Produced by CQ's Andrew Satter
"The Space Between Clinton and Obama"
by CQ's David Nather (1/14)
Craig at the Virginia Festival of the Book
Saturday (3/29) 2:00 PM EST
Barnes & Noble, 1035A Emmet Street
Charlottesville, VA (434) 984-0461
Craig on MSNBC Today
1:30 / 3:00 / 4:00 PM EST
. . . and on MSNBC "Hardball" 5:10 PM EST
Comments
Last night I heard Rachel Maddow state that on those (rare) occasions when she hears either Sen. Clinton or Sen. Obama say the word "McCain" a little bell goes off, reminding her that they haven't completely forgotten that the Republican party exists.
And that's a big part of the Dems' problem these days, as everyone has stated ad nauseum. Once McCain's economic proposals, or lack of them, become clear, that's when the Dems' ideas will hopefully stand out in stark relief.
Posted by: Mary Kitt-Neel
| March 28, 2008 6:38 AM
watch out for the po-leece down there in Charlottesville........looks like a big flap-doodle down on Highway 64.......maybe it'll be over before tomorrow.....
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 6:47 AM
http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=4536158&page=1
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 6:55 AM
Mornin' y'all!
Craig, your post today reminded me of this ditty today-
http://youtube.com/watch?v=YvkX3t5LgVI
Posted by: JennBe
| March 28, 2008 7:18 AM
Hillary's speech yesterday about both Clintonand Obama supporters NOT voting for McCain was great. Haven't heard the candidate of hope and change address it.
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 7:20 AM
Ahhh, I look forward to Friday's weblog the way I used to look forward to Sunday concert videos.
If Hil'ry, or anyone, thinks that the majority of people are back-your-party-come-what-may voters, she/they is out of touch. Is this a sign that she is backing away a bit, ready to settle for veep? Hope not.
Now, let's see if I can get word verifier to work this morning.
Posted by: blueINdallas | March 28, 2008 7:46 AM
Juan Williams on Election 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leoy8EOWzl8
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 7:47 AM
Thought this was pretty funny this morning-
ABC's Jake Tapper on "Good Morning America": "Former President Bill Clinton has a new way for his wife to become the nominee — only count the 40 primaries not the 18 caucuses. In a call with supporters in Texas, he said: 'Hillary's gonna wind up with the lead in the popular vote in the primary states. It's the caucuses … that have been killing us."
From the Playbook on the political-
http://dyn.politico.com/playbook/
Posted by: JennBe
| March 28, 2008 7:55 AM
Good Morning Craig, Everyone:
Nice to turn on the television have have Barnicle educate us on what change is:-))
If I were Barnicle I'd worry about Jaoba Chamberlain educating him who "Poppy" is :-))
--Heather
Posted by: Heather
| March 28, 2008 7:56 AM
Good morning all. Typekey isn't talking to me today. They say they are sending you passwords .... they lie.
Morning Joe is now talking about the thrills up Matthews legs. Have Tweety and Joe Joe had a falling out?
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 8:00 AM
"Obama is getting creamed by the Rev. Wright revelations, even though Democratic primary voters aren't paying attention. It will be quite different in the general, as most of us who deal in the world of political reality know. Obviously, Obama watched what Clinton did a couple of days ago. So he's decided to play a very simple game. It's called Follow the Leader. Oh, and for you Obama fans, your guy isn't the one leading. Because after sitting in the pews of Trinity for 20 years, admitting he'd heard some of Wright's screeds, after he said he didn't, Barack Obama still couldn't figure out the right thing to do until Clinton demonstrated it for him a couple of days ago.
So if you're one of those people buying his latest "Had the reverend not retired, and had he not acknowledged that what he had said had deeply offended people and were inappropriate and mischaracterized what I believe is the greatness of this country, for all its flaws, then I wouldn't have felt comfortable staying at the church," well, then I've got a country you can buy cheap. It's on sale for suckers."
http://taylormarsh.com/
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 8:01 AM
Morning all
Pennsylvania senator to endorse Obama ----AP
Bob Casey is now publicly on board.
Posted by: George | March 28, 2008 8:02 AM
Dear Craig:
I loved the newest episode of Video Trail Mix. Tell me your not as addicted to tv as well hmmmm better remain silent on that one.
Craig one thing, if Hillary had gone to the Virgin Islands instead of Obama and got that serious tan going, truly they would have been impossible to tell apart :-))
Kidding.
Sincerely,
Heather
Posted by: Heather
| March 28, 2008 8:03 AM
On the similar votes in Senate. There have been 85 votes on the war, and I believe they have voted the same 84 times. Not exactly the war monger vs. the peacenik.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 8:05 AM
mornin' all.
JennBe, Bill Clinton is simply speaking the obvious. He was not advocating not counting the caucuses, at least that one liner from Tapper doesn't say or suggest that, although in a sane electoral process no one would.
Blue, I believe it is Hillary talking to Dems who don't seem to understand the significance of letting a McCain presidency occur. At every point in the process up to the point you vote for someone in the general you face a choice between the 2 (or more) viable candidates that you have to choose from. In November, it will be McCain and one of the standing dem candidates. Now I can only look at the likely consequences of a McCain predsidency (the known likely consequences are an extended war in Iraq, an extension of Bushco economics, and a couple more RWNCs on the Supreme Court (to say nothing of the other two major levels of the federal bench)) and the choice for me is clear - the Dem.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 8:13 AM
" Is this a sign that she is backing away a bit, ready to settle for veep? Hope not."
I hope not too...because Obama won't be electable.
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 8:17 AM
JennBe: In a call with supporters in Texas, he said: 'Hillary's gonna wind up with the lead in the popular vote in the primary states. It's the caucuses … that have been killing us."
This that statement translates to this? How:
ABC's Jake Tapper on "Good Morning America": "Former President Bill Clinton has a new way for his wife to become the nominee — only count the 40 primaries not the 18 caucuses.
The spin by the Obamedia is sickening.
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 8:19 AM
And neither will Hillary.
Posted by: anon-paranoid
| March 28, 2008 8:20 AM
Has anybody read the article with regard to the mansion that Rev. Wright ($ 1.6million) is building in Chiacago..
