ORLANDO -- Florida Democrats pushing a vote-by-mail plan to redo the state’s presidential primary lost faith today that a deal can be struck to go forward.
“This is by no means a done deal,” state Democratic chair Karen Thurman said as she officially unveiled her proposal at a press conference this afternoon. “But it is the only solution we can provide.”
The party’s presidential candidates, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, showed little enthusiasm for Thurman’s plan. Most of Florida’s congressional delegation opposed it.
The apparent demise of Thurman’s proposal increases the likelihood that Florida’s hopes for restoring its convention delegation now rest with the national Democratic Party’s credentials committee. And many state Democrats are now turning their attention to how they will lobby that panel, which would rule in the days leading to the party's August convention.
For starters, Clinton enthusiasts note that the convention credentials committee is co-chaired by three former employees of Bill Clinton’s White House: Alexis Herman, former secretary of labor, James Roosevelt Jr., a former associate commissioner in the Social Security Administration under Clinton, and Eliseo Roques-Arroyo, a White House Consultant on Presidential Travel and Advance from 1998 to 2000.
Only 22 other members of that 186-member committee have so far been chosen -- all selected by Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean. The remaining 161 seats on the panel will be divvied up among delegates from states.
The Obama camp intends to fight Clinton’s credentials committee crusade to seat the disputed delegations. One reason for Obama to do so is that seating the Florida and Michigan delegations would raise the bar for how many delegates the frontunner needs to win the nomination and force Clinton to drop out – from 2,025 delegates to a majority number above 2,200.

Comments
Where is Katherine Harris when we need her?
Posted by: Bowmanc | March 13, 2008 2:36 PM
I don't understand why they can't do this mail-in vote.
Posted by: Patsi | March 13, 2008 2:38 PM
Appears to me that neither of the two want to do the all mail-in re-vote, but take their chances with a credentials comm fight.
Looks like we're going to get to witness an old fashioned
convention.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 2:45 PM
Dog's Eye
"Why do you think it was a Lexis/Nexis search? "
I suppose because Geraldine Ferraro named the two women on Sen. Obama's staff who got the info and then schlepped it around town to every news drop in the nation. I suppose she could have been lying but I haven't heard any denials from the women named whom she said she knew well from years of political activity.
As to what she said. It came after all of the other criteria she named that he possessed. He knows he was given access that he might not have had if publishers and political operatives didn't see something they could promote to the benefit of the party.
His heritage is one positive aspect of a group of things that could be noted as contributing to his success. What is so wrong about saying it?
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 2:56 PM
here's more on the AP Style book by the way:
http://www.apstylebook.com/
seems like i remember a discussion with an editor about this and the rule is that we identify members of Congress according to the official names they use. Hillary uses her middle name in the congressional listings, but Obama and McCain do not
Posted by: Craig Crawford
| March 13, 2008 2:57 PM
Jamie: I do not watch cable news and have no idea about the "2 women on Obama staff." Could you plz provide a link? Thank you.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 3:00 PM
"I don't understand why they can't do this mail-in vote."
Because trotting out a NEW voting process in FL - of all places - in one of the most hotly contested races in recent memory - is a recipe for litigation.
They need a bulletproof plan - that has the buy-in (at least at the start) of BOTH campaigns.
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 3:01 PM
Many in crowd awed by Clinton
By DAN DiPAOLO
Daily American 30 North Chief
Thursday, March 13, 2008 3:35 AM EDT
JOHNSTOWN - More than 1,600 people lined up and waited in near freezing temperatures to see former President Bill Clinton at the Greater Johnstown Area High School Wednesday afternoon.
With a 3 p.m. start time scheduled for the event, many showed up hours early to make sure they would find room in the gymnasium and be able to see the popular politician campaign for his wife, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Chuck Sponsky drove down from Ebensburg in order to see Bill Clinton for the second time in his life. Sponsky arrived at 10:30 a.m. and waited more than four hours to gain entrance. “I saw him at his inauguration. I'm a long-time Clinton supporter,” he said.
Posted by: Most Popular Democrat Still | March 13, 2008 3:14 PM
Bill Clinton......he's been a puppet, a pauper, a pirate, a poet, a pawn and a king.......he's been up and down and over and out, but I know one thing......each time he finds himself flat on his face, he gets himself up and gets back in the race........
Posted by: sturgeone | March 13, 2008 3:16 PM
when god closes a door he opens a window....?
Posted by: sturgeone | March 13, 2008 3:19 PM
I dont think I'd be counting out any clintons, though.....not just yet....
not that it matters to me, of course......
Posted by: sturgeone | March 13, 2008 3:28 PM
Dog's Eye
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLI0kOEFyfQ
Here is one interview. There are several. SHe mentions and compliments Axlerod in this one.
Here are several sites for all aspects of the furor.
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIH_enUS211US212&q=Geraldine+Ferraro+interview
The MSNBC political director just came on and said "Of course the Obama staff is playing the race card". If you want to fault the Clinton campaign for not handling these attacks well, fine. If you want to absolve Obama for things done in his name by Axelrod, find. But you can't say it isn't being done.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 3:34 PM
Obama's playing the race card and Clinton is playing the gender card - and each campaign would be stupid not to (of course it is HOW you play that is important).
But the real story is that Obama is winning and HRC is losing.
Winning depends on message and connecting with the voters - and this is what Hillary and her campaign need to focus on if they want to start winning.
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 3:38 PM
"Hillary uses her middle name in the congressional listings"
Isn't Rodham her maiden name? I believe middle name is Diane. Technically...this is a hyphenated last name.
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 13, 2008 3:40 PM
Nasty divisive campaigning
The Obama School of New Politics
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Obama_backer_Clinton_lies_and_stolen_election.html
Posted by: School for Scandal | March 13, 2008 3:43 PM
Jamie,
I'm sitting within earshot the tv and heard the same comments by Chuck T . You got an accurate paraphrase of most of his
reply, but the gist of what he said clearly are suggest both sides are guilty of playing the race card, 'however you define that", he said. .
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 3:46 PM
Jamie: thanks for the links, but what I'd asked for was why you and Wendy thought the original Ferraro interview came up in an Obama campaign Nexis/Lexis search.
Where did that story get started?
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 3:48 PM
"thought the original Ferraro interview came up in an Obama campaign Nexis/Lexis search"
Please don't be naive, as you know it is called opposition research. Everybody does it
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 3:58 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23590166/
Interview with Ferraro and Curry
"Obama campaign started it reference"
Posted by: Missing Link | March 13, 2008 3:59 PM
It was mentioned by Ferraro in one interview and she named the women. I can't find it. There was another mention on the news in passing today about how the Obama campaign knew about the Daily Breeze.
If you work on campaigns you know about the daily research done to find any and every newspaper or periodical or legal mention of your candidate. Lexis/Nexis is how those searches are done. Think of them as Google for publishers.
The Daily Breeze is hardly the New York Times. You have to go hunting specifically for anything in it as it is not likely to be part of daily reading by someone who would immediately leap on the name Ferraro and report it to the campaign.
I'm absolutely sure that this was one of the possible ways the Clinton campaign knew within 24 hours about Power making remarks to The Scotsman. Now I read the Scotsman on line a few times a week, but I hardly think it is on most people's reading list.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 3:59 PM
"Rodham" is not her middle name, it is her maiden name.
The styling is akin to that used in, for instance, mentions of Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy (later Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis).
It gives a nod of recognition to accomplishments realized under a previous name.
Posted by: benjaminblue | March 13, 2008 4:01 PM
Oh no - disillus... dem is back.
Btw buddy - you are not the first person to call me ignorant!!
(I am outta here for a bit - gotta go walk the dog - but I will be back)
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 4:02 PM
Wendy...Many women drop the use of their middle name after marriage, and use their maiden name as their middle name. I did...and do.
Posted by: harborwoman | March 13, 2008 4:05 PM
Here's the deal, though. You two stated very assertively that this story had been found by the Obama campaign and shopped around.
In this day of "teh internets", I do not find that to be the only possible explanation.
