beginning and then lost that to a junior senator show an incredible lack of planning and irresponsibility on her part. She started playing dirty and using republican tactics. Shame on her.

    I would love for a woman to be president, but after she started showing her true colors, my support went straight to Obama.

    By the way, Obama would never be in the same situation, IMHO, b/c he would have dropped out to save party unity and not sabatoge the party's chances come Nov for a self-serving need for power.

    Posted by: Melanie | May 31, 2008 11:00 PM

  269. I'm getting ready for the 2012 primary season. How should we screw up that election.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:00 PM

  270. vadaryl ------------------

    This is a link to Larry Sinclair's blog:

    http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/

    Posted by: GORDO | May 31, 2008 11:01 PM

  271. Unlikely, the question has been answered at every step of this election. There's nothing but information on Sen. Obama. Go to his website. Read his policies, go to the Library of Congress 'Thomas' site and look at the hundreds of pieces of legislation he's been a part of. Look at the winning 50 state strategy he's put together. If you still don't like what you see, vote John McCain.

    Maybe this isn't your intent, but I've been reading a lot of comments from Clinton supporters that seem to indicate that they want Obama supporters to grovel for a vote for Obama. Uh, no.

    Posted by: Denni | May 31, 2008 11:01 PM

  272. HRC Supporters have so much class. And accuse Obama and his supporters of sexism. What about their racism?

    The video today of the woman who was tossed from the press room today:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KACQuZVAE3s

    Posted by: jay | May 31, 2008 11:01 PM

  273. One thing Obama has not mastered with regard to the art of public speaking: The press conference. Stilted. Slow. Indecisive. Painful. I was praying that one of his handlers would cut the darn thing off.

    Maybe the deserved accoldates for his impressive public speaking skills should have a disclaimer:

    *only spectacular in front of crowds numbering 300 Obamaniacs or more.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:02 PM

  274. I"f she was a woman by another name, she would not be in this position in the first place b/c Obama ran a great campaign and always stayed positive w/o slamming Hillary's gender or race, unlike Hillary. Her name alone garnered many votes. The fact that she had a leg up on every candidate in the beginning and then lost that to a junior senator show an incredible lack of planning and irresponsibility on her part. She started playing dirty and using republican tactics. Shame on her"

    delusional bullshit
    you are insane and an idiot

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | May 31, 2008 11:02 PM

  275. Dooty

    What is it about Obama supporters that they have to tell us what we are thinking? If he turns out to be a great president, I will be proud of him. I just don't expect it to happen. It would be nice to be pleasantly surprised.

    If you do your thinking for yourself, I'll be glad to handle my own.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:02 PM

  276. Denver! Denver!

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:02 PM

  277. Senator Clinton is better than Kennedy or OBAMA (in my opinion) and after what Kennedy said about Hillary about her not being competent is going to be his legacy for me.

    I have NO respect for him and it is simply because - he doesn't deserve it. He stabbed Hillary in her back (in my opinion) for a relatively unknown and a CHICAGO Daley stooge. I doubt it, but if this person becomes pResident, then once more we will have someone in the white house, who is unlearned and doesn't know anything or CARE about anything but himself.

    I am a Black female who has fought in the civil rights movement and have been an activist for over 30 years and this young African American has literally destroyed everything I believe in. My years as a community activist has just become a joke. The Obamas of the world make me sick - Republicans dressed up as Democrats and try and make others believe they care
    about African Americans. Maybe he does care about African Ameericans, but I really don't believe so. I fought very hard to move up from being called 'COLORED' to be called and thought of as Black - Mr. Obama, Jesse Jackson nor any of the other sell outs in my culture gets the right to call me what they want - I choose to be a Black female born in the middle forties, fought for my people and still believe in something - it just doesn't happen to have anything to do with Mr. Obama.

    Let me explain why I don't like nor believe in this man:

    1. He began this campaign by 'transcending RACE' which leaves me out of the equation.

    2. He couldn't be bothered with attending the 'STATE OF THE BLACK UNION' any of the two years he was asked.

    3. He first threw his wife under the bus - it was evident he stopped campaigning with her. Loyaty is not a strong suit with this man.

    4. Obama has allowed his followers to call us (women) everything and has yet to denounce the sexism.

    And then finally when he didn't have time to attend the MLKing commemoration in Nashville, TN - King was told not to go by his handlers also, but he went (and paid the ultimate price).

    THE Democratic Party has done just exactly what the Republicans did in 2000 - I felt it then and NOW the stench is overwhelming.

    NO - I will not vote for McCain and WILL NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA - MY UNITY FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WILL BE TO ASK FOR A WRITE IN BALLOT AND CAST MY VOTE FOR SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON. So there Mr. Dean and all the other Misters in the party.

    Posted by: TNKincaid Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:04 PM

  278. Horse: Neener. Neener.

    Melanie: Enough with the Obama talking points already. It is the fact that I see Obama as a PERSON not a bi-racial person that I can call him arrogant. Once again, it has nothing to do with the color of his skin it is his behavior.

    Why do you feel the need to keep reducing Senator Obama to a bi-racial man to defend him? Quite frankly, it is Obama supporters that ride the race train all the time. You are essentially saying that Barack Obama cannot be criticized because of the color of his skin. IMO, that is really demeaning.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:06 PM

  279. "Dooty

    What is it about Obama supporters that they have to tell us what we are thinking? If he turns out to be a great president, I will be proud of him. I just don't expect it to happen. It would be nice to be pleasantly surprised.

    If you do your thinking for yourself, I'll be glad to handle my own."

    jamie the reason I said that was because there has never been any indication that you would ever change your mind about Obama. You have been very consistent in saying that he is not ready and I would never vote for him. How am I supposed to think anything otherwise.

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:07 PM

  280. At least you're smart enough to get the joke.

    Karen, it's not your time. Wait 4 more years and maybe, just maybe, it will be.

    Posted by: Rob | May 31, 2008 11:10 PM

  281. GAKaren,

    Neener Neener? How old are you anyway?

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:10 PM

  282. Horse: I was answering you in the manner your comments deserved.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:12 PM

  283. Hey Kincaid,

    That's the beauty about our country. Vote you pleasure! I do

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:14 PM

  284. Dooty

    "he could be the best president that this country could have ever had and you would say he was the worst."

    Just because nothing Sen. Obama has shown me so far makes me think he is suitable for the job, doesn't mean that I wouldn't acknowledge it if he proved me wrong.

    Just because someone thinks something in the present doesn't mean they will automatically think the same thing in the future. I judge EVERYTHING by my analysis of what is happening at the time I make the judgement when coupled with experience and history.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:16 PM

  285. While I respect McCain's service to his country in the Vietnam war, I have not seen anything from him that would make me think he would be a better commander-in-chief. In fact, his ranking in his class is cause for alarm.

    He is not the brightest bulb on the circuit and he has by his own admission said he doesn't know anything about the economy. I have no confidence in his abilities and I have been quite disgusted with him since he decided to crawl up Bush's behind and stay there. I do not understand how he became Bush's errand boy after what Rove and Bush did to him in South Carolina in 2000. For that alone, I would never vote for the man.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:19 PM

  286. Dog,
    What do you mean by "enough"? Please explain. I would hate to take it the wrong way.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:20 PM

  287. "Does anyone else think that the event was timed so that Obama would have an excuse to break from the church in preperation for the general election and also to minimize the amount of coverage?"

    I have to disagree with this. If he wanted an excuse to break from church, it would have mad more sense for the priest to mock HRC without mentioning she felt entitled BECAUSE she was white...as that just makes things worse for Obama. Would've made more sense to just have him mock her feeling entitled. Portraying her as feeling that way b/c Obama's black and she's white wasn't needed. Plus, I can't imagine that a Catholic priest would PLAN to say something ins a planned effort to help Obama. The guy may be a nut, but I think a conspiracy plan is a bit much.

    Posted by: XME | May 31, 2008 11:21 PM

  288. I don't see what any Clinton supporter could be upset about. They apportioned the majority of delegates to her in both states! What's left to complain about? She lost! She ran a bad campaign and she underestimated Obama and how sick this nation is of "politics as usual". There is no one to blame but herself and her advisers. Let's all rally around Obama and get him into the Whitehouse!

    Posted by: JMcG | May 31, 2008 11:22 PM

  289. Denni
    The fact that most of you Obama supporters so despice President Clinton the only Democrat to hold 2 terms in office and all the good he has done just mistifies me??? Yet another reason why i am no longer a Democrat.Proud Im sure you are!!!!

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:24 PM

  290. or, rather the White House...

    Posted by: J | May 31, 2008 11:24 PM

  291. tonyb39,

    The Independents welcome you with open arms. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:26 PM

  292. Hi.

    The Michigan compromise was irrespective of the vote. They just allocated delegates in an arbitrary fashion with a minor consideration for Hillary. That was done because if they gave HRC the 4 delegates she asked for, it would have been based on the vote. By delegitimizing the Michigan primary they took away HRC ability to count the votes casts in that primary, so she can no longer make the popular vote argument. That is why Obama’s people were not in favor of giving her those 4 delegates, and I don’t blame them. HRC showed that you cannot be magnanimous to her, she will bite your hand at every opportunity.

    As far the divided party goes, Obama may not be able to unit it, but McCain sure will. Only the most selfish, spiteful Democrats and Independents will look at their children and grandchildren and pull the level for McCain. And those that do, will never be able to look their progeny in the eyes and tell them: “Yes I screwed you and voted for McCain out of personal revenge.”

    On the topic of the White House qualification, I submit the following illustration. Obama, an unknown, beat HRC, with all her name recognition, financial backing, and party clout by using and understanding party rules. Some of you will point out that this make Obama a politician, and I would agree. After all, he is running for a political office, and a job as an accountant. But while being a politician, through out his campaign, he should an even keel character, and higher moral scruples than HRC. After all, I never heard him say that McCain would be a better president than Clinton, or that it would be great that the presidential election had two real patriots competing for the office. I think he will be just as astute in mastering the rules of being a president which will be of great value to move forward the people’s agenda.