Am anxious to know who sealed the deal on this mortgage....
Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008 8:24 AM
And for those of you who need an economic contrast between McCain and Clinton, & Obama, Krugman provides it.
Short story - in the mortgage arena - deregulate them and do nothing (McCain) versus tighter regulation and a progressive approach to aid homeowners and provide stability to the market for the Dems (although their programs differ in the particulars).
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/28/opinion/28krugman.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 8:24 AM
And homophopes I believe are those who have a problem with homosexuals. I don't have a problem with them.
I do have a problem though with anyone in a marriage whether it is the husband or wife who are repeat offenders who cheat on their spouses and stay together.
It tells your children that it's okay to cheat on your spouse. So a cheating spouse is alright in your book as far as children in the family go?
This is just as bad as staying in a relationship of verbal or physical abuse and don't do any good for the children. It only hurts them in the end and gives them a warped sense of values.
Posted by: anon-paranoid
| March 28, 2008 8:25 AM
Guys, I wasn't trying to start an arguement, just thought it was a funny little ditty. Trust me I'm not spinning for anyone. The only spin I know by heart is Republican. ;)
Posted by: JennBe
| March 28, 2008 8:28 AM
Patsi,
This is the bias that has been killing for some of us.
Can it be anymore clear how MSM is continuously twisting and turning. I am not a hateful person, but I can really feel the anger bubbling up. What I still do not understand is that Hillary doesn´t use this information (although information is regarded as new and relevant, and this is not) and shows the constant twists that are being made by MSM
The witchhunt continues.....
Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008 8:29 AM
Obama messiah' creator: How far will 'cult' go?
"The creator of a satirical blog that asks whether Barack Obama is the "messiah" says he has a serious purpose, hoping the mainstream media will "work through its childish infatuation" with the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.
"On a basic level, my concern is that Obama will ride the wave of emotion and mob-enthusiasm to office," Blosser wrote. "With the challenges (and inevitable compromises) that come with the job, illusions are going to fade and dreams are going to crumble."
Blosser is concerned voters are projecting onto Obama expectations that will be impossible to fulfill.
"People talk as if this man will usher in a new era of politics in which everybody, regardless of their opposing (and very real) political and moral convictions will join hands in some vague approximation of unity," he continued. "This will literally spell the end of politics as we know it."
"Obama's campaign seems to be predicated on the assumption that he has somehow transcended 'power politics,' that he is in fact the anti-politician," Blosser stressed. "Call me a cynic, but I have the hunch when you peel off the hope-saturated façade and get down to the hard business of running this country, you will find Obama is a politician, much like any other."
"How that will affect the masses will, of course, depend on the degree to which they were taken in," he added, noting the potential for let-down Obama has created by raising expectations."
(Yes, I know it is WND.)
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60093
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 8:29 AM
Bob Casey the anti choice senator.
Claire McCaskill the anti immigration senator
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 8:50 AM
" Is this a sign that she is backing away a bit, ready to settle for veep? Hope not."
I hope not too...because Obama won't be electable.
Posted by: Patsi | March 28, 2008 8:17 AM
Patsi: I'm not sure he is electable. I just don't think the Jeremiah Wright thing is going to go away now that the media is pouring over back issues of his magazine. I realize that the urban relationship between Italians and Blacks is different than other areas but I gotta tell ya...the latest insults from Reverend Wright aimed toward Italians did hit me a little different than the others (my grandparents immigrated to this country from Italy.)
I don't want to open a whole can of worms here...I am just saying that if eventually they find examples of Wright insulting most ethnic and religious groups, more and more people are going to be offended. And it starts getting more and more difficult to accept the story that Obama didn't know Wright was a bigot. (Let me state clearly here that I do not, for one minute, believe that Obama shares any of these views. I am of the opinion that he joined that church purely for street cred and probably didn't attend all that often.) Meanwhile, McCain just inches closer and closer to Pennsylvania Avenue.
I'll close saying this: The timing of that guy's retirement is just too convenient for color TV. If anyone thinks this was a coincidence I have a nice little oceanfront property to sell you in Iowa.
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 8:55 AM
KGC: Exactly my thoughts when I heard Bob Casey. That could have been a "thanks but no thanks" endorsement!
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 8:57 AM
You know, earlier this week, when discussing the race between HRC and BHO, some pundit said, "HRC is on the verge of making BHO unelectable in the general election...".
So, if BHO wins the nomination and loses to McCain, it will, of course be HRC's fault.
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| March 28, 2008 9:00 AM
Heather, you're funny.
Jamie, I hope you saw my reference for you on the book "Founding Brothers" by Ellis.
Craig, I don't know how you deal with the absurditiy of Olberman with a straight face.
Gordo, without using World Net Daily, maybe you can did up more real links between the anti-American and anti-Jewish Islamic groups and donnors and friends of Obama. And the perhaps the connections between these people and Obama's group of Pastors.
Obama's new claim he would have left Trinity had Wright stayed is pandering to polls. His Church still posts crap in their news letter and stands behind Wright,
And Jamie, did you see the link between AAAN and Cairs. The FBI and other Federal and Illionois State investigators are going to look at that.
What is the problem? For Obama to say he had no clue of this web around him is not believable. How did Rezko find Khadili and why would AAAN work with Cairs if they did not shre ideology. The Jewish vote will find this interesting.
I find it hard to see why any Hillary supporters would even go on MSNBC. I find Olberman and Mathews particularly offensive. Last night's broadcast was no exception.
Also, Bill Nelson's advocating a popular vote is funny. If a popular vote of Democrats were held today, Hillary would win the nomination. One has a hard time finding principle in the Demcratic Party.
Posted by: Maxtrue | March 28, 2008 9:02 AM
AP, is this the new Obama attack talking point? It's a bit short sighted don't you think? So now the standard you suggest would hold the McCains and Giulianis up as having done the right things in their unfaithful marriages. Excuse me compadre, but IMHO it is up to the participants in a marriage to decide whether to stay together following unfaithfulness, and your per se rule is ridiculous. How the couple deals with the disclosure determines whether staying together suggests it is OK to cheat - and kicking the bum out is not theonly alternative acceptable to all. Isn't there something to be said for remaining in a marriage and doing the hard work needed to salvage it after one party to it f*cksk up? You can keep your morality within your own family. For all you know, Hillary has Bill's balls in a jar on the mantle. Try talking about issues that mean a damn, and stop trying to be the morals arbiter.