Relevant paragraph from "missing link's" msnbc link (it's from an AP story):
" ...The controversy began when the national media picked up on comments Ferraro made in an interview last week with the Daily Breeze newspaper in Torrance, Calif.: "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."
==========
People: is there any chance that a lot of people are responding to Obama because he provides a positive message of bringing us together as Americans first to solve our problems together?
This peeling Americans apart by gender and racial politics has got to stop.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 4:07 PM
Craig wrote, "here's more on the AP Style book by the way:
http://www.apstylebook.com/"
I still have nightmares about Turabian, and my adherence thereto.
Posted by: Flatus
| March 13, 2008 4:13 PM
"Btw buddy - you are not the first person to call me ignorant!!"
If I called you ignorant it is because you were.
Dog Hussien Dog is not ignorant from what little I have seen of him. I doubt if he is naive either. Which begs the question, what is he?
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 4:13 PM
i wouldnt count clinton out yet either .......the video of obama;s pastor that ABC broke may change this whole race
Posted by: tz | March 13, 2008 4:17 PM
Jamie...
The clip where Ferraro names names is the MSNBC link to an Ann Curry interview, right above your post seeking same.
God I love how cancer survivors aren't afraid of anything and are not to be cowed. You can just see it in the look in her eyes.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 4:18 PM
Please listen to the interview with Ferraro and Curry.
It states very clearly what happened.
Posted by: Missing Link | March 13, 2008 4:19 PM
Race.
A few years ago we were having a dining room table discussion about race. My son-in-law, who is now 50, said it wasn't so significant.
I asked him, "Would you rather be black and the secretary-of-state, or white and the route salesman that you are?"
He thought about it for a while and said, "Thanks, that helps me understand."
Posted by: Flatus
| March 13, 2008 4:21 PM
Dog's Eye
"The controversy began when the national media picked up on comments Ferraro made in an interview last week with the Daily Breeze newspaper in Torrance, Calif"
Do you really believe that this story from a fairly obscure California newspaper hit all of the networks and newspapers all at the same time and hour as if by divine intervention?
You've got three choices: God wanted everyone to know how mean Ferraro was to Obama, Every news outlet in the country has someone on staff who reads The Daily Breeze, or someone sent them the story.
Now who had the most vested interest in making sure that this story got the widest distribution possible with the most negative spin?
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 4:25 PM
Slate article on Ferraro uproar
http://www.slate.com/id/2186324
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 4:29 PM
"Now who had the most vested interest in making sure that this story got the widest distribution possible with the most negative spin?"
It is my understanding the story started on dailykos.
Which doesn't answer your question but does deflect some of your accusation.
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 4:35 PM
"Which doesn't answer your question but does deflect some of your accusation"
Upon reflextion maybe not, a blog full of devoted fanatics is a great place to start nasty rumors
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 4:39 PM
"It is my understanding the story started on dailykos."
That's where i picked it up and posted here on monday afternoon.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/10/144252/803/258/473658
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 4:41 PM
Jamie: re your 4:25 p post:
do YOU believe that's the timeline?
Because I sure don't. These kinds of stories are viral. More likely somebody local saw the Breeze story, thought "whoa there", and emailed the link to some associates. It then hit a blog or two and spiraled through teh internets.
And about a day after the Breeze story was circulating through the blogosphere, someone did indeed conduct a Lexis Nexis search and put up a Washington Post story about Geraldine Ferraro and Jesse Jackson. (That part makes great sense to me, because the WaPost's archives are not as user friendly as the NYTimes, and are not free.)
That might be where you encountered the LexNex reference.
re the Slate item you put up: It's Mickey Kaus, talking in circles. He is a contrarian. In fairness, he seems to have it in for all the campaigns.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 4:44 PM
Go back and listen to the Curry interview. This was an Axelrod hit job carried off spectacularly. In the interests of his client he assaulted a woman who's personal strength and contributions to the party are almost legendary. Lee Atwater and Karl Rove would have been so proud of him.
Axelrod and his staff did what they are supposed to do, but it is really disgusting that Saint Barack is above it all with his "new" kind of campaign.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 4:45 PM
kos is a BO supporter but not in his campaign.His blog reflects the breeze original article.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 4:46 PM
How is it that Sen. Clinton "lost" Eliot Spitzer as a superdelegate? I mean, I know he resigned, but does that mean that "superdelegate" status simply evaporates? Or does it transfer to someone else (like the incoming Gov. Paterson)?
Posted by: Mary Kitt-Neel
| March 13, 2008 4:46 PM
If Obama was a white man,
He would be Mike Huckabee, without the experience.
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 4:46 PM
Halleluyah
With over 90% of the black vote going to the estimable BO it is not surprising to see the Hillary campaign mired in racism charges because Ferraro spoke candidly and truthfully. The truth won't set you free if your a Hillary supporter it falls under the weight of racial correctness and BO supreme agenda. Obama's Pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright's "God Damn America", is ushering in a new era of civility amongst the BO supporters as is his diatribes of anti semitic banter will uplift us all and will I hope bring us closer together.
Halleluyah
Posted by: Milquetoast for BO | March 13, 2008 4:49 PM
I thought Lex/Nex reference was about a similar 1988 Jesse Jackson slight she made and KO mentioned in his SC
it's all jumbled in my feeble mind.:)
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 4:49 PM
Yes I do. The actual speech was made on Feb. 28th,five days before the Ohio and Texas primaries. The article ran in the paper on March 7.
So it got from the newspaper on March 7 to every major network , radio station, and influential blog in the country in 48 hours?
You don't do that without a whole lot of help.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 4:50 PM
Harborwoman,
I'm glad you addressed the maiden name - middle name question with Wendy. I had written an answer, but it can be done much more succinctly by a woman.
Posted by: EdVB
| March 13, 2008 4:54 PM
Mary,
The governor and the lieutenant Governor are both Super Delegates. Once he ceased to be governor, he lost his super delegate status. That's a minus one for Hillary.
Now if someone gets appointed Lieutenant Governor in time for the convention (not sure about NY rules on this), they they would be an SD. I don't know if Patterson has endorsed anyone.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 4:54 PM
"I don't know if Patterson has endorsed anyone".
He was standing behind her during MLK day speech in Harlem if that helps..lol
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 5:00 PM
From Tuesday afternoon, March 11 NBC News First Read: item in its entirety, since it's short:
From NBC's David Gelles
I just spoke to reporter Jim Farber, who wrote the Ferraro story for the "Daily Breeze" of Torrance, Calif. He told me the Ferraro interview took place on Feb. 28th, five days before the Ohio and Texas primaries. The article ran in the paper on March 7th.
But it's important to remember that Ferraro made her comments at the time when many thought the Clinton campaign was about to go under.
The article ran with the headline, "Geraldine Ferraro lets her emotions do the talking."
This is the quote the campaigns are fighting over:
"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she continued. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept." Ferraro does not buy the notion of Obama as the great reconciler.
Farber says the parentheses "(of any color)" is a direct quote.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/11/756868.aspx
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 5:02 PM
Rez -- about "Kos" -- Kos is a site run by condescending pricks dripping with dreams of political power.
I read them for a long time....until I watched that smug little Markos Moulitsas on a show and realized he was at best a poseur and at worst a complete jackass. He's not even a real liberal.
Posted by: Patsi | March 13, 2008 5:05 PM
If Obama were a white man he would be John Edwards, or (Chris Dodd or Joe Biden although with a lot less experience.)
Posted by: If I were a rich man | March 13, 2008 5:11 PM
dog, Ferraro said last night on fox that when you search the word obama you get any and all references to that name. She said that is what his campaign does look for trouble and then creates more trouble.
He is sick and I don't understand why people do not see it.
Also I would like to know about this ABC that was about his pastor?
As far as I am concern Ferraro simply made a statement about blacks and women.. Gee I did not see any women being upset about her comment.
Obama is using the race card and only HIM.
He is running scare with PA and Ind. and KY coming up.