    Posted by: Alex | May 31, 2008 11:26 PM

  293. Alicia: Is the political climate in VA ripe for an ERA resolution? It sounds pretty interesting.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:27 PM

  294. Unlikely B
    Thankyou It felt so Liberating especially here in Florida the scene of one of the DNCs crimes!!!

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:29 PM

  295. Tony: It is quite liberating. Next order of business is to get off the DNC's fundraising lists. They've seen their last shekels from me.

    Posted by: GAKaren Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:31 PM

  296. New sheriff says "Now I must face a man that hates me..."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRRWzs5Q2N0

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:31 PM

  297. The power is in each of us. It is only when we think our voice doesn't matter that we quit speaking. Never quit.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:31 PM

  298. you could not kiss obama's ass any more lustily could you crawford ????

    enjoy all brown nosing you can until Nov...

    mccain 2008 !!!!!

    Posted by: anika | May 31, 2008 11:32 PM

  299. This is the first year I sent money....and guess what......it is the last year!!!

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:33 PM


  300. The race is won, so no need to rub Clinton supporters noses in it. I'll only react to comments that are either anti Obama or are making statements about why Clinton lost that puts it down to some sort of underhandedness. Hillary lost for a number of reasons that we've gone over ad nauseum on this blog.

    Right now, I'm just intrigued by all of the "McCain" fans. Nothing says delusion than moving from a left of center, pro choice, woman to a militaristic, far right, pro life neo con who supports eternal war.

    That's some really movable politics, but I like the multiple reasons why Obama is simply unacceptable to these people. Always everything but race, except for the code word of "arrogant" (see: uppity).

    So post on...

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 11:34 PM

  301. Dog,
    You have a problem with what I said? Over the top of what? Your personal comfort zone? Or your self-absorbed safety zone that you and your loved ones aren't the ones dying in Iraq?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:37 PM

  302. GAKaren
    Me too!! I have called them and told them never to send anything to me again and I have returned the latest survey and a personal note telling them Im no longer a Democrat thanks to there undemocratc ways and to leave me alone all to no avail I received something today pleading for donations for the congressional canidates and I wrote No Way!!! and sent it back!!

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:38 PM

  303. Poor Craig,

    He gets lambasted by the Obama folks for being a Hillary sympathiser even when he just lays out the facts as they are.

    Now he just lays out the facts as they are and he gets called an Obama brown nose.

    Anika ... stick around long enough to get to know and honest and decent man, or shut up and go away.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:38 PM

  304. I watched part of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee on C-SPAN today. Democrats are like cats, can't be herded and Repubs surely are the dogs.

    That Michigan thing is screwed up. The whole thing is screwed up.

    Chaos Theory is exactly what Dems do. It's in our blood. And God do they (we) talk a lot.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:38 PM

  305. Dog,
    I see what color your blood is, it is best we stop discussing this.

    peace~

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:38 PM

  306. Barack Obama is now the boss of the Democratic Party? OK, as of today, I am no longer a member of the Democratic Party. Obama is a loser. He states today in South Dakota that he is leaving his church to protect the church from media scrutiny. He is not leaving the church as a stand against the racial divisiveness they create. What a loser. He does not represent the feelings of the majority of Americans.
    I will never vote for him.

    Posted by: Becky | May 31, 2008 11:41 PM

  307. ditto what Jamie said.....if I said "xerox it", it would be a blunder.
    - but the point would remain the same. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:42 PM

  308. Becky,

    The Independents welcome you with open arms. : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:44 PM

  309. And the powerless do too...

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | May 31, 2008 11:45 PM

  310. Jamie, I'd just say to anika, STFU.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:46 PM

  311. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pphVs8bF0

    csn&y

    teach your children

    ".......and know they love you"

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:47 PM

  312. GA Karen There is a new Melanie! I am the one from GA who agrees with you and all the Clinton supporters. I would NEVER defend Obama. Should get a key , but I don't really feel like sticking around. Have enjoyed you GAKaren, Heather, Patsi and Jaime. Thanks!

    Posted by: Melanie | May 31, 2008 11:48 PM

  313. Jamie
    Well said Craig gets it from all sides!!! Anika pay attention Craig is a real Journalist.Nothin But the Truth This aint msnbc or cnn here!!!

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:49 PM

  314. Dog

    I didn't really think he was. His posts are too literate, informative and to the point even when I disagree with them. It was the old "uppity" bit that caused the response.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:55 PM

  315. Dog

    I like Harold Ford, but I'm not a major fan. I like Willie Brown.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | May 31, 2008 11:58 PM

  316. Mr.democrat
    I was just beginning to have a newfound respect for you.Man why say the only reason i don't like or trust Sen.Obama is because he is a person of mixed race? I can't just feel in my bones that this guy is not to be trusted just like i felt about GWB when in a debate with A.Gore he said you see what we do them in Texas don't you we put them to death!!! I thought the arrogance of this man!!! NOT about race then NOT about race now!!!! Think about this M.D.Please

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:01 AM

  317. For anyone who does not know about Willie or who isn't a fan. Check this out

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Lewis_Brown,_Jr.

    He has a new book out that will become my summer reading.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:01 AM

  318. Dog,
    I appreciate your story and respect it. Do you understand how someone that is facing death on a daily basis, because of a President who is inept , is a bit weary of some person who has absolutely no experience taking over?

    It is not to be unexpected. In this regard, I think, I myself would opt for experience.

    While everyone here is bitching about the color of skin or pants suits, others are being deployed in to hell. One of mine is heading to Iraq within the week. The family is a wreck, emotions are raw.......no one gives a sh*t if Obama is white or if Hillary is a b*tch or not....

    I do not know if this makes the whole thing any more real to you....or not. Once these soldiers go to Iraq - they are never the same. The return different people,damaged people, if they return at all.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:02 AM

  319. Who are you people? You are all so calm and rational...able to argue complexity while gracious. It's like no other comments/blogs I've read in regards to the Dems this year.

    Posted by: ae | June 1, 2008 12:06 AM

  320. The event prior to today do not matter in reality. We are in a place that is very bad, and has to be corrected.

    I do not think that concentrating on sound bites that the MSM SPOON feeds to its lame viewers is helpful.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:08 AM

  321. Obama's judgement is constantly being thrown off the bus

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:08 AM

  322. Supreme Court is too good a job for her. Ambassador to Burkina Faso.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 12:10 AM

  323. ae

    We were a community before these primaries and we will be a community after the election. At the moment we are all rather edgy and grouchy, but we are still actually speaking to each other not just shouting into a void.

    If you want to join the conversation, please do so.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:10 AM

  324. I think all of you Clinton loyalist are ridiculous. To jump ship on your party because you don't get your way, is childish and immature. Bill Clinton is not the savior of the Democratic party, if memory serves, Dems lost the house and senate after he was elected, and I won't mention that he was IMPEACHED. This is an election not a beauty contest. America's problems are bigger than the Clintons and your ego. I am offended that you would want to affliate yourself with my party - Independent. I personally think the Dem voters made a right decision with Obama, in case you forgot, he is in the lead, I guess the voters SPOKE after all.

    Posted by: BrainvsBrawn | June 1, 2008 12:10 AM

  325. Hey moron the vote today did not invalidate the popular vote totals.

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:12 AM

  326. Now that the DNC has recognized the Florida and Michigan primaries by agreeing to seat all of their delegates, the party has to recognize the popular votes in those states. The elections are no longer "illegitimate." Flawed, perhaps, but illegitimate, no.

    The way it is, the DNC cannot change the numbers of votes cast the way it did delegates. These were certified state elections with firm vote totals. Barack Obama removed himself voluntarily from the ballot. Hillary has to be allotted her votes, and he has to accept the consequences of his action, which is that he gets none of the popular vote in Michigan.

    As a result, by any count, Hillary Clinton now leads in the popular vote. From Real Clear Politics:

    To quote Senator Boxer Elections have consequences

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:15 AM

  327. Unlikely B
    Yes we are in a bad place.I don't really no what to do from here normally I would be looking for a change to a Democrat to help change things for the better but sorry to say not the case now.I knew the other day when some commentator on the radio was saying the Democrats would pickup alot of seats this year and it didn't make a difference to me that I have changed and so has the Democratic Party and im afraid not for the better.

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:16 AM

  328. BrainvsBrawn

    The really nice thing about a democracy is that you are not forced to vote for someone you think would be a mistake nor are you required to support a party that you think has made a disastrous error .

    Unless the Democratic party now wishes to copy the Communist party and require that ONLY members have rights, I would suggest that we are free to leave any time they no longer represent our beliefs and ideals.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:17 AM

  329. he is in the lead, I guess the voters SPOKE after all.

    the big ginganormous lead of a very few votes
    the voters have spoken but not very conclusively and the only way Obama wins is to suppress votes and disenfranchise voters

    hardly the voters speaking
    another obamabot who is an idiot

    Posted by: Brian's sock drawer | June 1, 2008 12:19 AM

  330. How can any Clinton supporters argue with a straight face Clinton actually gives a damn about democracy? She certainly didn't care (about MI and FL) when she was the de facto nominee, and for everyone, Ickes especially, to be argue so vociferously to the contrary is as about as disingenuos as one, or many as it were, can get.

    How about Ickes, using the word 'ass' as if his arguent was so righteous he was above civility. What a scumbag.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 12:20 AM

  331. See Dog, that is my issue with Obama...I do not think his judgment has been that great. I think his character is weak, as far as I have seen, and he is just not someone I would ever hire.

    If his wife were running, I bet she would be a much stronger candidate. I do not like her (personally) , but I believe she has a strong sense of self and I respect her strength of conviction. I think she could get the job done, and I think she could do great things for the country.

    Her baggage is the wimpy man she is trying to hold up.