You channeling Brian now ? That line of attack would be more typical of him than you.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 9:03 AM
Hillary Clinton started World War I
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 9:03 AM
Today's Trailmix is quite good. Clinton however, has tried to "encourage" Shrub to take action now and did present an idea that could have been acceptable to
a bi partisan effort. And Obama, Mr. Bi partisan ,took cheap shots at it.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 9:12 AM
Yes, a number of pundits have blamed Hillary for any disaster that may occur. Hell, then why get out now? LOL
Posted by: Maxtrue | March 28, 2008 9:18 AM
All is not exactly right on the Progressive side:
http://stubbornfacts.us/politics/2008_election/progressive_party_has_some_bigoted_skeletons_in_its_closet#comment-13787
Posted by: Maxtrue | March 28, 2008 9:21 AM
Craig, the economy is a monumental deal.
Consider this. We have the dollar crashing and overseas companies really trying to take advantage of the bargains over here.
What bargains are there? Hamburgers? Hotel rooms? What else? Certainly there are no bargains to be found in manufacturing, the traditional bedrock of America's economic might. Why? Because our manufacturing capability has been dismantled and destroyed.
And, once something as incredibly complex as the intermeshing pieces of a manufacturing economy are lost, so are the intellectual and trained human resources that created and maintained it.
I saw this coming back in the, when was it, late 50s or early 60s, when people in this country started to jump on the metrification bandwagon. (For the people who weren't around then, we (most of our hemisphere) used to make our nuts in bolts in inches rather than millimeters. The Blokes used a silly system called Whitworth. I know all this silly stuff because I was really into cars back then.)
In any case, there was a strong movement in this country to adopt metric units of measure across the board. It was done for manufacturing, but things like quarts and yards and feet still survive.
When we adopted it for manufacturing it meant that the rest of the world had an easy time making stuff to fit our machines. IMO, that was the start of our industrial downfall; it was then that we started losing our competitive advantage.
So what are the candidates to say? "It's the economy, stupid!"
Of course it is. But how in the world are we going to create something to replace manufacturing. And should we try to recreate some of our lost capability? The greening of America sure gives an incentive to do just that.
I know this for certain sure: We can't continue being a hamburger economy and have any sort of acceptable quality of life.
Posted by: Flatus
| March 28, 2008 9:23 AM
The current economic crisis is a result of unrealistically cheap credit and an unrealistic approach to the costs and sources of energy.
Both are the result of failed Shrubian policies.
(and the enabling goopers)
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 9:23 AM
"Hillary's speech yesterday about both Clintonand Obama supporters NOT voting for McCain was great. Haven't heard the candidate of hope and change address it."
And it's only getting marginal attention on cable news this morning. When they do highlight it, they don't highlight the part where she is actually pleading with her supporters to "please think about [it]" and that no matter what the difference between her and Obama she says they are nothing compared to the differences between the two dems and McCain. She is reacting to the poll that says her supporters won't vote for Obama. It would be nice if the media just doesn't clip it and say - Oh Hillary says the party will unite when what she was really doing is pleading with her supporters to be true Democrats.
And yep, Patsi is right...don't hear Mr. Hope and Change saying the same thing.
The problem with her pleading is that the same poll showed that most of the people that will vote the other way are Independents...not Democrats - only a small number were Democrats...so harder to convince Indies to go along with a party...I mean...that's why they are Independents.
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 28, 2008 9:25 AM
If BHO does win the nomination, the only way he would beat McCain, is to have HRC as his VP.
IMHO, HRC should not accept the VP position. I think, as VP, HRC would be blamed for every misstep BHO made, as President.
I am sure all the pundits would be saying that HRC and Bill must be behind the scenes "tag-teaming" poor, BHO into making bad decisions.
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| March 28, 2008 9:28 AM
When Bush took office oil was $23 dollarsa barrel and now $104. The cause for the increase is speculation which Bush hides behind a cloud of fear and confusion.
And he has done nothing for alternative energy programs. Congress should re work the investment tax credit for alternative energies and allow that to continue.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 9:33 AM
In the end...I think the thing that will finally sink Obama in the Fall (if he gets the nomination) is the contradiction on Israel. He says he's pro-Israel but then surrounds himself with people who are anti-Israel...and some even go a step further than just being anti-Israel...a couple of those yahoos are anti-Jew (in the hate kind of way...Wright/McPeak - I'm sure Max and Fry can fill in more details). This is starting to bubble up and there is only so long he can continue to say he is Pro-Israel while everyone around him trashes Israel.
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 28, 2008 9:35 AM
Scarborough has a crush on Hillary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QPBZJw6IKs&feature=user
This vid has clips of what Hillary said yesterday about not voting for John McCain...superb moment for her. Very real.
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 9:39 AM
Pogo wrote: "Try talking about issues that mean a damn, and stop trying to be the morals arbiter."
Hear! Hear! Pogo - well said.
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 28, 2008 9:39 AM
Senator Bill Nelson has proposed ending the electoral college. No canddate will ever visit Wyoming again.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 9:41 AM
Wendy: I imagine the outrage will be similar to that directed toward Jimmy Carter after his book came out...
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 9:42 AM
There aren't any significant policy differences between Hillary & Barak? That explains why the Clintons have tried to use race, religion, and gender as weapons.
But it didn't work.
Next, they tried to bribe/threaten the superdelegates into helping them steal the nomination.
That's not working either.
Now they're trying to work out a deal with Hillary as Obama's VP. No deal and she keeps fighting dirty all the way to the convention, which will weaken the party and hand the election to McCain. (And then, they're thinking she can run in 2012.)
Posted by: nash
| March 28, 2008 9:42 AM
fixed your typos Nasch you are so angry and silly
There aren't any significant policy differences between Hillary & Barak? That explains why Obama have tried to use race, religion, and gender as weapons.
