Obama's Ex-Preacher in GOP Ad

| | Comments (195)

Why shouldn’t the North Carolina Republican Party run a television advertisement spotlighting Barack Obama’s controversial former preacher, Jeremiah Wright? All this ad does is recite the facts and replay the video that the news media promoted for weeks.

Presumptive GOP presidential nominee John McCain asked the North Carolina party to pull the ad, but state Republicans are not running it to affect the White House race. The point of the ad is to influence the state’s race for governor.

It is surely a stretch to expect voters to think that any Democrat running for office in North Carolina is now somehow tied to Wright because a member of his former congregation is now leading in polls for the state's May 6 presidential primary. But that’s for the voters to decide if the state GOP wants to give this a try.

Far from scaring North Carolina Democrats away from Obama, there could be a backlash that favors him. Either way, state Republicans are more interested in the ad’s impact on their own race for governor, which is not really any of McCain’s business.

 

    Comments

  1. In case anyone wants to listen....

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lonnee-hamilton/placing-reverend-wrights_b_92738.html

    I don't know if it will change any minds - but it is interesting given our religious conversation of earlier.

    And Rev. Wright does have some nice things to say about Clinton (and I am being serious).

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 1:09 AM

  2. I'm rather glad the repugs are showing this ad, this is just the thing that will get out the Obama vote than this ad.

    And Craig national is also asking the state GOP to pull this ad, they know this is going to hurt them. And that's what we love about the south!

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 1:20 AM

  3. UPDATE 3-Wal-Mart's Sam's Club limits rice purchases
    http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2323679120080423

    Scary stuff.

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 1:36 AM

  4. Clinton's path to the nomination remains extraordinarily treacherous even after the victory in Pennsylvania. Her margin was decisive, but even some of her most loyal supporters privately expressed doubts last night that she can prevail in the long battle against Obama.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/22/AR2008042202959.html?nav=rss_politics

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 1:39 AM

  5. Tonight Hillary challenged Mr. Obama to two debates in Oregon, one specifically dealing with rural Oregon.

    Obama's campaign has declined.

    Barrroock, brrrrrock, brrrrrock...

    Posted by: Oregon Democrat | April 24, 2008 2:13 AM

  6. Come on Barack...debate..show some guts...

    Posted by: Oregon Democrat | April 24, 2008 2:24 AM

  7. Hmm
    How many has he declined so far?

    Anyway,
    getting to do some wrok here..... Will be back later

    Hillary......our Nominee!!!!!

    Posted by: Jason | April 24, 2008 2:25 AM

  8. Oregon Democrat,

    Why do you think Obama's declining to debate? He isn't good at candid
    responses. Clinton out-debates him every time. Obama does an okay job with scripted speeches, but I bet Darth Axelrod hires speech writers to do considerable editing.

    Posted by: prof marcia Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 2:35 AM

  9. Can Hillary ever be trusted to keep her word?"

    Hours after Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina agreed to sign a loyalty pledge put forward by party officials in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York followed suit. The decision seemed to dash any hopes of Mrs. Clinton relying on a strong showing in Florida as a springboard to the nomination.

    “We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process,” Patti Solis Doyle, the Clinton campaign manager, said in a statement.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/02/us/politics/02dems.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 2:51 AM

  10. Craig and fellow bloggers,

    In response to Craig's recent post, as far as North Carolina Republicans running the ad showing Obama's Rev. Wright, I'm not so sure that the ad will have a backlash affect. Maybe North Carolina independents or crossover voters
    might be nudged to vote for Clinton after being reminded of Obama's
    ties to the ranting preacher. I hate to admit it, but as a Clinton supporter and
    after all the mean-spirited attacks on Hillary, I kind of like it when Fox
    shows Wright screeching. Does that make me a bad person?

    Posted by: prof marcia Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 2:54 AM

  11. In answer to your question Marsha, yes it does.

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:05 AM

  12. prof:

    "He isn't good at candid responses. Clinton out-debates him every time. Obama does an okay job with scripted speeches, but I bet Darth Axelrod hires speech writers to do considerable editing."

    Hillary is the most scripted politician going. Don't think all those fabulous policy ideas and tricky arguments are all just popping into Hillary's head spontaneously.

    Every speech you hear - and every performance on a talk show (which tend to lack variety as she appears in 6 on one day to roll out the new talking points) - have been worked on tirelessly by the Clinton Machine.

    (And I suspect some in the media hate the Clintons because they often use them like puppets - despite the regular complaining we hear from the Clinton camp).

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:25 AM

  13. Obama is not an act. The message he is delivering on the campaign trail is the same one he has been talking about since 2002 (Iraq), 2004 (Red States vs. Blue States) and improving on the way politics is conducted in Washington (The Audacity of Hope - 2006).

    This is no "fairy tale". Obama is intelligent, hard-working and compassionate.

    And he has shown himself to be a skilled politician as well.

    (Wouldn't you agree? Look what he has been able to do against the Clinton Machine and their millions of loyal supporters....that is some pretty formidable competition ; )

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:33 AM

  14. “Hillary goes deeper and stronger in the Democratic base than Obama, but her challenge is that she doesn’t go as wide,” Mr. Hart said. “Obama goes much further reaching into the independent and Republican vote, and has a greater chance of creating a new electoral map for the Democrats.”

    Indeed, if Mr. Obama does become the first African-American nominee of a major party, the electoral landscape of the South could be transformed with the likelihood of strong turnout of black voters in Republican-leaning states like Georgia and Louisiana, which Mr. Obama carried this winter. (Mrs. Clinton has also argued that, given the Clinton roots, she could put at least Arkansas in play in the fall.)

    Obama advisers have also argued that swing states like Ohio

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/us/politics/24clinton.html?th&emc=th

    Posted by: BrianInNYC Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:35 AM

  15. I am off to Costa Rica.

    Carry on (and I hope no one storms out while I am gone - but of course I can't argue against taking a break.)

    Pura vida peeps!

