Hillary's Bosnian Fib Play

| | Comments (254)

Given the endless parsing of Clintonian motives, it would seem fitting to suspect that the great Bosnian fib was not so accidental. It is possible that Hillary Rodham Clinton benefited from her "mistake," as she called her recent assertion of once landing in Bosnia under sniper fire.

Although seemingly embarrassing for her, this episode did serve to provoke repeated airings of video showing Clinton on her trip to Bosnia 12 years ago looking more like a Commander in Chief than like a First Lady. While hardly arriving under a hail of bullets, as she has repeatedly claimed, the video clips do show Clinton in a much grittier setting than anything that might be expected for a purely ceremonial visit.

Not saying this flap was clearly purposeful. Just saying that the visuals are not entirely bad for Clinton. And this could be one of those stories where the pictures register with voters more than the controversy itself.

Craig at the Virginia Festival of the Book
Saturday (3/29) 2:00 PM EST
Barnes & Noble, 1035A Emmet Street
Charlottesville, VA  (434) 984-0461

 

Craig on MSNBC's "Morning Joe"
Thursday (3/27) 6:30 AM EST

 

    Comments

  1. By the by -- Just as the Clinton team has daily and weekly talking points about message that the campaign strategists want to go out, so does the Obama team.

    The latest Obama talking point is for Hillary to drop out lest she "continue to destroy party unity." The biggest talker n this point has been Bill Richardson this week -- said while Obama took his vacation (another strategic ploy -- to convey that he has the nominaion wrapped). Like lemmings to the sea, most pundits have repeated this campaign talking point, giving it an air of viability.

    The reality is several issues have emerged to bump the Obama momentum. He's had a horrible month of one negative story after another concerning his relationship with the racist minister preaching anti-American sentiment, his close association with federally-indicted slum lord Tony Rezko, his friendship with convicted bombers Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorhn.

    Hillary Clinton's polling numbers have surged in the last three weeks. She has a 20 point lead in Pennsylvania, and pulled to even in North Carolina. This worries the Obama camp and hence the latest talking point strategy to posit that Hillary Clinton "can't win" therefore she should be a lady and just drop out of the race. If you were dropping like a stone in the polls in two critical states that would be just the ploy to use to undercut your opponent. Put out the lie that your opponent can't win -- so people won't vote for her. Another sneaky sleight of hand tactic from the O-Team.

    Voters beware.

    Posted by: Divalicias | March 26, 2008 6:13 AM

  2. Apparently it must be MOST hard to elect a McGovern.....

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 6:13 AM

  3. Good Morning Craig, Everyone:

    You have an interesting take on Hillary's Bosnia issue and I agree with it. Honestly outside of opposition hatred for Hillary I don't understand why it is such a major issue. We would have to look long and hard going through a list of presidents that have not exaggerated their resumes.

    Hmmm sounds like a job for Doris Kearns Goodwin or Michael Beschloss :-))

    Sincerely,
    Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 6:14 AM

  4. McGovern's got lots of room to talk......who'd he lose to and how many states did HE carry?

    lol

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 6:16 AM

  5. "It is allready 11:00 in the morning in Amsterdam and this man is allready working for 4 hours!"

    ROFL, Jason....back in 1970 when I lived in Germany with my GI husband, he gave me the choice of going to either London or Amsterdam for a week vacation. I chose Amsterdam with NO hesitation. Ah -- after all that time in Germany, I could order a glass of cold milk at a sandwich shop! What a city!

    Posted by: Patsi Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 6:41 AM

  6. I lose more respect for Eugene Robinson on a daily basis. He's now trying to spin that Hillary's memory of Bosnia is part of a psycho autobiographical movie in her head.

    I will say this: when I was in the Golan Heights during the mid-'90s I stayed one night at a settlement. As I went to bed I could hear bombs going off in the distance. There was no violence at that settlement, but when I think about the trip to the Golan Heights, my only memory is of hearing bombs.

    Posted by: Patsi Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 6:52 AM

  7. the democrats must have some kind of political
    deathwish when it comes to presidential elections.
    they have all the ammuntion they need 'take careful aim'have the whitehouse in the crosshairs and what do they do? shoot theirselves in the foot.
    they have clinton' who can stand toe toe and fight any republican and they are trying to push her aside and nominate another loser.
    they say well clinton will say or do anything to get elected. if you want to elect a president thats what you have to have. you want to listen to john kerry' ted kennedy ' and all the rest of the losers who don't know how to win a national election. the democrats don't deserve to be in the whitehouse.you want to be all touchy feely and sensitive thats fine' get ready for another republican whitehouse.
    say what you want about the clintons they know how to win.
    the politics of hope and change
    i hope you know you can't change anything if you lose
    the far left has never elected a president 'never will


    Posted by: mqw | March 26, 2008 6:52 AM

  8. Here's a good story from Mother Jones about Hillary's religion.

    "Through all of her years in Washington, Clinton has been an active participant in conservative Bible study and prayer circles that are part of a secretive Capitol Hill group known as the Fellowship. Her collaborations with right-wingers such as Senator Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) and former Senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) grow in part from that connection. "A lot of evangelicals would see that as just cynical exploitation," says the Reverend Rob Schenck, a former leader of the militant anti-abortion group Operation Rescue who now ministers to decision makers in Washington. "I don't....there is a real good that is infected in people when they are around Jesus talk, and open Bibles, and prayer.""

    Read the rest of the 4 page story at link below.

    http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2007/09/hillarys-prayer.html

    This is some weird stuff if true makes Hillary more dangerous than some Right Wing religious nuts.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 6:54 AM

  9. I hear jesus talk and I think of crusades, schisms, and inquisitions......the only reason those things are "history" is that most people have evolved beyond fairy tales for belief systems.....

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 7:36 AM

  10. How relieved I am to see that others of you think this is one more example of the MSM writing off Sen. Clinton. You won't find a bigger fan of MSNBC than me, but lately I can hardly bear to watch. Their anti-Clinton bias is painfully obvious, as if they've been saving it up for eight years waiting for another Clinton to make a run for the White House. I wonder, in 2036, if Chelsea runs for president, will those MSM pundits who are still alive bare their fangs once again in a Pavlovian reaction to the word "Clinton"?

    Posted by: Mary Kitt-Neel Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 7:36 AM

  11. they hate the Clintons because they are free......

    chuck hagel on Imus.....

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 7:40 AM

  12. Chuck Hagel on his Iraq war vote.......the administration lied.....the admin told them that the vote was only for additional leverage....not war.....Hagel was lied to by the administration.

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 7:47 AM

  13. Here's how it really is.

    The C-17 crews may make only one trip a month to a particular base. Or they may make one trip a year. It's unlikely that they would make one trip a week.

    Before they take-off they are given a briefing by Air Mobility Command intelligence people. This briefing would include what type of threat they might experience while taking off or landing. In a hostile environment, such as around Tusla, the threat would undoubtedly include attack by shoulder fired SAMs with a range of a couple of miles to the potential for small arms fire.

    Based on the threat environment, the operations people would decide what type of mission profile to plan.

    In a case with DVs aboard as well as USO entertainers, it is highly likely they would plan their arrival in anticipation of SAMs being fired, or of small arms fire. Hence, the 'corkscrew' arrival.

    The passengers would have been briefed by the crew either before they boarded the aircraft or while they were on the airplane. The briefing would be intended to raise their adrenalin level to the point where there would be instant compliance with any orders given by the crew.