But it didn't work.
Next, they tried to bribe/threaten the superdelegates into helping them steal the nomination.
That's not working either.
Now they're trying to work out a deal with Obama as as VP. No deal and he keeps fighting dirty all the way to the convention, which will weaken the party and hand the election to McCain. (And then, they're thinking he can run in 2012.)
Posted by: Arianna | March 28, 2008 9:47 AM
Ally - thanks for finding that clip - I was trying to back-up and watch Mo-Jo this morning but couldn't get the entire thing so didn't see that they played the entire clip. Good for MoJo
Of course, now that JoeS has a crush on Hillary (CANNOT WAIT FOR THE VIDEO) - he's going to show all the good stuff.
ROFL
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 28, 2008 9:47 AM
Wendy: That was an authentic moment for her (hate that word because of Oprah) but it is appropriate here. When Obama talks about party unity it just doesn't ring true. It is begrudgingly.
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 9:52 AM
AP
Divorce is much harder on children than a cheating spouse. Unless there is constant fighting or violence in the home, the couple is better off staying together if only for the sake of security and finances. The divorce rate is what is inflicting the most damage on children in our modern society.
More than 65% of all men cheat (women do as well but it's a lot lower percentage). The divorce rate is high enough without adding more reasons.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 9:53 AM
Obama Surrogate Threatens Super Delegates
Is anyone besides me tired of Obama surrogates threatening super delegates? On Meet The Press today Obama spokesperson, former Sen. Bill Bradley, basically threatened super delegates to support Obama ... or else face a challenger in their next election.
This is not the first time I've heard this threat.
It seems the Obama camp thinks super delegates should "follow the will" of the voters in their respective states. If Obama won the most pledged delegates in a state, then all the super delegates in the state should automatically support him.
When questioned by Rep. Nita Lowey about whether Sens. Kennedy and Kerry should "switch" their support to Sen. Clinton, since she won Massachusetts, Bradley offered a telling response. He basically said they should go ahead and vote the way THEY wanted to because even if they were challenged, who could beat them?
This is an interesting thought process in an age of "new politics" being touted by Sen. Obama.
Posted by: Arianna | March 28, 2008 9:55 AM
Wendy! McCain does seem to have strong support for Israel, which will undoubtedly help him with the Jewish vote in the fall. Obama's problem will be trying to talk pro Israel - which he has done pretty well of late, and has gotten good reviews for it - while trying to distance himself from the Wrights, McPeaks, Zbigs, Powers, should I go on? While I hope that won't be fatal in NY, FL & CA if he wins the nomination, it certainly won't help him in those states.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 9:55 AM
Jamie: Thank you for saying that about children of divorce. I am a child of multiple divorces and I can tell you that it ain't easy.
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 9:59 AM
This election has shown that the caucus system is a problem as it is very undemocratice and is open to both fraud and manipulation. As with generals who fight the last war, the Clintons were depending on the old "insider" methods to win the caucuses. They were not prepared for the organization of the Obama team with a registration and turnout drive that overwhelmed the system.
Now that these flaws have become so obvious, perhaps the party will go to the secret ballot primary for future contests. For this one, it is simply too late. Obama found a way to stack up the states that hadn't been used before. Clinton probably would have won and out and out total votes primary battle, but that wasn't the system in place.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 9:59 AM
"People talk as if this man will usher in a new era of politics in which everybody, regardless of their opposing (and very real) political and moral convictions will join hands in some vague approximation of unity," he continued. "This will literally spell the end of politics as we know it."
And it just might save America and the Constitution.
Posted by: anon-paranoid
| March 28, 2008 10:02 AM
"Has anybody read the article with regard to the mansion that Rev. Wright ($ 1.6million) is building in Chiacago.."
I'm always amazed at the amount of money stacked up by these "men of God".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhDG67COW6w
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 10:05 AM
"I do have a problem though with anyone in a marriage whether it is the husband or wife who are repeat offenders who cheat on their spouses and stay together.It tells your children that it's okay to cheat on your spouse. So a cheating spouse is alright in your book as far as children in the family go?This is just as bad as staying in a relationship of verbal or physical abuse and don't do any good for the children. It only hurts them in the end and gives them a warped sense of values."
I do have a problem though with [anyone who thrives on conspiracy theories and sees Nazis under every bed].
It tells your children that it's okay to [live in a fantasy world]. It only hurts them in the end and gives them a warped sense of [reality].
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 10:06 AM
Arianna,
Bill Bradley is a useful tool for Obama, and hardly a big stick swinger, except in the financial and consulting field. Remember, his presy campaign in '00 was lost not as much because of Gore, but because of McCain. And the candidate of hope and change is using him this time? I think there are better choices out there. He is probably still popular in NJ, but when did NJ last vote repug? His answer about Kennedy & Kerry is certainly consistent with the politics of hope & change, now isn't it? LOLOL
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:07 AM
As I said a few days ago, compelling Superdelegates to vote based on the results of their "state" presents some challenges because that's not the way the system was set up. Does a SD vote with the state they live in now? Or is it the state in which they served? Or is it their home state if they didn't serve in office? Are they going to force the SDs to vote the way their state voted or are power players like the Kennedys and Richardson going to get a pass on this rule and they can vote against their state results? Only the peons must follow the rules? The lack of leadership in the Democratic party is pathetic.
Posted by: Ally
| March 28, 2008 10:07 AM
"Bradley offered a telling response. He basically said they should go ahead and vote the way THEY wanted to because even if they were challenged, who could beat them?"
Bradley gave this same response with a smirk on his face a couple of weeks ago.
Maxine Waters has the best response:
"I'd rather LOSE MY SEAT..."
and guess what...nobody is going to beat Maxine Waters either.
Posted by: Wendy!
| March 28, 2008 10:08 AM
pogo...
It was suggested that Obama was a bad parent because of the CHURCH he attended. And I responded to that. To even suggest he was a bad parent because of it I brought up cheating husbands and wifes that condone it.
If someone were to cheat once than I think that they should try to work it out. But multiple times and its probably still going on, doesn't say that Bill's a bad parent either.