    (that is what they say down in Costa . . . "pure life")

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:41 AM

  16. Couldn't let this one slide:

    McCain opposes equal pay bill in Senate

    Republican Sen. John McCain, campaigning through poverty-stricken cities and towns, said Wednesday he opposes a Senate bill that seeks equal pay for women because it would lead to more lawsuits.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080423/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_fair_pay

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 3:45 AM

  17. People in Oregon are referring to Mr.Obama as Chicken Little..

    Posted by: Oregon Democrat | April 24, 2008 3:48 AM

  18. Oregon TV News Coverage..

    Why won't Obama debate in Oregon???

    Posted by: Oregon Democrat | April 24, 2008 3:55 AM

  19. Brian,

    It was a rhetorical question. Incidentally, I can live with your biased opinion of me. Anyone who is okay with Rev. Wright ads questioning Obama must be a bad person. I completely understand your thinking.

    You must really be upset now that North Carolina Republicans have decided to run the Rev. Wright/Obama ads no matter what you think.

    Posted by: prof marcia Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 4:26 AM

  20. hahhahahaahha. LOL

    This will backfire if he doesn´t debate.

    He also went for a 10 day press hiatus....It got very little coverage. Only on FOX.....

    Posted by: Jason | April 24, 2008 4:27 AM

  21. If Obama is so "unscripted" and glib why does he "ah, ah" and stumble
    his way through so many of the debates? Senator Clinton clearly articulates her ideas every time no matter what the question. I'm just asking.

    Posted by: prof marcia Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 4:33 AM

  22. Hillary Clinton just raised ten million dollars online in less than 24 hours. Yet, Obama and his surrogates would like us to believe Americans want her out of
    the race. HA!

    Posted by: prof marcia Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 4:37 AM

  23. Obama is not good at talks he can't control. It is best for him that he does not debate. Even with all the help he gets from the media, it is not his best forum.

    This morning I was watching last nights Daily Show. I have not been as avid a watcher as I usually am. I am slowly but surely cutting out most of my TV. It is a good thing.

    Jon was making fun of Hillary for staying in this race. I wanted to jump into the TV and strangle him. Why do these morons on TV think that a intelligent, capable woman, who has wanted something all her life should just quit because many people, who don't know what they are doing, vote for someone they don't know much about. Are these people pod people? Have I gone nuts and this all makes sense??

    Also, what is this blue typekey someone mentioned.

    Posted by: ct | April 24, 2008 6:35 AM

  24. begala on Imus

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 6:42 AM

  25. PS. Now that I have mentioned that I could be nuts and have a good potential defense I will throw out a theory.

    I think the last two Republican presidents were men that were chosen to be figure heads while other powerful people pulled their strings.

    Maybe the Dems are going to try this also. What if Obama has been chosen to be a figure head with other powerful Dems pulling his strings? That is the only thing that explains what is happening.

    Don't hold this against me. I'm nuts.

    Posted by: ct | April 24, 2008 6:48 AM

  26. pod people and string pullers......sounds about right to me......ie business as usual............so much for "change"

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 6:54 AM

  27. you left out reagan......you know, the actor with alzheimers.......talk about figurehead......

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 6:57 AM

  28. Sturge,

    Re: Begala

    I'm listening to a streaming broadcast of WABC on my computer. His imitation of Carville was fantastic.

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:00 AM

  29. Sturg, I did mean Reagan.

    Posted by: ct | April 24, 2008 7:00 AM

  30. oh....sorry.....that makes it the last 3 unless you figure Bush 1 has a string in his hand, of course.......

    begala's great......

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 7:08 AM

  31. Sorry Sturg, you are right. I forgot about daddy George. I guess I am still asleep and having a nightmare.

    Posted by: ct | April 24, 2008 7:13 AM

  32. I've gotta ask this question to Warren:

    Empire or Jedi?

    By the way , I see Obama as either Lando or Han Solo.

    He's not Luke Skywalker and Hillary isn't Darth Vader. Because , as we all know , Darth Vader was Luke's father.

    Lando was smooth , but you didn't know whether you could trust him or not. You could trust him , but you weren't sure.

    Han Solo was an outsider , Just like Obama is a Washington outsider. Luke wasn't. Luke was fulfilling his destiny to be a jedi knight.

    If Obama is Han Solo , MSNBC is Princess Leia

    MSNBC: "I love you."
    Obama: "I know"

    BTW , Sturgeone , you are a voice of reason here. :)

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:20 AM

  33. Good Morning Craig, Everyone ☺
    Not much to say after being castigated and taken out of context yesterday.

    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:30 AM

  34. Warren,
    Thanks for the link on Rev Wright... So Rev Wrights ability to move on to peace and loving - Hope and Healing I could not find in his messages. Does Dean help right Wrights messages?

    This only reinforces the concern even with the full text.

    Mr Obama please answer.... Help us understand

    Posted by: Ping Pong Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:32 AM

  35. maybe rev. wright can hire some chicago poor
    as servants for his new 10mllion dollar mansion or
    get them some caddy jobs at the golf course next door

    Posted by: mqw | April 24, 2008 7:37 AM

  36. the remarks by Obama..Bitter and cling to their guns and religion are not going away..hence the Pennsylvania vote..and i believe Indiana will go for Clinton..these are the first votes after those remarks..Obama is done..Hillary will be the democratic nominee

    Posted by: emmy | April 24, 2008 7:38 AM

  37. Chicago isn't safe these days. Especially if you are a kid!

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:38 AM

  38. Corey.....
    ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

    guess that means Michelle is Chewbacca.....

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:39 AM

  39. Rove's oped in this mornings Journal is a must read. Its distilled essence is that there is only one remaining Democratic candidate with 'nads:
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120899654405739949.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:43 AM

  40. I had this guy I know come up to me last year at the grocery store , Renee. He said , "I can sound like Chewbacca! Wanna hear me?" He then proceeded to make this gurgling sound and ask , "How was that? Was it pretty good?" This guy also once told me that when he was 13 years-old they clocked his fastball at 90 mph and when he was 16 they clocked his fastball at 105 mph. My response was "I call bullsh*t!" He has a 105 mph fastball and he's a stocker at a grocery store?

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:44 AM

  41. corey........that doesnt bode well for "here".........

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 7:45 AM

  42. Corey said:
    This guy also once told me that when he was 13 years-old they clocked his fastball at 90 mph and when he was 16 they clocked his fastball at 105 mph. My response was "I call bullsh*t!" He has a 105 mph fastball and he's a stocker at a grocery store?

    but man oh man you oughta see him stock those shelves.........