    If there was anything really hot going on when they were on approach, the crew would have been briefed in-flight and it would have been their responsibility to either proceed or abort.

    No matter how Hillary characterized the threat upon her arrival, I did see a whole bunch of grunts walking around wearing their body armor and carrying their weapons.

    It disturbs me when people such as Matthews or Tuckah or Olbermann talk with 'expert' (snicker) knowledge about what she said or what the threat actually was.

    She had the courage to go their, and the courage to take her daughter showing her what the world is really like.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 7:53 AM

  14. Reference my last:
    http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/03/hillarys-bosnian-fib-play.html#comment-58373

    It really ticks me off that McPeak, a General Officer of the United States, would allow Mr Obama's campaign to repeatedly mischaracterize what transpired.

    I think he has his own agenda--one that I think is not honorable.

    Oh, in the last sentence, change 'their' to 'there' . Which goes to prove that I'm far from perfect, too.

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:07 AM

  15. Dear Flatus: Thanks for the military perspective. It helps to hear what goes on "behind the scenes."

    I agree with Craig...this flap might actually help her. At least she has been to Bosnia. It proves that she also has a "world view."

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:07 AM

  16. Craig -- I just read that you are going to be in C-ville for the book fest. Sorry I'll miss you. I'm teaching this weekend in Stafford. But I am taking the kiddos to Michie Tavern and Monticello today as part of our American Revolution studies, prompted b the John Adams series on HBO. The kids have been watching it and they are fascinated. We went to Gunston Hall yesterday, several sites in Alexandria tomorrow., plus the cherry blossoms at the TJ Memorial. Gotta get on the road -- happy blogging y'all!

    Posted by: Divalicias | March 26, 2008 8:13 AM

  17. Parent not hero portrayed in 'Dreams from My Father'

    "In his autobiographical book "Dreams from My Father," Barack Obama paints a heroic picture of his father as having emerged from a poor Kenyan village, where he was nothing more than a simple goat herder, to become a Harvard-educated economist, destined to return to Africa to fulfill his promise.

    Unfortunately, the reality is much bleaker than the tale Obama tells in his book.

    In truth, Barack Obama senior, Obama's father, was a polygamist who had already abandoned one wife and child in Africa when he met Obama's mother in Hawaii.

    After being educated at Harvard, Obama senior returned to Africa, abandoning Obama and his mother, to live the life of a chronic alcoholic who ultimately killed himself in his second drink-induced car accident, while driving drunk on the streets of Nairobi."

    (Yes, I know it is WND.)

    http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59850

    Posted by: GORDO | March 26, 2008 8:13 AM

  18. After my dog George got me up so early I cruised around reading some blogs and posts. I don't believe I have ever been as demoralized about the future of the Democratic party as I now am. It used to be that the Freepers invaded message boards and spewed their vile right wing ideas with the worst sort of ugliness. They very often used sexual messages to make a point, talking in bizarre terms of gang rapes in prison and simply awful sexist viewpoints about either women or -- men who were Democrats.

    The case in point this morning is a couple of places where the discussion had been Chelsea Clinton's "None of your business" answer. These new young "Democrats" -- I'm sure they think they are liberals -- are starting to sound exactly like their Freeper compadres.

    If this is the crowd that has been attracted, and who are taking over the party, then THAT will spell the end of the real Democratic party, not whether Hillary and Obama are duking it out in a primary,

    Posted by: Patsi Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:24 AM

  19. Patsi, you're so perceptive. :-)

    I think there's little chance of the party surviving in a form that will make me comfortable.

    (Rosten's Education should arrive today. While I was looking for a place to stash it, I rediscovered his Joys of Yiddish. Today must surely be a special day!)

    Posted by: Flatus Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:31 AM

  20. Let me preface what I'm about to say with...I just woke up and I've had no coffee...

    but...I'm glad JoeS is back on MoJo -

    Hopefully he's learned his lesson about letting the nuts run the asylum.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:36 AM

  21. Patsi: College kids don't remember what it was like when Bill Clinton was President. Obama has done a superb job of bulking the Clintons together with Bush/Cheney...part of the "Washington politics as usual" problem. The Obama campaign (with the help of the media) has done an excellent job of "reverse plastic surgery" on the couple who once were the heroes of the Democratic Party. Whether or not the party can recover is debatable.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:39 AM

  22. Wendy: Yes, Joe was actually likable today...he may be "back!"

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:40 AM

  23. Carl Jeffers is on Imus right now. I love Carl!

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:41 AM

  24. I know she is supposed to be smart however I don't agree with Craig's idea. Hillary Clinton is a congenital liar and this is just another one. Remember she said she helped solve the Irish Peace Agreement, that she was involved in the passage of NAFTA which she now negates. She is a dangerous person with a severe personality disorder.

    Posted by: Skylark Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:41 AM

  25. Wow my day is made:

    At least my morning will get a great start with Harold Ford Jr. congratulations to Harold on analyst job at MSNBC and DLC the Democratic Party will only improve and strengthen under his sensible leadership! Amen!

    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:41 AM

  26. I think the fib was deliberate but to figure it would end up as a plus? If Senator Clinton's campaign were that clever the primary fight would be over.

    I hope a lots of Wahoos show up on Saturday!
    The other guy sounds like fun..currently running the. "American Expatriate Cocktail Research Station in Belize, Central America. " I'd be interested in that research.

    The Obama campaign is certainly full of myths. They are now claiming all the credit for increases in Democratic party registration. What a load of crap
    They are claiming credit for all of the increases in the younger vote ignoring the increases in 2006 and 2004 and the fact the percentage increase in 2007-8 is the same)

    I will vote for Obama if he is the Democratic nominee but I will never forgive the Obama supporters I know who have based their support on lies about either Hillary or Bill Clinton.

    A lot of talk earlier in the year about the soul of the Republican Party. It looks like an epic battle in the Democratic Party as well. It looks like a battle between
    liight weight cocktail party liberals and blue collar Americans who are being left behind.
    As Obama would say "Let them eat argula!"

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:42 AM

  27. Catchy Obama phrases have been used before

    "Evidence is accumulating that Barack Obama is an equal opportunity plagiarist, readily borrowing some of the catchiest lines in his campaign speeches and ads from a variety of literary, movie, political and popular sources, all without giving credit or attribution to the original source.

    In the 2006 movie "Man of the Year," Robin Williams plays a comedian who gets elected president.

    In the movie, Williams gives a speech in which he says, "Red States, Blue States. There [are] no Red States and Blue States. There's only the United States of America."

    Obama, in his 2008 Iowa caucus victory speech said, "Because we not a collection of Red States and Blue States. We are the United States of America."

    (Yes, I know it is WND.)

    http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59904


    Posted by: GORDO | March 26, 2008 8:47 AM

  28. My sharp eagle eye noticed the American flag pin on Harold's lapel unlike "you know" that refuses to wear one.
    --Heather

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:47 AM

  29. ^who

    Posted by: Heather Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:48 AM

  30. Drat

    Craig is finally doing something at an hour I can watch and I'll be in registration training for the caucus. Is anybody close enough to do it in person.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:50 AM

  31. Flatus - this relates to your excellent 7:53 analysis - small clip of a story from '96 about the actual visit - from reporter who was on the trip. While she may have embellished, puffed up, mis-remembered...whatever it was...it sounds like the situation was tense and I'm sure Hillary would have been briefed on it.