    "Behind every great man there is a woman." <- someone else said that not me

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:21 AM

  332. Hey DB moron
    we don''t elect the president by caucus either
    more pointless drivel from the morons cruising for a drubbing in the fall

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:23 AM

  333. BrainVsBraun
    To late Independent i am and Im here to tell ya its not just your party.The Democratic Party left me Im not the first person to say that and after today I wont be the last.

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:23 AM

  334. Wow, typos look even more egregious in quotation. Yikes!

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 12:26 AM

  335. Everyone get a grip.
    This man (BHO) is running the first 21st Century campaign.
    Why would you want to be associated with the last 20th century campaign (HRC/JM)!

    Posted by: Tomas Del Sol | June 1, 2008 12:27 AM

  336. It doesn't matter much now does it ?

    The whole thing is a disgrace. They will never fix it. They like it this way.

    If the money stops, they will re-evaluate.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:28 AM

  337. I know a way way for Bill and Hillary to become relevant again. Hillary makes a pitch to become McCains V.P. !!!!! A Centrist/Unity ticket!! She will get her revenge and they will stand a good chance of winning.

    Posted by: MB | June 1, 2008 12:30 AM

  338. This man (BHO) is running the first 21st Century campaign

    more horsedooty from the Obamabots

    Dean ran the first 21st Century campaign
    Obama relied on old school politics and using rightwing media narratives and flat out lying.
    Nothing new about that

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:31 AM

  339. Poor troll your candidate lost. . get a life, move on

    Posted by: DBCooper Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:31 AM

  340. Posted by: DBCooper | June 1, 2008 12:31 AM

    As opposed to the delusional lies you spread around
    you clueless jerk

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 12:33 AM

  341. I'm a white boy in Philly who started out as a Hillary supporter in the beginning. But as her campaign started rolling she lost me.

    Her staff is a bunch of wonks that have obviously taken a page from the Rove strategy playbook on how to pander to idiots. A gas tax holiday? Puh-leeze, who thinks this is a good idea? Pay it with a windfall profit tax? Like the oil companies aren't just gonna' pass that down to the guy at the pump.

    Mark Penn? This is the best you can do, this guy a pure money lobbyist who didn't even know about delegate apportionment . She hired people out of loyalty instead of their skill sets, haven't we seen enough of that already? Heck of job Brownie!

    Her campaign is broke-- she can't manage her money, how is she going to manage ours?

    She is constantly stretching the truth or outright lying about facts and figures (she's won the popular vote, if you count this but not that and then divide by pi, snipers, 35 years experience etc.etc).

    She's changed who she is on this campaign more times than I change underwear, she puts on fake accents, she a big gun advocate, she a real shot and beer girl etc etc.

    So I'm voting for Obama in November, I'm an independent and here in the great commonwealth I can't vote in the primaries. Even if she does somehow pick up the nomination I'll still vote for her. Because while I respect McCain as a man, I really don't think we need a 72 year old white guy making decisions for us any more, especially one who is ready to pull the military option. Plus I would really like my civil liberties back, so there is no way I can pull a lever for a republican (I have in the pass, locally at least, never in a presidential race)

    I ask of the Hillary supporters that say they will vote for a Republican instead of Obama, will you really throw out the chance to regain Habeas Corpus, individual privacy, proper goverment regulations over big corporations and risk a never ending money laundering scam called the Iraq War because your canidate didn't make it? Pretty foolish I must say...

    Posted by: Wayne Junction | June 1, 2008 12:34 AM

  342. Why hasn't the congress done anything when they had the majority?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:36 AM

  343. what is wrong with them?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:37 AM

  344. did they walk into cement?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:38 AM

  345. they failed

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:38 AM

  346. "Why would you want to be associated with the last 20th century campaign (HRC/JM)!"

    It won?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:40 AM

  347. By "It won", I was referring to the Clinton male half of the team.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:43 AM

  348. Sorry, but as a lawyer, I can tell you that Hillary Clinton would be a terrible Supreme Court Justice.

    Being a member of a bar or two and having worked for a time as a lawyer does not make you a good Justice. A Supreme Court justice has to be able to look at both sides of an argument and to analyse law and facts with honesty. One needs a judicial brain.

    Try something else for Hillary, not a justice.

    Posted by: lou | June 1, 2008 12:45 AM

  349. Brains de Mush - It's over troll move along nothing else to see

    Welcome Wayne! check it out

    Posted by: DBCooper Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:48 AM

  350. OK, forget Burkina Faso. How about Hillary Clinton for Ambassador to Bosnia? She'd be like a ninja, dodging sniper fire and getting Bosnian input on important matters.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 12:49 AM

  351. in my company, I fire people that fail.

    it's really simple, you fail, you're fired.

    I guess politics is different......you're not fired until you are in jail.

    my expectations are too high.....thank glue I have my book

    It's late ....
    peace~

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:50 AM

  352. Why is that every time some one posts that is a lawyer they have to inform everyone they are a lawyer? is it a secret code they follow or something?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:52 AM

  353. LOL champ

    Posted by: DBCooper Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:52 AM

  354. You hit the nail Craig. Also, the followers of Obama hate Sen Clinton while the supporters of Sen Clinton hate and will never vote for Sen Obama.

    TIME FOR A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE GUYS.

    Sen Hillary Clinton, Independent Candidate for President

    Posted by: politicsisdirty | June 1, 2008 12:55 AM

  355. Hey lou - Welcome aboard we are gearing up for the General election. Come around often.

    Night all

    Posted by: DBCooper Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:56 AM

  356. The entire drawer is posting tonight' along with Dumby Cooper

    Must be a slow night at Union Station and the Minn. Airport

    Posted by: Brian's sock drawer | June 1, 2008 1:00 AM

  357. Astounding the number of Retuglican trolls here stiring up BS about what happened today.

    I hope you realize that your efforts are wasted, and that Obama is going to destroy McCain in November.

    Posted by: W.R.Printz | June 1, 2008 1:09 AM

  358. Sock Lover- Damn you need help! Don't mix those meds.
    with booze, it's a killa.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KACQuZVAE3s

    Posted by: speedy gonzales | June 1, 2008 1:18 AM

  359. How was I supposed to know that there was somewhat of a civil debate going on on CRAIG CRAWFORD's blog. Is he the guy that's always on Olbermann chuckling about something?

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 1:18 AM

  360. "Moral cowardice that keeps us from speaking our minds is as dangerous to this country as irresponsible talk. The right way is not always the popular and easy way. Standing for right when it is unpopular is a true test of moral character."
    ~ Margaret Chase Smith

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito | May 31, 2008 9:2 PM
    ============================

    Damn! THat is soo true, ub ... I just wish that had been acknowledges by ALL BHO supporters this primary, instead of them keep telling us we should just shut TFU & accept who the DNC wants to shove down our throats!!!

    Posted by: Viv Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:25 AM

  361. I came back for this

    Champ

    Welcome aboard. For the huffpo transients. Whether we agree or disagree, this is a place (with a few exceptions) that respects ideas and conversations. We honestly do try to keep it civil and even when we fail, we try to pull back from the abyss and reflect the gentleman who allows us this space.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:25 AM

  362. She could still sabotage his candidacy by manipulating her supporters into more childish behavior like they displayed today. I think she and Bill would do it just out of spite; I think they are THAT flummoxed right now.

    Obviously i think it's a silly 2012 strategy also, and the fact that she probably HAS a 2012 strategy is exactly why the Clintons need to be as far away from the White House as possible. They don't care about the American people, they only care about being the most powerful people on earth and Bill being able to comand 1 million dollars to give a speech. Something tells me his fee might be going down a little.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 1:29 AM

  363. Craig Crawford rocks!

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:30 AM

  364. Champ.....you must really be harpy now right?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:32 AM

  365. Obama has made it clear he does not want the Clintons around.

    Obama win or lose --it's all on him
    It has nothing to do with the Clintons

    Of course Obamabots are already looking for an excuse

    Posted by: Brian de Clinton | June 1, 2008 1:33 AM

  366. Boy, we really do have a bunch of new Obama supporters on the blog. Welcome! I'm so used to being outnumbered by Clintonites that it's a bit strange to see. Maybe lurkers who now want to speak?

    Anyway, Craig is right. We've now seen a transition that began in 2006 and will culminate with a landslide victory in 2008. This country tried Republicanism and is rapidly looking for the receipt. McCain is nothing but old, tired Republican conservative policy. In other words, he's Bob Dole.

    Obama 08!

    Posted by: Mr. Democrat | June 1, 2008 1:37 AM

  367. I think Al has become his own man....he likes it better when people want him. He'll cash in his "i.o.u.s" when appropriate.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:38 AM

  368. What do you mean by 'harpy'? Do I sound like I'm gloating? Sorry, I'm just venting a little because Hillary's minions have been driving me nuts and no one in my family talks politics. I am an Obama supporter, but I don't drink Obama flavored kool-aid. He is the first politician in the national spotlight that deserves a shot, imo.

    Inexperience is exactly what we need in Washington. The administrators of power don't build rockets or develop nanotechnology or perform brain surgury. They sit in plush well-furnished halls and resorts and shift money around and decide how you should live. Simple as that. Now that the Democratic party is congealing around Obama, do I think he will be any different; i.e. am I naive enough to believe that the SAME people won't be controlling us? No. But if there is one possible candidate who can shake things up a bit, in a good way, I think it's Barry.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 1:40 AM

  369. Champ

    I genuinely hope you are right. All I've seen is just one more Chicago Pol playing by Chicago rules with a hit man named Axelrod. No different, no change.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:44 AM

  370. I am happy for you champ.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:46 AM

  371. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwc5YSAc-7g

    dixie chicks - ready to make nice

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:49 AM

  372. I really can't believe all this bickering amongst ourselves... In all reality Obama and Clinton have virtually identical policies which is why it turned from a campaign of ideas to a personality fight. Ultimately both would be a lot better than McCain. Anyone whether they be an Obama supporter or a Clinton supporter would be a complete fool not to vote for the other in the General Election... Shame on all of you for for being so partisan over who will lead the country in the right direction which is a democrat and not a republican. Swallow your pride and take a stand for what is best for the country, the world and your family and friends. If it Obama does secure the nomination support him and the same goes for Hillary too, though that is looking increasingly difficult.