But to suggest because of church one attends makes them a bad parent and suggesting Obama's a bad parent because of Rev. Wright is something scumbags like Republicans would do and not Democrats.
If clinton supporters are going to start judging the morals of Obama than it should be far game to judge the morals of the clintons.
Posted by: anon-paranoid
| March 28, 2008 10:10 AM
"Obama's problem will be trying to talk pro Israel - which he has done pretty well of late, and has gotten good reviews for it -"
He's also added "God bless America" to the end of speeches .....
Tell me again why I love politics ...
I think I liked him better when it was obvious religion was a way for an ambitious man to achieve political success.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 10:11 AM
I had a chance to watch colbert last night.. it was a rerun from St-Patrick's day, but as I didn't see it then, it was new to me! :)
"Nation, it’s tempting to say that our economy is in the crapper. But I think that’s unfair. It is past the crapper, down the tubes, out the illegal runoff pipe into the ocean where lobsters are feeding on it."
haha... i love colbert!
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 10:12 AM
" some pundit said, "HRC is on the verge of making BHO unelectable in the general election...".
Yeah....like Rev. Wirght didn't gift wrap it for the Repubs. I also agree that Wright's anti-Israel raves will hurt. I'm not sure I understand this country's blind following of all Israeli policy, but it damn sure is a huge deal across the country.
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 10:13 AM
Bill Richardson has shown the way for the superdelegates to vote......they must all vote for the candidate who in their estimation will be most electable in November.......New Mexico went for Hillary, right?
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:16 AM
Pogo
I voted for Dollar Bill in the primaries. But like so many
gris eminence in the Democratic Party, he would rather discuss unrealistic approaches to problems that don't matter instead of what average Americans face everyday.
Posted by: Arianna | March 28, 2008 10:18 AM
What if at the end of the primary calendar Barrack still leads Hillary with about 100 delegates, but she is consistently up in the polls and Mi and Fl were shut out. What r the super delegates to do?
Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008 10:19 AM
Hey Nash good to see you.
Looks like moveon.org is getting involved and standing up to Billary's attempt at threatening Pelosi, good for them, time to send them more money!
Subject: Do Billionaires Own the Democratic Party?
Hi,
I don't know if you saw this, but 20 big Clinton donors tried to bully Nancy Pelosi for saying that superdelegates should let the voters decide who becomes the Democratic nominee. This is the worst kind of insider politics, and it has to stop.
You and I and everyone who has ever given money or time to a progressive candidate make up the backbone of this party.
We need to send a strong signal that we, the small donors, will back Democratic leaders with the courage to stand up for Democracy in the Democratic party. Please join me and sign this statement today.
http://pol.moveon.org/democracy/?r_by=-9123072-kr4Jdd&rc=paste
Thanks!
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC
| March 28, 2008 10:22 AM
the rules are that the superdelegates are to vote for he or she they think will win in november.....on whatever criteria they wish to apply......
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:22 AM
" some pundit said, "HRC is on the verge of making BHO unelectable in the general election...".
Correction: This was said right before Texas and Ohio. It was said on CNN two days before the election, by some african american pundit. Can not recall his name. it is not new....
Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008 10:22 AM
Hi Tylenol
How is Mr. T? Is he staple free?
The economy is Northern California is bad bad bad.
Even out local paper which still holds on to it's Republican outlook admits we are in a recession.
Local governments are going bankrupt in the bay area.
But Shrub what me worry?
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:24 AM
the rules are that the superdelegates are to vote for he or she they think will win in november.....on whatever criteria they wish to apply......
Then wthat the F#$%& is the argument of Nancy Pelosi and the rest?
The Super D´s will decide for themselves. Or are they afraid of what is coming....The convention is after all NOT a caucus......(Hope you catch my drift.....)
Posted by: Jason | March 28, 2008 10:25 AM
Alfred "W" Newman....
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:26 AM
hi KGC... Mr T will be staple free this afternoon :)
not only Shrub, McCain said the other day that Americans are on their own..no gov't help. Nice guy, that McCain.
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 10:27 AM
So many nick names for Shrub
Deficit George Herbert Hoover Custer Bush
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:29 AM
AP, I see your point - and I see the parallels. I don't believe I engaged in that from a moral perspective - I did chuckle at the political snafu it presented however since he, more appropriately his surrogates, have jumped on Bill's pecadillos from day one of the campaign. That said, what's the moral upside for your kids of staying in a church like Wright's? Belief that it's OK to believe in a God who's preached about by one who condemns the country you aspire to be president of and rejects the people who are God's chosen people according to the book the religion is based on? It makes absolutely no sense.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:30 AM
Kate....did you mean to leave out "Caligula"?
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:30 AM
jamie, heheheh
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:32 AM
Tylenol
Good news about Mr. T!
McCain's response was classic
get a job...get two jobs ...get three jobs if you have to.
Did you see the BBC story about "Dubyaville" a homeless encampment in Southern Cal. All people who had lost their homes through foreclosure.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:32 AM
(caligula translates as "little boots" by the way.)
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:32 AM
Kate....did you mean to leave out "Caligula"?
Posted by: sturgeone
I knew there was something I was leaving out :)))
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:33 AM
Yes all those poverty stricken folks at Move On need to check with their accountants to see if they can spare another 100,000 from the piggy banks.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 10:33 AM
Arianna - aloof is the word that comes to mind for Bradley - and that was his rep in the Senate.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:34 AM
(caligula translates as "little boots" by the way.)
Posted by: sturgeone | March 28, 2008 10:32 AM
Thank you for this Sturg...too funny!
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:38 AM
McCain of course realizes that there is increasing employment opportunity in the rapidly growing segment of the economy that provides services to Americans displaced as a result of mortgage foreclosures.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:39 AM
Larry Sinclair update:
"Donald Young, the gay choirmaster at Obama’s church, telephoned me not long before he was murdered. How did he know who I was and how to contact me before I went public with my allegations about Obama?"
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/donald-young-the-gay-choirmaster-at-obamas-church-telephoned-me-not-long-before-he-was-murdered-how-did-he-know-who-i-was-and-how-to-contact-me-before-i-went-public-with-my-allegations-about-oba/
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 10:41 AM
"it is not new...."