Posted by: Carol
| March 13, 2008 5:23 PM
Good Lord, I just watched the entire Olbermann "special comment" just to make sure I wasn't dreaming when I saw it last night.
It's even more ridiculous-sounding a full day later, if you can believe that.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 5:28 PM
Patsi,
I'm not dailykos nut and would tend to agree with you since I have more knowledge about them other than occasionally seeing MM on TV. I pick up the same vibes about him as you. I stop in there more out of habit than looking for info since I used visit more often too. ;)
i definitely not promoting it/him.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 5:29 PM
Carol,
Tis true, tis pity
Posted by: Milquetoast | March 13, 2008 5:30 PM
edit: I'm NOT a dailykos nut and would tend to agree with you since I have NO more knowledge about them other than occasionally seeing MM on TV.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 5:34 PM
Rez -- Yeah, like you I suspect, my bullshit rader starts to go off when I read a lot of the self-appointed arbiters of political taste in blogland, no matter who they support and for what.
Posted by: Patsi | March 13, 2008 5:35 PM
Name meanings:
Barry (Obama): "Marksman" Gender: Male Origin: Celtic/Gaelic
Barack (Obama): The meaning of the name Barack is Blessed
The origin of the name Barack is African
Info on this name: Form of the Hebrew name Baruch.
Hussein: (Barack Obama): The meaning of the name Hussein is "Handsome One"
The origin of the name Hussein is Arabic
Hillary Clinton: The meaning of the name Hillary is "Cheerful"
The origin of the name Hillary is Greek
Info on this name: Sir Edmund Hillary, the first to climb Mt. Everest. Hillary Rodham Clinton, politician.
Diane (Hillary Clinton) :
The meaning of the name Diane is Divine
The origin of the name Diane is French
John (McCain): The meaning of the name John is "God Is Gracious"
The origin of the name John is Hebrew
Info on this name: John F. Kennedy, 35th U.S. President. John Travolta, actor.
Sidney (John McCain): The meaning of the name Sidney is Contraction Of St. Denys
The origin of the name Sidney is French
As you can see, the nomination process itself is boring me, but I like to look up name meanings... I submit for your enjoyment.
Posted by: EUROTOM | March 13, 2008 5:36 PM
Well to our good friends GORDO , Maxtrue and other Repug supporters of JMc I suggested you read Phil Izzo's article in today's WSJ.
The Repug leaning WSJ is acknowledging that we are in a recession that will be deep NOT shallow.
As I blogged previously we have to look a the recession of mis 1981 to 1983 to see the similarities and even then this one is far more complex.
I suspect that many Repug incumbents will be announcing their retirements from the House and Senate.
To the disillusioned Repugs I say the Dems welcome you with open arms.
Let us join together with HRC in this cycle and restore the great land .
At the end of her first term we can all say one good term deserves another.
Posted by: Vivian | March 13, 2008 5:38 PM
Patsi- They obviously have a lot of time and money (well funded), so better they run down the 'news' than me.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 5:39 PM
And if Corey is around, here is the meaning of our middle name:
MITCHELL: The meaning of the name Mitchell is "Who Is Like God?"
The origin of the name Mitchell is American
Info on this name: Form of Michael.
Posted by: EUROTOM | March 13, 2008 5:39 PM
OK EuroTom: you must look up Craig and Crawford next.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 5:42 PM
OK EuroTom: you must look up Craig and Crawford next.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 5:42 PM
Ok: Craig: The meaning of the name Craig is From The Crag
The origin of the name Craig is Scottish
Info on this name: Craig Kilborn, Talk show host. Jenny Craig, diet maven.
Crawford (Craig): The meaning of the name Crawford is From The Crow Ford
The origin of the name Crawford is English
Info on this name: Scottish placename
nighty night!!!
Posted by: EUROTOM | March 13, 2008 5:44 PM
Jamie:
"The Daily Breeze is hardly the New York Times. You have to go hunting specifically for anything in it as it is not likely to be part of daily reading by someone who would immediately leap on the name Ferraro and report it to the campaign."
First of all - I would see nothing wrong with any campaign using Lexis. It is a smart and efficient way to search the news (especially if you don't want to read it - and are instead just looking for ammo).
But I don't think its a forgone conclusion for the following reason: Obama has supporters all over the country - and I am sure at least a few read the Daily Breeze. And with the grassroots operation he has built - people - like me - are willing to do whatever we can to help out the campaign. Barack is great at getting a lot of people involved.
You all worry about his experience - but you need to understand that Barack Obama is not an arrogant jack ass like George W. Bush. He is basically the complete opposite.
Born into a broken home - born into dynasty. Grew up all over the World - grew up in the center of the GOP. Went to law school and taught constutional law. Went to B-School (likely based on connections) and thinks the Constitution can be ignored or changed if it becomes inconvenient (especially for reasons based on politics - not National Security).
A contemplative, hard-working, smart politician - that surrounds himself with the best ideas and the best people. One willing to grow and evolve as he leads - rather than arrogantly following an unflinching plan laid down by his cronies.
You hate Bush. And there are a lot of Republicans that hate Hillary. That bitterness to colleagues - who are doing the people's business - is counter-fucking productive!!
You can point out a lot of flaws with Obama - as you can with anyone who puts themself out on that stage - but he represents the best way forward to not just turn the page on the Bush Era - but to start a new freaking chapter.
* * *
And since it is a nice day here in the city - how bout some tunes (and a beer):
Don't pass this around too much - cause it will be overplayed as it is (MoJo's theme song no doubt - but there can be a modern remake that can be dropped like a week before the general - the GOP won't know what hit them!!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl3vxEudif8&feature=related
Shhhh!!
And as always, for the Clinton supporters (this is a great song!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtkVGClqrT4
Si Se Puede!
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 5:53 PM
Warren
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJtgEfIla0A&feature=related
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 6:08 PM
Usted no puede hacerme
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 6:10 PM
A senior Obama strategist, David Axelrod, acknowledged that he is receiving varied advice from Democrats, including changing Obama's stump speech to emphasize his American roots and pushing for a second round of changes in the nation's welfare laws, this time aimed at stray fathers.
The campaign's casual response to the Goolsbee episode seemed to assume a presumption of innocence that does not exist for politicians. A story that could have been dealt with the day it broke on Canadian television was instead handled carelessly. Obama said he was told that the story was untrue, but later it became clear that a meeting had taken place, and Clinton seized on the contradiction to portray her opponent as a liar.
"That was the information I had at the time," Obama pleaded on Monday
Making adjustments is something all campaigns do. But this is not the situation that Obama's aides hoped they would be in. Axelrod acknowledged that fatigue is setting in. "There's a weariness," he said. "We're in the 27th inning of a nine-inning game."
Washington Post Staff writers Peter Slevin, Michael D. Shear, and Alec MacGillis contributed to this report.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:10 PM
KGC
"changes in the nation's welfare laws, this time aimed at stray fathers."
But that would be an issue. Does he do issues?
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 6:18 PM
Jamie
It only says they are getting advice not necessarily taking the advice. It will be interesting to see if he does change his stump speech.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:21 PM
"Good Lord, I just watched the entire Olbermann "special comment" just to make sure I wasn't dreaming when I saw it last night.
It's even more ridiculous-sounding a full day later, if you can believe that"
Being on the recieving end of a left wing full force smear attack is a bitch isn't it. Go over and talk to Arlen Spector maybe you will get a little sympathy
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 6:22 PM
Jamie
I was taken with the last part where Axelrod admits the game is tied and both sides thought they would have wrapped it up by now. "the 27th inning,."
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:23 PM
Pasti:
"Yeah, like you I suspect, my bullshit rader starts to go off when I read a lot of the self-appointed arbiters of political taste in blogland, no matter who they support and for what."
I am curious if you count yourself in this category?
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:28 PM
DisDem,
Think you missed the point of my post. Olbermann's special comment wasn't so much an attack as it was a personal meltdown on national TV. He was the only victim. I don't think anyone but he, his closest friends and loved ones need any sympathy right now.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:30 PM
KGC:
"I was taken with the last part where Axelrod admits the game is tied and both sides thought they would have wrapped it up by now. "the 27th inning,.""