    Posted by: melancholypoet | June 1, 2008 1:50 AM

  373. Wow, Totally Blown away by all the Obama Supporters!

    Welcome and stay awhile! Come back often and have good debate...of course not with me! We Agree. ;0)

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:50 AM

  374. Jamie,

    Would you prefer a principled but spineless ninny like Gore and Kerry who let themselves get pushed around by hacks like Rove and Karen Hughes?

    I'm giving the aforementioned the benefit of the doubt by calling them principled. Maybe I'm being too harsh with Gore, but Kerry totally rolled over.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 1:50 AM

  375. Swallow your pride and take a stand for what is best for the country, the world and your family and friends. If it Obama does secure the nomination support him and the same goes for Hillary too, though that is looking increasingly difficult.

    Posted by: melancholypoet | June 1, 2008 1:50 AM

    Amen and pass the hot chocolate. I'm with you. You can come around again and help me pass that one out some more.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:53 AM

  376. Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:58 AM

  377. well, Brain and Shiela, Obama would not approve. Why? Because he has class and tact. Foreign words to the Clintons.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 1:58 AM

  378. "Would you prefer a principled but spineless ninny like Gore and Kerry who let themselves get pushed around by hacks like Rove and Karen Hughes?"

    NO I would like a principled woman with a spine who seems to genuinely care about others rather than an inexperienced on a national or international level political hack who allows his minions to run rough shod over anybody and anything that gets in his way while pretending to some sort of high ideals.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:58 AM

  379. Champ,

    Love our mutual class act.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:01 AM

  380. very nice intro champ, we have no class and tact.....wow

    I think i am in love

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:01 AM

  381. Burrito,

    You know thats not true. Clinton is a class act too. But its nice after all this time for someone to come on the blog and state and Obama is a class act.....pretty rare but welcome in my book!

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:04 AM

  382. Here comes that vote for me, On CSPAN

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:06 AM

  383. Dang, lot of action tonite! What a diffrence a day makes.lol

    Craig, I see Huffpo linked you on their Pol page, great for traffic.

    Welcome Obama nutz !

    Poor UB :( Legend's a winner!

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:07 AM

  384. it's never going to change because the synergy has been set....it would take someone who had the skill to bring people together.


    Jamie, didn't you post a while back an article that address the theory of first agitating your followers and then presenting them with solutions....something Obama learned from am mentor early on?

    It's happening again.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:07 AM

  385. I mean the following sincerely:

    I am sorry for the modern feminist movement that they have installed such a poor representative as Hillary Clinton as their standard bearer, because she is just using them. There are plenty of examples of strong competent women besides her. There will be a female president someday, it is just a matter of time. I am sorry for those older women who don't believe they'll see it in their lifetime; they just picked the wrong horse.

    How on earth can the feminist movement get behind a candidate who is still married to a womanizer who has had many many affairs while being married to her? Is that integrity? Of course not. It's a marriage of convenience, so she can maintain her death-grip on whatever power she can grab. Senator from New York- Puhleeze. I thought she was from Scranton. Oh wait, I mean Illinois. Oh wait, I mean Indiana, Oh wait, I mean Arkansas. Where exactly is she from again?

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:10 AM

  386. Legend is hot, I'd vote for him : )

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:11 AM

  387. UB

    Yep. If you want the fun version watch The Music Man.

    Create a problem then present a solution. It's the easiest way in the world to fleece the sheep.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qam1fbQmA_s

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:12 AM

  388. Burrito,

    now I really like you and don't want to get your dander up and....I have only been listening to all of you for the last year and a half. But it seems to be that you all whipped yourselves up.

    I have never seen so much misinformation get talked about to the point of Urban Legend. Too bad we don't have an Obama Urban Legend Site, but none of your would believe it anyway.

    In truth, that is why I have never defended obama to you guys since last November. It did no good.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:12 AM

  389. Oh Gosh,

    I am going down hill fast. Hurry up and vote paleeze. I want to see what I missed.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:14 AM

  390. " You don't want new comers getting the impression that you think of yourself as the center of the universe. "

    Absolutely not. Why would I want your delusion?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:17 AM

  391. Absolutely not. Why would I want your delusion?

    Posted by: Jamie | June 1, 2008 2:17 AM

    Spiting my coke on the computer! LOL

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:19 AM

  392. 'Hissy fit' good one. He kind of reminds me of Heather Wilson with his tone.

    "You wanted us all to be abuzz with her mooooves on the fieeeeld..."

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:19 AM

  393. Chef Nun (wow that's a nice abbreviation),

    Are we confusing John Legend with real legend? I barely preach about HRC, so quite honestly it is difficult for you to upset me....I know you are for Obama man, that's okay, I do not think I ever told anyone to change their thoughts or votes or anything. So carry on , and enjoy the ride.

    There are issue I am disappointing in, but they can not be fixed at this point. The future is only a ride, not to repeat he past.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:19 AM

  394. What I like the most. "In the Best Interest of Party Unity"

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:20 AM

  395. Sheila,

    Thank you for the LOL

    I have windex if you haven't stocked the household yet>

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:21 AM

  396. he = the

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:21 AM

  397. Sorry Burrito,
    I sincerely didn't want to upset you. I was using your words as a bridge to others so, carry on. ;0)

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:22 AM

  398. lol.....center of the universe

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:23 AM

  399. you can't upset me....: ) seriously....unless you pick on the service men and women...then my claws come out.


    besides he has no defense ...... j/k

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:26 AM

  400. Wow Ickes was totally beyond upset. The word really IS stunned.

    I can't remember ever seeing him like that. He's been so cucumber cool.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:27 AM

  401. Well Burrito,

    My son did three tours. He's safe for two more years and then its time again. I don't envy your family. Its a very helpless feeling.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:28 AM

  402. is he on TV?

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:29 AM

  403. you'd be pretty stunned to when you finally realized that White House Chief of Staff appointment was out the door.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:30 AM

  404. CSPAN

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:30 AM

  405. it sucks. basically. that's the long and short of it.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:30 AM

  406. thanks.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:31 AM

  407. http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS

    if you don't have a TV, like me

    there's a live stream and a recording, because you missed Ickes on the former, he just finished

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:34 AM

  408. okay, it is way past my dream time.....take care everyone....I am happy for the winners......everyone else...well you suck!

    ( do I have to put j/k there or will people understand)

    peace~

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:34 AM

  409. Good night Burrito and sweet dreams.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:36 AM

  410. Champ,

    Welcome, good to see an Obama man around. Got to tell you, with the exception of Jamie, all the hens are away, or asleep, so be prepared later when they show up. lol. Things can get pretty hot sometimes, but it's okay. You'll find a nice place here.

    Later

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:38 AM

  411. For those staying up late after watching the C-SPAN replay, the MSNBC "first read" postings throughout the day are interesting

    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:38 AM

  412. oh, by the way, before this party ends...

    is there a site as Pro-Clinton as Huffpo is Pro-Obama? Just curious. Mayeb You shouldn't tell me. Nothing good would come out of me participating on a forum there.

    Nah, nevermind, go ahead and tell me

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:38 AM

  413. Wow some really rude supporters in the rules committee......

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:39 AM

  414. Taylor Marsh, My friend.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:40 AM

  415. Champ

    Stick around here. There are strong groups on both sides and if you are really really good, Chef Sheila has been known to bring in muffins in the morning.

    Now one more attempt. Good night.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQZJXkh88oM

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 2:43 AM

  416. i got it bookmarked. Good talking to you all. here's one for you:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22eubaCUNJU

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:46 AM

  417. I'm urging Hillary Clinton's 17 million voters to vote for John McCain in November. Obama lacks the judgement to lead.

    Posted by: Michael | June 1, 2008 2:51 AM

  418. All 17 million were waiting with bated breath for your input.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 2:52 AM

  419. I thought so too. I'll pay! Jamie was on good behavior for the new guy ::)

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 3:08 AM

  420. Hey Michael, Urge ahead.

    Posted by: Rezdog Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 3:09 AM

  421. lol...Urge on, you crazy diamond

    Our nation welfare hinges on the steadfast urging of righteous urgers such as himself.

    Posted by: champ | June 1, 2008 3:16 AM

  422. I think the goal of unity is a long way coming yet.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcdnlNZg2iM

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 3:43 AM

  423. why doesn't Hilary run as an Independent? She'd win.

    Posted by: ky marco Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 4:12 AM

  424. Bethyboo? Are you insane? run as an Independent? ask Joe Lieberman how being an Idependent is going to work out for him. He no doubt after the 2008 elections are said and done.. and the Democrats have a stronger lead in the Senate will find his ass off his committee chairmanship.

    You know Clinton has moved the freaking goal posts so far out I can't see them anymore. If she goes to Denver she hands the election to Mccain. None of the Parties leaders act like they are going to let that happen. The Speaker of the House came out and said as much! Are you going to accuse her of being unfair?

    In interests of speaking the truth.. I have found this whole process interesting and stupid all in one breath.. Clinton has made a good run at this election... but... her goal was to give Obama a knock out punch during Super Tuesday... when that didn't happen then tother 'factors' came into play... Then the little comments by both sides just made me hide my head in shame... I will say this Obama didn't have his supporters yell out 'Lipstick on a pig' during the rules meeting...

    This whole thing just needs to end and for all of you that say 'I'm voting for Mccain this fall!' Well you want to vote for Bush's 3rd term you go ahead. You want to make sure Rove V Wade is over turned. That the War in Iraq keeps on going. That the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. That a man who claims he doesn't under stand what is going on with the ecomony.... That my friends is what you would be voting for if you just say it's unfair and walk away.