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 7:48 AM

  43. Dick Gregory to be on Imus on Monday!

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:48 AM

  44. Rove, of course, knows what he's doing.....it's a reverse support.......If Rove is seeming to be for Hillary, then the idea is to drive Democrats away from her......what's so enigmatic about that?

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 7:51 AM

  45. Yeah , he was a quick draw with his pricing gun! Off to the dentist. Later all!

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 7:52 AM

  46. dick gregory......that's gotta be great.....

    I was going to join a wagon train and go out west......but then I found out they wanted ME to pull the wagon......

    --Dick Gregory sometime in the sixties

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 7:54 AM

  47. corey - Good one about MSNBC...and right on the money with Lando, too.

    The Rev Wright story won't go away, either. Just because the ad was aimed elsewhere, doesn't mean it won't have some sort of an effect. It also doesn't mean that the GOP won't do even worse down the road. Obama should step down.

    Here's how I'm making myself feel better about voting Rep if Obama is the nom:

    McCain theory: He's not looking at a second term anyway, so he's spouting the party line until he gets into office and then disassembles W's horrid policies & finds a way to bring most of our troops home without announcing it to the enemy.

    (And, no, Hil'ry as veep will not get me to vote for that arrogant, hollow, W-ish Obama.)

    Posted by: blueINdallas | April 24, 2008 7:57 AM

  48. the Rev Wright ad in NC is just to see how it plays so they can punch it up and flesh it out for November.......without costing them on the national stage......it's only NC, and only for the Gov race......
    Ha ha ha ha ha ha

    silly republicans.........

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 8:00 AM

  49. MoJo was all anti-Obama this AM.

    I guess he finally got the GOP memo.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:21 AM

  50. The NC ad is part of the same pattern that we saw with Richard Mellon Scaife endorsing Hillary.

    The vast right wing conspiracy is now backing Hillary.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:24 AM

  51. Flatus,

    I read the Rove thing this morning. The SD's need to read that and think about it. It lays out Obama's problem in brutal detail.

    Posted by: Bowmanc Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:25 AM

  52. Mojo and Matthews say that that Hillary's supporters are "Reagan Democrats."

    They are older, socially conservative (code word for racist) democrats who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004.


    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:27 AM

  53. mojo and matthews possess between them all the relevance of a stale jelly donut........

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 8:30 AM

  54. I see that the Hillary people are now listening to Rove to help them clarify their thinking.

    Why don't you all just JOIN the GOP and get it over with?
    Hillary is one step away from it. She's marching steadily to the right, day after day.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:31 AM

  55. On Hardball Matthews showed an attack ad about Obama's vote against a bill to toughen the sentences of gangland criminals and it was one the most POWERFUL ads I have seen. The panel of pundits including Joan Walsh and Roger Simon were all shocked and one said in unison with my wife and I "WOW," The ad is pure dynamite and yet is "not racist" said Simon but an ad that is incredibly chilling. If this portends the type of ad Obama will face his personal negatives will rise greatly and make him the weakest of contenders, a Michael Dukakis with more baggage.

    toast

    Posted by: Milquetoast | April 24, 2008 8:34 AM

  56. What is happening now in the Democratic party is that a minority of "Republi-crats," backed by the GOP and the MSM, are trying to destroy the primary campaign leader.

    We'll just have to see if the voters in the remaining primaries will buy into this, and whether the superdelegates wise up.

    If they don't, the Democratic party will become a subsidiary of the GOP.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:38 AM

  57. Hillary marches to the beat of a different democratic drummer.......you know........the one who gets to play when their candidate actually WINS an election........

    McCarthy, Mondale, McGovern, Dukakis, Kerry, Gore.....yes, we democrats dont wish to actually win elections.....what principle does that show?

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 8:38 AM

  58. Toast, did they suggest that the ad was being broadcast somewhere? Who sponsored it?

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:39 AM

  59. Nash, every time you climb on your soapbox and start waving your polarized banner, I check my bank balance to see if I can afford another contribution to Mrs Clinton's campaign.

    Thanks for keeping me focused!

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:43 AM

  60. mornin', all -

    nash, you must have missed the anti-Hillary rap mojo gave. Bottom line was give it up, the race is over, bad math, etc. You would have approved.

    And Mojo and Matthews are, as usual, and as typical for republicans, oversimplifying everything about Hillary's supporters and getting it wrong. Just as a f'rinstance, how many Reagan Democrats do you think are her supporters here? Maybe one?

    The older, socially conservative voters (you know, the racist ones) are likely going to go for McCain - you know, those southern republican voters who came and voted in the dem primaries in the deep south against Hillary - and believe me, the older socially conservative voters in the south are not fans of Bill or Hillary - they still have their Bush/Cheney '00 and '04 bumper stickers on their cars down there - and who Barack thinks he's converted.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:45 AM

  61. Isn't it obvious? The GOP WANTS to run against Hillary.

    She and Bill are two of the most personally corrupt, dishonest, and morally bankrupt politicians in the country.

    The GOP has collected a vast supply of dirt to use against them in the general election. (i.e. the blue dress.)

    Obama, on the other hand, will be harder for them to attack. He doesn't have as much baggage.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:46 AM

  62. Are we in some sort of time warp here? Craig's byline reads April 25 (tomorrow) 6:00 am (first post by Warren was 1:09 am.) yet noone seems to have noticed.

    ...as I write this (and submit for the 3rd time) strange space music is playing in the background.

    Posted by: patd Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:46 AM

  63. nash......that's pure gibberish.

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 8:48 AM

  64. Craig may have "mis-wrote".

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 8:51 AM

  65. The Democratic party is in the process of tying itself in knots but now the GOP and the MSM are jumping in the mix and making things worse.

    In November, you Hillary supporters may wake up and find that Hillary lost and McCain is the President-elect and you'll be saying, "What happened?"

    And then you'll say, "It must have been Obama's fault."

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:52 AM

  66. Obama, on the other hand, will be harder for them to attack. He doesn't have as much baggage

    LOL
    now that was funny.