--Jason
I only heard it last week...it was new to me 8~)
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| March 28, 2008 10:42 AM
all those rosy job numbers for the past 8 years -- i'm so glad all those people found jobs flippin burgers... but I have a suspicion that those burger flippers are precisely the people who went for those subprime mortgages..so they've been screwed twice by the Shrub admin..and not kissed even once..
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 10:43 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xNOHPJn2Wg
Michelle Obama at South Carolina - just some words out of context
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| March 28, 2008 10:43 AM
oh fer...gordo..stop!!
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 10:44 AM
The words that come out of MLRO's mouth, never cease to amaze me...
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| March 28, 2008 10:47 AM
Jason,
First, read the moveon link above, it explains what these Big Donors are bitching about, which is contrary to DNC rules.
Secondly, as I understand, the Clinton campaign (Big Donors) jumped the gun and assumed a hardass approach to the SDs before even reading Pelosi's remarks, thereby further alienating more SDs. Another foot shooting stroke of genius.
Thirdly, Pelosi's stance on SDs and their duty has not changed.Clinton campaign(Big Donors)are back to the popular vote should win strategy, which is bogus as to rules.
Lastly, sturgeone is correct,
the rules are that the superdelegates are to vote for he or she they think will win in november.....on whatever criteria they wish to apply."
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 28, 2008 10:48 AM
Rez
That is your spindrool (hat tip Lardass Liberal) on the letter.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:51 AM
spindrool as opposed to your ??
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 28, 2008 10:55 AM
Come On Gordo .... We can't have two murderers running at the same time for the Democratic presidential nomination ... It depletes the political pool for later contests.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 10:55 AM
So sturgeone's comments are incorrect?
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 28, 2008 10:56 AM
ty, wait til you see how the nitwit in chief tries to spin today's wage and inflation numbers to be a good thing. I'm sure the folks whose mortages are in delinquency and foreclosure will be comforted to know that goods other than food and fuel were a little cheaper last month and that inflation was only four times the rate of wage increases.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/28/business/28cnd-econ.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1206716125-k46zHl3BQRC5OMwFnawMDA
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:57 AM
I will clarify my remarks although it was clear
Your comments on the letter sent by the donors
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:57 AM
spindrool? I missed that. LL, you are the man!!!
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 10:59 AM
goods other than food and fuel were a little cheaper ...
Yeah but because food and fuel were so high who can buy anything else.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 10:59 AM
hell..who can buy gas and fuel???
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:03 AM
dammit! that would be 'food and fuel'
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:03 AM
Spindrool really needs to get into the dictionary. We need an official meaning and then need to use it as often as possible from all sides until the polticos pick it us.
Craig, can you add Spindrool to "One More Cow"
So and so said, ....
Noun: "Oh that's just so much spindrool!
Verb: "He's spindrooling again!"
Adjective: Another spindrool announcement came from the campaign.
Other suggestions?
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 11:04 AM
"spindrool" is a fabulous word, it is just awesome
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| March 28, 2008 11:04 AM
Patsi...I just coined it tonight:
Spindrool: A collection of random unrelated factoids hastily pulled together in an illogical fashion in order to sustain an ongoing wet dream. Spindrool.
Heck. Maybe it'll make the list for this year's National Spelling Bee. The regionals were today, by the way.
Posted by: LardassLiberal | March 27, 2008 8:21 PM
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:05 AM
oh..and that surge is really working innit??
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:05 AM
kc, IMHO exempting food and fuel from the inflation figures is as bad as not counting city driving when you figure gas mileage and not counting in unemployment numbers people who ceased to draq benefits and have given up and no longer are seeking employment. And the economic figures are "good" or "bad" based not on how their effects impact consumers, but rather how they appear compared to the govenment's economists expectations. We can expect lots of spindrool on the gov't's. press releases on these numbers in fact, I'm betting they'll be too soggy to pick up.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 11:06 AM
About the only way to keep your grocery bill down is to avoid anything made with wheat and to shop as close to home as possible ... your backyard would be a good place to start.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 11:06 AM
well..there's spindrool..and then there's tweety's spin-spit.. that's when the wet dream is transferred to anyone in close proximity
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:07 AM
Jamie-----------------------------
Some even tried to tie the death of Sonny Bono to the Clintons. Also, the Clintons were behind the "OJ murders" - OJ and Bill Clinton had the same drug dealer.
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 11:08 AM
dammit - that would be "draw benefits"
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 11:09 AM
Pogo/Ty
I too don't get how you exempt food and fuel.
I think Shrub is the worst elected official in the history of the United States. We will be recovering from the damage he and his gooper pals have done to every sector of life in the US for a long time. Republicans should hang their heads in shame and work to change their own party not weasel out. What a bunch of wimps.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:09 AM
Did the Clintons move the tree that Sono Bono hit???
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:11 AM
Jamie
Good point about home gardens. And if you don't have a place at your home, a lot of places have community gardens where you can have a plot. Another way, if you cannot garden is CSA's community supported agriculture or farm shares. You buy a share of a farm for a season. It helps eat seasonally and locally both of which can stretch food dollars.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:12 AM
Might have to substitute "political position" for "wet dream" in the official dictionary definition. Then someone could write
The Joy of Spindrool
with all the possible positions one could take.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 11:13 AM
spin-drool-ism : practice of the spindrool religion
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| March 28, 2008 11:14 AM
"I think Shrub is the worst elected official in the history of the United States."
He was NOT elected - stole it twice.
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 11:14 AM
spin-drool-ism : practice of the spindrool religion
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| March 28, 2008 11:14 AM
oops sorry double post
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
| March 28, 2008 11:15 AM
Pogo
"dammit - that would be "draw benefits""
When if comes to getting benefits from the government, "drag" might be more accurate.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 11:16 AM
He was NOT elected - stole it twice.
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 11:14 AM
'I acceot your correction
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:16 AM
^^^ Sonny.. sigh.. i really DO know his name...
yep.. trickle down theories only work with urine.. oh wait! that's the idea.. piss on everyone!
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:16 AM
pogo...