    "MRS. CLINTON DELIVERS A 'THANK YOU' TO US PEACEKEEPING FORCES IN BOSNIA
    Published on March 26, 1996
    Author(s): Ron Fournier, Associated Press

    MARKOVICI, Bosnia-Herzegovina -- Protected by sharpshooters, Hillary Rodham Clinton swooped into a military zone by Black Hawk helicopter yesterday to deliver a personal "thank you, thank you, thank you" to US troops."

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:50 AM

  32. What I heard her say was that a reception had to be moved indoors because of sniper fire. Thats all. Here, and with Matthews last night, you and he make it sound like she said she was personally under fire and had to "duck and cover" as Matthews put it. So, unless you heard something different from her than I did, this is yet again an example of the media twisting and shaping things to suit their own story lines.

    Posted by: Jammer | March 26, 2008 8:50 AM

  33. Katherine: And that was my point on the blog yesterday. It is because many of her supporters are women (and men) over a certain age and of a certain income/education level, that the media can ignore their votes and their will.

    David Brooks was on Morning Joe this morning saying that most Democrats support Obama. I think this is debatable considering that he hasn't managed to close the deal. He was supposed to close on Super Tuesday. Then on Super Tuesday II. And guess what? He couldn't wrap it up. He is the Matt Hasselbeck of politics (OK Seahawks fans, back off, this is just my opinion. Matt is not a closer.)

    As I said, the Obama campaign and the media have impuned the reputation of beloved figures in the Democratic party (to many). Need I remind everyone that Bill Clinton was the first Democrat to win reelection to the presidency since Franklin Roosevelt? And left office with a 65% approval rating? Now Bill is a racist, maniacial and divisive lunatic who will do anything to get Hillary elected so his dynasty will come to fruition.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:53 AM

  34. Morning all. Linked below is the latest proposal being floated for seating FL delegates -- it's another permutation of cutting the delegates in half. But check out how the perversity of the convoluted proportional rules is amplified even further by this approach. HRC wouldn't just lose half of her 38 delegate margin. According to this story, her delegate lead would shrink from 38 to six. Here's how that happens -- using an example from just one of the state's congressional districts:

    "But cutting the delegate total by half would almost wipe out Clinton's lead, thanks to a party rule requiring that a candidate who gets at least 15 percent in a given congressional district receive at least one delegate.

    One example is Orlando's 8th Congressional District, where Clinton won with 54 percent to Obama's 29 percent, worth three delegates to Obama's one. But if the state gets only half of its pledged delegates, Clinton would get one delegate and Obama one, because he met the 15 percent threshold."

    Whole story is a good read:

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/orl-dems2608mar26,0,507190.story

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:56 AM

  35. It is not an Obama talking point or a media bias - it is called math.

    It is very difficult to imagine away the Hillary can win the nomination - and this hope that a super-majority of the super delegates will hand her the nomination after she lost the primary is a bigger fantasy than her trip to Bosnia.

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 8:57 AM

  36. Ally

    Bobo Brooks just pimping his own column which he lifted from the righwing Politico which gets all its stuff from Drudge. No one in the media does any original work. They all take their ques from Drudge

    The world according to Obama no Democrat has ever done anything good. We have all just been waiting for him to arrive so we can rescue ourselves. No wonder Democrats who lead everyday lives shake their heads and walk away.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:00 AM

  37. Obama needs to get rid of McPeak...the Bill Clinton crack was nothing compared to what is going to start bubbling to the surface about him - he's going to be a liability to Obama on the Israel issue as Obama continues to say one thing about Israel but then surrounds himself with people that say another...McPeak is the closest person to him now linked to anti-Israel /anti-Jewish statements. Eventually he's not going to be able to wiggle away from these anti-Israel / anti-Jewish views.

    The article linked also includes some interesting tidbits about the Iraq war...seems to mirror the Power fiasco in some ways too.

    It's not getting a lot of mainstream coverage...yet...but they did a little segment on it on "The Race" on POTUS08 yesterday...so it is bubbling.

    "The interview of Tony McPeak in the Oregonian has turned into a bigger headache for Barack Obama than first thought. Obama’s chief military adviser told the newspaper in a 2003 interview that the US should keep troops in Iraq for “a century … if we do [the war] right,” echoing exactly the same sentiments that Obama has ridiculed as “a hundred years of war” when John McCain made them. Now Obama has to explain why the former Air Force Chief of Staff blames the Jews for the Iraq war..."

    http://hotair.com/archives/2008/03/26/obama-adviser-war-the-fault-of-american-jews/

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:01 AM

  38. Open question:

    Does anyone have contact with Wolfson? I would like to know if Sinbad has passed the Clinton campaign commander-in-chief test....

    The "new dream ticket"?

    Clinton/Sinbad '08!!

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:01 AM

  39. Warren

    Apparently you failed math. Obama does not have enough delegates to win and will need the same super delegates to get there.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:01 AM

  40. Leo Rosten......anything by him is superb reading pleasure......the man who actually said (about Mr Fields) "Any man who hates dogs and children cant be all bad....."

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 9:02 AM

  41. Flatus

    You ordered a copy of H*M*A*N K*A*P*L*A*N?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:05 AM

  42. Patsi,
    I had a glass of milk for you during lunch! :))

    To be quite honest, I do not think the fib was intentional. I do not think Hill can afford these fibs. The only way is up, and this kind of fibbing is not helping. Even in Holland it made headline news!

    Hillary needs to wake up and smell the cheese. It is now or never.

    And I do agree that the O campaign strategically send their guy on holidays. Giving people the feeling that he is actually allready the nominee....
    On the other hand, according to ppp, Hill is losing NC by more than 20points.... She can lose states but she is not allowed to lose states lopsidedly, unless it is a caucus.

    Any updates on Fl & Mi?

    Posted by: Jason | March 26, 2008 9:05 AM

  43. Obama is slipping in the national polls and doing poorly in the all the state primaries to come.

    Looks like the math isn't going in his favor.

    Poor poor Obama no caucus states coming
    No busloads of college students to bring in.
    Gee when everyone gets to vote the results are always so much different.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:06 AM

  44. Hi Craig, I think I love you. haha Your spin on Hillary's trip was genius. You are exactly right. She had to know the MEDIA is looking for any mistake she could make. This time she got them YEAH.
    Oh yes, as LADY she should drop out and let the MAN take over. Garbage.
    Notice she came right out and said she made a mistake more than Obama said about his 20 years at his church and it was HIS church.
    You know he still has not really answered the question WHY he did not drop the church or talk to Wright about his comments and try and change Wrights mind.
    Wright is in hiding. Guess no one can find him.

    Posted by: Carol Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:07 AM

  45. Gordo - you are really getting desperate (and sloppy).

    In 2004, Obama said:

    The pundits, the pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into Red States and Blue States; Red States for Republicans, Blue States for Democrats. But I’ve got news for them, too. We worship an "awesome God" in the Blue States, and we don’t like federal agents poking around in our libraries in the Red States. We coach Little League in the Blue States and yes, we’ve got some gay friends in the Red States. There are patriots who opposed the war in Iraq and there are patriots who supported the war in Iraq. We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.

    http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/convention2004/barackobama2004dnc.htm

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:09 AM

  46. "David Brooks was on Morning Joe this morning saying that most Democrats support Obama."