He is being gracious (which I know may sound like a foreign concept to you - but it can be quite effective)
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:30 PM
"I was taken with the last part where Axelrod admits the game is tied and both sides thought they would have wrapped it up by now. "the 27th inning,.""
So they think they are losing.
It would explain the strange use of racial politics.
It is a better theory then this mornings, "they must be f88king stupid "
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 6:30 PM
Warren
"He is being gracious (which I know may sound like a foreign concept to you - but it can be quite effective"
Pot meet Kettle
And in the context of the article...not really. What are you going to do when Obama loses?
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:33 PM
Mary K-N and Jamie,
The Albany area newspapers are telling us that the State Constitution appears to leave the Lt. Governor's seat empty. David Paterson will be sworn in as Governor on Monday and there will be no Lt. Governor until the next gubernatorial election.
Joseph L. (Joe) Bruno is the Republican majority leader in the State Senate, and it will fall to him to handle the cermonial duties of the Lieutenant Governor without acceding to that position. There is some discussion that Bruno might get two votes if a piece of legislation ends in a tie. Nothing against Mr. Bruno, but I hope that's not the case. There's just something unseemly about any legislator in a bicameral body having an extra vote.
Anyway, since we won't have a lieutenant governor, it appears New York will lose one super-delegate. Governor Paterson has been a strong Hillary supporter and everything I've read in the past few days, seems to indicate that support will continue.
Posted by: EdVB
| March 13, 2008 6:34 PM
Yes...I think it would be fair to say you are "losing" your bid to become President of the United States when video of your spiritual advisor shouting "God Damn America" is suddenly in wide circulation.
Yes, indeed, I would think that is not a good thing for a man who wants to be President of the United States.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:35 PM
OK guys, there is a real factual problem with the Ferraro interview with Ann Curry you directed me to.
Oddly enough, it recurs in today’s NYTimes article as well. Ferraro herself appears confused about the timeline of events.
Curry interview from last night, about a minute in: Mrs. Ferraro (GAF) responds that she did not even give the interview, that she spoke to about 350 people at a public event and she infers that the reporter took an answer she gave and wrote it up as an interview.
However, the offending quote in its entirety was published online last Friday, March 7 in an LA local publication, the Daily Breeze, in advance of last Sunday’s scheduled [March 9] Ferraro speech in Torrance, CA.
from initial Daily Breeze story, published Friday, March 7: Geraldine Ferraro Lets Her Emotions Do the Talking
“ …An outspoken advocate for women's issues and a staunch supporter of presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton, Ferraro will offer her views on the state of the nation and the race for the White House at 7 p.m. Sunday [March 9] at the Armstrong Theatre in Torrance. The program is part of the American Perspectives series.
Speaking by phone from her New York law office, the 72-year-old former Democratic congresswoman outlined the themes that will dominate her talk.
…When the subject turned to Obama, Clinton's rival for the Democratic Party nomination, Ferraro's comments took on a decidedly bitter edge.
'… "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position," she continued. "And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept." Ferraro does not buy the notion of Obama as the great reconciler.
===
From NYTimes today, Joyce Purnick on interview yesterday with GAF:
“…Ms. Ferraro made the comments that touched off the latest exchange of Democratic brickbats after she gave a paid speech last week to the Torrance Cultural Center in Torrance, Calif. The Daily Breeze, a newspaper in Torrance, reported that she said: “If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman of any color, he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.”
====
HOWEVER, ATTENTION NEW YORK TIMES: the Daily Breeze published the quote from GAF BEFORE the paid speech in Torrance. Further, the reporter interviewed GAF over the phone from NYC at the end of February.
NBC First Look item from Tuesday afternoon, March 11, by reporter David Gelles: I just spoke to reporter Jim Farber, who wrote the Ferraro story for the "Daily Breeze" of Torrance, Calif. He told me the Ferraro interview took place on Feb. 28th, five days before the Ohio and Texas primaries. The article ran in the paper on March 7th.
========
Is it that hard for the MSM to do some factchecking and get their ducks in a row?
And it’s sad that GAF launches these assertions without facts. Of course Susan Rice and Jan (Tukasi?? didn’t catch name) responded on behalf of the Obama campaign. But they did not shop the story around. It was out there.
http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_8489268?source=rss_viewed
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 6:35 PM
Lardass-"Liberal":
Let's play a game.
If I showed you the following post 3 months ago:
"DisDem,
Think you missed the point of my post. Olbermann's special comment wasn't so much an attack as it was a personal meltdown on national TV. He was the only victim. I don't think anyone but he, his closest friends and loved ones need any sympathy right now."
Would you guess it was written by:
A. McCain Supporter
B. Clinton Supporter
C. None of the above
(now we know (C) is off the table ; )
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:37 PM
gracious and Axelrod ???
Warren ,
no lawyer would put those two words together, at least not with a straight face.
What do you really do?
Posted by: disillusioned democrat | March 13, 2008 6:38 PM
Dog...while you're busy splitting microscopic hairs over supposed inconsistencies in the Ferraro-is-a-racist timeline, the other side will be opening up a wig factory with all the raw materials Jeremiah Wright has provided.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:40 PM
I hope David Patterson voters for Obama as a Superdelegate.
Most likely will - just like every other Superdelegate that made his or her mind up after the primary race got going and Obama started winning (even the 21 year-old that Chelsea couldn't convince - heck I bet Bill even gave the kid a call and put a little pressure on him - imagine that). Anyways, Patterson would also face some serious heat if he sticks with Clinton.
The only Superdelegates are the ones who were in the Clintons' pocket at the start of this thing (and the remaining ones they have stashed away if are still calling themselves "undeclared").
Any more word on which way Richardson or Edwards are leaning - I think they are the only endorsements left of any significance (we can save Gore for the general election).
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:42 PM
"We Obama supporters want his stump speech changed, and we don’t want the kitchen sink…just the trut" Karlolenna
And what is that?
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:43 PM
Warren. I've got a better idea than playing your game. Let's just take ballpeen hammers and drive 16-penny nails into each other's heads. It would make more sense than your post. ;)
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:43 PM
No thanks Lardass - I am going drinking!
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:46 PM
Lardass: no, that's a serious problem. The timeline is totally wrong, and it's wrong to say the Obama campaign was flacking the issue. Her whole argument on the Curry interview starts to fall apart once you think about the timeline.
GAF dived into that one herself, and the Clinton campaign let her go on and on through the current primary (Mississippi).
Obama does not have Rev. Wright out speaking for him. Mrs. Ferraro was a finance chair -- honorary or not -- and has been closely linked with Hillary.
Lardass: I jumped into this discussion because I'm tired of some people asserting that all controversies, racial or otherwise, hail from the Obama campaign.
That is so unfair.
And it usually goes uncorrected because so many of the Obama supporters have given up posting here, due to the frequent nastiness on this blog.
This very morning, Wendy! and EuroTom were opining they might drop off for a while. And they're not even Obama supporters!
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 6:50 PM
Btw, LL: are you really "carrying too much weight" (that is how my Dr. puts it - hah!)
I got fat in college - and then gain weight again when they chained me to a desk. But I gotta get back in shape for FL (and walking Lucy helps....). I am looking to cut down some of my vices - and Obama message of change can be incorporated.
(I am sure the self-help books are forthcoming and will be on Oprah's book club.)
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:50 PM
Don't forget your Fake ID.
:)
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:51 PM
PS Lardass: I do not for a minute think Mrs. Ferraro is a racist.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 6:52 PM
By the way people - pretty much everything we have been talking about today will do us NO good for the general election.
Almost another day lost - good thing Obama was out taking on McCain on taxes.
Later locos.
Don't forget Lost tonight!!
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:54 PM
LL:
I was almost gonna say:
"I wish!!"
But I actually enjoy growing up...
Posted by: warren | March 13, 2008 6:54 PM
Dog...I hear where you're coming from now that you explained it. Maybe I missed the context upthread.