    Jack

    Posted by: whskyjack | April 24, 2008 8:53 AM


  67. Flatus, I believe it is going to air this week in either NC or a western state? I cannot remember who the sponsor is but it is by the team used to create the Willie Horten ad.

    toast

    Posted by: Milquetoast | April 24, 2008 8:53 AM

  68. Good morning all.

    $10 million in 24 hours

    60,000 NEW DONORS

    Quote of the week: "What we need to do is stop this whining and stop this namby-pambyism."

    Personal thought: Heather please hang in there and don't let the Obamaniacs get to you - you have facts on your side.

    Have a great day - work/school too busy to hang out here very much. :-(

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:55 AM

  69. What is happening now in the Democratic party is that a minority of "Republi-crats," backed by the GOP and the MSM, are trying to destroy the primary campaign leader.

    Posted by: nash

    Obama's wounds are self inflicted.

    toast

    Posted by: Milquetoast | April 24, 2008 8:56 AM

  70. "And then you'll say, "It must have been Obama's fault.""

    LOL

    That is a classic example of what Psychologists call projecting.

    Jack

    Posted by: whskyjack | April 24, 2008 8:56 AM

  71. "Nash, every time you climb on your soapbox and start waving your polarized banner, I check my bank balance to see if I can afford another contribution to Mrs Clinton's campaign."

    Flatus - me too - Nash may now qualify as a Hillraiser with all the money he's raised for Hillary from this blog.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:58 AM

  72. How is the popular vote being calculated. The normal primary like PA all the votes are counted but how are the others counted.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 8:59 AM

  73. "Flatus, I believe it is going to air this week in either NC or a western state?"

    It starts airing today in North Carolina and the ad "supposedly" is directed at some down ballot races..."supposedly".

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:02 AM

  74. Thanks, Wendy.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:05 AM

  75. begala being re-played on Imus at nine-thirty.......the carville impression alone is worth the price of admission.

    Posted by: sturgeone | April 24, 2008 9:07 AM

  76. Craig, where is a post about Hillary Clinton's "Bizarro World" that she must live in to keep reinterpreting the math, the rules, or whatever it is she's decided to change into her favor today?

    It is unbelievable to me that people would fall for her crap. The Obama people need to run an ad showing in her own words how many times she changed positions on the primary.

    Okay, stepping down now.

    Posted by: JennBe Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:07 AM

  77. Hillary's camp spin yesterday was they were leading in the popular vote, the only way I see that is you count FL & MI and you can still use the uncommited for votes for Obama and take out the caucuses and I have her leading by 100,000 or so votes. With everything I have Obama winning by 360,000 or so votes. I still don't know how the caucuses are counted but I took CNN vote counts.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:09 AM

  78. It's time for Obama to go negative. The Clintons are easy targets. If you gave me a day, I could write a dozen devastating ads, and I'm an amateur.

    #1 would be an ad saying that Clinton voted for the Iraq war, even though she knew it was wrong, because she was AFRAID OF LOOKING WEAK. In the background I'd show shots of flag draped-coffins returning from Iraq. I'd have wounded vets saying "Hillary betrayed us."

    Let's see if Hillary is comfortable in THAT kitchen.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:12 AM

  79. Flatus, et al

    The ad that is being called a "willie Horton" ad against
    Obama may be viewed at Taylor Marsh's website.

    The ad was created by the same guy who created the
    willie horton ad.

    It is about gang violence in Chicago & legislation about
    the death penalty tha Obama voted against.

    Also. abcnews has Obama's explanation as to why
    he voted against it--the bill was vetoed by then Governor Ryan. I

    Sorry, tried to link but somehow, I could not get it here.

    Posted by: Coreen | April 24, 2008 9:13 AM

  80. "It's time for Obama to go negative"

    Another funny one.

    Obama has been negative since January.

    Jack

    Posted by: whskyjack | April 24, 2008 9:15 AM

  81. Obama attack ad #2: "Billy-goat"

    Voiceover: "Do we want to have a sexual predator roaming the halls of the White House, again?" Shots of cigars, blue dresses, thong underwear, and pizza boxes. "Do we want a President who can't stop this from happening, again?"

    "Vote for Obama. He can keep it in his pants. And he HAS one."

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:18 AM

  82. Obama ad on Iraq

    Yes I spoke out against the war but then I voted for all the funding and did nothing once I got elected.

    It's easy to be against the war when William Ayers is your audience. Harder when you get inside the beltway

    Posted by: Nashetta | April 24, 2008 9:19 AM

  83. My other question for Hillary in ad would be why is spending so much money on staff? 200,000 dollars a month to Wolfson? Seems to me, she more concerned with making her staff rich with the money she raises rather than using it to run a winning campaign.

    Posted by: JennBe Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:20 AM

  84. Flatus, et al

    There are 2 ads that are out there--the Rev Wright
    clips (by the NC Rep. party) being used to attack
    dem. candidates in NC & the gang violence ad--both
    can be viewed at Taylor Marsh's site.

    Here is the abcnews Obama rebuttal to the gang
    violence ad.

    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/how-republicans.html

    Posted by: Coreen | April 24, 2008 9:21 AM

  85. ct

    Go to http://www.typekey.com

    Register and get your name as you want it to appear here and your password. Come back here and on the left side you will see a box to check after you enter your name and password.

    It will ask if you want to share your email. Click yes. Then click "remember me"

    Once your message posts, you should show a little blue key (see above for the people with keys).

    If you checked "remember me", from that point on you won't need to do anything but type in a comment and hit submit.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:21 AM

  86. Obama in the White

    Voice over of Rev Wright

    I hate whitey and white people not welcome in the Blackhouse now.

    Rap music and pictures and stories of Chicago gang violence. Kwanza not Christmas

    Posted by: Nashetta | April 24, 2008 9:22 AM

  87. Thank you Nash..even though I made a Hillary donation yesterday, I'm now going to make another one.

    Posted by: Oregon Democrat | April 24, 2008 9:23 AM

  88. Thanks Coreen, I'll try to search it out. That Willie Horton one was devastating despite being a shameful misrepresentation.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:23 AM

  89. "MoJo was all anti-Obama this AM.
    I guess he finally got the GOP memo."

    Maybe he just got sick and tired of the one sided, totally biased, and irrational media slam against Sen. Clinton.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:23 AM

  90. w-jack: You think Obama has been negative?

    I know negative.
    Negative is a friend of mine.
    That. sir, is not negative.

    But if Obama would just hire me, I'd make the Willie Horton ad look like a Hallmark card. After I got through with them, the Clintons would have to move to France.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:26 AM

  91. Floyd Brown is back.

    "Brown, the former political director of "Americans for Bush" (meaning George H.W. Bush), was a key player in the infamous 1988 "Willie Horton" ad, and his new group the National Campaign Fund -- which launched a new website "Expose Obama" -- aims to take a similarly low-road approach to the presidential race and his new target, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois.

    The subject of the ad is Obama's record on gang violence, which in recent days has become a real problem in Obama's home town of Chicago."


    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/04/how-republicans.html

    Posted by: GORDO | April 24, 2008 9:28 AM

  92. Vote for Obama. He can keep it in his pants. And he HAS one."

    Really not according to Michelle --she wears the device and the pants in their family...it's a pump

    Posted by: Concern Trolls for Obama | April 24, 2008 9:28 AM

  93. Flatus

    This should be the Obama gang violence ad.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cabl0KSFUqoad through youtube

    Posted by: Coreen | April 24, 2008 9:29 AM

  94. "Obama has been negative since January."

    Jack...even before that he was calling her a liar and making his arrogant tea party cracks.

    I laughed when I read that too.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:30 AM

  95. OD: I'm sure Mark Penn will enjoy spending your donation.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:31 AM

  96. Nasch

    What a silly man you are. I'll bet you get to keep it in your pants...

    Posted by: Ariana | April 24, 2008 9:31 AM

  97. "Thank you Nash..even though I made a Hillary donation yesterday, I'm now going to make another one."

    Me too...Flatus?

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:33 AM

  98. Ariana: I don't like cigars, if that's what you mean.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:35 AM

  99. Mojo and Matthews say that that Hillary's supporters are "Reagan Democrats."

    They are older, socially conservative (code word for racist) democrats who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004.


    Posted by: nash | April 24, 2008 8:27 AM

    ====================================================

    Nash:

    This may come as a shock to your system but socially conservative people of good conscience are not racist we do not have to wallow in the depths of social depravity to prove we are not racists.

    It is moronic remarks like that... that make it impossible to take you seriously and allow you any credibility at all.

    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:35 AM

  100. "They are older, socially conservative (code word for racist) democrats who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004." - Nash

    First of all, socially conservative is two words. Second, socially conservative is generally taken to mean anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage.

    It seems to be a consistent pattern with many Obama supporters that see racism lurking around every corner. Of course racism can be inferred into just about anything, if that's what one wants to see. Perhaps the best example of this is the view of former Pres. Clinton as a racist. That is patently false by any reasonable standard, yet he is now perceived by some to be the 21st century's Jim Crow. Not only is it utterly ridiculous but it demeans the good name of all those that fought real racism.

    The unintended by-product of this hysteria is that people begin to just tune it out and when there is a real incidence of bad behavior, it is lumped with the many false alarms and simply ignored.

    Posted by: QuitFoolingAround Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:36 AM

  101. David Axelrod, has seen at least $12 million paid to his Chicago-based firm, where David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, was a partner until he left to go work for the campaign. (Plouffe makes $12,000 a month in salary.) Obama has paid his chief pollster, Joel Benenson, $635,000 so far.

    Clinton's campaign pays for health insurance not Obama.

    Posted by: Concern Trolls for Obama | April 24, 2008 9:39 AM

  102. When you are talking older , how old are you talking about? 50? 60? 70? 80? There are a lot of socially conservative people here in Holland. I've never heard them called racists. Most are just called Dutch people.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:39 AM

  103. Heather: I guess the kitchen is too hot for you today. It's OK when Hillary does it, but not when someone else does it to her. Then it's "depraved."

    I wish you Hillary people would make up your minds about negative campaigning. For days you've been hammering Obama because "he can't take it." And you've been saying that Hillary is "immune." She's not.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:41 AM

  104. This may not be same guy , but there is a statue of Willie Horton at Comerica Park in Detroit. I took a picture of it when I went to a Tigers game last year.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:42 AM

  105. CTFO, Because people making $200,000 a MONTH need thier health care payed for by HRC

    Posted by: JennBe Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:45 AM

  106. he Washington Post reports this morning via an anonymous Democratic strategist that the Obama camp may seek to remind voters of the less impressive days of the Clinton administration:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/23/obama-camp-may-turn-to-ne_n_98157.html

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:45 AM

  107. The first person to mention the Massachusetts furlough program in the 1988 presidential campaign was Al Gore. During a debate at the Felt Forum sponsored by the New York Daily News, Gore took issue with the furlough program and brought up the Horton incident.

    Republicans would pick up the Horton issue after Dukakis clinched the nomination. In June 1988, Republican candidate George H.W. Bush seized on the Horton case, bringing it up repeatedly in campaign speeches. Bush's campaign manager, Lee Atwater, predicted that "by the time this election is over, Willie Horton will be a household name."[3] Media consultant Roger Ailes remarked "the only question is whether we depict Willie Horton with a knife in his hand or without it."[4]


    [edit] The index card
    In April 1988, Lee Atwater asked aide Jim Pinkerton for negative research to defeat Dukakis. Pinkerton returned with reams of material that Atwater told him to reduce to a 3x5 index card, telling him, "I'm giving you one thing. You can use both sides of the 3x5 card." Pinkerton discovered the furlough issue by watching the Felt Forum debate. On May 25, 1988, Republican consultants met in Paramus, New Jersey holding a focus group of Democrats who had voted for Ronald Reagan in 1984. After giving the focus group the material Pinkerton provided on the index card, most of the voters switched from favoring Dukakis to favoring Bush. These focus groups convinced Atwater and the other Republican consultants that they should 'go negative' against Dukakis. Further information regarding the furlough came from aide Andy Card, a Massachusetts native whom President George W. Bush later named as his chief of staff. [5]


    [edit] Jumping the gun
    Although commercials about Willie Horton were not run until the fall campaign, Bush first mentioned him at the Texas Republican convention on June 9, 1988. The following week at the Illinois Republican convention in Springfield, Bush began to press the argument against Dukakis by declaring that Dukakis had let Horton loose to 'terrorize innocent people' and continued support of the furlough program until the Massachusetts legislature changed the law. Bush again mentioned Horton at the National Sherrifs Association in Louisville, Kentucky and declared himself in favor of 'life without parole' for convicted murderers.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Horton

    Posted by: Lee and Jimmy P | April 24, 2008 9:46 AM

  108. Heather

    For me false charges of racism are as morally reprehensible as racism its self.
    That is why I have no respect for Nash.
    I suspect he thinks he is funny, but then so does the bigot that tells racist jokes.

    Jack

    Posted by: whskyjack | April 24, 2008 9:46 AM

  109. "He has a 105 mph fastball and he's a stocker at a grocery store?"

    No control. He beheaded the first base umpire?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:51 AM

  110. Stock in trade of the Obama campaign

    "anonymous sources"

    Probably Arianna and DAvid Geffen sipping champagne on his yacht.

    Oh yes, Hillary Clinton killed her lesbian lover Vince Foster in front of the travel office staff that's why she had them fired.

    Formerly the Obama campaign argued the rightwing would use this kind of crap but Scaife's change of heart indicates he even admitted prior to the campaign
    he was wrong.

    But the Obama campaign still promotes the righwing lies. Must still be a lot of snow in Maine.

    Posted by: Concern Trolls for Obama | April 24, 2008 9:51 AM

  111. In important happenings...Red Wings host the Avalance tonight.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 9:55 AM

  112. Craig

    There is also an ad in Louisiana trying to pair Rep. Don Cazayoux with Obama and Pelosi.

    http://rothenbergpoliticalreport.blogspot.com/2008/04/la-6-obama-debuts-in-gop-ad.html

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6HszQqFT8

    Jack

    Posted by: whskyjack | April 24, 2008 9:59 AM

  113. paul begala was great on Imus. Just heard the replay, his impression of Carville was right on.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:00 AM

  114. VaDaryl
    "How is the popular vote being calculated."

    It is all rather arcane, but in the caucus states, some report actual popular vote and others don't. For the ones that do, it's straight forward. For the ones that don't it is guess work since you have to work backwards from the delegate vote and the location where that delegate vote happened since different locations are given different weights. The best you can do is come close to the count.

    As close as I can tell if you leave out Michigan but count Florida, she is still behind by a little. If you give her Michigan, she is ahead. If you give her Michigan but give him all the "uncommitted", then she is behind by a little again.

    A lot will hinge on the margin in North Carolina. If she can keep it close or even win. (call me crazy but I think it's possible), then I think a legitimate claim to the popular vote could be made.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:01 AM

  115. From today's NYT: Race a factor in Dem nomination

    But just when it seemed that the Democratic Party was close to anointing Mr. Obama as its nominee, he lost yet again in a big general election state, dragged down by his weakness among blue-collar voters, older voters and white voters. The composition of Mrs. Clinton’s support — or, looked at another way, the makeup of voters who have proved reluctant to embrace Mr. Obama — has Democrats wondering, if not worrying, about what role race may be playing.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:11 AM

  116. You know , this election would be much easier on us if we were choosing between two white males instead of Hillary and Obama. No racism or sexism charges to deal with.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:17 AM

  117. I am confused why Hillary and her camp is spiining that she has the most votes. She needs to be correct with everything now and not feed the media with anything more to hammer her on. It's close and if things fall right she can get the popular vote lead. She needs FL & MI and so do the Dems in November.

    Posted by: vadaryl Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:17 AM

  118. The Clintons played the race card and their followers (as we have seen on Crawfordslist) let them get away with it.

    The end result will be that McCain will win.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:17 AM

  119. The same article points to other issues besides race]
    such as Obama's elitism image

    "While arguably critical to determining the viability of Mr. Obama’s candidacy, the role of race is difficult to disentangle from the other strands of the political debate surrounding him, encompassing topics like values, elitism, ideology and experience. "
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/us/politics/24obama.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1209046496-eGiyi+qQGYI7fyHgj/7naA

    Posted by: Sweeping Up | April 24, 2008 10:18 AM

  120. nash - JennBe is a good example of how the republicans want to run against Hillary. Wake up, have a cuppa.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:18 AM

  121. Correction to my earlier post:

    70,000 NEW DONORS

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:19 AM

  122. Corey,

    Detroit statue:

    It must be the same guy. There couldn't possibly be two Willie Hortons in America.

    On your pitcher/grocery clerk, 105 mph sounds like an exaggeration, but Jamie's right, if he can't get it over the plate, he'd better at least make sure he stacks the cans of peas correctly.

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:20 AM

  123. "has Democrats wondering, if not worrying, about what role race may be playing."

    Nash, My guess is that racial animosity is a factor in about 10% of the vote on Sen. Clinton's side of the scale. That is the negative.

    On the positive side, A large number of women take into consideration that Hillary is a woman, they are proud of her and they vote for her. A large number of the AA population take into consideration that Sen. Obama is of their heritage. They are proud of him and they vote for him.

    To automatically say that all the white people voting for Sen. Clinton are racists or that all the black people voting for Sen Obama are misogynists is just plain stupid. Now where the media is concerned, both attitudes are probably more true since, particularly on cable, they tend to reflect the extremes of attitudes in society.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:23 AM

  124. Dear whskyjack:

    Thank you for the kind words and I totally agree with you!

    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:24 AM

  125. Heather:

    Don't let 'em drag you down. You do a great job with your posts. There are more people here who appreciate your contributions than not. To castigators and takers-out-of-context, I would say, "Your opinion of me is none of my business."

    Posted by: Ivy Green | April 24, 2008 10:26 AM

  126. "The composition of Mrs. Clinton’s support — or, looked at another way, the makeup of voters who have proved reluctant to embrace Mr. Obama — has Democrats wondering, if not worrying, about what role race may be playing."

    Perhaps different questions should be posed. According to exit polling data in PA, Sen. Obama got 90% of the votes from blacks and over 40% of the votes from whites. On their face, those statistics seem to be at odds.

    Why are so few black voters willing to embrace Sen. Clinton? Did race play a factor in their decision?

    Posted by: QuitFoolingAround Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:27 AM

  127. Pogo

    "JennBe is a good example of how the republicans want to run against Hillary."

    JennBe is a good example of someone who doesn't have a clue about how the health care system actually works.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:28 AM

  128. Jamie: If perhaps 10% of whites would never vote for a black person, wouldn't you agree that there may 10% of men who would never vote for a woman? Is there the potential that it all evens out?

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:30 AM

  129. And, along these lines, isn't it possible that there are at least 10% of women who will never vote for a white man for President ever again? (ha)

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:31 AM

  130. Oprah.com Community: OBAMA! ...Dec 12, 2007 ... And, yes, I did catch her racist remark that it's "our turn"

    Nash tell Oprah to stop it!

    Posted by: Code words | April 24, 2008 10:32 AM

  131. Obama is just having trouble closing the deal. He's more Todd Jones (Detroit Tigers reliever) than he is Mariano Rivera.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:32 AM

  132. And Jamie: Yes, can you just imagine the headlines if Hillary didn't provide health care coverage for her employees? Yowsa!

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:32 AM

  133. "If you don't like the way I finish games , just go to your kitchen , fix yourself a sandwich and come back in 15 minutes and it'll be all over." - Todd Jones

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:36 AM

  134. Michelle Obama: "I'm A Big Fan Of Accessories. I'm Married To One"
    Huffington Post | April 9, 2008 04:54 PM

    Posted by: Does not have one | April 24, 2008 10:42 AM

  135. "Hillary didn't provide health care coverage for her employees? Yowsa!"

    Totally ignoring the fact that the coverage never lapsed and the bill was paid before the news item ever appeared.

    Doesn't take any imagination. It happened. One of the less delightful aspects of a free press is that they are allowed to be as stupid and biased as they like.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:42 AM

  136. nash, that is very helpful advice to Hillary's camp. I'm certain that her staff will take the level of your support for her into account when the consider it.

    You are certainly on a race kick this morning. Let's be correct - Bill compared Obbama's SC results to Jesse Jackson's, said they both ran great campaigns there. Obama followers claimed Bill was playing the race card. Jackson, one of ehth 2 subjects of Bill's remarks, who supports Obama and who is no stranger to racial comments against him, said he didn't believe Clinton meant it as a racial remark and he didn't perceive it as such.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:43 AM

  137. hey folks, a word of caution about Obama camp buzzing the media with talk of a coming mass of SuperDs -- they also said that six weeks ago on the day they lost Ohio: http://thepage.time.com/2008/03/04/tom-brokaw-says-obama-has-50-more-superdelegates-in-his-back-pocket/

    Posted by: Craig Crawford | April 22, 2008 5:33 PM

    Yes, where are all those Super Ds? Anyone?

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:43 AM

  138. jamie, re: jennbe, you could be right - I didn't intend to comment on that. I am just countering nash's comment that the repubs want to run against Hillary. Jennbe is one of what, 2 active repub posters here recently (counting her and Ping), and she's rabidly anti clinton. I didn't mean to comment on her knowledge of healthcare or lack thereof. So at least half of the repubs here apparently would rather run against Obama. But then, there are no shades of gray in nash's comments this morning - kind of sounds like a republican today.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:49 AM

  139. Pogo

    "Bill compared Obbama's SC results to Jesse Jackson's, said they both ran great campaigns there"

    But Nash thinks there is nothing wrong (which there isn't) when all the news media report the heavy AA turnout in Philadelphia and other major cities. In fact this morning they are all reporting that NC will have about a 10% increase in the usual already heavy AA vote which will make it harder for Sen. Clinton to come close or win. I guess all those news folks are racists as well.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:51 AM

  140. Jamie: Jeez...I missed the health coverage story...

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:52 AM

  141. jamie - under the new rules everyone except Obama supporters is (are?) racist.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:54 AM

  142. Yes, where are all those Super Ds? Anyone?
    Posted by: Ally

    I think Jimmy Carter could surprise everyone and be a Jane Fonda moment?

    toast

    Posted by: Milquetoast | April 24, 2008 10:56 AM

  143. Dear Ivy Green:

    It was very sweet of you to say that and I deeply appreciate it.
    It may be a simple act of kindness but it means more to me than you may realize thank you so much Ivy Green ☺ <3

    Sincerely,
    Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:57 AM

  144. The only reason Jimmy Carter hasn't officially endorsed Obama is because it would hurt, not help him. Kind of like Bob Casey. He should have said thanks but no thanks that guy too.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:59 AM

  145. Random thought from the Pong

    We need to elect based on ability to be President, Not on ability to run for President

    McCain / Romney 08

    second Choice
    Hillary and anyone but BHO

    Posted by: Ping Pong Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 10:59 AM

  146. Second Random Thought -- OK lots of people are talking about it.

    BHO will be easier to defeat,

    Go BHO

    Posted by: Ping Pong Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:01 AM

  147. Corey.....
    ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!

    guess that means Michelle is Chewbacca.....

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee | April 24, 2008 7:39 AM

    Well now that you mention it, she even looks a bit like ... oh never mind!

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:01 AM

  148. Careful ET...dangerous territory.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:02 AM

  149. Terrorist Fundraisers for Obama

    "Two years ago, Hatem El-Hady was the chairman of the Toledo, Ohio-based Islamic charity, Kindhearts, which was closed bt the US government in February 2006 for terrorist fundraising and all its assets frozen. Today, El-Hady has redirected his fundraising efforts for his newest cause - Barack Obama for President.

    El-Hady has his own dedicated page on Barack Obama's official website, chronicling his fundraising on behalf of the Democratic Party presidential candidate (his Obama profile established on February 19, 2008 - two years to the day after Kindhearts was raided by the feds). Not only that, but he has none other than Barack Obama's wife, Michelle Obama, listed as one of his friends ..."

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=6203178D-C782-42E2-8D56-765A3D7EDCD7

    Posted by: GORDO | April 24, 2008 11:03 AM

  150. Does this make me a Racist?

    I do equally disagree with anyone with Socialist practice. I will admit that, and also those that do not promote and demand individuals to be responsible and contribute to our society according to ability.

    So if that makes me a racist?

    Posted by: Ping Pong Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:04 AM

  151. Here's the NYT article nash was drawing from. His comments about Clinton's supporters are a paraphrase and overreaching recitation of Axelrod's assesment of Clinton's supporters that leave no question about the racist intent of the comments. Axelrod was less direct and more coded in his words. In truth, I don't think Axelrod was making the same suggestion as nash - I imagine Axelrod understands and would admit that much of Obama's support is racially based.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/24/us/politics/24obama.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:05 AM

  152. I know many times a day they play the Liberty Mutual Commercials, which I love instead of race baiting and leveling charges of racism and bigotry at each other please click this link and let each of us do something kind for one another


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76h8jbjZqOI

    Thank You

    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:05 AM

  153. This doesn't advance the debate at all, but a friend forwarded it to me, so I'm doing the same.

    Disclaimer: No real doctors were used and no actual surgeries took place for this story.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    A Japanese doctor said, "Medicine in my country is so advanced that we can take a kidney out of one man, put it in another, and have him looking for work in six weeks."

    A German doctor said, "That's nothing, we can take a lung out of one person, put it in another, and have him looking for work in four weeks."

    A British doctor said, "In my country, medicine is so advanced that we can take half of a heart out of one person, put it in another, and have them both looking for work in two weeks."

    A Texas doctor, not to be outdone said, "You guys are way behind. We took a man with no brains out of Texas, put him in the White House, and now half the country is looking for work."
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Amending disclaimer: Well okay, maybe the last one did happen.

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:08 AM

  154. Rove's oped in this mornings Journal is a must read. Its distilled essence is that there is only one remaining Democratic candidate with 'nads:
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120899654405739949.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

    Posted by: Flatus | April 24, 2008 7:43 AM

    You know, I think I'd take ANYTHING Rove has to say with not even a grain of salt. He is a shrewd, evil man who wants nothing more than to see the Dems self-destruct in November. I read the article, but I found nothing there that was comforting at all for either candidate. A couple criticisms could be considered valid, but overall it seemed to stick the fingers in the eyes of both candidates and, by default, those of us who are DEMS and want to see a viable win in November.

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:09 AM

  155. They are older, socially conservative (code word for racist) democrats who voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004.


    Posted by: nash | April 24, 2008 8:27 AM

    Nash seems to be OBSESSED with so-called "code words"....

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:11 AM

  156. Ping Pong

    "I do equally disagree with anyone with Socialist practice."

    It doesn't make you a racist. It does mean that you may not completely understand the tenets of Socialism (which by the way is totally different from Communism even though often confused). Even that supposed paragon of Capitalism, Adam Smith, considered certain conditions now called Socialism as being beneficial.

    To make it simple, there are certain parts of group dynamics that function better and are actually cheaper if the benefits are spread equally while the expense might be borne unequally simply because it is better for the group as a whole.

    Each society has to decide what those parts should be.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:15 AM

  157. See, 50/50 on republicans supporting/opposing Clinton as opponent as opposed to Obama. thanks Ping, and I can say without hesitation, I have never noticed you saying anything that suggested that you might be racist.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:16 AM

  158. It's time for Obama to go negative. The Clintons are easy targets. If you gave me a day, I could write a dozen devastating ads, and I'm an amateur.

    #1 would be an ad saying that Clinton voted for the Iraq war, even though she knew it was wrong, because she was AFRAID OF LOOKING WEAK. In the background I'd show shots of flag draped-coffins returning from Iraq. I'd have wounded vets saying "Hillary betrayed us."

    Let's see if Hillary is comfortable in THAT kitchen.

    Posted by: nash | April 24, 2008 9:12 AM

    Nash, it's TIME for Obama to go negative? Are you for real? He started his negative attacks against her when she was in first place in the polls... remember the less that stellar debate performance she had? Obama was already taking her on after her campaign determined he had to in order to turn the numbers around. To their credit it worked. So much for "new politics"...

    As Hillary said at the time "they [OBAMA and the other candidates] are not attacking me because I am a woman... they are attacking me because I'm ahead".

    Really Nash, your credibility is taking a serious hit here. You are so partisan for Obama that you don't even see the shit his campaign has done in the most traditional ways possible, to knock down Hillary. And then you expect her to bend over and say "please kick me again".

    And Nash, Ive asked like 3 times now... and I have to wonder. Are you really an academic professor or not? All I asked was the discipline and you totally ignore it. Why? I mean you said you're a professor, so why not say "Professor of [you fill in the blank]"... Or is "professor" just a pet word for your desire to educate people via blogs and so forth? And yes, it probably isn't any of our business, but it does seem weird that you are so quiet about it.

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:20 AM

  159. As always, the Republicans planned to make this election about "social issues."

    Now that Obama is probably going to win the nomination, the key GOP social issue will be race.

    And the Clintons were nice enough to get the ball rolling early. They have convinced large numbers of Democrats that "a black man can't win." (This also provides cover for the racists in the party who wouldn't vote for Obama under any circumstances.)

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:21 AM

  160. pogo, an apology, I am "green" as a blogger and therefore unfamiliar and my post was an error.

    toast


    Heather, a lovely sentiment. 11;05 post

    toast

    Posted by: Milquetoast | April 24, 2008 11:22 AM

  161. The Clintons played the race card and their followers (as we have seen on Crawfordslist) let them get away with it.

    The end result will be that McCain will win.

    Posted by: nash | April 24, 2008 10:17 AM

    jeez man, cool it! Someone get this guy some medication!!

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:24 AM

  162. When you are talking older , how old are you talking about? 50? 60? 70? 80? There are a lot of socially conservative people here in Holland. I've never heard them called racists. Most are just called Dutch people.

    Posted by: Corey | April 24, 2008 9:39 AM

    Corey ? Here in Holland? I thought you were in the states...

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:26 AM

  163. Nash

    "They have convinced large numbers of Democrats that "a black man can't win."

    Would you care to provide specifics of where and when they did this, or is this just another one of your no proof empty remarks?

    I've heard both of the Clintons say that there is no doubt he could win, but that they believe she would be a better president.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | April 24, 2008 11:26 AM

  164. toast, what you talkin' 'bout? From yesterday? I think you just confused my byline, which was above, with jamie's comment which was below and thought I had posted the comment.

    Posted by: pogo Author Profile Page |