    Also she has won the "Democratic" vote in almost every primary. SHE not HE has a majority of the Democratic votes...clearly he is as delusional as the rest of them.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:10 AM

  47. KGC:

    We will see how all those blue collar Dems feel after HRC tells everyone how rich she is...

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:11 AM

  48. two new studies suggesting Sirhan Sirhan wasnt the only shooter of RFK........

    gee, ya think?

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 9:14 AM

  49. Another snipet on Hillary's Jesus group from Mother Jones link posted above.

    "When Clinton first came to Washington in 1993, one of her first steps was to join a Bible study group. For the next eight years, she regularly met with a Christian "cell" whose members included Susan Baker, wife of Bush consigliere James Baker; Joanne Kemp, wife of conservative icon Jack Kemp; Eileen Bakke, wife of Dennis Bakke, a leader in the anti-union Christian management movement; and Grace Nelson, the wife of Senator Bill Nelson, a conservative Florida Democrat.

    Clinton's prayer group was part of the Fellowship (or "the Family"), a network of sex-segregated cells of political, business, and military leaders dedicated to "spiritual war" on behalf of Christ, many of them recruited at the Fellowship's only public event, the annual National Prayer Breakfast. (Aside from the breakfast, the group has "made a fetish of being invisible," former Republican Senator William Armstrong has said.) The Fellowship believes that the elite win power by the will of God, who uses them for his purposes. Its mission is to help the powerful understand their role in God's plan."

    It says a lot about Hillary and how she believes religion makes the elite like her and others the rightful rulers over the general populace.

    So are you all ready to be raptured yet?

    It seems like the Religious Right don't have the patent on religion after all.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:15 AM

  50. warren

    as opposed to the obama's...who not only are rich but]
    cheap

    And that is the dumbest argument ever. Are you saying John Edwards had no empathy for the poor
    simply because of his wealth

    The senate disclosure forms etc. all indicate the Clintons have done well since leaving the whitehouse
    Americans have no problem with financial success as long as you don't leave your empathy behind.

    You apparently never had any

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:15 AM

  51. Yes...they clearly have Wright in some safe house somewhere till all this blows over:

    "Wright’s Fla. Event Canceled"

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/wrights-fla-event-canceled/

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:16 AM

  52. Warren has a dream.

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 9:17 AM

  53. Jammer:

    "What I heard her say was that a reception had to be moved indoors because of sniper fire. Thats all. Here, and with Matthews last night, you and he make it sound like she said she was personally under fire and had to "duck and cover" as Matthews put it. So, unless you heard something different from her than I did, this is yet again an example of the media twisting and shaping things to suit their own story lines."

    Hillary Clinton:

    "I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/campaign.wrap/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

    Time to take Lucy for a walk and get to work...

    (Don't forget to play nice ; )

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:17 AM

  54. Warren: You don't think they know she is rich by now?

    Chuck Todd just said on MSNBC that the Superdelegates are "worried" she will win the next several states and make their decision "hard." Many wish she would quit now and make it easy for them to nominate Obama. I can't figure out which is worse: The possibility that Chuck Todd is spewing suppositions on national television or that he might be right and that the Superdelegates are a bunch of ninnies (proving again that Democrats don't win because they can't tell a story and may not even KNOW a story to tell.) Howard Dean is a fool if he thinks the calls for Hillary to drop out now are going to help the party.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:18 AM

  55. Wendy:

    Glad to see you are now a champion of suppressing free speech...

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:19 AM

  56. A little more about who some of the members are.

    "Coe's friends include former Attorney General John Ashcroft, Reaganite Edwin Meese III, and ultraconservative Rep. Joe Pitts (R-Pa.). Under Coe's guidance, Meese has hosted weekly prayer breakfasts for politicians, businesspeople, and diplomats, and Pitts rose from obscurity to head the House Values Action Team, an off-the-record network of religious right groups and members of Congress created by Tom DeLay. The corresponding Senate Values Action Team is guided by another Coe protégé, Brownback, who also claims to have recruited King Abdullah of Jordan into a regular study of Jesus' teachings.

    The Fellowship's long-term goal is "a leadership led by God—leaders of all levels of society who direct projects as they are led by the spirit." According to the Fellowship's archives, the spirit has in the past led its members in Congress to increase U.S. support for the Duvalier regime in Haiti and the Park dictatorship in South Korea. The Fellowship's God-led men have also included General Suharto of Indonesia; Honduran general and death squad organizer Gustavo Alvarez Martinez; a Deutsche Bank official disgraced by financial ties to Hitler; and dictator Siad Barre of Somalia, plus a list of other generals and dictators. Clinton, says Schenck, has become a regular visitor to Coe's Arlington, Virginia, headquarters, a former convent where Coe provides members of Congress with sex-segregated housing and spiritual guidance."

    Good company she keeps huh?

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:19 AM

  57. Wow warren you must keep banker's hours.
    I have never heard of an associate going to work after 9am

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:20 AM

  58. National Poll of Superdelegates:

    [ ] Worried

    [ ] Not worried

    check one.

    Posted by: sturgeone | March 26, 2008 9:21 AM

  59. From page 3 of article.

    "We contacted all of Clinton's Fellowship cell mates, but only one agreed to speak—though she stressed that there's much she's not "at liberty" to reveal. Grace Nelson used to be the organizer of the Florida Governor's Prayer Breakfast, which makes her a piety broker in Florida politics—she would decide who could share the head table with Jeb Bush. Clinton's prayer cell was tight-knit, according to Nelson, who recalled that one of her conservative prayer partners was at first loath to pray for the first lady, but learned to "love Hillary as much as any of us love Hillary." Cells like these, Nelson added, exist in "parliaments all over the world," with all welcome so long as they submit to "the person of Jesus" as the source of their power.

    Throughout her time at the White House, Clinton writes in Living History, she took solace from "daily scriptures" sent to her by her Fellowship prayer cell, along with Coe's assurances that she was right where God wanted her. (Clinton's sense of divine guidance has been noted by others: Bishop Richard Wilke, who presided over the United Methodist Church of Arkansas during her years in Little Rock, told us, "If I asked Hillary, 'What does the Lord want you to do?' she would say, 'I think I'm called by the Lord to be in public service at whatever level he wants me.'")"

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:22 AM

  60. And by the way, Obama believes that anyone making more than $90,000 a year is wealthy. That guy has got a lot of nerve.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:22 AM

  61. Warren:

    I really did LOL at your last post

    and who would those blue collar workers have be President? There is nobody left in the race that ISN'T WEALTHY.

    You keep harping on how blue collar workers are going to feel about Hillary's wealth...which is a complete sign of desperation on your part because you know the Bosnia story isn't going to be the Jeremiah Wright story you want it to be.

    Everyone keeps talking about how O' connects with people...well he hasn't connected with blue collar workers...just college kids and rich "typical white" folks. Hillary has connected with the worker bees...this is a done deal...they already know Bill and Hillary are wealthy...an exact figure from the Clinton tax return isn't going to change it.

    Do a poll a month after Hillary Clinton's tax returns come out and I bet your average blue collar worker won't even be able to give you a ball park figure of what is on there. Why? BECAUSE THEY DON'T CARE about how much Hillary made last year. THEY CARE about how much they're going to make next year.