Warren...good luck with that game plan you described. And don't drink too much!
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 6:54 PM
" Mrs. Ferraro was a finance chair "
member of the finance committee as long as we are striving for accuracy.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 6:55 PM
dog,
i think KGC &Jamie are up to speed on sequence of events.
If I recall correctly, GF gave a speech where she uttered her infamous lines. About 7-10 days later she gives a telephone interview to a reporter who was at speech and asked her about her comments, to which she basically repeated herself in the interview. Breeze published story and story was picked up a few days later and reprinted in more several recognized pubs/sources.
There's an email address for reporter in original article.
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 6:56 PM
Warren,
I don't pretend to travel in David Paterson's circle, but he's going to be the Governor of New York, and Mrs. Clinton is our junior senator. I expect the man to vote his conscience, but I don't expect he'd have to face much heat if that conscience tells him to stick with the New Yorker.
Senator. Clinton beat Senator Obama by 17% in New York, so he'd have a defensible position.
Posted by: EdVB
| March 13, 2008 6:59 PM
Thanks KGC. I'd meant to doublecheck that one before submitting. But need to get dinner started!
Back in a few.
Rezdog: no, unless GAF has been spouting this particular line all over the place (and someone will look into that), the interview with Daily Breeze took place Feb. 28.
Published March 7.
Speech took place March 9.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 6:59 PM
Rezdog and dog
Dog H dog and Jamie and have the same sequence.
In the Ann Curry interview, Ferraro says she isn't sure of the source of the quote whether it was picked up at the speech (and she adds she assumes it is accurate) but doesn't credit the phone interview given before the speech. She took questions at the event. I assume she said the same thing there.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 7:02 PM
very strange i commented citing story here last monday 3/10
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/03/momentum-no-more.html#comment-49967
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 7:10 PM
dog,
sequence must be wrong look at my previous post
Posted by: Antoin "Tony" Rezdog | March 13, 2008 7:11 PM
Rezdog
So do you remember where the link came from.
Or are you a regular reader of the Breeze. :)
This is great. You could be the key.
Someone earlier said they thought story started on Dkos
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 7:14 PM
Rez and dog
I don't think your post and dog's sequence contradict.
You posted on the 10th. The story posted on line the 7th and the speech was the 9th. The phone interview
was on 2/28.
Ferraro never saw the article and just assumed it was published after the speech.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 7:18 PM
KGC: thanks.
However, the important point to me wasn't the timeline, it was that she made those remarks in a formal telephone interview, from her office (one of probably hundreds since February, I will grant you) and tried to pass the remark off as something she said in an informal Q&A after her speech that the reporter wrote up as an interview.
Agreed, an interview with the Daily Breeze (LAX to Long Beach is not as memorable as a call with the Financial Times.
But it was the way she handled the question with Curry that got me wondering.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 7:24 PM
Dog...I think these are distinctions without differences. I think if you asked GAF the same question today, she would answer the same way. I think that's part of her point. She's not disavowing the statement in the least. Nor should she.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 7:26 PM
Obama's Pastor: God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11
"Sen. Barack Obama's pastor says blacks should not sing "God Bless America" but "God damn America."
The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its own "terrorism."
Rev. Wright married Obama and his wife Michelle, baptized their two daughters and is credited by Obama for the title of his book, "The Audacity of Hope."
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788&page=1
(Wonder why this info is just now reaching the mainstream? I knew about it a long time ago.)
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 7:28 PM
Well yeah. We all have eyes. Obama has a black father. Hillary is a woman.
But I think GAF's point was to disparage Obama for getting a free ride because he is black.
Rather than say that he's gaining traction because he is an agent of change and speaks to people's hopes rather than fears.
Get after him for his identity, rather than deal with his message. (And there: just get the word out that there isn't one! And his followers are cultists.)
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 7:29 PM
dog
I think she didn't remember about the phone interview.
After all this was a business appearance, a paid speech and the article mirrored the speech and the q and a after.
But I do think when you add in circulating the 1988 remark, that's not just viral.
Not that this is an excuse but she does have a rather severe regime of cancer drugs.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 7:29 PM
Gordo...maybe it's because you live and surf on the bank of a creek feeding into a rivulet that is the source of a stream that combines with a dozen others just like it into an obscure tributary that is, like, 10 million miles from the nearest mainstream.
Just a theory. :)
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 7:31 PM
You guys and gals, should all just pour yourselves a drink, or pack a bowl... the media is picking the next President, not you, or you over there....relax.....don't worry, be happy!
It will be over before you know it....
There may be some side effects, that include : (fill in the blank)
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 7:37 PM
"Grew up all over the World ""
Born Hawaii. early years in Indonesia. Most of teen years back in Hawaii School in NY and MA. Lives in Illinois. Made one trip to meet family in Africa. Not exactly a world traveling gypsy.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 7:38 PM
The Rev. Wright "stuff" is the sort of thing I have been warning about - there are more and harder "hits" on the way. They will make the Rev seem mild!
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 7:42 PM
March13...that post is scary. It's like one of those drug commercials that promise you a lifetime of sexual bliss as long as you're willing to deal with the side effects of "constipation, heart attack, liver malfunction, kidney shutdown and, in some rare instances, permanent brain damage or tiny aliens hatching out of your chest cavity."
I love those commercials. They always make me laugh.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 7:49 PM
LL,
ever catch the ones that say "death" could be a side effect....that's rich...we're selling you this to feel better but there just a small hitch....
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 7:53 PM
" Don't call people "racists" lightly or just to make a rhetorical point. It's a pretty offensive allegation"
Thank you LL. The idiot in our midst who likes to throw bombs just to watch the bang doesn't know anything about me. He is so totally off base that he might as well be on the moon. It's not only false and offensive, it is personally painful.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 7:53 PM
I think that is exactly how GF feels.
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 7:55 PM
KGC: for mentioning GAF and the cancer drugs: that's what I think too.
And am so grateful she is still with us.
Now, as to whether I want her to be deliriously happy with November 2008 election results.
Uh, nope.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 7:57 PM
I always giggle at the part, "May cause blindness'
Automatically think, "See you mother was right about what happens if you do that"
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 7:57 PM
What happens at 3 hour and 59 minute, is that still Ok????
Sorry I have always wondered about that.
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:00 PM
March...yeah...now that you mention it, I think I did see one with the "death" side effect. It was in the voice over just as the beautiful couple was walking barefoot down the gorgeous beach right before going indoors to have incredible sex....or DIE TRYING!!!
Which reminds me of another goofy thing from commercials like that. I think it might be the Cialis commercials that have various romantic settings for "His-n-Her" outdoor bathtubs, fully plumbed with running water. Can you imagine that such a setup exists anywhere in reality? My questions include:
1. Who would want to get in a His-and-Her bathtub taht has been installed at the end of a long, rickety boat dock when one could just jump in the lake?
2. How many times a year would one use said His and Her bathtubs, and would it really be worth the headache of maintaining the 100 yards of hot and cold plumbing and keeping them free of bugs, critters, and leaves year round? Not to mention winterizing issues?
3. Are His-and-Her outdoor bathtubs even really that sexy? Maybe if you're Rob and Laura Petrie. But if you're anyone else, isn't the whole point of Cialis and other such drugs getting into the SAME bathtub as your beloved?
I'm sure there are other inconsistencies that I can't quite put my finger on right now.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:01 PM
god damn the whitewoman for having an opinion
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:02 PM
Jamie...you're most welcome.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:02 PM
dog
I thought Craig Crawford was right on when said, anyone who is connected to a campaigned should be mirandized.
The campaigns seem to take turns being Lucy and Charlie Brown.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 8:02 PM
you are so right LL....
I do not even begin to understand the 2 Separate claw foot tubs....I have even asked people what does that mean? - like I have no idea.
and the umbrella, ????
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:05 PM
March13...just accept the reality of those lazy guitar riffs and move on. It's SEXXXXXXYYYY!!!!
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:08 PM
ferroro is just the latest victim of obama biased media witchhunt'
Posted by: mqw | March 13, 2008 8:08 PM
lol lol
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:09 PM
Obama has a lot of huntin' to do, there is more where that came from....
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:10 PM
Obama's forgotten people
"This breaks my heart. I was thrilled to see Obama elected to the U.S. Senate in 2004 and to be sworn into that select group of 100 in 2005. I was excited to know that a bright, highly educated, charismatic man would serve his state of Illinois and the American people. I was happy — and followed his new Senate career with hopeful interest — until I began to research his history and found out that he ignored the plight of Chicago’s poorest and most desperate. It was a "deal breaker" for me ..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP-YoB5mnZs
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 8:16 PM
Would that be with ? or without Cialis ?
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:21 PM
March...nope, no Cialis required in that case. It's just dickweed. That grows anywhere.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:23 PM
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/03/florida-faces-conventioneve-de.html#comment-51725
Wanna bet? Cuz you got to be shi**ing me!
Posted by: Dexter
| March 13, 2008 8:23 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O2SX2TkVec
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:23 PM
"Jamie if what I've said is personaly painful to you, good, it should be. "
When you get back to your kennel I hope your mother bites you.
You are a cruel, vengeful and viscious man.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 8:25 PM
That Cialis spoof was awesome. Thanks March.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:25 PM
jesus kreist, date! I thought BORING until the damn elevator door got him !!! HAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by: Dexter
| March 13, 2008 8:29 PM
Dex...there's one guy who could never make it as a line worker in a Tyson's chicken factory.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:30 PM
March 13.
Loved it! Especially liked the girl who tripped while walking past.
Thank you.
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 8:33 PM
Lardass Liberal : But what a model for sausage casings!
Posted by: Dexter
| March 13, 2008 8:34 PM
omg dex!!!
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:35 PM
man...is THAT what that was I felt poking my seat back at the movies Saturday night?
Posted by: Dexter
| March 13, 2008 8:35 PM
Driving the car with it and hitting people in the head at the theater was hilariously understated.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 8:35 PM
and the fact that it was distributed by nationalbanana.com....
Posted by: dog hussein dog | March 13, 2008 8:37 PM
Does BHO still go to that church? Now that ABC News is picking up the story about BHO's pastor. Since anybody that says something that has any reference to race has to leave the campaign's should BHO say something about this guy.
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4443788&page=1
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:43 PM
Daryl...
BHO now, rather sheepishly, refers to Wright as his "former pastor." So he's working hard to backpedal.
It'll be kind of hard to take the title off all those books he sold, though. ("Audacity of Hope" came from one of Wright's sermons or writings)
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:45 PM
Not sure if BHO still goes to the church or not.
Wright has "retired" in recent weeks. I do know that has been reported.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:46 PM
I think BHO's wife statement about being proud can be linked to some things this pastor has said also.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:46 PM
Daryl...Abso-tootin'-lutely it can be linked. It's totally of a piece, and it all makes sense in the context..
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:48 PM
Now should we just drop this issue about BHO's relationship with this pastor and his relationship with that weather underground guy who had connections with the first twin tower bombing. I know Hannity and crew will not let these issues go. Hannity is on this every day now.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:49 PM
This link was posted earlier. You have to scroll about half page or more down to see the video.
http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:51 PM
August 7, 2007
Obama's Church Has a New Pastor for a New Generation
by Diana Keough
Religion News Service
Otis Moss III is striking in a raw way. Broad-faced, boyish and slender, the 36-year-old preacher looks more like a man who is consumed with fashion than the fate of sinners.
But when he steps into the large pulpit of Trinity United Church of Christ -- the South Side church that presidential candidate Barack Obama calls home -- and begins to preach, all eyes are drawn to him.
"JE-sus is the one who puts the devil in his p-la-ce," Moss says, stretching "place" into three syllables. The choir standing behind him, more than 100 strong, seems to fade away. Moss holds a microphone in one hand and moves his free hand to the beat of his sermon. He seems incapable of uttering a dead sentence
http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=14058
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 8:51 PM
Stories like this can bring down a candidate.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:51 PM
VaDaryl...no doubt.
SWIFTBOAT will look like a rowboat with a missing paddle, once the Repubs are easilty able to turn all this into one of those high-speed, drug-running Scarab boats from the opening credits of Miami Vice.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 8:53 PM
David Paterson endorsed HRC a long time ago.Don't expect him to change his mind.He is standing firm in his endorsement just like Charlie Rangel.
They are both from Harlem and HRC won that district.
Posted by: Vivian | March 13, 2008 8:55 PM
Maybe they can, but not as fast as a Hooker at the Mayflower, Room 871, for $4300.00.
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 8:55 PM
I know HRC has had some relationships with some questionable people too, but these two people are off the scale.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:56 PM
LL
"Not sure if BHO still goes to the church or not"
Well he has been busy campaigning, but the last 20 years of regular attendance might be a little hard to hide.
Posted by: Jamie
| March 13, 2008 8:58 PM
Will be interesting now the ABC News has picked up the story and it's not just rightwing radio guys.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 8:58 PM
Sen. Barack Obama's pastor says blacks should not sing "God Bless America" but "God damn America."
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4443788&page=1
Posted by: march13 | March 13, 2008 9:02 PM
maybe Rev Wright could sing out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckarOiWLLtY
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 9:04 PM
sinnermannnnnnnnnn.................where ya gonna run to
Posted by: sturgeone | March 13, 2008 9:11 PM
Dan A on MSNBC is now on this story too.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 9:12 PM
NBC/Wall Street Journal
Hillary 47
Barack 43
RCP: Hillary soaring in Penn..
The tide is turning folks..
Posted by: Oregon Democrat | March 13, 2008 9:20 PM
why did obama put his name on the Fl ballot but left it off MI? Same question to Hillary why did you put your name on both ballots?
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 9:20 PM
Obama's disturbing Africentrism
"When Obama joined Trinity United Church of Christ, he promised to uphold the church's "Black Value System." This declaration is where members affirm their commitment to God, the "black community," the "black family" and the "black work ethic," in addition to disavowing "the pursuit of 'middle-classness.'" They believe the "competitive" nature of white "entrapment of black middle-classness" will cheat blacks of their African identity while keeping them "captive" to white culture.
The "Black Value System" statement was written in the 1980s by church members. It means the members embrace "things African above things American," says black political commentator Erik Rush, who also says this should be as alarming as a Republican presidential candidate "belonging to the Aryan Brethren Church of Christ." Tucker Carlson of MSNBC once described Trinity as having a "racially exclusive theology" that "contradicts the basic tenets of Christianity."
(Yes, I know, it is from WND.)
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57059
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 9:21 PM
TV bites
Posted by: sturgeone | March 13, 2008 9:23 PM
What crazy things are going to happen before Pa? They better hope if it's bad it happens now not during the week before the primary. Voters are going to remember the latest event.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 9:24 PM
The NY Gov will be old news in a few weeks.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 9:25 PM
What to do with FL and MI will be decided by then.
Posted by: vadaryl
| March 13, 2008 9:26 PM
University of Arkansas Poll:
Hillary leads McCain by 15 pts.
McCain leads Barack by 16 pts.
Posted by: Oregon Democrat | March 13, 2008 9:48 PM
"We Obama supporters want his stump speech changed, and we don’t want the kitchen sink…just the trut" Karlolenna “
Obviously, KGC, you don’t listen to Marc Penn and all his sleazy comments along with the other Clinton pundits. I would wager you don’t listen to ANYTHING that Obama has to say as I don’t listen to ANYTHING Clinton has to say. God, I’ve listened to the bitch for 16 years. Isn’t that enough? The Clinton’s are bringing up this race thing and you know it. Admit it. You know it and they are doing it for a reason…to be sure that the less educated of this country (right now those in PA) know that there is this person, who, BTW, happens to be brilliant, intelligent, charismatic, knowledgeable and COULD bring about real change to this country, who is running for president; but, hey, you gotta get it that this guy is a black man. Get it. That is what the Clinton’s, et al, are all about. He’s black! Now, Marc (sleaze bag) Penn and the other Clintonistas have made their point, just as they did in DUMB Ohio.