    Now I will admit.. I voted for Clinton here in Texas, but I am not going to sit by and watch another Republican enter the white house...

    You think Obama lacks the judgement to lead? Mccain didn't even know we aren't back yet to pre surge levels. He's against upping the GI Bill

    Wake up my fellow Clinton supporters.. It is possible that Clinton could be on the ticket, and if not... Clinton will no doubt be supporting this ticket in some way...

    Or... get ready..... Bucain is coming to a white house near you... and you will have nothing but yourselves who didn't vote to blame

    Posted by: CourtneyHawk | June 1, 2008 4:59 AM

  425. I suggest you look at a few things before you jump ship... you might not like Obama... I don't like Hlllary.. but I will not stand for another Repuke in the WH...
    This was a post from another site... but one that is worth looking to..

    Wow… did it take me a long time to read through all of these posts… I have a few things that I would like to add.
    First… for those of you who say that Obama has no record, I direct you to this site. This woman has done a marvelous job in researching the two democratic candidates work in the US Senate: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/20/ 201332/807

    Executive orders and legislation have been fully explained as the terminology of being a professor or not. Though it is refreshing to find a candidate that so boldly states that we’ve been duped for the last 8 years and probably further back than that.

    Second… Those of us that support Obama must do our best to ensure that the Swiftboating tactics don’t work this time.. and they will be out in force. He is a man of strong beliefs and ethics and, IMO.. to keep bringing up his church, which he has now left… (some will say for political expediency.. but I truly believe that it was a heart wrenching decision for him and his family. I still get people coming to me saying that he is muslim..that he sat in a Black Liberation Theology Christian Church for 20 years…. fear tactics) I believe that we have a more informed electorate this year… I believe that we are smarter than the Rovian tacticians take us for…

    Regarding the voting for funding of the Iraq war… Obama put it pretty simply… once you have driven the bus over the cliff, you can’t do much less. To vote to stop funding the war would not have brought our troops home.. it would have just given them nothing to fight with but stone knives and bearskins.. and, unlike McCain.. he holds our military service men and women in the highest regard.

    Education… Obama is the only candidate that I have heard who supports a broad education for our children and who recognizes the important role that teachers and parents play in our children’s future. He wants to level the playing field and put more emphasis on overall education rather than teaching to the tests… He states that we, as parents, are also responsible for the education of our children…. Unfortunately, we have a generation of Bush/Clinton years that are now raising our kids…. and the College/University kids now see that there was a lot wrong with that.. so, I guess we didn’t do too badly, but we let a lot of people down….

    Foreign Policy… I find it absurd that Obama is chided by McCain about visiting Iraq.. and that he has not spoken to General P face to face… even though he is running for President, as a junior senator, it is not his place to jump the Chain of Command and go talk to the Commander in Iraq face to face… the military is not to be used as a political tool… the military serves and protects the constitution of the USA and they are under the POTUS…. for Obama to talk to General P directly would undermine good order and discipline. In regards to talking to our “enemies” without preconditions… I find it absurd that it has been spun into inviting someone to tea… Let me make it clear what I think preconditions means… A precondition is something that must be achieved before you even consider talking to somebody. I.E. My neighbor has a dog that howls all night.. and until he kills or gets rid of that dog, I am not gonna talk to him about his dog that howls all night… Precondition is different than condition…. I.E I have a problem with your dog because it howls all night.. can we talk about it? Does it need better dog food? More attention? Let’s see what we can do in order for me to sleep at night.

    I digress, and I am sorry… I feel very strongly about Barack Obama..like many of you, this is the first time that I have been energized by a candidate since I was 18 years old and campaigning for George McGovern… I am a half Japanese/Caucasian and I am a 52 year old woman..Barack Obama has brought me back to that time I was 18…. He is a once in a lifetime candidate who deserves all of our support as he unites our fractured nation…. Thanks for listening to my rants.. I will step off my soapbox now…

    Posted by: Show Me | June 1, 2008 5:08 AM

  426. TNKincaid - I appreciated your comment. I don't think I have seen any of your comments before - are you new?

    I have wondered about how some blacks felt about Obama's behaviour and the results of same. There doesn't seem to be the same kind of energy to his campaign I remember from the freedom riders - then there was a kind of quiet determination. Maybe it was simply Martin Luther King and his dignity. I was just a lower middle class white girl in the mid-west and had never seen anything like it, and was awe-struck seeing
    young people getting on buses, with their jaws squared and sitting still, ready to go. Those people wanted to be treated like actual Americans, they wanted their rights as Americans, and I was stunned that anyone disagreed with them. But Obama has changed that, not my opinion but the situation. I hate seeing what I'm seeing,and the hysteria, and the kind of hateful an insulting words that are on this blog. It gets pretty low and ugly here. The media calls me a racist because I support a white candidate.

    It was infuriating to see civilly disobedient demonstrators be picked up from a street and arrested and going to jail, but lord, it was magnificent to see them say nothing and not resist - they made the cops who picked them up look like fools. That's the technique that won the civil rights act and actually changed the whole world, because the whole worldsaw and admired.

    Dr King was the greatest leader of men and women since Jesus Christ, and I think he would be woebegone to see that some respected, long-time
    black congressional women might be dropped by this political party because they dared to support a white woman candidate.

    I'm sure I have offended the Obama supporters here, but I sure do hope I haven't inadvertently said anything to offend you, TNKincaid. I rmember those blacks girls in Little Rock and think you deserve all the respect in the world, and I'm sorry you don't feel you are getting it. You are from me.


    As for whoever suggested we should vote for David Axelrod - do you REALLY want to get Chicago machine politics to run the country? You might think they already do, but trust me, they don't yet.

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 5:35 AM

  427. Since He quit his church, maybe he'll become a Muslim.

    But he probably has a problem with Osama Bin Laden. The Christian Science Monitor lays it out.

    Stafford, Va. - Osama bin Laden must be chuckling in his safe house. After all, the 2008 campaign could very well give Al Qaeda the ultimate propaganda tool: President Barack Hussein Obama, Muslim apostate.

    The fact that Senator Obama – the son of a Muslim father – insists he was never a Muslim before becoming Christian is irrelevant to bin Laden. In bin Laden's eyes, Obama is a murtad fitri, the worst type of apostate, because he was blessed by Allah to be born into the true faith of Islam.

    Click on Link for the article

    http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0519/p09s02-coop.html

    Posted by: Bowmanc Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 5:46 AM

  428. "Show me" - I suggest you read Hillary's book "It Takes a Village" and her autobiography "Living History".

    Those of us who have been offended by the "walk on water" presentation the MSM has given us of Barack Obama, are having a hard time with the sexism and hatred that has been directed at Hillary. I was impressed with Barack at the 2004 Democratic National Committee. I do not hate the guy, but he is not my candidate. I am back and forth on whether I can even envision voting for him.

    I have never felt this level of uncertainty before and I started to vote in 1980 starting with Jimmy Carter (still pissed Reagan won) and up to and including 2004 when I woke up early in Denmark (on vacation) to watch CNN to see how the votes were falling for Kerry.

    In closure I will say that I am not closing the door on voting for the nominee. if Hillary is the VP candidate, the decision is made for me. If not, I will wait, listen, read and learn.

    Best,

    Tom

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 5:47 AM

  429. "I suggest you read Hillary's book "It Takes a Village" and her autobiography "Living History".

    Tom,
    I have read both of those books... I suggest you read "Dreams from My Father" and "The Audacity of Hope".... I guess since I am bi-racial, I identify with this man and his struggles to figure out where he belongs and who he is. I am enthused when I hear his vision for America.. no other candidate, including the one you support, has offered a future that resembles the past vision that our founding fathers thought when they formed our more perfect union....

    and Bowmanc.... the Muslim thing died awhile ago... as they say in Texas.. That dog don't hunt.... try another tactic....

    Posted by: Show Me | June 1, 2008 6:45 AM

  430. Todd Putnam has written a new, critical analysis of Bill Clinton's nearly 8 years out of office.

    It is entitled "The Comeback Id"

    http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/07/clinton200807

    Comments?

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 7:11 AM

  431. The Democratic Party most definitely have thrown Hillary (along with Bill) over board Craig, but in doing so, threw a lot of other people off the boat too.

    Some of us are loyal to the people who have done the most for this party in recent years and that's Bill Clinton and his administration. (And please, everyone, I not in the mood to hear about Monica.)

    Howard Dean and "his new coalition" have taken "their vision" of the party in a new direction, and I'm not going there with them. I don't recognize a Democratc party that "doesn't need" the "little guy", because if this country isn't about the "working class, whoever he or she may be, then what is it about?

    Power and Agenda and Control. That's what this party is trying to become. Some votes have become more important than other votes, so since when is non equality called Democracy"?

    I was born into a country that taught me, since I can remember, that we were all created equal. I guess it t was naive of me to believe that because this year has proven me wrong. So if they don't think that's obvious to anyone watching, then they don't understand half of America.

    I don't even blame Obama, anymore, because I've come to seeing him as a pawn. He's just their chosen "front man". And I fear he owes way too many people to ever become a President to the people.

    I am not going to fall in line, regardless of the outcome of this election. And I won't ever be fooled again.

    Ms. Independent

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 7:37 AM

  432. "in person she is both frighteningly intelligent, genuinely very warm, and quite witty."

    Too bad she blew it then with those major character defects - inability to handle reality, lying, Rove tactics, staying with that rat of a husband. If she'd dumped him after the Monica mess and struck out on her own, she'd have been way more impressive.

    Posted by: janice | June 1, 2008 7:43 AM

  433. Too bad she blew it then with those major character defects - Janice

    "Major character defects'?

    You can talk like that, and then say "she" has major character defects?