    ROFLMAO

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:23 AM

  62. Last night on H&C, Frank Luntz said Hillary has won the "Democratic" vote. Obama's lead is from Repubs & Indies.

    Posted by: GORDO | March 26, 2008 9:24 AM

  63. Bishop Richard Wilke, who presided over the United Methodist Church of Arkansas during her years in Little Rock, told us, "If I asked Hillary, 'What does the Lord want you to do?' she would say, 'I think I'm called by the Lord to be in public service at whatever level he wants me.'")"

    And this is terrible because????????????

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:26 AM

  64. How about some religion in public schools. You know, no separation of Church and State.

    "But the senator's project isn't the conversion of her adversaries; it's tempering their opposition so she can court a new generation of Clinton Republicans, values voters who have grown estranged from the Christian right. And while such crossover conservatives may never agree with her on the old litmus-test issues, there is an important, and broader, common ground—the kind of faith-based politics that, under the right circumstances, will permit majority morality to trump individual rights. The libertarian Cato Institute recently observed that Clinton is "adding the paternalistic agenda of the religious right to her old-fashioned liberal paternalism." Clinton suggests as much herself in her 1996 book, It Takes a Village, where she writes approvingly of religious groups' access to schools, lessons in Scripture, and "virtue" making a return to the classroom."

    Yes lets brainwash the young to serve and die for God like the religious right does. Sort of like Jesus Camp I would assume.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:26 AM

  65. Warren:

    I'm not...and if you'll go back to some of my posts from when the original Wright controversy broke, you'll see that I ACTUALLY said their are a few points I agree with Wright on - in particular US Foreign Middle East foreign policy having a lot to do with 9/11 - I've actually been known to say something very similar.

    I don't care whether he speaks or not - he can speak wherever and whenever he wants and say whatever he wants. More power to him.

    What I said in my post is the Obama campaign and perhaps Wright have decided to keep him on the down low for a bit while this blows over.

    So....Warren...if anyone is suppressing free speech it is your ole friend Obama and his handlers...so go ahead turn that finger of your's right back around...how many times do Obama supporters have to do that...quite often I would say.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:28 AM

  66. AP - can you just provide the links to the article/articles so we can read them if we choose...thanks.

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:32 AM

  67. Most Obama supporters live in a bizzaro world where they accuse Clinton of the very things they are doing.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:32 AM

  68. Craig the kool-aid has obviously fried your gray matter and you've gone insane, you've reached a new low in apologizing for the Clintons.

    Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:32 AM

  69. kgc...

    So its alright to let the elite rule over us since there doing it for Jesus?

    Not because they want to do it to improve their citizens.

    Real good company she's with who are working for Jesus.

    "The Fellowship's God-led men have also included General Suharto of Indonesia; Honduran general and death squad organizer Gustavo Alvarez Martinez; a Deutsche Bank official disgraced by financial ties to Hitler; and dictator Siad Barre of Somalia, plus a list of other generals and dictators."

    Yes real good company.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:34 AM

  70. Hillary has won more Democratic votes, you say? Okay, let's play the tape of the Obama camp's comeback to that:

    "But what you people don't understand is that no nominee can be elected president with just Democrats. That's why we NEED Obama."

    That's a pretty sorry organizing principle for a major political party, isn't it?

    Basically, "we need to nominate someone who doesn't have the support of the majority of our own members." How warped is that?

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:35 AM

  71. Wendy! ...

    I did early in the comment thread above.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:37 AM

  72. I'm off to the gym to burn a little lard.

    Catch you all later today.

    Posted by: LardassLiberal Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:37 AM

  73. AP

    You are the only person I know who could turn a women's bible study group into a nefarious takeover of the world as we know it.

    Women all over the nation are going to have to give up tea and cookies on Wednesdays now that Mother Jones has found out what they are up to.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:37 AM

  74. "Craig the kool-aid has obviously fried your gray matter and you've gone insane, you've reached a new low in apologizing for the Clintons."

    Does that mean you're going to quit the blog . . . again?

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:39 AM

  75. I guess that I should re dig up the link where it says she tried to impede the impeachment of Nixon for you all as well.

    I'll see if I can find it again for you.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:40 AM

  76. AP - ah...thanks...

    Posted by: Wendy! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:40 AM

  77. And just to set the record straight and this will be my last post here, my decision to leave has for the most part nothing to do with the people who post here but the host of this blog. I find his repeated claims to be unbiased without foundation, he takes shots at Senator Obama every chance he gets, any "compliment" of Obama he has made is delivered in the most back handed of manner. His trailmix entry of "Obama vs. Florida and Michigan" was pretty much the last straw for me and I now understand why the only TV outlet he now appears on is that of the king of racial jokes Don Imus, water seeks it own level. Over and out!
    Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC | March 21, 2008 10:28 PM

    Posted by: How Rude | March 26, 2008 9:41 AM

  78. guess that I should re dig up the link where it says she tried to impede the impeachment of Nixon for you all as well.

    I'll see if I can find it again for you.

    Posted by: anon-paranoid | March 26, 2008 9:40 AM


    baloney dig up the link

    Posted by: talk about conspiracy nutz | March 26, 2008 9:42 AM

  79. Here's another link on The Family from The Nation.

    Hillary's Nasty Pastorate

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/20/opinion/main3955108.shtml

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:44 AM

  80. Warren

    "Glad to see you are now a champion of suppressing free speech"

    And those calling for Hillary to quit are a sample of democracy in action?

    If Obama nominated 28% of Clinton backers vote for McCain

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/105691/McCain-vs-Obama-28-Clinton-Backers-McCain.aspx

    Gallup rolling daily, still nearly tied

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/105664/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Clinton-Remain-Nearly-Tied.aspx

    Now tell me again why she should quit?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:47 AM

  81. Unable to find the Nixon impeachment link right now, but here is a link to a book that exposes the religious fundamentalist elite ruling class.

    "From the bookjacket:

    They are “the Family”—fundamentalism’s avant-garde, waging spiritual war in the halls of American power and around the globe. They consider themselves the “new chosen,” congressmen, generals, and foreign dictators who meet in confidential “cells,” to pray and plan for a “leadership led by God,” to be won not by force but through “quiet diplomacy.” Their base is a leafy estate overlooking the Potomac in Arlington, Virginia, and Jeff Sharlet is the only journalist to have written from inside its walls."

    http://jeffsharlet.blogspot.com/2008/02/blog-post.html

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:51 AM

  82. " It Takes a Village, where she writes approvingly of religious groups' access to schools, lessons in Scripture, and "virtue" making a return to the classroom."

    She has stated she doesn't want prayer in schools or religion specific doctrine, but what is wrong with teaching children the golden rule, being kind to each other, the value of work ... don't steal, don't murder ... hardly a virtue free environment if you want a decent society.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:53 AM

  83. Wendy

    "Does that mean you're going to quit the blog . . . again?"

    It's necessary to remind us of his disapproval at least twice a day.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:56 AM

  84. My sharp eagle eye noticed the American flag pin on Harold's lapel unlike "you know" that refuses to wear one.
    --Heather

    for you Heather,

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=m1qE2vJdDw4

    Yo soy un demócrata amarillo del perro.

    Yo soy Hussein Horsedooty!

    Posted by: yo soy Horsedooty! Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 9:59 AM

  85. Jamie...

    So you think its alright to put religion in public schools according to what you wrote, that is if I read it correctly.