Hopefully, Obama will stay ahead of the fray and go on with his message and ignore the degenerates.
Posted by: Karolenna | March 13, 2008 9:53 PM
To KGC:
"Mrs. Ferraro was a finance chair "
member of the finance committee as long as we are striving for accuracy.”
But, she seems to be a mouth piece for the Clinton campaign, as she has said she will continue to be.
Posted by: Karolenna | March 13, 2008 9:55 PM
GORDO,
Enjoy the ride until June when HRC will be confirmed as the nominee.
Then Dems will draw the clear , compelling distictions between our vision and solutions against your man JMc status quo vision.
Posted by: Vivian | March 13, 2008 9:55 PM
Axel wanting to change Bo Stump speech. It is about time. Because anyone who things he is going to go to Washington and change the way things have run for 200 years is smoking stuff that is rotting your brain. That said, why didn't he try to change it while he was in Congress? Flim Flam Man
Speaking of that - CQ has an article on the Fl /Mi redo's. Seems Bo wants to veto everything about Fl redo - and as to the original - he says no way unless Hill splits the delegate vote with him 50/50/ .Yes the audacity - to suggest she give him her delegates or unless he won't play - he'll take his marbles and go home. I think he has already lost his marbles.. There is his ego showing up again..bigger than he is.
Posted by: young 73 | March 13, 2008 9:57 PM
From KGC:
“maybe Rev Wright could sing out”
Well, you could have Rod Parsley as McCain does on his side. Talk about hypocrisy. Parsley has his 12,000 plus congregation and his fleet of jets to take him where and whenever he wants in the name of Jeezzzzeee…uusss. Hypocrite. His website says Jesus promises you an abundant life. God, talk about abundant. A man of God does not travel around in jets, IMO.
The horror stories I could tell of families destroyed by that bastard. Families completely split apart when one or the other spouse goes into those doors and the depths of his “word”. Have a good friend right now who is bright, very beautiful and intelligent. Her husband “went through those doors” and she is trying to disassociate herself (by divorce) from the devil.
http://www.rodparsley.com/
Posted by: Karolenna | March 13, 2008 10:00 PM
"But, she seems to be a mouth piece for the Clinton campaign, as she has said she will continue to be."
Karl
Not a single accurate word and Karl you are kind of shrill tonight
'Let me repeat my question
this is your statement
We Obama supporters want his stump speech changed, and we don’t want the kitchen sink…just the truth.'
What changes do you want and what is truth.?
Sounds to me like you have your balls all in a twist.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | March 13, 2008 10:05 PM
“Enjoy the ride until June when HRC will be confirmed as the nominee.
Then Dems will draw the clear , compelling distictions between our vision and solutions against your man JMc status quo vision.”
Well, I for one will be on my way to Denver along with (hopefully) thousands of others. Some of us have seen democracy stolen from us before (’68). We won’t allow it again. The Clintons, if “chosen” by the so-called super delegates, will destroy the Democratic Party by their greed.
At that time, I am for Obama going Independent. I’ve heard others say the same thing. I know he would win more votes than HRC. Who gives a shit if McCain wins at the point? What’s the use? He will bomb Iran anyway and 2012 is just down the road.
Posted by: Karolenna | March 13, 2008 10:06 PM
Karolenna
Have you submitted your application. I think you could in on the first try,.
Posted by: dumb troll hall of fame | March 13, 2008 10:09 PM
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/03/florida-faces-conventioneve-de.html#comment-51760
Didn't you see her as a young atty., every day, at the tables during the televised Watergate hearings?
Posted by: Dexter
| March 13, 2008 10:09 PM
"Sounds to me like you have your balls all in a twist.:
Probably. I'm just tired of hearing about all of these white, older females for Clinton. Not true. Almost every friend I have, who BTW is older, is for Obama...Republicans and Independents. God knows, there are a lot of them here. You and yours are ONLY for HRC because she is a woman. But, she is NOT the woman who would be president at this time. Trust me. She is not. She is NOTHING but power hungry, as is her husband. BTW, I'm am so happy and glad to see that his polls are really down. Maybe those who want to pay to hear him speak will think twice now.
Now, how can we bring Monica to the forefront????
Posted by: Karolenna | March 13, 2008 10:11 PM
Vivian ---------------------------
"Then Dems will draw the clear , compelling distictions between our vision and solutions against your man JMc status quo vision."
Where did you get the idea I'm for McCain? Have been for Hillary and against Obama from my first post here.
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 10:23 PM
Calm down, Karo. Maybe Bill will call you back after all.
Posted by: Patsi | March 13, 2008 10:28 PM
DUMBASS QUESTION: "Ok I've seen about 4 clips of Rev. Wright. what exactly is it he's said that is so terrible?"
PAINFULLY OBVIOUS ANSWER: Gee, I think maybe "God Damn America" might be a good place to start, particularly if one of your followers happens to be running for the President of the United States (of America).
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 10:29 PM
Karolenna...I think it's time for you to go beddy bye right now. It'll all be better in the morning.
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| March 13, 2008 10:32 PM
LL, You good!
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/trailmix/2008/03/florida-faces-conventioneve-de.html#comment-52002
Posted by: Flatus
| March 13, 2008 10:49 PM
This is a church I could belong to.
A church that doesn't just worry about my soul but worrys about the whole me. My brain , my body, my spirit. Look at the ministries in the link below
http://www.tucc.org/ministries.htm
I'm ready to go to Chicago and join a church
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9oXrK0LazE
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 10:51 PM
Some more of those dangerous radicals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCJbzqcz6Fo&feature=related
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:09 PM
Dangerous radicals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSXnQkqYqA4
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:17 PM
Oregon Democrat proclaimed in righteous indignation:
"I would get out of my seat and walk out of the church if those sentiments were professed from the pulpit"
Something like this? from the mission statement
"We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian"
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:40 PM
'*peeks in the room to see who's around*
Damn Gordo is that you!
scared the shit out of me..:)
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 13, 2008 11:42 PM
OD
Maybe this would make you walk out.
"we are called to be agents of liberation not only for the oppressed, but for all of God’s family"
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:44 PM
How about this OD
Would this make you walk?
"We are called out to be "a chosen people" that pays no attention to socio-economic or educational backgrounds. We are made up of the highly educated and the uneducated. Our congregation is a combination of the haves and the have-nots; the economically disadvantaged, the under-class, the unemployed and the employable"
For me this statement make me want to go to Chicago and I would have to walk because I've got no car.
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:48 PM
Barack Obama's Pastor Problem
"The top story in the blogosphere right now is reaction to this ABC News Report on Barack Obama's pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who says:
"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/03/barack-obamas-pastor-problem.html
Posted by: GORDO | March 13, 2008 11:50 PM
"The fortunate who are among us combine forces with the less fortunate to become agents of change for God who is not pleased with America’s economic mal-distribution!"
Sing it brother , Praise Jesus!
Amem!!
Posted by: black like me | March 13, 2008 11:52 PM
Good night everyone..Enjoying the rain in beautiful Oregon.
Posted by: Oregon Democrat | March 13, 2008 11:56 PM
"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No, no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme."
Is there nothing there that is not true ?
When you look at the way we ignored New Orleans.
The way we execute criminals without a worry if they are guilty or innocent. The way we debate on this very blog and across the nation, the legitimacy of torture. The fact that dozens are dying everyday in a war we started and don't know how to end?
So should we be blessed?
Why?
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:00 AM
Barak's Pastor problem is his pastor gives a damn and tells the truth. Not a good political strategy
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:04 AM
Truth? This is a political campaign - let's see Obama defend those statements.