    Look at how you stand in judgment.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 7:47 AM

  434. Five things to watch in Puerto Rico

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10733.html

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:07 AM

  435. Posted by: LushIsLinda Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:21 AM

  436. Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:38 AM

  437. Stretch, yawn ... Good Morning folks - Somebody kick Sheila out of bed, I need fresh baked blueberry muffins, coffee, and fresh squeezed OJ

    Denni and other newbies. If you put links in your posts, don't put in more than two at a time. It gets the message bounced for review as a spam defense. If you have more than two, use multiple messages.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:48 AM

  438. re: janice 7:43 character defect post.
    keeping one's vows is a major character VIRTUE not defect, at least it used to be in the olden days and some cultures and religions even now think that.

    re: trinity tempest.
    anyone have an idea what impact pfleger's & wright's pulpit politicking will have on trinity's tax status?

    Posted by: patd | June 1, 2008 9:15 AM

  439. patd

    Pfleger was a "visiting" minister, so probably none or nothing more than a hand slap. For Wright or anyone else in the employ of the church, it would be a question of openly endorsing a particular candidate directly from the pulpit.

    Churches have always slid around this one by doing things such as distributing ballot cards at community events as recommending those candidates that "support our beliefs" or by "endorsing" as private citizens - again separate from the inside of the church itself.

    The IRS steps very lightly around the freedom of religion clause.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 9:23 AM

  440. Russert>>>>17 millions have voted for hillary, largest primary vote in history.....

    Daschle>>>>It's time to put that behind us.......

    lol

    Posted by: sturgeone | June 1, 2008 9:46 AM

  441. TY jamie,
    i am a greatful fan of your ability to respond with such clarity and civility, so like our gracious host.

    Posted by: patd | June 1, 2008 9:47 AM

  442. Puerto Rico Poll: Clinton 51%, Obama 38%
    El Vocero (Spanish Language-translated) ^ | 5/28/08

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2022416/posts

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 9:54 AM

  443. Sturgeone,

    Yep .... all you totally unnecessary folks just get in the line at the back, we need to take the group photo.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 9:54 AM

  444. TY jamie,
    i am a greatful fan of your ability to respond with such clarity and civility, so like our gracious host. Posted by: patd

    I'm grateful too.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 9:57 AM

  445. Me three.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:02 AM

  446. "Google" is now in our lexicon. There were other search engines before it, but "to google" became a verb because the company that created that engine is very, very good at what it does.

    Likewise "clintonesque" and "clintonism" have entered the vernacular. Senator Clinton and former president Clinton are both very, very good at what they do, namely, over-the-top prevarication. Spin has existed since voting was invented, but the Clintons made it their own.

    Posted by: SpinSpinSpin | June 1, 2008 10:05 AM

  447. Australia is out of Iraq. Which of the "coalition of the willing" nations are left ... anybody?

    http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-world/20080601/Iraq.Australia/

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:11 AM

  448. Spin spin spin

    Getting a little dizzy there are you

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:13 AM

  449. Jamie,

    "...won't stop spinnin' 'till I hit the ground..."

    Thin Lizzy

    Posted by: SpinSpinSpin | June 1, 2008 10:16 AM

  450. The Sunday morning piece on RFK is really good. At least there is the reminder that he wasn't a liberal in the sense that today's younger crowd thinks of as "liberal".

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:16 AM

  451. spins 10:05 post using "very, very good at what they do, namely, over-the-top prevarication" as the test IMHO also qualifies the following: obamatons, obamaniacs.
    sorry for the dig and just when we were trying to unify here.

    Posted by: patd | June 1, 2008 10:18 AM

  452. patd

    I'm really trying to ignore the "kick 'em while their down" mentality, but they may just be reflecting their candidate's way of doing things.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:21 AM

  453. email to the South Carolina Democratic Party:

    Mr Werner,

    Please route this email to the appropriate individual.

    Effective immediately, please terminate any affiliation I have with the SCDP to include the Yellow Dogs. I realize I committed to making contributions for a year. I will honor that commitment, but send me no more emails or mailings, beyond acknowledging that my requested actions have been accomplished.

    The basis of my withdrawal is the pathetic triumph of self-interest over expressed commitment that was exhibited at yesterday's Rules Committee meeting. I simply cannot continue supporting an organization where the personal loyalty of those in leadership positions means so little.

    Thank you,

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:23 AM

  454. Being a former Clinton supporter, I am disgusted at the way Senator Clinton, her campaign, and her "diehard" supporters have acted throughout this campaign and especially yesterday. It is painfully obvious she is in it for herself and that many of her closest suporters are there for personal gain as well. I am a democrat and will never vote republican, but sadly, after watching the events of this primary and the Clinton campaign and supporters at the RBC hearing yesterday, I will never support Clinton or her closest supporters with money or my vote again.

    Posted by: NS | June 1, 2008 10:23 AM

  455. Howard Dean is the Dem's Katherine Harris.

    Posted by: GORDO | June 1, 2008 10:24 AM

  456. Gordo

    I don't think he looks like that in a sweater.

    Katie and "the twins" have a long history around here.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:30 AM

  457. Being a former Clinton supporter, I am disgusted......
    I will never support Clinton or her closest supporters with money or my vote again. Posted by: NS

    I personally don't believe you were ever a Clinton supporter.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:30 AM

  458. Flatus,

    I was inspired by your letter and respect you even more because of what you stand for. Thanks for sharing it.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:33 AM

  459. Chloe, you've got that right. There's a lot of trolling going on trying to separate elements of the party. It's probably part of the repug divide-and-conquer effort.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:34 AM

  460. Maybe Howard Dean should be called Howard Harris.

    Posted by: GORDO | June 1, 2008 10:35 AM

  461. Dear Mr. Crawford,
    We love your commentary especially on Imus... How do we make the point that we are sick of "Billary". If Obama, as we hope becomes the nominee and puts Hillary on his ticket, we will vote for McCain. We are sick sick sick of all of this rule changing etc. The McCain camp must be thrilled with all of this infighting and indecisiveness.
    Sincerely,
    S.

    Posted by: Stoker95 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:37 AM

  462. Flatus

    Just as a matter of pure curiosity, I would love to know how many "take me off the list" posts the DNC has received. It would be impossible to get all the figures for all the state/county/precincts, but I imagine the DNC figures are known if we could find someone on the inside to tell us.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:41 AM

  463. It's okay we are sick of people who refer to President and Senator Clinton as Billary and all other terms stolen from the right wing freak show

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:45 AM

  464. Flatus
    Wonderful letter!!! I have wondered myself just how many peaple have asked to be taken off there mailing lists? Maybe some party official if asked by a journalist could get the stats???

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:46 AM

  465. Jamie, thanks for the insight!

    Flatus, McCain hasn't asked for any of the things you've stated, so far. Why would he start if he was unfortunately elected as POTUS? He's been a cheerleader for this mismanaged war, claiming victory in places where it's clear there's been no victory and talking about walking safely through Iraq when it was clear he was in body armor with a protective detail.

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:51 AM

  466. Chloe,

    Loved this paragraph in the NY Times article

    "In many ways, Mr. Obama is wheezing across the finish line after making a strong start: He has won only 6 of the 13 Democratic contests held since March 4, drawing 6.1 million votes, compared with 6.6 million for Mrs. Clinton."

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:55 AM

  467. Its all over for Clinton in Democratic Party . She should now look at options to fight as Independent .

    Posted by: sathya Ramana | June 1, 2008 10:55 AM


  468. NEW THREAD

    Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:55 AM

  469. Denni
    I use no one as an excuse not to support Sen.Obama but it would be a lie to say that his supporters and the way in which some have conducted themselves didn't have an effect on my thinking.I take full responcability for my vote or in this case lack of one.

    Posted by: tonyb39 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:56 AM

  470. This is from a friend who was actually inside the RBC meeting room yesterday afternoon.
    _________________________________________

    I know that today's ruling on FL and MI was extremely disappointing. I was actually inside for the second half after a very lucky moment in which four DNC officials actually gave us their seats if we promised to "yell and boo" loudly for Hillary. They were very low key about the situation and basically let us know that we needed to keep this really quiet. Upon entering the meeting, it was clear why they wanted us in there. The crowd was overwhelmingly supportive of Obama. I made sure to follow through with my end of the deal: I was very vocal. It was an extremely emotional experience in terms of feeling very alienated from the party. There was a five second pan to Donna Brazile just at the right moment (which makes me think she was already being watched for making facial gestures and the camera people were Clinton or McCain supporters) in which she made the most offensive and bored looking expression while Ickies was talking. It elicited a ton of boos and other comments. She had no idea she was on camera during that moment and it was clear that the camera person showed her purposely to expose her. It was very shocking to me that she would sit up there and make that face. It was extremely telling.

    Overall, the experience was surreal. It was very tense during the second half and I kept thinking of all the people I have talked to over the last six months who have reported feeling alienated, angry, frustrated and generally left out. I remembered all of you and how disappointed you have felt. I honesty felt obligated to make some noise in that setting. We have spent weeks writing letters, sending emails, making calls and generally, doing everything we can to get the media and DNC to take us seriously. We have been respectful and considerate the entire time. I was thinking that at that moment, the country was watching and that was some of the only media time we have actually received in the last several weeks. I felt like it was my duty to be vocal and forthright with my disgust for the situation, as otherwise, how will the rest of the country (who thinks it's only Clinton out there fighting because that's all the media shows) doesn't even realize we exist? Leslie, who was inside the meeting all day, and Diana, who was also in the meeting all day, appeared to share my sentiments. Despite the fact that we were outnumbered 4 to 1 inside that meeting, from what I understand, we sounded as though we were equally matched AND we made sure to make the DNC feel as uncomfortable. While I normally wouldn't advocate this, at the same time, when will our dissent be heard? I decided that today, a little civil disobedience was called for in order to let everyone know that we here, we're not happy and we're not going anywhere. I want you to know that we were thinking of all of you today and truly feeling as though we were representing you in that meeting. I noticed the blogs were full of Obama supporters wagging their fingers and making comments about the "rude" behavior of Clinton supporters. The massive numbers of responses speaks volumes. They were shocked to see her supporters so vocal in their opposition to Obama. That type of behavior has always belonged to Obama's supporters (on a much more unaccpetable level). I think it was a real eye opener for them. Regardless, I want you to know that today, we all had our chance to voice our outrage at the meeting. Each of you had a voice in that meeting and we made sure that it was heard. Don't give up, Hillary has the popular vote and truly, all I can say is this: Denver.

    Posted by: Alicia Knight Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:59 AM

  471. Denni,

    Mr McCain has been a 'team player'. That said, he has also been a vocal critic of the mismanagement that characterized the Rumsfeldian adventure.

    There are plenty of things where Mr McCain has failed to impress. Find those places and report on them accurately.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 10:59 AM

  472. http://youtube.com/watch?v=KACQuZVAE3s

    one of Clinton's supporters yesterday at the Rules Committee Meeting.

    ¡yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 11:05 AM

  473. Too bad she blew it then with those major character defects - inability to handle reality, lying, Rove tactics, staying with that rat of a husband. If she'd dumped him after the Monica mess and struck out on her own, she'd have been way more impressive.


    Posted by: janice | June 1, 2008 7:43 AM

    Janice, quite unnesary....You don't lend much to Unity. And that statement is just plain out of line and over the top! I'm an Obama supporter and I think you should rethink how you try and defend your candidate here.

    These people have been sincere in their dedication to Senator Clinton.

    Posted by: Chef Sheila Hussein The Nun Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 11:11 AM

  474. People keep suggesting Hillary Clinton has "proven her metal" in this campaign. That is very generous interpretation. What she has really shown is that no lie is too great, in her mind, in her quest for power and achieving what she personally wants.

    We've had 8 years of that kind of "leader" and we know what it has gotten us. Clinton has no future (hopefully) as a leader in this country, whether as Democrat, Independent, or Republican. This great nation needs great leaders, not soul-less sycophants.

    Posted by: Thomas Jefferson | June 1, 2008 11:16 AM

  475. Harold Ickes on cnn

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 11:16 AM

  476. God Damn America!

    Look what Obama and now the Dem Party stands for.

    America is bad! Whitey bad too!

    What a bunch of fools the Dems are. I hope they have fun playing with all that Obama money (which for some reason is coming from Repubs), now, because it's going to dry up really quick.

    There's alot to be learned about Obama. None of it good either. Monday promises to be an exciting day. Hang on to your seatbelts, Dems. The ride is going to get very bumpy from here on out.

    Posted by: OxyCon | June 1, 2008 11:27 AM

  477. Wolf sayd CNN is the only news organization that's providing exit polls today. Polls closing at 3 but they'll have them sooner.

    Posted by: chloe Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 11:32 AM

  478. Yall just yacking away and not saying a damn thing! Quit tryin' to convince each other of your self-righteousness. The other person doesn't care! Get it?

    Some of you got the county fair Blue Ribbon around your neck, some of you got your whittle feelings hurt because the big boys took your ball and went home...Get A Life, folks! All of Ya!

    Posted by: Take A Breath | June 1, 2008 12:07 PM

  479. Unilke you, TonyB, here's what affects my thinking: more than 4,000 American troops who've died, thousands more wounded, more than a million people who'll probably lose their homes this year, the younger women who have to worry about Roe v. Wade, the potential for conflict with Iran, health care, consumer protection, etc, etc, etc.

    You're welcome to vote for McCain because Obama supporters make you made. I'm voting for the future of my country. NO to McCain, 'foreclosure Phil', his lobbyist/advisors with questionable ties to scary people, and the Republican party that's trashed the constitution all for the sake of supporting Bush and his needless war.

    We just differ, that's all.

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:07 PM

  480. I'm curious. The Obama supporter was the person who LAST YEAR voted against full sanction. Ickes and the other Clinton supporters (probably thinking they were keeping votes from Obama just as they thought they'd frozen him out of the money game) voted FOR the full sanctions.

    Why aren't the Clinton supporters being held accountable? They are NOW screaming disenfranchisement, where were they A YEAR AGO!?!?!

    When is the Clinton team ever going to be responsible for the careless mess they've made of this process????

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 12:10 PM

  481. The Dems, lefties and liberals don' t understand this yet, but if, indeed, BHO is now the head of the Democrat Party, they all will rue that ascenscion.

    Do they really think the Clintons and her supporters will not accept this?

    Soon, if not already now, all the king's men and all the king's horses won't be able to put the politically correct, anchorless, rotten-to-its-core Democrat Party back together again.

    But they'll have time for at least the next election cycle to try, while President McCain is in office.

    Who knows, but maybe they'll have a few more presidential-election cycles to attempt to re-invent themselves from the fractious disaster they now have become?

    All this couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.

    Posted by: CKA in Red State USA | June 1, 2008 12:31 PM

  482. The word everyone is forgetting in all this is: S-a-n-c-t-i-o-n-e-d!

    The Florida and Michigan Democratic Primaries were U-n-s-a-n-c-t-i-o-n-e-d by the Democratic Party. These Primaries Occured ... But the Results D-o N-o-t/D-i-d N-o-t have to be R-e-c-o-g-n-i-z-ed by the DNC.

    All these Clinton Supporters on the Board said as much when T-h-e-y Voted to N-o-t Recognize These Primaries.

    N-o-w, These Hypocrites, Did Not Even Want to H-o-n-o-r Their O-w-n Vote. By Right: Sentator Clinton N-o-r Senator Obama Could Have Received A-N-Y Delegates and the Board Would Have Been Fully Within Their Right.

    I Contend That Some Here Do Not Truly Believe in Democracy. The F-i-r-s-t Sentence of the Constitution Reads: " We, The People of the United States in O-r-d-e-r to F-O-R-M a M-o-r-e P-e-r-f-e-c-t U-n-i-o-n ..."

    That was the purpose of the Meeting Yesterday. To Recognize That the Party is Not Perfect. But the W-o-r-k of Forming a M-o-r-e P-e-r-f-e-c-t U-n-i-o-n Within the Party Has to Begin.

    I Think the Decisions V-o-t-ed on and A-g-r-e-e-d to Were the B-e-s-t H-o-p-e for all Concerned in Working Toward the Realization (With-In the Democratic Party) of Having a M-o-r-e P-e-r-f-e-c-t Union.

    Just My Opinion ...

    Posted by: Tdamion | June 1, 2008 12:33 PM

  483. This is what the Clintons get for being so devisive.Yes it is time for a change.

    The Catholic Priest got it right even if it hurts Barck. Not because she was Bills spouse does not entitle her to being president. Her decision making and judgement stink.Had she been a good leader her campaign would have been better run a nd her ignorant supporters at the RCB convention just proves my point. Barck was able to have his supporters listen.

    Clinton is just a tired old brand name.

    Obama 08!

    Posted by: Allison | June 1, 2008 1:09 PM

  484. The Michigan formula recognized that about 30,000 voters wrote in their preference (overwhelmingly Obama) and that under Michigan law those votes are not counted. The Michigan state Democratic party explained that this was the justification for the adjustment.
    This corresponded to the poll data available at the time indicating a 10 pt margin for Clinton. Whether this 2 delegate shift to Obama can be justified is not really the issue.
    Sen, Clinton ran a campaign that would have won in the past, but did not adjust to the present conditions. Therefore, she lost. Sen. Obama ran a superior campaign and therefore won. Whether Sen. Clinton's supporters accept this, and work for Sen. Obama's victory in Novemeber, will determine te outcome of the election. In a democracy, you accept outcomes and if sufficiently energized work to reverse the result next time.

    Posted by: loki50 Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 1:28 PM

  485. I watched some of the RBC live broadcast yesterday. What became apparent right away was that the DNC et.al. is not representative of the population of this country. On the committee were 50+% African Americans. AA's make up 12-15% of our country's population. The Democratic Party is misnamed. I hope that what comes out of this terrible campaign season is a viable third party headed up by Hillary Clinton. It's time for change, all right. Change to true representation. Tomorrow I'm headed to my county election bureau to change my registration to Independent from Democrat. In November I'll be voting for John McCain. He's the lesser of two evils.

    Posted by: Timefortruerepresentation | June 1, 2008 1:32 PM

  486. Timefortruerepresentation - you are just as much of a liar as Hillary is so you want to vote for McCain...be my guest...we don't need evils like you who try to divide the democratic party...you can go and sleep with the Lobbyist!!

    50%+ African American...please! Hillary math has and will always be wrong. Go away!

    Posted by: NoLove4Hillary | June 1, 2008 1:54 PM

  487. "...Barack Obama has displaced Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, as boss of the party."

    So Craig, is your Kool-aid cherry, grape or orange today?

    Tell me what Obama and his backers gain if Obama loses in a landslide during a year when the Democratic Party is all but guaranteed to win? What’s the point of controlling a Party that will become a laughingstock by November?

    Four delegates. That's all he got by dragging his feet on Michigan. Yeah, that's some real smart politicking there--he handed her the issue of Denver, Craig. Too bad you don't see that.

    Posted by: Blue State Girl | June 1, 2008 1:56 PM

  488. Ding Dong the wicked witch is dead!!!!

    Posted by: Steven G | June 1, 2008 2:50 PM

  489. Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 3:55 PM

  490. Does anyone even think about the term limit issue? Bill Clinton was term limited. How legitimate is it for his wife to run for president? How is this a feather in the cap of feminists? I don't get the furor! Women should hold out for a truly independent female who can earn the office on her own merits!!

    Posted by: tao changer | June 1, 2008 4:45 PM

  491. 1,2,3, Everybody: Obama/Clinton '08!!!!