    Isn't that what parents are suppose to do?

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:00 AM

  86. I guess you trot out the flag when it is convenient. How many flags did Obama have out during that race speech? 8 or so? I LOVE AMERICA! I LOVE AMERICA! I LOVE AMERICA! I wish we didn't have to play this game. I don't think anyone who didn't love this country would be a Senator or running for President. Nuff said.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:04 AM

  87. MSNBC is quoting a PPP NC poll of 3/24 showing Obama up 21 points. A PPP NC poll of 3/17 showed Obama up 1 point. So in one week there was a 20 point turn around? Fishy?

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:05 AM

  88. In that 3/17 poll, Clinton actually led among Democrats. Again, Obama can't win his own party.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/19/poll-clinton-catches-oba_n_92352.html

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:08 AM

  89. Below is more on who Obama holds close. Add him to ZBig, Malley, Powers and Rice. And then connect McPeak to some of the garbage Wright and Meeks spew. No, no connection at all.....


    By Aaron Klein
    © 2008 WorldNetDaily


    JERUSALEM – Sen. Barack Obama's military adviser and national campaign co-chairman has implied U.S. politicians are afraid of Jewish voters in Miami and New York City and that American Jews are the "problem" impeding a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    Merrill A. McPeak, a former Air Force chief of staff, also compared the Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist organizations to what he described as religious radicals in Oregon and claimed "born-again [Christians]" supported the war in Iraq to help Israel.

    Discussing Middle East politics during a 2003 interview with the Oregonian newspaper McPeak stated, "We don't have a playbook for the Middle East. You know, for instance, obviously, a part of that long-term strategy would be getting the Israelis and the Palestinians together at . . .something other than a peace process. Process is not a substitute for achievement or settlement. And even so the process has gone off the tracks, but the process isn't enough."

    (Story continues below)

    The Oregonian interviewer asked McPeak whether the problem in solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict originated with the White House or the State Department.

    "So where's the problem?" the interviewer asked.

    McPeak replied, "New York City. Miami. We have a large vote – vote, here in favor of Israel. And no politician wants to run against it."

    McPeak went on to insist that to solve the conflict, Israelis must "stop settling the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, and maybe even withdraw some of the settlements that've already been put there. And nobody wants to take on that problem. It's just too tough politically."

    McPeak did not point to Palestinian terrorism or the recent election of Hamas to power as problems impeding an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal.

    As a follow-up question, the Oregonian interviewer asked McPeak whether "there's an element within Hamas, Hezbollah, that doesn't want Israel to exist at all and always will be there?"

    McPeak responded by comparing the two terror groups to "radical" Oregonians.

    "There's an element in Oregon, you know, that's always going to be radical in some pernicious way, and likely to clothe it in religious garments, so it makes it harder to attack. So there's craziness all over the place."

    McPeak said there was "some" good will toward peace on the Israeli side, but qualified, "that's maybe the more cosmopolitan, liberal version of the Israeli population – I think there's enough good will there.

    "I don't know if there is still on the Palestinian side, because they've been radicalized pretty well," McPeak said.

    The McPeak interview circulated on several large blogs yesterday, including the popular Powerline blog, after it was first pointed out in the American Spectator online magazine by Robert Goldberg, a writer and vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest.

    Interpreting the identity of voters in Miami and NYC McPeak had referred to, Goldberg stated: "Translation (as if it's needed): Jews – who put Israel over every American interest – control America's policy on the Middle East."

    Goldberg also pointed out McPeak once claimed Christian Zionists were driving America's policy in Iraq to benefit Israel.

    Stated McPeak while discussing the Iraq war: "Let's say that one of your abiding concerns is the security of Israel as opposed to a purely American self-interest, then it would make sense to build a dozen or so bases in Iraq. Let's say you are a born-again Christian and you think that Armageddon and the rapture are about to happen any minute and what you want to do is retrace steps you think are laid out in Revelations, then it makes sense . So there are a number of scenarios here that could lead you in this direction. This is radical...."

    McPeak is the latest Obama adviser to be highlighted for controversial views regarding Israel.

    WND recently quoted Israeli security officials who expressed "concern" about Robert Malley, an adviser to Obama who has advocated negotiations with Hamas and providing international assistance to the terrorist group

    Also Samantha Power, who was described as Obama's closest adviser until she resigned earlier this month after making strong remarks against Sen. Hillary Clinton, advocated in an interview investing "billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel's military, but actually investing in the state of Palestine."

    Stated Goldberg: "Obama has a Jewish problem and McPeak's bigoted views are emblematic of what they are. Obama can issue all the boilerplate statements supporting Israel's right to defend itself he wants. But until he accepts responsibility for allowing people like McPeak so close to his quest for the presidency, Obama's sincerity and judgment will remain open questions."

    Posted by: Maxtrue | March 26, 2008 10:09 AM

  90. A little background info on McPeak aka Skeletor:

    Just a little FYI from a long-time USAF pilot, General Merrill ‘Skeletor’ McPeak is probably the most-hated general officer in Air Force history. Seriously, ask any Air Force people who were around in the early to mid 90s and they will give you an earful about this guy. My old Huey squadron used to fly him between Langley Air Force Base and the Pentagon and he was a total dick, completely pissed off that he, a fighter god, had to ride in the back of a smelly helicopter. Plus, he insisted on wearing a helmet hooked up to the comm system so he could hear if anyone on board was talking about him behind his back (thats where the Skeletor name came from, seeing his pinched, skull-like face framed by a big-ass helicopter helmet). Highlights of the McPeak years:

    - Personally pushed new, redesigned, extra-shitty flightsuits, with zippers on the side, frickin’ epaulets on the shoulders and pleats. Nicknamed ‘The Fag Bag’, worst uniform ever, quickly canceled by the next Chief of Staff.

    - Crammed the T-3 ‘Firefly’ down the Air Force Academy’s throat to do pilot screening training with (instead of the reliable and time-tested Cessna 172). After two instructors and two cadets died in back-to-back crashes, McPeak’s retort: “We’re not training dentists to fly their families to Acapulco here”. What an asshole.

    - Finally, McPeak is the one who mentored a certain Lt Colonel named Darleen Druyun through her entire career, finally resulting in an Air Force scandal that is still being felt today (Wikipedia her name and prepare to be disgusted).

    So, yeah, if Obama wants to use Skeletor for an advisor, go ahead. The USAF sure as hell doesn’t want him back.

    BTW- Darlene Blewhim is the nitwit who also 'blew' Boeing out of the tanker contract.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darleen_Druyun


    Posted by MyNameIsEarl | March 25, 2008 11:20 PM

    Posted by: Maxtrue | March 26, 2008 10:15 AM

  91. good morning gang....

    Craig.... I like the way you think
    and I bet you have a great time with Joe Bageant this weekend..... I read his book "Deer Hunting with Jesus"..... for this northern gal, it was an eye opener into the southern mind..... there was a lot of humor sprinkled around the book..... I'd love to have a beer with him..... and I don't like beer....

    Lardass..... I'm glad you enjoyed my hot tubbin vacation..... Rick and I are going on another long weekend ski vacation with a local ski club tomorrow....
    we are going to Mont Tremblant in the Laurentians in Quebec.... just north of Montreal.....

    Jason..... welcome to the blog....

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:18 AM

  92. Putting aside methodology, 1 in 20 polls is an outlier ( these polls use a 95% confidence level).

    Posted by: GORDO | March 26, 2008 10:19 AM

  93. I lose more respect for Eugene Robinson on a daily basis. He's now trying to spin that Hillary's memory of Bosnia is part of a psycho autobiographical movie in her head.

    Posted by patsi

    sorry but Eugene Robinson's been licking Obama's ass during this whole campaign. He is one of his lap dogs....

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:26 AM

  94. The Hillary-Bosnia comments are just another example
    of the media using a most effective right wing radio
    method of constant repitition to create a perception of absolute fact, regardless of the veracity of the issue.

    Did Hillary mis-state the Bosnia events, yes, she failed
    to add the word "possible" ground fire & "were forced to cut short an event on the tarmac with local children"... "although one 8 year old girl gave me a copy of a poem"..... and we were "hustled off" to the fortified American base at Tuzla. (all at p. 344 of her book). The totality of the events were as she stated them, but that does not play into the goals of a compliant, fawning media intent on their own agenda--currently to undercut all of Hillary's efforts. The same with the repetition that she cannot win, the superdelegates really don't want her, on & on. It remains to be seen whether the voters in the remaining primaries buy into the media spin.

    Just like today's spin that she re-introduced the issue
    of race to divert from the Bosnia "lie". To us the media
    is a transparent, disingenuous vehicle, however, most
    do not follow all as closely as many of us. The jury is
    still out as to their success.

    Posted by: Coreen | March 26, 2008 10:29 AM

  95. Confirmed - Obama Is Zbigniew Brzezinski Puppet

    ..."ended this morning when the withered mummy of imperialism himself appeared on MSNBC's Morning Joe* to campaign for Obama, urged on by his own moronic daughter, Mika Brzezinski, an Obama groupie and sycophant."

    http://rense.com/general81/abig.htm

    Posted by: GORDO | March 26, 2008 10:34 AM

  96. I know she is supposed to be smart however I don't agree with Craig's idea. Hillary Clinton is a congenital liar and this is just another one. Remember she said she helped solve the Irish Peace Agreement, that she was involved in the passage of NAFTA which she now negates. She is a dangerous person with a severe personality disorder.

    Posted by: Skylark | March 26, 2008 8:41 AM

    Skylark, where did you get your diploma to analyse "severe personality disorder"?

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:34 AM

  97. AP

    No that isn't what I said. I said that there are universal virtues that should be reflected in education. You don't have to preach religion to reinforce standards of behavior among human beings.

    I went to school for 16 years without ever hearing religion or prayer in the schools, but we sure learned about decent behavior and what was expected by the individual in society. But I suppose if you think it is okay to omit viture and have foul language, rapes on school buses, shooting and nooses ...

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:34 AM

  98. Obama has assembled Zbig, Malley, McPeak, Powers and Rice. Now please tell me they don't share some similiarities. Is the press going to examine the meme? Given the Boeing mess, I am surprised nobody zeros in on McPeak. In any case, there is also the connection between Wright and Meek's anti-Jewish rants and the spin in foreign policy from his advisors. Remember Power's suggestion to invade Israel and use the military aid in building a new Palesitine? Malley and Zbig's views are well known, so what is holding up the Press from taking on the Obama team's views?

    Instead, the turn towards Bosnia. Well, at least Hillary went there. What has Obama done? Has he traveled to talk to families in Darfur? It is a desperate media play to shift focus from Wright and Obama's team of disputatious thinkers.

    Posted by: Maxtrue | March 26, 2008 10:36 AM

  99. "The world according to Obama no Democrat has ever done anything good. We have all just been waiting for him to arrive so we can rescue ourselves. No wonder Democrats who lead everyday lives shake their heads and walk away."

    EXACTLY!

    Posted by: Patsi Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:37 AM

  100. Some random thoughts while I try to find a @#$# pain killer that actually kills pain...

    Heather with regards to this quote:

    "You have an interesting take on Hillary's Bosnia issue and I agree with it. Honestly outside of opposition hatred for Hillary I don't understand why it is such a major issue. We would have to look long and hard going through a list of presidents that have not exaggerated their resumes."

    At what point will we as an electorate actually use standards to judge these people by? If you did that sort of thing on a job interview, not only would you not get the job, chances are that HR person would email all of her HR friends within the industry to get your ass black listed. Yes I know everyone lies, how about doing it in an environment where you have to break a sweat to catch the person in a lie?

    I AM SO SICK OF THIS LAPEL BULLSHIT. I will never be so jingoistic as to wear one or demand my elected officials wear one. I got into an argument with an American Legion type down here about that last week. I asked him why the pin thing bothered him yet he didn't care that the flag was used on napkins or even worse, men's underwear. I think it's more offensive that someone could wipe their ass or blow their nose into the image of the flag...never mind potential urine or shit stains...after I sent him to a local TJ Maxx and Dollar Store to see for himself, he called me to apologize...not only were the items as bad as I described, but they were all made in China too...

    Posted by: Bear Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:37 AM

  101. Craig the kool-aid has obviously fried your gray matter and you've gone insane, you've reached a new low in apologizing for the Clintons.

    Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC | March 26, 2008 9:32 AM

    Troll alert... Drawing a blog pentagram again. Anyone got the garlic?

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:39 AM

  102. I was listening to James Carville on CNN 's situation room. Why is it that he can never complete a cogent sentence? Anyone else have this reaction when he talks? It's like he's so nervous and changes direction in every sentence he makes.

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:43 AM

  103. Her is another example of Hillary's pathological lying......


    "She said that Chelsea was jogging around the World Trade Center on 9/11 and happened to duck into a coffee shop when the airplanes hit. She said that this move saved Chelsea's life. But Chelsea told Talk magazine that she was in a friend's apartment four miles from ground zero when the first plane hit. Her friend called her, waking her up, and told her to turn on the TV. On television, she saw the second plane hit, disproving Hillary's claim that "she heard the plane hit. She heard it. She did."

    Don't tell me there is not something severely wrong with woman. Why would should lie about her daughter????to get sympaythy of course

    Posted by: Skylark Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:44 AM

  104. Patsi and KGC. Come on now, the Obamas want to save us! We are not worthy. We are not worthy. We are not worthy:

    From Michelle: "And Barack Obama, will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your division. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zone. That you push yourself to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved and uninformed."

    Huh. All this time I thought I WAS involved and informed. Maybe it was all a mirrrageeeee....

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:44 AM

  105. jamie...

    Its in her book. "where she writes approvingly of religious groups' access to schools, lessons in Scripture, and "virtue" making a return to the classroom."

    Why did she write it if she don't mean it? Are you suggesting that what she wrote is a lie?

    Posted by: anon-paranoid Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:45 AM

  106. But the good news Ally is that, for the very first time in your adult life, you can be really proud of your country. ;-)

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:46 AM

  107. Patsi:

    Your man Ford was good on MoJo today.

    KGC:

    "Most Obama supporters live in a bizzaro world where they accuse Clinton of the very things they are doing."

    This is the nature of the beast and I feel you people are doing the same thing. It is a fight for the most important job in the world. Alls fair in love and war.

    Everyone:

    No takers on the Clinton/Sinbad ticket?? He has foreign policy "experience"...

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:47 AM

  108. Oh...thanks ET! I feel so much better now!

    And I agree with you on Carville. Hillary has better advocates out there.