Posted by: GORDO | March 14, 2008 12:09 AM
Gordo
What an Aryan Christian web site looks like
http://www.aryannations.org/
What Black Liberation web site looks like
http://www.tucc.org/about.htm
Learn the difference so you don't look like a fool
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:14 AM
black like me:
http://www.blackagendareport.com/
Posted by: Patsi | March 14, 2008 12:18 AM
From my 9:21 PM post:
"It means the members embrace "things African above things American," says black political commentator Erik Rush, who also says this should be as alarming as a Republican presidential candidate "belonging to the Aryan Brethren Church of Christ." Tucker Carlson of MSNBC once described Trinity as having a "racially exclusive theology" that "contradicts the basic tenets of Christianity."
Posted by: GORDO | March 14, 2008 12:25 AM
I think Barack needs to bring his pastor out of the closet.
The man is loaded with charisma, He is intellegent and knows how to stay on message. Put him on 60 min. or some show like that. let him go on Opra. He will charm the hell out of them. Everybody will see he is a good person just a little wacky. Then no problem /oldnews.
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:25 AM
Gordo
Just a question since you reposted your rascist slander.
Does it take a lot of time to iron that robe and get it wrinkle free?
another question.
How do you keep it so white?
Since it is covering up such a dirty soul I would think leakage would be a problem.
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:35 AM
I did not write that - complain to Erik Rush and Tucker Carlson (their quotes). Just like Obama, when cornered, you play the race card. Are you Bear?
Posted by: GORDO | March 14, 2008 12:45 AM
Where I live the pastors always say a prayer for the POTUS no matter who s/he is at the time.
I personally would not be offended by "God DAMN America", but then I would never hear it in local churches, so that's no issue.
It's true that people are already picking apart every little thing in all the candidates' past and present, but if this is "just warming up", it'll be interesting what the swift boaters will do against the Democrat.
Obama didn't say it, and I'm sure he didn't write the sermon.
However, I did see and hear John McInane McCain say he would keep troops in Iraq for one hundred years.
Now, this alone should have been enough to cart him off the stage, disallow him to debate---finish him like the debate king-makers finished off Dennis Kucinich---just keep him away. But , my friends, we know what's going on. I have not gone so far as a radio host on Air America did last week, calling HRC & Obama "neocons", but there is no doubt they are saying they will "end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan", and are not meaning it at all.
Either one , add McInsane McCainto the mix, and say any of the US POTUS contenders are keeping us in this g'damn war of WBush forever. Bush wins. It's a shame...maybe even a GODDAMN SHAME, right, Rev?
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 12:47 AM
"Because as far as I can see Obama's the whitest black man around."
Patsi,
That's one of those ''too much for the average Indian'" things.:)
i'm confounde;, what do you mean?
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 14, 2008 12:49 AM
Patsi
Interesting link. I skimmed it.
Is Obama a progressive? Good question.
The prison article brings up several points for me. We all know several people that are in prison. It is a tragedy that so many young black men are in prison but most of them did not get picked up on their way to Sunday school. I think something can be said about the sentence structure in this nation. But there were some of them that were a danger to my community and I don't want to see them released. Things are peaceful now. they weren't 15 years ago.
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 12:52 AM
That airhead Dana Perino on Stewart's show, talking about how the press has lost interest in the Iraq war...Ernie Pyle is spinning in his grave, as are Edward R.Murrow and Bob Trout.
Walter Cronkite must be going crazy.
The war rages and we have to find it on page 7. Move over , Walter, room for me on the disgusted bench?
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 12:54 AM
Chunky Monkey ...extra choco-syrup all over it. TY Bri.
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 12:57 AM
* Fox's U-Bet Chocolate-Flavored Syrup*
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 12:58 AM
Hear that story last week on ComCen about Moses being high as a kite on some hallucinogen when he received the Ten Commandments?
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 1:00 AM
Gordo
If you continue to post racist material even when you have been given proof to the contrary, then what else should I call you?
If you don't want the lable attached to you then don't do it.
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 1:05 AM
black like me ---------
There you go again - the race card. Think the Repubs will back off? The Rev is being discussed on CNN as I post. I've been warning Obama supporters about the Rev Wright problem before this went mainstream. Fair or not, it's out there now.
Posted by: GORDO | March 14, 2008 1:20 AM
the girl can SING! And pretty damn well, I say:
http://weblogs.newsday.com/entertainment/music/blog/2008/03/ashley_alexandra_dupre_aka_kri.html
Posted by: Dexter
| March 14, 2008 1:24 AM
Gordo
"the race card" is a political strategy that is designed to remind blacks that in the end we can't trust you whites at all. You will always screw us.
That is political
This is personal
I said what I said and you are what you are. Outside of me reaching throught internet tubes and slapping the shit out of you, there is nothing more to be said
Posted by: black like me | March 14, 2008 1:44 AM
black like me ---------
How do you know I am not Black? This issue is not going away. But maybe if we close our eyes and put our fingers in our ears, we can all pretend it is not being discussed elsewhere. You remind me of Bear.
Posted by: GORDO | March 14, 2008 1:59 AM
......Looking at what posts I could.......is this blog about to implode? Don't answer that. I'll check back in a few days to see if we are all still here and the atmosphere has cleared a bit.
Posted by: Sheila Hussein the Chef Nun | March 14, 2008 5:31 AM
Dear Craig:
I watch you often, mostly from MSNBC a.k.a. MSBHO [messiah Barack H. Obama network] Hardball, the now defunct Tucker, Countdown etc and always enjoy your segments that are far too short.
You are one of the few credible journalists I respect and perhaps the only one not in the tank for Sen. Obama's campaign.
What amazes me is the hatred for Senator Clinton that permeates through the media and many liberal democratic websites. Daily she gets castigated from both the left and right wing.
Yesterday the whole entire day on MSNBC was spent castigating Senator. Clinton in relation to silly trivial nonsense of a comment by former Rep. Geraldine Ferraro [whom I deeply respect and admire] for a comment she made that was speciously in a deliberate way portrayed as racist, which angered me and simply not true! The whole day was endless replays of Geraldine’s comment, and Hillary’s apology ad nauseum.
Today I would like to see how the media addresses the verbal messianic Black Separatist views of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright who, in one capacity or another has been associated with Senator Obama’s campaign. Many of his homilies have little to do with Senator Obama’s message of hope, unity and reaching out and being inclusive. Let’s face it; Rev. Wright plays an important role in the Senator’s life. Well over 20 years of his life has been devoted to this Church and Reverend. When we attend Sunday or Saturday services, we listen to our pastors and try to carry out what they preach in their homilies and employ it in our everyday lives. Now having prefaced that, what does it say when a Reverend preaches that HIV was sanctioned by government against African Americans, or that [paraphrasing] that America deserved 911 and calling upon God for the damnation of America. In addition, that Americans were horribly wicked for dropping nuclear bombs upon Japan, maybe the Reverend forgot about Pearl Harbor and the Bataan Death March?
The immediate days ahead will be interesting ones, so far at this posting Senator Obama has not repudiated the Rev. Wrights remarks other than a disclaimer by a campaign aide, I suppose they are weighing the situation. On the one hand, if he repudiates the Reverend, he risks possibly alienating the African American community and being labeled an “Uncle Tom” or if he remains non-committal and refuses to renounce and repudiate the Reverend publically will he lose support among whites that have supported him?
All I can say is that the days ahead will be very interesting. In any event, I do not think there will be a revote in Florida and honestly, I see no logical rational reason that the delegates cannot stay as is since both Hillary and Obama’s names were on the ballot. Michigan however is a different story and who knows how that will play out.
Anyway, Craig, you will have to get back at Mica, Joe, and Willy on “Morning Joe” having a little fun at your expense. Anyway, wink wink I like your video in the “hot tub”
Sincerely,
--Heather
Posted by: Heather | March 14, 2008 9:11 AM
......Looking at what posts I could.......is this blog about to implode? Don't answer that. I'll check back in a few days to see if we are all still here and the atmosphere has cleared a bit.
Posted by: Sheila Hussein the Chef Nun | March 14, 2008 5:31 AM
the only problems here are constant wankering about other people's posts and the insult machine you encourage. No one else is having a problem
Care to sign up
Posted by: dumb troll hall of fame | March 14, 2008 9:51 AM
Post A Comment