I had said that most churches have the children in Sunday School during the Mass and Sermon that I have attended, though it has been awhile. Or they send them to the play room area where the children don't hear the Sermon.
If they want to assassinate someones character because of the church one attends than there are a lot of people who not only sit in the pews on Sunday, but also watch on television the bigoted remarks of those like Jerry Falwell, Dobson, Robertson and Hagee and the many others who preach hate and bigotry every Sunday.
Don't call Obama or suggest he's a bad parent because of the church he attends unless you don't go to church or are affiliated with those mentioned above or preach like they do.
You can always find something you don't like about what your Pastor, Priest or Rabbi says remember that and if you continue to attend or participate at that church you to can end up being labeled a bad parent.
Posted by: anon-paranoid
| March 28, 2008 11:17 AM
Was I the inspiration for "spindrool"?
If so - I am honored!
Posted by: warren
| March 28, 2008 11:21 AM
"spindroollary" like punditry
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:23 AM
tylenol -------------------------
"Did the Clintons move the tree that Sono Bono hit???"
No. Sonny was intercepted on his way down the slope - then he was picked up and slammed into the tree to fake an accident."
Posted by: GORDO | March 28, 2008 11:24 AM
Cool PA Senator Bob Casey endorsing Obama, another SD for our side!
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC
| March 28, 2008 11:25 AM
HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA...gordo..yer a pistol!!
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:27 AM
"Some even tried to tie the death of Sonny Bono to the Clintons."
Well they did plant the tree.
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 11:28 AM
haha..i'm picturin Bill and Hillary, in full ski gear, crouched on the "expert run" waitin on Sonny... yer too much gordo!
Posted by: tylenol
| March 28, 2008 11:29 AM
Obama's pro choice stand is already questioned by a lot of people. His endorsement by Bob Casey isn't going to help that much.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:29 AM
LMAO @ BHO, on the VIEW saying he didn't have time to have someone examine every sermon his pastor had given, over the last 30 years.
Well, BHO only needed to buy "the best of" boxed set of sermons by Rev Wright.
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| March 28, 2008 11:30 AM
" the gay choirmaster at Obama’s church, telephoned me not long before he was murdered. How did he know who I was and how to contact me before I went public with my allegations about Obama?"
ROFL! I'm positive that Hillary and Obama teamed up to murder both this guy and Vince Foster.
Posted by: Patsi
| March 28, 2008 11:32 AM
JennBe said: "Hillary's speech yesterday about both Clinton and Obama supporters NOT voting for McCain was great. Haven't heard the candidate of hope and change address it."
Guess you weren't watching ABC News last night, huh?
On another topic, interesting column in today's Chicago Sun-Times:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/sneed/865494,CST-NWS-SNEED28.article
Posted by: Yankee Clipper | March 28, 2008 11:33 AM
Bob Casey also a bad vote on FISA
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:33 AM
Pretty sad when Hillary has to justify staying in the race at her rallies.
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC
| March 28, 2008 11:37 AM
Why would one watch ABC for news(sc)
Charlie Gibson told Imus they didn't cover the Libby Trial because the issues were too complicated and he didn't understand them
I think that is true for all of their news(sic)
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:37 AM
And just to set the record straight and this will be my last post here, my decision to leave has for the most part nothing to do with the people who post here but the host of this blog. I find his repeated claims to be unbiased without foundation, he takes shots at Senator Obama every chance he gets, any "compliment" of Obama he has made is delivered in the most back handed of manner. His trailmix entry of "Obama vs. Florida and Michigan" was pretty much the last straw for me and I now understand why the only TV outlet he now appears on is that of the king of racial jokes Don Imus, water seeks it own level. Over and out!
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC | March 21, 2008 10:28 PM
Posted by: How Rude | March 28, 2008 11:39 AM
kc, that was a construct that was intended to give more "stable" economic figures by removing the most volatile elements of the consumer economy from the equation - which 2 years ago, before petrofuels started their meteoric rise, comprised 21% of the average husband/wife family unit's budget. It yields a stable and accurate, although unrealistic, figure. It's sort of like saying that my retirement savings would be a whole lot more if it weren't for all these bills.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 11:40 AM
Again the prayers for the Surge to fail.....What we see is Sadr worried that positive movement will end his game. We see mostly Iraqi troops taking on the hotbed. Yep, Shia troops against Shia militants, so why not support the Iraqi government instead of hoping for doom. The critics said this situation would never happen, yet Maliki has issues his ultimatum. If he triumphs it is a blow to Obama and Dean.
I can tell you why of course.
Yes Wendy,
Zbig, McPeak, Malley, Powers will not escape the Republican thresher. When you take this group's views and add them to the GROWING connections between Wright, Jackson, Meeks, Farrakhan (not denounced by Obama's church he still attends), Khadili, Acuhi and the info like what Jamie supplied yesterday (see link between Cairs and AAAN) a picture does emerge. This is why Nader said what he did. How Obama thinks his BS to the Jewish community will sell despite those who support him now, is fantasy.
McCain to a true friend to Israel and Obama has no record, bad friends, didn't vote for sanctions and would have done ZERO to contain Saddam. I wish McCain asks Obama what he WOULD HAVE DONE. Want to bet he copies the Hillary plan? And I posted his interview with Russert before he spoke at the convention. Now that was a flip-flop. He says we MUST make Iraq stable before we leave. He parrots Hillary's line.
Obama's credibility sinks every day. Give him some more time and his friends, advisors, mentors, supporters will do more damage. It took a while for the Press to investigate Wright and that was pushed by FOX. I am sure the FBI and other agencies are looking hard at Cairs, AAAN, and the various web of charities, money flows and activities of numeropus elements of the web including Auchi. One thing is for sure already: how Obama got himself into this web is a terrible case of bad judgment and credibility. Rezdog can hope we will never answer the questions I asked yesterday, but imagine Obama ever gets elected and the investigations eventually lead to some disturbing evidence? We will have a repeat of the Starr investigation, but yielding far more troubling behavior. The continued investigation into this would undermine his role as Commander in Chief and hurt his credibility in the Middle East.