    Posted by: Mike S | June 1, 2008 5:35 PM

  492. This is like 1492 - "so-called everyone said the world was flat - columbus knew it was not. Later he was proven right and the so-called everyone was proven wrong" Wrong - do you understand.
    Fact: Obama has offered nothing but silly speeches with little of import.
    Fact: Hillary (no matter if you love or hate her) is the only one of the three that really knows how to get things done in the gov. She was also the only one that actually had any details and a plan to work with.

    She is the best candidate - unfortunately, too many democrats have stars in their eyes and are too dense to see that yet. If they don't see it soon the dems will loose again.

    Hillary - keep going - keep going.
    M.H.

    Posted by: Myron Heaton | June 1, 2008 6:55 PM

  493. Will Obama still be the "new boss" after he loses the presidential election, or will he be toast?

    Posted by: annette | June 1, 2008 7:34 PM

  494. Barack in Charge. Of what, the nastiest race in history? Barack is a puppet. A puppet surrounded by goons who tell him what to do and strong arms the one person who deserves the Presidency, Hillary Clinton. The DNC (Dean, Pelosi, Brazille) are complete sell outs and back stabbers. If Barack becomes the nominee by hook or by crook, America will answer by making McCain the next President of the United States. Barack would only create the Un-united States.

    Posted by: EsmeraldaB | June 1, 2008 7:44 PM

  495. In case you missed it, Flatus... he quickly stopped criticizing the war effort when he started running. He admits that mistakes were made, but is far less that critical, now. I can more links that spell out the McCain shift in policy, if you're interested.

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 7:47 PM

  496. Sunday, June 1, 2008
    FOX NEWS says a TV network has the "Whitey" tape

    In Breaking News, No Quarter reports that Roger Stone of Fox News says that a TV network HAS the tape on which Michelle Obama, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.)'s wife, rants against "Whitey."

    The following appeared June 2, 2008, at 14:43:30. See Fox News transcript:

    ... this has little to do with the general election and a lot to do with why hillary clinton is staying in the race. look, there is already a buzz in washington at least seven news organizations have contacted me. wanting to know how to get their hands on this tape, giving me more information than i had after i had spoken to each one of them. i now believe the tape exists and i believe a network has it. if this pans to out to be true based on michele obama’s previous comment that this is the first time she had been proud of her country which i think shows an attitude it is problematic.

    The bus is idling, waiting for you, Michelle.

    Posted by: WendyPrince | June 1, 2008 7:56 PM

  497. Short memories! The Clinton's were party outsiders. Once in, they never played the games. That is why all the old school party insiders (Kennedy) were so glad to try to exact their retribution against that young upstart that took their Nomination in '92.

    And now, the arrogant DNC is about to senselessly throw the weakest candidate into the General Election because of the egos!

    You know what the Democratic Party is getting to be really good at???

    LOSING!

    Posted by: yael | June 1, 2008 8:05 PM

  498. OOPS!

    Losing! AND backroom deals and closed door meetings. -Only yesterday.

    Pure arrogance.

    Posted by: yael | June 1, 2008 8:07 PM

  499. Hard to tell the Republican Right Wing from the Democratic Party Right Wing. What sickness... the No Quarter crowd has gone after Michelle for some time, now. How pathetic.

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:09 PM

  500. The procedure that the RBC adopted is this:
    a. the primary in Michigan was seriously flawed
    b. so serious was the flaw that the primary could not be used to reflect the will of the voters and so was rejected as a proper vehicle of expression of the voters will; viz only one candidate on ballot, only some voters casting votes, mail-in votes being rejected etc
    c. the primary in Michigan was therefore declared null and void; soundly rejected as a valid primary
    d. the mood of the RBC was however, that on reflection, the voters should have a delegation that should attend the convention on the basis that the debacle was not created by the voters
    e. in arriving at a model to represent the will of the voters, both the persons who actually voted as well as those who wished to vote, but could not vote, had to be factored into the solution
    f. a workable model had to be developed to provide that expression of the voters will - aka fair representation; as Harold Ikies said, fair representation is a bedrock philosophy of the Democratic Party.
    g. in the absence of seating based on the rejected primary result, an alternative fair and rational model has to be used
    h. enter the Michigan Democratic Party; the State party, over the last several weeks, had done extensive work with voter analysis, including all factions, to arrive at a compehensive proposal from an exthaustive process.
    i. Michigan developed one workable solution; ably presented by the State Chairman and Senator Levine
    j. while the Michigan State party solution was, initially, viewed as very radical, and in some minds, undemocratic, in reality it was as good as a solution as any
    k. why ?; having declared the primary results as null and void (which also means that the votes cant be counted or credited to anty party) , then to be able to seat the delegates a fair formula had to be developed outside of the basis of the non-primary

    I think the RBC arrived at a decision which reflected a fair representation and a wise compromise backed by rationality and logic. Remember this was to restore a 100% delegate penalty

    The four delegate difference is neither here nor there in the big picture

    Posted by: The Silk Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:14 PM

  501. we'll see whose crying when 17 million dems vote McCain in Nov,

    Posted by: scottd | June 1, 2008 8:29 PM

  502. Really sad. Poeple have mad this election about themselves and their hurt feelings. I don't know how to tell you this, but Americans are DYING in the field in Iraq. People are losing their homes, and there are millions without health coverage. How sickly and myopic to want to punish someone for WINNING an election.

    Punish HUNDREDS of millions of citizens to stick it to ONE man. What madness. This is not a game.

    Posted by: Denni Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 8:34 PM

  503. No one is going to cry SCOTTD!

    The 17 million dems will be voting for Obama because of things like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFM1xqqTX_g. Of course, LESS YOU! Stop pretending like you are a dem when you are a supporter of Bush's Third Term. You can't fool us. Go away!

    You see a dem with Brain will never vote for McCain or say what you say.

    Posted by: NoLove4Hillary | June 1, 2008 8:36 PM

  504. “You see a dem with Brain will never vote for McCain or say what you say.” - NoLove4Hillary

    Democrats know a winner when they see one, and it ain’t Barack Obama. To vote Obama would only sanction all the sexism, reverse racism, fingergates, bittergates and the Wrights’, Ayers’, Rezkos’, Odingas’, Auchis’, Michelles’ of the world, and true Democrats could never allow that. Ain’t gonna happen, my friend.

    We support Hillary all the way to the White House. Our reserve vote goes to a hero, Senator McCain. Obama is not worthy to stand in the shadows of either of these people.

    Posted by: EsmeraldaB | June 1, 2008 9:02 PM

  505. DENVER!

    Posted by: sophie | June 1, 2008 10:00 PM

  506. EsmeraldaB - you see...most with Brains are tied of cheats. Your girl is the worst politician ever. She is a liar, divisive, polarizing, has too much negative to have a chance in the GE but at least I will tell you this dem has a brain to choose her over McCain if she was the nominee. Start thinking with your head rather than your balls or your estrogen!

    Go vote for your hero who continues to be losing his bearing. I am sure you will enjoy the following heroic stories and vedio's about him. Watch out for that McCain's sniper fire! Oh...almost forgot this is a guy who had called his own wife a "cunt" --you just have to google it if you don't believe it. How about that? ain't he a colorful hero?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSlAJ5hkAC4&feature=related


    Posted by: NoLove4Hillary | June 1, 2008 11:02 PM

  507. That was a great link re the popular vote, Chloe. I was wondering what they would do with that little factor. The wrangling isn't over.

    Chloe, Jamie, OD, Jason, and Flatus - I do enjoy your attitudes. Most of you I can't keep straight, so I'm tempted to say I enjoy Patsi also, but she gets SO much volume of nastiness that I'm not sure about. I've decided to consider the sources, tho, and say you're cool. I've left out names cuz I can't keep them straight bit if you go along with those already named, I salute you as well. You are havens of serenity in an increasingly polluted and toxic ocean.

    Flatus, I've taken my name off their lists several times and just got two more letters. They're gettin' em back.

    Hillary isn't hurting the party - it's self-destructive. She has every right to run and they are showing what they are made of - the same stuff the kgb is made of - ok, that's an gross exaggeration - but not a total lie.

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | June 1, 2008 11:27 PM

  508. I couldn't be more pleased to see Hillary failing. I've realized over the years that all politicians are evil and corrupt.

    The Clintons' are the epitome of this. It's time to get over all the political hero B.S.

    POLITICIANS DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOU! Stop putting them on these pedestals!!! If people cared as much about God who lends them breath, they would be happier people.

    This is the best video I've ever seen about Hillary:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6Lstkiexhc

    Take a moment to see it on youtube. It's not a song or anything silly....

    I wish I could see a blog where thousands of people were bragging about God Almighty and how great he is....

    Posted by: Richard in Texas | June 2, 2008 12:37 AM

  509. Nice, my political party is now "run" by a Marxist radical with Anti-American friends? Oh, where did it go wrong. I may be liberal, but not a radical who loves anti-american rants and partial birth abortion as Obama, the new Dem "boss" does. No Obama for me please. http://www.hellnobama.com

    Posted by: JulieL | June 2, 2008 6:14 AM

  510. Yay, my political party is now run by Americans who know a fellow American with outstanding credentials from a Washington insider. Oh, my how how the millions of newly registered voters got it right. I may be a yellow--dog democrat but election 2008 is about loving America with a new bi-partisan voice and while upholding the health choices of ALL Americans. The democratic party bosses are finally done away with. Obama shares the congratulations. And away with Republican oligarchists in November!!!!!

    Posted by: earart | June 2, 2008 9:27 PM

  511. Well, my political party is me - c'est moi. The democratic party bosses are still in control in my view, and the party will have to be wrested from their dead fingers in about twenty or thirty years, by which time I will have been long long gone. Enjoy your brief moments, all those who think there's a new day in the party. You are doing and thinking exactly what the bosses want you to think. This is one election disappointment I won't have to face. You have my sympathy (but I'll bet you want to throw it back in my face, huh? How did I know?)

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | June 3, 2008 1:07 AM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)