    I am on "DAY 13. NO SUGAR." Ugh. I am crabby.

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:48 AM

  109. EuroTom,

    If you ever have a chance to play poker with Carville, take every dollar out of your 401K and sit down at that table...

    He has ADD and he is easily worked up. When he is speaking, he probably in mentally a paragraph ahead of what he is actually saying and I'm sure the more he gets worked up, the harder it is to keep it all straight...

    Posted by: Bear Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:48 AM

  110. This is the nature of the beast and I feel you people are doing the same thing. It is a fight for the most important job in the world. Alls fair in love and war.


    What happened to new politics

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:49 AM

  111. Yes, Hillary exaggerated her Bosnia story, but how is this anything like Skelator and Zbig, Wright and meeks, Rezko or Auchi, Malley or Powers? These people are close associates (except Malley and Auchi) who helped Obama formulate his thinking and political path. Want to see Zbig back working in the White House or McPeaks SECDEF? How about Powers a Middle East envoy or Malley?

    The media is back in business having been thrown for two weeks by Wright. Now they filter and spin again, hoping to make back what Obama lost. MSNBC puts Zbig right back out there counting on the stupidity of the American people to ignore both history and even the distance Obama has put between Zbig and himself. I date the NYT to review the views and history of Obama top advisors. And talk about exaggeration. Was it an exaggeration for Obama to first say he never went with Rezko to see the house Auchi's money would help deliver? Was it an exaggeration to say Obama never was informed of the sanction vote? What do you call his promise to get us out of Iraq in 12 months or that he never heard Wright say nasty stuff during the twenty years of sermons?

    There is no balance in media anymore.

    Posted by: Maxtrue | March 26, 2008 10:51 AM

  112. Does he really have ADD?

    Posted by: EuroTom Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:51 AM

  113. Skylark,

    Your description of Hillary's comments about Chelsea and 9/11 are all from right wing web sites. I did a search and there is not a single reputable news org.

    Now here is a description from Chelsea herself and her wandering "south" towards the towers to call her mother. In all the events that happened that day, separated from a daughter it wouldn't be unusual for a mother to get the details wrong and have to recant. It's hardly some deep psychological disease.

    http://www.zpub.com/un/ChelseaAsAdult.html

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:54 AM

  114. Personally the flag pin is such a small symbolic thing to do, I do not understand why anyone would chose that battle when our country is at war.

    4000 dead, 40k wounded Americans - A man that wants to Commander in Chief and he can't do that one little thing.

    I think it shows his lack of judgment - again.

    Posted by: unlikely_burrito Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:54 AM

  115. KGC:

    A campaign is a lot different than governing.

    Posted by: warren Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:56 AM

  116. I am curious,

    What has the US government done in the last 30 years that you are proud of?

    Bussing? The more I look at it, they are pissed that the Cold War ended and it was unintentional, it is now a lot harder to achieve the American Dream...

    We still have racism, we have rampant sexism, kids can't play in the street without fear of being kidnapped or raped. Those same kids can't go to church without fear of being diddled or raped.

    Posted by: Bear Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:56 AM

  117. And did Obama ever think that the Iraqi government would be giving Sadr an Ultimatum backed up by Iraqi troops. I bet you won't hear a single word of support coming from the Obama camp. How many think Obama is praying Sadr wins? And how American is that?

    Posted by: Maxtrue | March 26, 2008 10:57 AM

  118. Warren:

    So we can ignore the rants from the Obama campaign that go something like this: "How can we expect her to run the country when she can't even run an effective campaign?"

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:58 AM

  119. Bear....
    I am sorry about your pain..... hang in there buddy....
    and I agree with you about the lapel pin.....

    Jamie.... sometimes I wonder why you beat your head against the wall with trying to reason with certain people on this blog...... but hey.... good luck to you..... :0)

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:59 AM

  120. AP

    "lessons in Scripture" are not the same as reading scripture or worshiping the religion that it represents.

    If anything, scripture is an outgrowth of universal truth not the other way around. Ethics are ethics whatever the source.

    You do have this habit of one thing with something in common to another thing is automatically the equal of a third thing. It's a major logical fallacy.

    Posted by: Jamie Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 11:00 AM

  121. Both Clintons are Pathological Liars – always have been – always will be!!!

    “Hillary Clinton said that she had been named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to scale Mt Everest, even though she was born a couple of years before his feat.”

    The Bosnia incident: “this incident does not make Mrs Clinton look like “a prevaricating resume padder;” it makes her look like an out-and-out liar.”

    “her lying about her policies, such as her promise for middle-class tax relief when she voted for a middle-class tax increase.”

    “when you lie about something that is really meaningless in the scheme of things, it tells people something more about you, it tells people something deeper about you. If Mrs. Clinton lies about the meaningless things, if she lies when there is no logical reason to lie, when the lie can only hurt her and telling the truth cannot, there’s simply something wrong with her.”

    http://commonsensepoliticalthought.com/?p=2572

    Oh, and she brought peace to Northern Ireland. Ha, ha

    “Hillary Clinton had no direct role in bringing peace to Northern Ireland and is a “wee bit silly” for exaggerating the part she played, according to Lord Trimble of Lisnagarvey, the Nobel Peace Prize winner and former First Minister of the province.”

    http://www.orbis-quintus.net/?p=3129

    Bill Bradley's take on Hillary Clinton:
    “The bigger the lie, the better the chance they think they’ve got. That’s been their whole approach,” he said. “She’s going to lose a whole generation of people who got involved in politics believing it could be something different.”

    “As a reporter who visited Bosnia soon after the December 1995 Dayton peace agreement, I can attest that the physical risks were minimal during this period, particularly at a heavily fortified U.S. air base, such as Tuzla.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/21/AR2008032102989.html?sub=AR

    Oh, and there is always the “I did not have sex with that woman”. There are so many lies they cannot be posted here for fear of appearing as a book writer by the name of Maxtrue!!! Pathological liars…both of them. Anything to get their perverted desire for control and power.

    Posted by: Karolenna | March 26, 2008 11:04 AM

  122. Warren:

    So we can ignore the rants from the Obama campaign that go something like this: "How can we expect her to run the country when she can't even run an effective campaign?"

    Posted by: Ally Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 10:58 AM


    Ally, that is a legitimate question to raise. People did say in 2000, how can Bush lead the country when every business he ran failed? These 8 years have proven that was a fair question to ask then.

    I put my tin hat on yesterday and wondered to myself if Guiliani would have aggressively run against HRC in 2000 if he didn't get cancer? The more I think about how she ended up running against Lazzio, the more curious I get. Same can be said for how the stars lined up for Obama's senate run.

    The Red Flag for me was when the news of HRC spending $50 Million on a reelection campaign when she could have spend $500,000 and still pulled the same percent of the vote. She basically ran unopposed and she still spent that much?

    Posted by: Bear Author Profile Page | March 26, 2008 11:07 AM

  123. Ally:

    I said campaigning is different than governing. Not that campaigning does not matter.

    I think the biggest issue about the way the Clinton campaign has performed - is her electability.

    From the get-go, I thought Obama would be a stronger general election candidate and still do. The problems I thought HRC would have - credibility and likability - have only been made worse by the Democratic race.

    Hillary is getting damn near close to unelectable in the fall - meanwhile - the Clinton campaign is trying to spin electability as her strongest argument.


    Posted by: warren