Is this what Democrats want? And when Hizb'Allah and Syria start their bullshit in Lebanon, when more reports of Iranian nuclear work hits the press, as more support from Iran is seen in Iraq, who will the Democrats lean to stand tall? Obama? THis will start to happen before November. And when the moderates in Pakistan make their deal with militants, as Russia continues to use Belarus to deliver weapons to our foes, as Columbia investigates the efforts of FARC to get uranium, who will Democrats think is tough enough and hawkish enough to stand tall? Obama?
Give it some time Wendy. Obama has developed a knack for poor judgment and bad advise. A combination of mistakes and continued support for Hillary will likely triumph for her at the end of the day.
One thing is for sure" Obama is pretty Liberal and sports many who are extreme. His story has already caused such divisiveness, it is hard to imagine how he will get anything done. He has read Kauss's take over at Slate. That is why he used the word "pivot" yesterday. He is trying to signal he will move Center, but he will spend all his time now explaining his radical friends. his dubious advisors. His move to center, unlike Hillary's will look so pandering, even the Press will have to laugh.
Again, just picture Obama now hoping Sadr makes gains. What does that say about him? Of course, what is going on is exactly what one would expect as security is transfered to Iraqis and Sadr doesn't like that new reality. Jews should consider Deans remarks this morning that we should focus on Iraq. In the end, national security and the questionable story of Obama will be Barak's undoing.
I gues 28% of present Hillary supporters are actually Republicans....LOL And I will love it when Obama radicals are forced to vote for McCain.
Posted by: Maxtrue | March 28, 2008 11:40 AM
i am so in love with "spindrool." Lardass strikes again. Let's make it our secret word today on msnbc. I will make sure to drop it in somehow, starting at 1:30
Posted by: Craig Crawford
| March 28, 2008 11:52 AM
Pogo
Kind of like Shrub's new capitalism --where you only make money and when you get in trouble the government bails you out. Unless of course you are some poor schlameil with a sub pime mortgage
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 11:52 AM
And just to set the record straight and this will be my last post here, my decision to leave has for the most part nothing to do with the people who post here but the host of this blog. I find his repeated claims to be unbiased without foundation, he takes shots at Senator Obama every chance he gets, any "compliment" of Obama he has made is delivered in the most back handed of manner. His trailmix entry of "Obama vs. Florida and Michigan" was pretty much the last straw for me and I now understand why the only TV outlet he now appears on is that of the king of racial jokes Don Imus, water seeks it own level. Over and out!
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC | March 21, 2008 10:28 PM
Posted by: Brain Dead in NYC | March 28, 2008 11:57 AM
AP, as I said, I didn't engage in the moral judgments you mentioned about Obama as a result of his affiliation with Wright and his church, but it is a political nightmare that he won't wake up from for some time. I do go to church with my wife and kid (wouldn't want to set a bad example) although I do not believe. It's a Catholic Church that has no nursery, and in my experience, Sunday school is held before, after or between church services, and in every church I've attended, once kids get beyond about 6 years old, they quit going to the nursery. And I certainly don't agree with everything the priest says - not being a believer, that shouldn't be a surprise - but I've never heard him condemn the US - criticize it, yes - call for it to change from its warring ways, yes - state that it is not acting consistent with Christ's teacings, you bet. But he never speaks of the US with vitriol and has never criticized the Jews. I have never been concerned that my kid was listening to the man. His ministry is about love, compassiona nd charity, among other laudable human characteristics. But I don't care about what most churches do, and I frankly don't care whether Obama's kids went to Wright's services or think he's a bad parent even if they did - but if I did care about that, I would only care whether kids go to the services at THAT church, and whether Obama's kids did. Talking about most churches just changes the subject and demonstrates nothing.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 11:59 AM
Hey Max,
"It was only hours after Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg finally made it clear that he was not running for president that his chief political guru, Kevin Sheekey, suggested that he would be the perfect running mate for Senator Barack Obama."
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/28/nyregion/28bloomberg.html?ex=1364356800&en=efe41c5f48648dac&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Strange bedfellows?
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 28, 2008 12:02 PM
Oh poop
I can't figure out how to unblock msnbc on the remote
I definitely want to hear the first public use of "spindrool"
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 12:03 PM
Rez
You do know that Bloomberg by virtue of being a NY state resident could not be on the ticket with Clinton.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 12:05 PM
kc, I love it - did you block MSNGO to prevent yourself from accidentally watching it? I tend to have that kind of resolve myself - I swore not to visit HuffPo, but find myself there from time to time despite my best intentions to the contrary. I sometimes wonder why our BS filters let it through.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 12:07 PM
Why, I'm as pro-choice as all you filthy estrogenetic freaks!
I believe that every woman on earth has the right, no matter how young or how old, to be retroactively aborted.
Die, die, my darlings!
Posted by: Brian McCain in NYC | March 28, 2008 12:08 PM
I suppose it is too much to hope for that we might get "spitdrool" or "spinspit" as well?
Posted by: Jamie | March 28, 2008 12:09 PM
Thx KC didn't know that, but would he want to be?
Posted by: Rezdog
| March 28, 2008 12:13 PM
Well, folks, I'm headed out for the weekend - keep 'em between the lines.
Posted by: pogo
| March 28, 2008 12:13 PM
Wow, the amount of attention I garner from some of you is quite amazing.
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC
| March 28, 2008 12:15 PM
Please note - "Brian McCain in NYC" does NOT speak on behalf of Obama.
(Thanks goodness Brian was not Obama's preacher - than we might have some real problems!!).
Posted by: warren
| March 28, 2008 12:15 PM
Pogo
Yes I throw up a little whenever I see Tweety.
Although I did enjoy the Obama girl video showing his man crush and what a drooling fool he is.
I like Tylenol's "spin spit " for Tweety.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker
| March 28, 2008 12:15 PM
Alas warren I'm an agnostic, not likely preacher material.
Posted by: Brian Hussein In NYC
| March 28, 2008 12:19 PM
Rez
I am a fan of Bloomberg's work as Mayor of NY
But I thought the whole presidential run was
ridiculous along the lines of the Unity 08 baloney.
I think Bloomberg has a big giant ego and big giant purse to go with it. If he could be on Clintons ticket
he would want to. He likes being a player
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker