So why hasn’t John Edwards already endorsed Barack Obama? On the surface, the two Democrats are simpatico when it comes to railing against lobbyists and standing up to Hillary Rodham Clinton.
But something has happened to give Edwards pause since shutting down his own presidential bid. It might not have helped that Obama ungraciously stepped on Edwards’ withdrawal announcement, diverting the news media’s attention to his own speech at the very moment that his former foe was scheduled to go before the cameras.
Or, maybe Edwards is mulling over the details of his lengthy, policy-oriented telephone chat with Clinton after he dropped out. Could he be comparing that to the terse call from Obama, who was less interested in a wonky conversation, instead focusing on whether or not Edwards had decided to endorse?
Perhaps Edwards will be influenced by how Clinton honored his wishes to keep their recent private meeting out of the public eye. Contrast that with the public spectacle that the Obama camp is making of their candidate's meeting with Edwards.
Still, the odds ought to favor Edwards backing Obama, but the longer it takes the more obvious it becomes that something slowed it down.
Craig on "Imus in the Morning"
Tues (1/12) RFD-TV/WABC-AM 6:30 AM EST

Comments
From previous thread
Sheila is usually the one who tries to pour a little oil on the troubled waters though even she who is the most peaceful of creatures has gotten a little perturbed when Obama is not loved as much as she thinks he should be. :-)
It's why we sometimes call her the hall monitor.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 3:16 PM
Sooooo close....
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 3:17 PM
Oh Craig, stop it! People are starting to talk. And I think Bill is getting jealous.
xoxo
Hil
Posted by: Hillary | February 11, 2008 3:18 PM
Craig,
It could well have to do with the Clinton and Edwards' health care plans being more compatible. That was the major focus of his work as an attorney, politician, private citizen, and candidate.
The Obama plan has more holes than swiss cheese for the insurance companies to slip through.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 3:19 PM
From previous thread:
Diva: "I was phone banking for Hillary voters in Washington State and I heard from older voters who didn't want to have to take a ferry to go caucus. Why were these caucuses held so far away from these voters?"
I just heard a caller on Seattle radio say that she had to drive 15 miles to go caucus. Others at the caucus had to drive as far as 25 miles.
How did this happen? In Iowa the caucuses are very near your home...I have never heard of having to go this far to caucus, especially in an urban area.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 3:22 PM
No dog'd eye -- no real details except to say that they would not vote Dem in the general. It was in the Tennessean's running exit polling on line the day of the primary. I know one guy, a Repub, who hates all the candidates....and said he was going to vote for Hillary....when I asked him if he'd be there in the general he said no. I asked him to stay out of our primary then.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 3:29 PM
I'm betting Edwards endorses Clinton.... with a very carefully timed annoucement.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 3:29 PM
dog's eye -- I am concerned because I haven't heard a word from my friend. She's been pretty much in touch until now. And nothing on the daughter's web site. They were to get the verdict on Friday so I fear they got bad news.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 3:31 PM
" the IRAQ WAR is the REAL issue in this race!"
I think that "they are coming to kill us" is going to be the issue. Romney threw down that gauntlet in his last speech. The Republicans know that there are millions of people who -- no matter what they say about Iraq -- believe their lives are in constant danger from "Islamo Facists" and will vote accordingly. We will see external threats, real or not, and security alerts close to the election. In the end, that's what I think it will be about. And I'm just not so sure where the American public really is on this. I think we have become a nation open to mass hypnosis and hysteria.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 3:36 PM
Look, I appreciate your willingness to point out bad stuff that the media does to Clinton.
But this is just plain silly. They shared a love for "railing against lobbyists and standing up to Hillary Rodham Clinton"?!?
That's one stylistic similarity, and the fact that neither of them are Hillary.
That's it? That's the reason for you to pretend that it was a shoo-in for Edwards to endorse Obama?
Come on, this is Village-level reasoning in an effort to manage the expectations game.
Doing it to make Hillary look good isn't any better than doing it to make her look bad.
Posted by: Elvis Elvisberg | February 11, 2008 3:37 PM
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 3:43 PM
Hi Craig,
How is your foot? That was a big foot. haha
I hope Edwards goes with Hillary. He can head up the health care problem.
There had to be a big problem with the caucuses. Hillary should have taken at least a few?
Again Obama is all words with no substance. We need substance.
Go Hillary
Posted by: Carol | February 11, 2008 3:45 PM
"open to mass hypnosis and hysteria."
This opens up a sociological question. Now I know that every generation has its "dead celebrity causes riot" events, but it seems as if in the last 20 years things have just gotten too weird with the lighted candles, messages, cards and flowers piled on a shrine. What is going on? Is it a failure in education, a fear of the modern age that puts more emphasis on talimans and religion, an influx of other more emotional cultures? Or perhaps just TV coverage of the latest "best pictures" events?
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 3:50 PM
MSNBC (and others) are saying the Edwards/Obama meeting has been cancelled.....maybe it's not a given he'll go with Obama.
Posted by: Gidget
| February 11, 2008 3:52 PM
HRC ad
aimed at the young voter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IA8Wy51Ionk
Comments?
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 3:55 PM
Wait...is that true that the call with Obama was less detailed and he was being terse...or are you speculating?
If you are speculating you are feeding into my theory that Obama is arrogant and a jerk which wouldn't be fair because I'm really struggling with that.
I'm not sure how to read that part of your post
:-/
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 4:07 PM
Gidg, it's certainly not a given, although I have to repeat, I think John will eventually endorse Barack. Call it a feeling.
jamie, I wonder, too, about those shrines. I can't imagine putting stuffed animals, flowers,candles, and cards out for someone I never met. Just like I wonder about the crosses and wreaths placed at fatal accident sites. The last thing I want to do is remind myself ofte spot a loved one died every time I pass it. Hell I've even seen vinyl cutouts on car windows commemorating the death of a family member. I really don't understand it.
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 4:09 PM
Burrito
I'm not so sure...Friday Elizabeth Edwards was less than sympathetic about the Chelsea Clinton remark - she had a funny look on her face like...give me a break Hillary - even though the words that came out of her mouth were mo cautious.
I'm still sticking with my question from the last thread to Craig...has Edwards lost his moment. That one poll from WI looks like maybe no as there are a lot of Edwards supporters on that and undecideds. An Edwards endorsement could swing WI.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 4:10 PM
I just saw something that said Clinton was ahead in the polls in Rhode Island! Yipee
OK - it's Rhode Island I know.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 4:26 PM
I've seen successful GOTV campaigns and Washington looked to me as if the Clinton campaign pretty much left it up to the local activists who acted as if this time was going to be like every other time. They got completely blindsided by the sheer size of the number of people at the Caucus.
Even more than the old folks, they should have had every union organizer out making sure that there was a bus or group of drivers for every caucus site.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 4:29 PM
Jamie: Yes, they need to get out more than just the elderly. I just use it as an example since I personally transported older folks to my caucus. The Clinton campaign really dropped the ball in the caucus states.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 4:35 PM
Jamie:
You should have been named the new campaign manager of the Clinton campaign ; )
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 4:41 PM
Wendy, Rhode Island has as many electoral votes as Maine and has 21 delegates. They all do count, don't they? That's what I hear.
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 4:43 PM
Wendy, make that 32 delegated for RI
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 4:44 PM
Pogo
Oh...thanks...then I repeat Yipee - Hillary is ahead in RI
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 4:46 PM
Here is the Rhode Island poll. It is a March 4 primary
which doesn't help with tomorrow's states.
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/rhode-island.html
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 4:54 PM
Wendy,
Don't discount Rhode Island because it's a small state. Next to Massachusetts, that is the state the Clinton's do best in. A couple of years back, striking firefighters in Providence adjusted their picketing of the cities mayor so that Hillary could attend a party fundraiser and not have to worry about crossing their line.
If she does not get 60% of the vote in that primary, I would be shocked and it would be a major disappointment for her side.
She has been endorsed by every major Democrat in that state except by Rep. Patrick Kennedy and the AG Patrick Lynch. If I am not mistaken, Mr. Lynch's brother is a Clinton supporter.
Obama's only connection to the state is the fact that his Brother in Law is the Mens Basketball coach at Brown. While I think he will poll even to her in Providence, I see HRC doing as well as she did in the areas of RI that border MA.
Posted by: Bear
| February 11, 2008 4:57 PM
This is actually the one I saw - of course - it's not one of the major polls.
http://www.projo.com/news/content/projo-20080211-brownpoll___.b10d88a1.html
I'm just happy she's ahead somewhere
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 4:58 PM
well, if Obama doesn't sweep the Chesapeake primary, he will have defied all the prognosticators. There's plenty more states out there and lots of delegates to try and lay claim to.
Daddy duties call - later, all.
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 4:58 PM
The Clinton Campaign needs to drop this Shuster thing. It is starting to come back and bite them in the butt, which is exactly what I was afraid of. Chelsea really needs to portray herself as a strong young woman who is not injured by the words of some pundit. The radio show I listen to just did an hour on it, Barbara Walters said on the view to drop it...it is backfiring. Badly.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 4:59 PM
Wendy, she's ahead in PA, OH, TX, WV, OR and a few other states, but there's plenty of time for Obamam to work on those.
Posted by: pogo
| February 11, 2008 4:59 PM
Jamie,
I'm pissed off that Dwight hasn't written back to me from Washington State Democrats. Why can't they have the caucus and the primary too and have them at least divided the way the Repugs do it? This just sucks, and I am sorry if I sound like a broken record. I don't want to be a downer, but just when I think I can deal with Obama, a couple of his supporters get so arrogant and nasty that it makes my skin crawl. Really!
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:00 PM
Bear...
Good to see you! I hope you're getting good medical advice and care. Take care, and get well....
Posted by: harborwoman | February 11, 2008 5:00 PM
Hey gang...for those of you who have missed the past, say, four weeks of Obama vs. Hillary acrimony on this blog...here's a great post from another blog that pretty well sums up all the arguments made on all sides here:
http://alexbalk.tumblr.com/post/26058843
Posted by: LardassLiberal
| February 11, 2008 5:01 PM
"new campaign manager " Didn't totally manage campaigns, but did run the office and staff for campaign managers. Even that earned a T-Shirt and a much needed trip to the padded cell afterwards. :)
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 5:01 PM
EuroTom: Yes, the primary ballot has made for a very confusing situation in Washington. I have heard many reports of people who thought they could do one or the other. Between that issue and the distance to the caucuses for many folks, it sounds like a real CF.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 5:03 PM
To further comment,
RI is one of the few states where Hillary's ground game would exceed any effort Obama has put forth in the election thus far. She is held in high esteem in the academic circles and there is a working class and ethnic vote that would skew to her favor since there is a large Dominican and Latin population there.
I don't know which way the Haitian population would tilt. That group, if anything like my family, would vote based on issues first.
There is a budding Laotian and Vietnamese population there in Providence and I have never been able to figure out their politics or whether they are a politically active group... I will offer insights as the information becomes available and between doctors visits.
Posted by: Bear
| February 11, 2008 5:03 PM
Wendy-
Me too! She's also 10 points up in Texas (48/38) but 12% undecided...in Calif those undecideds broke her way, but...fingers crossed.
We have to have something to look forward too because tomorrow is looking like a blood bath.
Posted by: Gidget
| February 11, 2008 5:04 PM
Bear,
My hopes and good wishes to you. Take Care!
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 5:05 PM
bear, I like your nickname. I am often called a "teddy bear" because of my size and shape. LOL... anyway, what's up? you are sick? We don't want that!
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:07 PM
All this micro-targeting . . . they should have fired Penn a long time ago. That guy gives me the creeps.
He always has that plastic smile on his face while he is attempting to stick a knife in someone's back.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 5:09 PM
Pogo - have you seen a resent Oregon poll? I figured she'd get WV - man no place more blue collar than WV (my Dad is from WV - I'm hoping it goes her way).
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 5:10 PM
Is Maryland a big state? I just did a google search on the size of Belgium (our country) and it says that we are about the size of Maryland.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:10 PM
I meant recent
sorry...i was too late to fix it
:-(
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 5:11 PM
Yes I've been preparing myself for tomorrow knowing there are still a lot of states left out there...BIG states...BLUE states...blue collar states!!! Her little run is coming- Obama can have the end of Feb...Hillary will take March.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 5:14 PM
My dad lives in Oregon and the Obama ground game is powerful there as well.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 5:15 PM
Wendy, from your mouth to God's ears...
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:15 PM
is Oregon a caucus or a primary?
I really believe Hillary would have done a lot better in a WA primary rather than caucus...I'm not saying a win but I am saying a closer race and more delegates. I think Oregon will be the same in some places.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 5:21 PM
Obama vs. Axelrod on Superdelegates
"So I guess Obama's strategy is to accept superdelegates who say "Obama's our guy," but if the voters say "Hillary's our girl," those superdelegates should think long and hard about how they approach the nomination and ignore the voters' choice. Got it"
http://www.taylormarsh.com/
Posted by: GORDO | February 11, 2008 5:21 PM
Wendy we will know on 19 February
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:21 PM
Oregon is a primary state.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 5:28 PM
I am just wondering if ANYONE here watched the news clip with Cher where she talks about Hillary, Barack and an ex-President? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C61nORMvObA
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:29 PM
Gordo - thanks for the post. Yes the hypocrisy coming from the Obama camp has always been evident to me. I wouldn't mind so much if he was just your typical political hypocrite...but he presents himself as something different as being above it...then he's not. If he's going to play politics as usual...then play it...bring it on...I can live with that...but don't say you're not like the rest and then act like the rest. It's too transparent.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 5:31 PM
What cracks me up is that Clintonites are mad that people don't perceive Obama to be as politically devious as Billary. Talk about setting the bar low.
Posted by: alpha1906
| February 11, 2008 5:33 PM
Remember that point in the (SC?) debate when Edwards went after Obama for not voting in the Senate and voting "present" 130 times as an Illinois legislator? Edwards was really perturbed at BHO railing at how BHO ducked making the tough decisions, saying "That's why you are elected! To make the tough decisions!" Maybe Edwards is remembering that and it's giving him pause before throwing hi support to Obama.
Posted by: Divalicias | February 11, 2008 5:34 PM
Ally --- I don't know why the caucus locations were so far away for some Washington voters. My guess is that outside Seattle and other urban areas, WA is a very rural state.
In Virginia that could happen too. We don't caucus by precinct -- we caucus by local Democratic committee, one caucus site per county. Depending on where that caucus site is, people would easily have to drive more than 20 miles to vote.
Posted by: Divalicias | February 11, 2008 5:39 PM
Virginia caucus?
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 5:52 PM
Hillary Pollster Mark Penn: Obama More Likely To Suffer Fate Of John Kerry Or Al Gore
The "GOP attack machine," Penn suggested, "skewed the perceptions of such distinguished public servants as Al Gore and John Kerry" in a way that left perceptions of them "out of touch with reality."
Penn said that Hillary has "withstood" this process, while Obama would find that his independent support "would evaporate relatively quickly once he faced the Republicans." Penn added that the GOP "is already playing the national security card against Obama."
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/hillary_pollster_mark_penn_hil.php
Posted by: GORDO | February 11, 2008 5:55 PM
one more gooper gone
Source: Shadegg to Retire
Monday, Feb. 11, 2008; 5:32 pm
Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.) will announce this evening that he will retire from the House upon the conclusion of his current term, according to a well-placed Republican source.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 5:55 PM
alpha WTF are you talking about? American politics are corrupt... If you think Obama is above that, wake up... it's time to have some coffee and do a reality check.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 5:55 PM
Roadside shrines -- I don't have a problem with them at all. When people experience a loss, whether it be for a celebrity or a relative, the grief can be comforted by seeing that others have also expressed their sense of loss. The act of creating a memorial can be healing. No memorial is trivial -- each one is an expression of a life come to an end and the empty space in the lives of those left behind.
Pogo, even if there isn't a shrine next to the place where a loved one was killed, do you think for moment that the family forgets where that life was ended? Rest assured it's never forgotten.
Posted by: Divalicias | February 11, 2008 5:57 PM
Bear - I see you are having medical difficulties. I wish you the very best and I'll be thinking about you.
Colleen
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 5:58 PM
Diva: These were suburban Seattle callers...not in rural areas. If anyone has more info on the Seattle area and the distance to caucus I would love to hear about it.
As far as taking a ferry, I can't imagine where you would have to do that. All of the island communities have some amenities. I think if you have a grocery store and a school you should have a caucus site!
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 5:58 PM
I've been saying Shuster was just speaking in the vernacular of the day and making a point , innocently, illustrating how the Clintons are using Chelsea.
I'd say about 4 out 5 people tell me I'm insensitive as Shuster and we both should be banned to Siberia.
Oh well, so be it...I suppose the men out in Cal who fix cars up for poor young hoopdee drivers will hafta call their TV show " Fix Up My Ride".
Then there's John McCain, mean-spirited crazy son of a bitch (no offense old-Mom McCain...just a generic S.O.B.---not calling you a female dog)---remember what HE called Chelsea? :
http://www.attytood.com/2008/02/the_worst_thing_thats_ever_bee_1.html
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 6:04 PM
Gore and Kerry were not strong in terms of likability.
The way Obama connects with voters - we will interpret attacks on him like attacks on us. Be afraid GOP.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 6:04 PM
EuroTom: Just watched the Cher video. Love her. Love the shoes. Love the bag. Love Cher.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 6:10 PM
I BRAKE FOR POLAR BEARS
or, as a famous blogger wrote, "If that damn bear gets any cuter I'm moving there!"
http://www.nuernberg.de/internet/polarbear/
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 6:10 PM
Is anyone watching Tucker? Who or what did he call a slut?
Posted by: Linda~in~Wisconsin | February 11, 2008 6:12 PM
Warren, this "connection" is so media generated, that's what bugs me. All of a sudden Teddy Kennedy said "boo" and the MSM RAN with it! I think they'd make Attila the Hun seem like this likeable, teddybear of a man if he was running against Hillary. And once the MSM picked up on it, people get manipulated by the buzz that was created. I bet if you really asked the everyday Obama supporter what exactly he stood for they wouldn't know.
I am a pessimist and it's time to sleep.
good night.. and I don't mean to rain on anyone else's parade.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:13 PM
Inspiring Kool & The Gang song from 1993 called "Unite". There is no video for this song. It effectively uses samples from MLK's "I Have A Dream" speech.
http://www.last.fm/music/Kool%2B%2526%2Bthe%2BGang/_/Unite?autostart
Posted by: Corey
| February 11, 2008 6:14 PM
Cool Ally, she's my favourite. I loved what she said about politics. LOL...
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:15 PM
Dex, ditto - the Shuster debacle is much ado about nothing. Perhaps outrage could better be directed at dead soldiers, New Orleans, the homeless and starving children in America.
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 6:17 PM
Craig, I am so upset with Tucker, what kind of a man is he? He is disrepectful of his guests, stretches the truth, tells half truths and takes things out of context and really just bad mouths everyone. Really turns me off to watch MSNBC.
Now he is nagging on Hillary saying that SHE is saying poor me. I HAVE never heard her say that in any shape or form.
Posted by: Carol | February 11, 2008 6:18 PM
Warren ---------
Will Obama still be likeable after the Repub Attack/Smear Machine has worked on him for months?
Posted by: GORDO | February 11, 2008 6:18 PM
"This opens up a sociological question. Now I know that every generation has its "dead celebrity causes riot" events, but it seems as if in the last 20 years things have just gotten too weird with the lighted candles, messages, cards and flowers piled on a shrine. What is going on? Is it a failure in education, a fear of the modern age that puts more emphasis on talimans and religion, an influx of other more emotional cultures? Or perhaps just TV coverage of the latest "best pictures" events?"
________________
Jamie -- I'd be inclined to look at a series of causes including worsening education....in the meantime, I'll just quote the late great Frank Zappa:
"It's not getting any smarter out there."
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 6:22 PM
EuroTom: And what she said made sense. She killed it.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 6:23 PM
Carol, I turned on the TV to hear the word slut coming from Tuckers mouth...........What was that all about?
Posted by: Linda~in~Wisconsin | February 11, 2008 6:23 PM
Tom
You're right about Obama supporters not really knowing what he stands for. Did you see the Larry King with Will.I.Am, John Legend and America Ferrera?
Early in the interview America went with the Hillary has substance and not just slogans...which both Will and Legend took offense to.
Later a viewer who was about to graduate from college was wondering who she should vote for...who was going to do something about jobs and her future.
Will said she should vote for Obama because...he couldn't really answer...he then said...it's not just a slogan I believe him...and he left it at that.
At first Larry was going to pass on America but she insisted on answering. Her answers were of course talking points I realize that but she outlined specifics from Clinton's plan to help create green collar jobs and help students pay back loans who are willing to do public type jobs like teaching, nursing, research etc. It was choppy but she did a good job highlighting a few things...definitely better than I don't think it's just a slogan.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 6:25 PM
Divalicious
"When people experience a loss, whether it be for a celebrity or a relative, " I think there is a difference between loss of someone personally close and known as opposed to traipsing off to sob over someone you have never met. These cult like gatherings of bathos are something new and catered to by the media. Look at the whole wallowing in death with TV cameras logging every sob and shriek. There is almost something mentally irrational about the carrying on.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 6:25 PM
First Far North Dallas election sighting (in a terse, brutal fundamentalist area), a bumper sticker for Obama on a new, shiny, red Corvette, convertible - top was down.
tt
Posted by: tiptoe
| February 11, 2008 6:26 PM
Euro Tom -- I can't watch the clip because of my old computer....sorry....
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 6:27 PM
For what it is worth, Edwards during the last of the debates seemed to "side" with Hillary. I personally liked how he stood with her rather than against her. Both Edwards and Richardson have not given an endorsement. Again, what do they know that we do not know? At this time (and isn't it mostly about the timing?), I do not think an edorsement is forthcoming . I think endorsements are most effective, if at all, when the candidate drops out (like Guliani for McCain).
On another note, surprised to read about Hillary and McCain in a vodka drinking contest (Newsweek) in 2004 on a senate trip to Estonia (taxpayers expense?). This was before that lovely purple bottle -- Jim Hendrix vodka -- hit the market, for sure.
And in the previous thread, someone asked about scotch...I vote for a bottle of Pinch as it a groovy bottle shape and decent scotch.
Posted by: Blonde wino
| February 11, 2008 6:33 PM
Bear, sending positive thoughts your way. Fight it tooth and nail.
Posted by: eprof2 | February 11, 2008 6:34 PM
Wendy: I watched Larry King and I thought America rocked. She was so bright, so knowledgeable, so passionate and so detailed. I fell in love with her. I did sense some tension on the set and which mirrors some of the tension I see in these discussions. I hope that we are all able to come together in November!
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 6:35 PM
tiptoe
Romney drives a red convertible.
Posted by: Blonde wino
| February 11, 2008 6:35 PM
alpha...."Billary" is getting on my last nerve. How would you like me to start calling your guy an "Obamanation"?
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 6:37 PM
clever, Patsi...very clever!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 6:39 PM
just a caution for all of us. Dirty and Rough Politics Ahead.
Is Clinton Campaign Stirring Up Maryland Jews Against Obama?
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/10/is_clinton_campaign_stirring_u/#more
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:40 PM
Colleen
"the Shuster debacle is much ado about nothing." I think that it was a kind of "last straw" situation. The reaction would have been negative but a simple apology for using a word that still meant one thing to listeners that was not intended in the modern sense. It still was a crass, unwarranted remark but not on the level of the mcCain quote.
What was wrong was that the station had been so non stop constant Hillary bashing that the Shuster remark brought a deluge from the public down on the NBC president's desk.
I note that today, MSNBC has seemed a bit more chastened and even handed. Every Obama person has been matched with a Clinton person and fewer snarky anti Hillary remarks. I believe several people more than Mr. Shuster may have gotten an ear full.
Now Tucker is still a useless dweeb but that is another situation.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 6:42 PM
Patsi,
We're going to live in an Obamanation very soon, so go on ahead!
Posted by: alpha1906
| February 11, 2008 6:43 PM
Ally
I noticed the same tension. I felt bad for America because she sat in the middle of the two - but I give them all credit they were ALL very polite and nobody stepped on anyone else. All three of them listened to the other talk before commenting.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 6:44 PM
Yes....I like it....Obama-nation....good catch Alpha!
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:46 PM
Obamanation.. I like it.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:46 PM
dog...yes...I stand corrected adding the word some would have been more effective. I apologize for painting with too broad a brush.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 6:47 PM
Obomination is better spelling
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:47 PM
Too Late Euro Tom. ;0) Too late.
Obama-nation is an Alpha catch.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:49 PM
Although I never use the term, "Billary"...I think it is kind of cute!! When I hear/read it...I always smile 8>)
Now, a pop-culture term that sends shivers down my spine is..."Barchelle"!!
I would much rather have "Billary" in the White House...instead of "Barchelle"
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 6:49 PM
oh and alpha, you don't need to reply to this... I would just caution you to tone down the confidence to the point of arrogance. The nominee has not been chosen yet, so I think you are sipping the bubbly way too soon.
As the old adage says: "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched"
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:51 PM
Sheila,
Ed Lasky is an extremist and if you look back at his other articles, you will see that he frequently praises and supports Republicans. He hates Soros who has been a major donor to Democrats. Check out some of his previous articles:
http://www.americanthinker.com/ed_lasky/
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 6:52 PM
Bear,
My prayers are with you my friend. Since you don't take shit from anybody or anything, I'm sure you'll be back and good as new soon.
dnd
Posted by: dnd | February 11, 2008 6:53 PM
Obamadrama
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 6:53 PM
I don't care about him Jamie, The Pamphlet is horrible and wrong though. Something to watch out for.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:53 PM
What role would Oprah play in the Obamanic White House? I am guessing "spiritual advisor". She certainly thinks she walks miles about the rest of us.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:54 PM
Tom - I agree - Obama and Obama supporters have the same problem with too much arrogance too soon. While the supporters won't hurt the campaign I think Obama himself may.
I am a USC Trojan...we have many reasons to brag about our football team...we were favored to win the last three national championships going into the season...we didn't...nuf said.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 6:55 PM
letters@msnbc.com
MSNBC/Microsoft-NBC
30 Rockefeller Plz
3rd Fl
New York, NY 10112
(212) 664-4444
Does microsoft own NBC?
Posted by: Linda~in~Wisconsin | February 11, 2008 6:55 PM
I'm sure after the Campaign was over Maya Angelou would be magnanimous enough to volunteer for that role. She is manificent and authentic.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:56 PM
EuroTom
This might answer your question
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnL9HRLNxIA
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 6:56 PM
This political season is making me paranoid....Tucker just said he thought Edwards would endorse HRC.....and I immediately think...is that good...bad....what he really thinks....what he wants us to think ....will it hurt Hillary...yikes!
Posted by: Gidget
| February 11, 2008 6:56 PM
BTW - dog - I meant SOME Obama supporters.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 6:56 PM
30 Rockefeller Place is definitely NBC's headquarters. I believe MSNBC is a duo project of NBC, owned by General Electric last I heard, and MSN.
Posted by: EuroTom
| February 11, 2008 6:57 PM
Linda In Wis
no, not anymore. They have a small share though.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:57 PM
They dropped in 2004. They were losing too much money on MSNBC
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 6:59 PM
You know, maybe all of this earlier primary and caucus vote wasn't such a great idea in retrospect.
I still believe the convention is where the dem race will be decided and the media will have us frayed by the time late August is upon us.
Posted by: Blonde wino
| February 11, 2008 6:59 PM
Obama-nation has a ring to it! ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:00 PM
I just received this from Media matters.
Tell NBC News President Capus that the time for apologies has passed.
Sign the petition
http://mediamatters.org/action_center/capus/
Thanks for the feedback on microsoft. Does that explain some of the votes in Washington?
Posted by: Linda~in~Wisconsin | February 11, 2008 7:01 PM
dog - I'll give you that one - the campaign was over confident in the early days. I know Hillary is tough but this will toughen her up even more - make her that much better of a president.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 7:01 PM
or as McCain would say "oh bom iran"
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:02 PM
dog - I will also admit that for the most part the Obama supporters here are less arrogant and far more thoughtful...though I still think HE himself is. My problem is I keep reading the comments at Talking Points Memo - now that group IS very arrogant.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 7:03 PM
Linda In Wis,
having grown up in Washington and still heavy ties to the state,
Let me tell you....Washington is as singular and original in their thinking as Alaska.
No, they are very liberal and very very independent in their thinking.
Washingtonians would have been studying and stretching and eaking out what made sense to THEM.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:03 PM
I'm just curious. Did McCain and Clinton do vodka shots together before or after he called her daughter ugly?
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 7:04 PM
or as McCain would say "oh bom iran"
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:02 PM
From one Obama Momma, That was CUTE!
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:05 PM
Anyone have any tips as to how to get tickets to debates?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:11 PM
I will take the advice, all cable news is crap.
Posted by: max | February 11, 2008 7:12 PM
Anyone have any tips as to how to get tickets to debates?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:11 PM
I have that answer. I was on the Kerry Campaign and did the Debate in Florida.
ALL of the tickets were given out by each party through the campaigns and VIPS for each party.
So you are out of luck.....unless you are a person with an inside. ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:14 PM
Hey Wendy,
My undergrad and grad degrees are from UCLA, so must be natural enemies. lol
Tom, not arrogance. We in the Obama ranks know that we're fighting an uphill battle. We have to call more people (which I do every day and all of the other Obama friends I have do) about getting people out to vote. And we're excited about our candidate. So excuse us if we say that on a board that's overwhelmingly for HRC.
Posted by: alpha1906
| February 11, 2008 7:15 PM
Dog's Eye: I have limited by MSNBC viewing significantly for the very reasons you mention. I still watch Dan Abrams but that's about it. The Morning Joe coverage on South Carolina primary day was just one of my last straws.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 7:16 PM
Alpha! You are on a role buddy!
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:16 PM
ticket information for Cleveland debate
Ticket requests are already pouring in. CSU got 800 calls before noon Friday. The Wolstein center holds 13,00. But no decision yet how many tickets will be available.
When that information is available it will be on our website , WKYC.com. and Cleveland State's website (
Channel 3 President and General Manager Brooke Spectorsky provided the link between NBC and Cleveland State
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 7:18 PM
Shelia thanks ... I have no insides :(
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:19 PM
My Bust Kate,
must just be the General.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:20 PM
thanks KC
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:21 PM
I agree on getting news from different sources. Catch someone on Charlie Rose - you can hear a whole conversation. Plus, most anyone you bump into has an opinion (or at least a few talking points).
I am sure PBS has transcripts of Mr. Rose - who is the best in the game.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:22 PM
Burrito,
Get on a campaign and be excited and work feverishly for your candidate, no matter who it is.
Its fun and its worthwhile with so many awesome people to bond with. No matter how many long hours. Better than sitting up in the nose bleed section at the Debates. ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:22 PM
Either way I know it's not easy...That's the one I want... I have friends calling me...HA! like I have any connections... People are funny
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:23 PM
I have offered to volunteer.... will see what happens
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:25 PM
Warren, Dog,,,,,is it just me or do Obama supporters tend to watch more CSPAN and less MSNBC?
Could that be why we are generally happy? ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:25 PM
I have offered to volunteer.... will see what happens
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:25 PM
You go girl!
Don't just offer, walking in that office and say, "Where's the Pamphlets?" ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:26 PM
Sheila, that so-called Jack-Up-The-Jews campaign is bogus. First of all, there aren't enough Jews there to take that kind of a chance. Second, there have been several "slimes" -- ones that actually got reported about -- that were "attributed to Hillary's campaign and were later traced back to some right wing groups.
I hope the Obama folks don't think we on the other side sit around thinking, "Oh, my God! I got an anti-Hillary email! I bet it came from Obama!"
I repeat:
"It's not getting any smarter out there." Frank Zappa
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 7:28 PM
"Obama-nation has a ring to it!"
I can't wait until you get your "O" THE PRESIDENT stickers for your cars.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 7:30 PM
I love MSNBC. I think it talks about the politics of politics. I know sometimes it is like a gossip show - but if you can cut through the bs - you can pick up on a lot of different views. They have some very opinionated people on that network - all of whom know this stuff inside and out.
I have a crush on Norah, get a kick out of Tucker (even though he is a total bastard) and kinda like Joe.
I also think Pat sometimes provides real insight into the cold heart of GOP politics - and he cracks me up too.
But I also watch CSPAN and CNN and of course FOX.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:32 PM
would that be a big "O" ?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:33 PM
Warren! You are a real live Political Junkie! lol You will go far on this blog!
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:33 PM
Well it certainly is not helping me quit smoking ; )
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:35 PM
Wait until after the General. I quit 1 1/2 years ago. I literally waited and cut down very slowly. But in 2004, you couldn't have wrestled them from me.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:36 PM
Do children of past presidents get secret service protection for life?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:38 PM
I kind of have a "girl crush" on Norah myself 8)
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107064/MyImages/norahodonnell.jpg
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 7:41 PM
No Burrito,
But they get equal protection as their parents for 10 years after the end of the Office or until they are adults.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:41 PM
http://www.secretservice.gov/faq.shtml#faq2
just was curious
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:42 PM
LL: this is my work computer - should I click on that link.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:43 PM
Thought I remembered this comment made by Edwards. As fast as this Primary is moving, he could very well endorse Clinton...or keep his first preference.
We'll see soon enough.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/the-edwards-end.html
The Edwards Endorsement
January 30, 2008 2:59 PM
Something to keep in mind about John Edwards and endorsing…
He has never come out and said he would endorse Barack Obama, but he has always made it clear that he preferred Obama's politics to Clinton's.
Before the Iowa caucus, he explained it this way to me: "One of them believes change is necessary and the system doesn't work, and the other defends the system."
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:43 PM
Oh, yeah, warren...it's OK...just a semi-sexy pic of Norah...it could be a screen-saver for you!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 7:44 PM
Therefore, President Clinton will be the last president to receive lifetime protection.
What a cool career would that be, I think it is perfect for my son.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:45 PM
All this hoopla about John Edwards' endorsement....does anyone think it would matter at this point?
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 7:48 PM
No no - got a picture of Fiji. But I am due for an update.
I wouldn't put anything past Edwards. If he couldn't get something from Barack that Hillary was willing to give - he would put together quite an argument as to why he is endorsing Hillary.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:48 PM
Obama-nation has a ring to it!"
Is that where the Obamaniacs live?
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 7:48 PM
Is she married?! What's that MSNBC address again?
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:49 PM
Erin Burnett is the best warren, forget Norah... who ever. Mind you, I'm not trying to play match maker.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15838220/
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:50 PM
Jamie! Probably. ;0)
warren,
Of course Edwards would go with the one candidate that would move his agenda forward. He'd be a fool to waste some good fuel.
But don't count Edwards out. His followers are too loyal and will follow his lead. So delegates and Edwards Supporters. Some of the most loyal of the lot....good trade ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:51 PM
Warren....Nora just had a baby this last year.... lol
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 7:52 PM
Erin seems boring.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:53 PM
at least compared to Norah!
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:53 PM
warren....Norah is married...they just had twins not too long ago
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 7:54 PM
just one thing about the pimp remark.. when shuster used it, he certainly wasnt using it in the 'pimp my car' definition.. he was using it in the old-fashioned definition..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 7:54 PM
she's smart & knows money & and wont allow herself to be played by the scum at MSnbc. Maybe too much to handle??
j/k
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 7:55 PM
Clinton and Edwards need the majority Obama can bring to push any agenda through. I don't care how hard they fight and personally I am sick of all the fighting. (and it will be a fight because it is the polar opposite of what the GOP are talking about right now).
Once I realized these people were acting more like lawyers than public servants - I was on the change bandwagon before it even got on the tracks.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:58 PM
Well I hope she's happy.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 7:59 PM
Aren't they all lawyers?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:00 PM
Norah's husband
http://freshfarmmarkets.org/programs/chef_at_market.php?cmindex=6&cmgroup=t_v
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:01 PM
Hah! Erin Burnett may be too much to handle, but I was thinking the opposite. I am only worried about my own economics. This is capitalism baby!
But I went to Catholic school - so I believe in charity and it is fun to contribute to Obama. Break out the checkbook Billary!
But I tell you one thing - the amount of money spent on these things is ridiculous. That money could be put to much more productive use.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 8:04 PM
Lucky man.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 8:05 PM
the system is broken, on that, I think we can agree
All the money, no kidding, there is a better way
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:07 PM
she's lucky too....... he can cook! and likes to cook!
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:08 PM
I think a little more than half of the Senate are lawyers and of course Bill Hill and Barack all are - those 3 are some of the best lawyers around.
But it drives me crazy when politicians often act as hyper-partisan advocates that refuse to see any side but there own. And all these trumped up and publicized investigations seem to take up more time than making laws.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 8:10 PM
Senator John Glenn endorses Senator Clinton
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:11 PM
That's nice, I did not know he was still living.
Good for him.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:13 PM
Going to watch TV. Btw, no global warming in NYC tonight.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 8:15 PM
Does anybody know the latest poll numbers. The last one I saw was done on the 9th.
Maryland Rasmussen Clinton 31% Obama 57%
Virginia Rasmussen Clinton 37% Obama 55%
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:16 PM
unlikely_burrito
Do you know who Dick Celeste has endorsed or if he has?
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:21 PM
vadaryl,
I believe Talking Points Memo usually has polls in the right hand corner.
Don' t know how accurate, but they are there. ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 8:21 PM
And.... Real Clear Politics.
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 8:24 PM
If Obama wins tomorrow, Edwards will endorse him. It's got nothing to do with principle or the way he was treated. he WANTS TO BE VP, and would crawl across broken glass to do it.
What kind of man runs for president when his wife has cancer? A guy driven by blind ambition who will sacrifice anything. And I don't think his wife is brave. I think she's a doormat.
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:24 PM
PaBu is on KO. (Check your Crawfordslist acronym dictionary.)
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:26 PM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 8:27 PM
No I do not know about D Celeste...
KGC -You must be from this area? Cle? or just really knowledgeable?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:27 PM
Okay ....or both. :)
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:27 PM
Nash,
Your a naughty boy! Edwards wants it yes, but not over his wifes health. ;0)
Posted by: Sheila
| February 11, 2008 8:28 PM
I thought we gave up polls and cigarettes?
Posted by: Corey
| February 11, 2008 8:29 PM
I am from Canton athough I don't live in the area now I keep up and I visit regularly since I have family and friends there. In 2004 I spent part of the election in Ohio.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:29 PM
ahhhhhhhhhh...there's vadaryl...the star of the Clinton Manassas town hall!!!
I got all swept up in the excitement of yesterday...I am volunteering for the 6-9am and the 4-7pm shifts(sign holding)in Manassas tomorrow.
Weather forecast.....snow, sleet and rain!!
What was I thinking????
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:32 PM
I want to give up on the polls, with those numbers it's not even close.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:32 PM
for Kerry ...I assume... that was close. too bad they got the anti-gay-marriage initiative on the ballot that year + plus the youth vote did not deliver. we were disappointed.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:33 PM
Sheila: I'm just trying to get the Edwards people on my case. I was getting tired of getting abuse from just the Clintonites.
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:34 PM
LOL @ "(Check your Crawfordslist acronym dictionary.)"
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:34 PM
The pictures came out great
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:36 PM
Va daryle - we all saw you - you looked really good on camera, and believe me that is not always easy. :)
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:36 PM
a little music to calm the nerves
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nugGHt_NDQ
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 8:36 PM
i am getting calls was that you I saw on TV
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:37 PM
It got air time even tonight.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:38 PM
I know...I saw you on CNN!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:39 PM
It's time to set this thing straight.
Shuster misspoke. I was not offended, and I was a big Bill Clinton supporter and even though I take exception to Hillary supporting the war all these years, right now I can't rule out voting for her...in other words I understand she had to cover her daughter's dignity, but she moved on, as should we...we either think the thing was trifling (like me) or a BIG DEAL (like a lot of you.)
But face it folks...WE know Shuster but 90% of Americans never heard of him , or couldn't place him, or tell ya if he was with CNN, msnbc, or al-jazeera, for that matter.
BUT, John McCain, who is running for president, made HORRIBLE comments about dear sweet Chelsea and he's getting a goddam pass! Here's David Corn's viewpoint:
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 8:39 PM
CNN has a four minute video of the rally called Virginia listens to Clinton*\
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:39 PM
*again, today
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:39 PM
Top Story over at NYTimes...
“She has to win both Ohio and Texas comfortably, or she’s out,” said one Democratic superdelegate who has endorsed Mrs. Clinton, and who spoke on condition of anonymity to share a candid assessment. “The campaign is starting to come to terms with that.” Campaign advisers, also speaking privately in order to speak plainly, confirmed this view.
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:39 PM
funny
KGC- yeah things politically are better, but up here CLE it's a mess.
Crime, foreclosures, brain drain, high taxes for businesses.....it look really hopeless.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:40 PM
try this one http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/politics/2008/02/10/sot.clinton.whooped.up.update.cnn
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:40 PM
Dexter
John McCain has said horrible things about a lot of people and gets a pass for all of them
But he is not pretending to be a journalist,
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:41 PM
damn...Huckabee is on Larry King tonight, too?
I thought MLRO would have the entire hour!! Some of my friends and I have bets on how long it will take her to "misbehave".
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:43 PM
He admits he is an ass. No doubt, he'll blame it on repressed anger about being a prisoner of war.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:43 PM
The georga peach pickers, BBQ rag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKzIDOJydtE
jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 8:44 PM
People do not change...either they are basically decent and respectful or they are not!
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:45 PM
Crime, foreclosures, brain drain, high taxes for businesses.....it look really hopeless.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito
that's a grim list. I thought Cleveland was having a lttle boomlet --has the Bush years crushed the forward momentum.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:45 PM
I got a perfect shirt for tomorrow, it says vote Hillary for President
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:48 PM
I do think if she gets blown away tomorrow it could be all over.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:49 PM
Katy Crack: yeah-but..
Jesse called NY "Hymie Town" and it finished him.
Journalists snipe at pols all the time...it's their job....
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 8:49 PM
Global mutli-national capitalism strikes at Valentines day.
From today's NYTimes.
"Rest assured, the global supply of that filler of heart-shaped boxes everywhere is not threatened. But the truth is perhaps more troubling for cash-strapped Lotharios, particularly in Germany, where authorities suspect that several major companies are conspiring to raise the price of chocolate."
(We don't need no stinkin' links.)
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:49 PM
Dex..i didnt mean to imply that McCain should get a pass... I'm just tired of the same old crap from PMSNBC... McCain has one truly warped sense of humour.. i hope it becomes apparent as the campaign wears on..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 8:50 PM
Cleveland has shot itself in the foot so many times.... it's a shame. They have lost funds, there are not enough police in the streets, the downtown is empty.....there are traveler's advisories published in other states.....It's a mess.
1 in ten home are foreclosed...those homes have been stripped of the scrap metal....people are shooting each other, schools have violence, broken neck for one teacher, broken leg for another... and the latest is - heron in the school in the town next to where I live, which is considered an affluent suburb.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:51 PM
Vadaryl:
Bill could wear a T-shirt that said, "President for Hillary."
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:52 PM
Well, re Ohio....all I know is that my daughter and her "mom's group" in Cincinnati are heading to the polls with their toddlers in tow to cast their votes for Hillary....and my granddaughter will be wearing a t-shirt that says, "One day a woman will be president."
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 8:53 PM
dex
the media loves McCain he's a straight shooter
a maverick and that makes it ok to say the things he does. I'm with you. He should get called out for the stuff he says --they all should .
In 1998 when there was outrage over the janet reno is chelsea's father remark --it was justa joke..
apparently on republicans are allowed to tell jokes.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 8:53 PM
Thanks to lushlslinda I did get that seat.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:53 PM
That's a great clip, vadaryl!!
I saw your wife(Iris...right?)and Hilary, as I was leaving...I love the pic they got with HRC!! Wow!!!!
I am sure they got some good ones of you, too!! And I saw a photographer taking pics of your Hilary...he was from where?
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:53 PM
heron = heroin
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 8:54 PM
vadaryl...you deserved to have that seat!!!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 8:55 PM
If Hillary is out of the picture does that mean the press will start unloading on their rising star.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:57 PM
ok.. i just got home.. which one on the CNN video is vadaryl?
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 8:58 PM
re: Shuster "pimp" comment
Shuster is a smart-ass preppie hired by Dan Abrams, MSNBC fraternity president, and pledge master.
"Thank you sir. May I have another?"
Posted by: nash
| February 11, 2008 8:59 PM
The Washington Post but they never used the picture. Rats! C-Span showed her signing my wife's shirt. My daughter was blocked out. When she came around to me they ended their broadcast, but I did get to say hello to her.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 8:59 PM
OK...LK is on...
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:00 PM
Yes, a woman will be President one day. But I am beginning to wonder if I will see the day.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 9:00 PM
lol nash.. lotsa towel-snappin goin on there..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:01 PM
it is so sad, I am amazed that the whole town hasn't been purchase by some foreign country. I mean we sit on the 11th largest source of fresh water.....in the whole world.
Our company is global so it doesn't hurt us, but as soon as our ties here are eliminated we are gone.
Unless things change..........And let me tell you "chanting " the words "change" or " yes we can" isn't going to get it done.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:01 PM
She was saying I need all the help I can get for Tuesday and she is not kidding she needs help!
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:02 PM
ohhhhhhh..that is so cool, vadaryl!!!
I was wondering why HRC didn't get to all you guys immediately!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:02 PM
Michele Obama live on Larry King for the hour now
Posted by: Kathy | February 11, 2008 9:03 PM
tylenol
vadaryl is behind HRC's right shoulder....red sweater/white tee
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:04 PM
Huckabee is going to be on Larry King, too.
I hope LK asks if she would vote for HRC!!
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:05 PM
She did come to the back first but only the first row, I got caught on the chair and could not get to her, but when she came around she came back to the side and that's when I got to shake her hand and say hello. The secret service guy almost jumped in when he saw someone moving chairs around. It was me tripping on them.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:05 PM
We need a resurgence of old-style journalism for this campaign.
I can't say I approve , in the historical sense, of Mencken's hatred of anything he perceived as British or favoring anything Brit-like, but he sure as hell made it lively with his criticisms of pols. Here's an excerpt from Vidal's introduction in his book o Mencken:
"Hoover is the ego; he also represents the British interest, forever trying to draw the great stupid republic into their wars and combinations. Calvin Coolidge is a near-fascist clown whose career is "as appalling and as fascinating as a two-headed boy." Warren G. Harding is the master of a glorious near-English in which "the relations between word and meaning have long since escaped him." Harding's style "reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it." Mencken's descriptions of these wondrous clowns are still a delight because, though the originals are long since erased from the collective "memory" of the United States of Amnesia, the types persist. " I am not," Mencken observes demurely at one point, when blood is on the walls, "a constructive critic."
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 9:07 PM
thanks LiL... good goin, vadaryl! lots of men in that group behind her too..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:09 PM
We all looked to serious back there, they should of had has act more excited, but we were all trying to listen to what she had to say. So we were not staged.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:09 PM
One comment.
In my household growing up, we were never allowed to refer to someone else as a "pronoun"....it was considered disrespectful. We were taught to use their name.....so when MO says "she" or "her" instead of Hillary or Senator Clinton it just makes me cringe.
She said once she wont say the name because she is afraid of the sound bytes that might come from it.
BS
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:12 PM
LOLOLOLOL @ "The secret service guy almost jumped in when he saw someone moving chairs around. It was me tripping on them."
yeah, I saw her with the first row!!
You know, I don't know if you saw the little, elderly lady sitting behind me...she was so sweet...she was going on and on about how this was her first rally and she was so excited and all!!!
Well, I switched seats with her, so she could be in the first row...she hugged me and said she wanted to cry!!
One of the photographers took her pic(and her name)...but I don't know if the pic was used anywhere.
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:13 PM
They have had problems at the rallies with people sitting up front blocking the TV cameras. So that's why they did not have any signs. All camps are complaing about this. They want their person to be heard and be visable.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:14 PM
MLRO must be on meds tonight...she is very calm.
..I'm just sayin'
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:15 PM
The NY Times article is now becoming part of the dialogue. Just heard an interview on the radio and a strategist saying that the nomination is "slipping out of her grasp" according to campaign insiders.
So that's it? They're packing it in? It's over? Or is this the media picking up the NY Times story and preaching it as if it were gospel? What is going on here because I am getting really depressed.
Posted by: Ally
| February 11, 2008 9:15 PM
LOL @ "I come to this thing as a Mom"
--MLRO
LOLOLOLOL...and I happen to be the wife of the candidate
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:16 PM
Did you see the lady with the sign that read I am a Hill fan, this was her third rally, and I was able to get Hillary to sign it for her.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:17 PM
Now ya see? that's what I like about being Anglican :)
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:17 PM
Sarah McLachlan-"Good Enough"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFfwR0dJzUw
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 9:17 PM
Ally..it aint over.. to quote Julian of Norwich, "all will be well and all will be well.."
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:19 PM
Well, why didn't Iris stay to get a pic of you with HRC???
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:19 PM
Chelsea asked one of the Secret Security Agents what he was afraid of, and he said Osama, Obama, and your mama.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:21 PM
Lush - what kind of meds, do you think?
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 9:21 PM
listen to her slurpin' Oprah
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:21 PM
I do not find MO compelling.....what is her salary? 675k a year? and she is connecting with people because her father was poor.....disingenuous...would be an understatement.
Sorry _ but I see so much that is distasteful it makes me wonder ....
they always say birds of a feather........flock together.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:22 PM
She could not get to the stage. They would not let us off the stage.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:23 PM
LOL @ "Osama, Obama, and your mama."
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:23 PM
Dan Abrams is all in a twist about the NYTimes saying they couldn't find people to substantiate Obama's drug use.
Is Obama James Frey
CNN.com - Oprah to author: 'You conned us all' - Jan 27, 2006Jan 27, 2006 ... Author James Frey on Thursday admitted he lied and embellished events about himself and other characters in his best-selling book about ...
www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/books/01/27/oprah.frey/index.html - 42k
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 9:23 PM
Lush - what do you mean by "slurpin"?
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 9:24 PM
unlikely_burrito....I wonder if her Dad was a mill worker??
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:24 PM
colleen
valium and suckin' up ;)
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:26 PM
well, that interview was boring...nothing new
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:28 PM
Lush - what makes you think it's valium? Maybe valium makes people slurp.
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 9:28 PM
While the Obama and HRC folks pound each other over the head a little reality break.
Images from CPAC.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/cpac-dispatch-by-digby-and-then-theres.html
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 9:29 PM
relax, colleen
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:31 PM
Terrier judging time at the dog show
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 9:31 PM
CNN
Hillary in Virginia link http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2008/02/10/sot.clinton.whooped.up.update.cnn?iref=videosearch
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 9:31 PM
What is going on in WA state. They stopped counting the votes, that's a joke.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:31 PM
Osama, Obama, mama-old,old, old, boring.............
Posted by: max | February 11, 2008 9:32 PM
LOLOL@ Lush. I am relaxed, taking my valium!! LOL
Posted by: colleen | February 11, 2008 9:32 PM
My bumper sticker is going to end up:
"yeah that's right -I am voting for my dog!"
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:33 PM
Huckie just said some nice things about Hillary and Obama.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:35 PM
" I think you will see a woman president of the US in your lifetime. Am sure Patsi's granddaughter will too."
Well, I won't live to see it if not this time.
But I am being told that the woman should "get out of the way of the dream." (I hear this every day on c-span....)
So what am I to say to that? Do I say, "Screw you! Get out of the way of OUR dream. IF this is about minorities, then the fact is, women are the oldest oppressed minority in the history of MANKIND.
I say "get out of the way of the dream" is horsecrap on any level.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 9:37 PM
colleen
I don't take prescription drugs...I am a relaxed person, by nature...but if valium works for you...go for it. :)
Posted by: LushIsLinda
| February 11, 2008 9:38 PM
dog
Fin and I will root for the beagle since the welsh terrier didn't make it into the finals.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 9:39 PM
Dog's Eye
Have you ever considered Anglican? It's Catholic without the confession and with married male and female priests. :-)
Henry VIII only fired the Pope. He didn't make too many other changes.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 9:42 PM
awwww..ya gotta love a beagle :)
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:43 PM
poor poor poor Obama's - they only had 991K salary in 200(5)?
Stop the pretenses. It makes me sick. Poor little rich (minority) folk.....who so understand what it's like to live in a million dollar home and send the precious babies to private school and oh it's so difficult to juggle, ballet with Latin classes, and i work full time, so i know how hard it is......... who's buying this crap?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:44 PM
Anglican is catholic lite :)
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:44 PM
well...here it is in a nutshell.. anglican (and episcopal) has always had a 'big tent' view of things.. not a lot of dogma.. and some of us want that tent to extend to gays... others dont.. (happened when they were talking about ordaining women too, by the way.. lots of people threatened to walk.. some did..most stayed and it's been rather good.) same thing's happening now.. everything will settle eventually..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:47 PM
Anyone else find it ironic that HRC will need Texas, a.k.a., Bush Country, to win this thing? Talk about poetry!
Is W registered in TX? I'd be curious to know who he's voting for. Probably the Huck.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 9:50 PM
There has been some schism talk in England and the US on ordination of gays. I know there was quite a stir a while back when one of the Deans here in the U.S. performed a Gay ceremony.
I suppose it's just natural for religions to need to hate somebody.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 9:53 PM
Love thy neighbor.......oh, that is unless we tell you to hate them.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:54 PM
Burrito:
I should send a few of your posts to my friends in Ohio.
Who do you support again?
People don't like to be talked to (or about) in terms of demographics.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 9:54 PM
What about Ohio, the state in question in 2004.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:55 PM
Maybe Jr. will vote for Hillary since Sr. likes bill so much.
Posted by: vadaryl
| February 11, 2008 9:56 PM
Just happened to remember something about Episcopal that stunned me at the time. Apparently there is a group that has shifted into the Evangelical camp. When I was living in Stockton I was interviewing for a job and nearly fell over at the "born again" views.
So if you decide on Episcopal check under the hood for what is running the engine. :-)
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 9:56 PM
my daughter made everyone shut up for a while at the last synod (general meeting).. she's 19..and rather small but feisty.. she said "every church has a sign outside that says "the anglican church welcomes you.." it's DOESN'T say 'we welcome you..unless'... it DOESNT say "we welcome you.. as long as...".. it's time to stop leaving ppl on the doorstep..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:57 PM
oh you're right Jamie.. but most churches have websites and you can get a lot of info from them.. including whether they are 'left' or 'right'.. see? it creeps into everything..
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 9:59 PM
Warren- I live in Ohio now. I have lived in CA ,TX and OH....The demographic I obtained on OH were from NPR site. see below
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/vote2008/state.php?state=OH
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 9:59 PM
Patsi:
You can say you have seen a historic moment in this counrty's history. This thing is just getting started.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 9:59 PM
dog's eye - I bet you like the onewhere I said I was voting for my dog! :)
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:05 PM
"You can say you have seen a historic moment in this counrty's history. "
Warren, Warren....you are OH so young and oh so....well.....I'll just say that I was born in 1945. I have seen many historic moments in this country's history. If you think your Obamamania is THE one, I suggest you read a little more and worship a little less.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 10:06 PM
Religon, sex and politic's - this blog is almost as good as prime time tv
I think the Episcopal had several congrigations break away of the ordination of a gay priest
maybe that was said earlier - to much to read
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:09 PM
Patsi:
I think electing the first black president is a tremendous accomplishment for this country. I also think electing a man that has been against this war from the outset will send a powerful statement to the entire world. I think Barack is the best to move this country's foreign policy forward in this critical moment in time.
That is what the "fierce urgency of now" means to me.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:10 PM
well..goodnght everyone.. yer all welcome to come to my ordination.. :)
Posted by: tylenol
| February 11, 2008 10:11 PM
Dog,
If religion divides then it is not?
As my daughter tells me - fighting for peace is like having sex for virgintiy
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:12 PM
1945!! You just a pup - plenty of more female leaders on the rise.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:12 PM
"But I do not necessarily the election belongs to a woman, or to a black, or to an Asian, or whomever."
Absolutely agree, dog's eye... that was my point.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 10:13 PM
George Bush isn't a real texan
Molly Ivins and Barbara Jordon are real texans
http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/11/in-praise-of-barbara-jordan/#comments
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 10:13 PM
I meant you're
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:14 PM
Why in the world does it matter so much what the color of his skin IS!!!!! That in of itself makes this idea backwards...if we are all equal...then the only real CHANGE would be a WOMAN!!!!!
He is but a man, whether he is pink, purple, or gray.....just a man NO MORE and no less....same as it has ever been.
NOW a WOMAN President would be a REAL accomplishment and a REAL change.
YOU CAN NOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:16 PM
Warren,
Even when BO is not elected - the respect and support from most segments of the population is wonderful.
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:16 PM
unlike Burrito
Anything other then WASP is a change.
Now a black, jewish women or anything other then main stream- make that single women. That would be change
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:19 PM
In CRAIGS post - I did not catch "the public spectacle " created by Obama with the Edwards thing.
Did I misssomething?
Is Craig over sensative - with all the bad karma for HRC?
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:22 PM
Dog , I have heard several stories along those lines....especially from people who travel to remote areas.... it says a lot.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:22 PM
"I think electing the first black president is a tremendous accomplishment for this country. I also think electing a man that has been against this war from the outset will send a powerful statement to the entire world. I think Barack is the best to move this country's foreign policy forward in this critical moment in time."
I would have KILLED to see Barbara Jordan elected president. But not because she was a black or a woman, although both would have been frosting on the cake.
Let me rewrite your "platform" just a bit:
"I think electing the first woman president is a tremendous accomplishment for this country. I also think electing a strong woman will send a message to the world that this country has turned a corner on the oldest form of discrimination in history. Further, I think Hillary is the best to move this country's foreign policy forward in this critical moment."
Having said that, my vote for Hillary is not solely based on her gender. I've already said that I loved Edwards and was almost in the tank for Obama until he turned the campaign quasi-religious.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 10:25 PM
Ping - I try to be color blind, I am not religiously motivated, I have many relationship with people from different parts of the world, and quite honestly....men and women, regardless of race, think and process issues differently.
That is why I think a "real change" would be a woman. And a change by color(ie. race) is only promoting change by believing the very racist thoughts that blacks are different then whites.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:28 PM
religion.
So how many died in the crusades? I guess you could almost say it continues to this day
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:28 PM
Burrito - good points, and Mr Obama is very much mainstream so agree that the a female would be very different then a male - mars and venus..
However the bias or lack of on the voters to elect and support either is a reveling statement.
Maybe Jessie and co can go out of business.
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:33 PM
So maybe all of the HRC machine (including the 4th estate elements) are worried that their cheese is about to get moved...
you can qoute that is a Pingism
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:36 PM
Dog,,,
If the polls are correct - which they have not been - they show Obama as the best option of the two to defeat John McCain...
Now has anyone talked about the eventual ticket ?
McCain and Mitt !!
Just wait
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:38 PM
It wont matter in the end, because we all only have one vote, and none of us have any way to know that our votes actually are counted or not.
So it is a leap of faith, hope and everything in between.....
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:39 PM
CRAIG..
If not reported yet (and I am way behind on my blog homework)
John McCain and Mitt will be the winning ticket..
Best of both worlds and with the VP in the jump seat on the hill - much can be done on the domestic economics
WOW That is a power house
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:40 PM
it's only a power house ticket if they put a bag over McCain's head .....
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:43 PM
Patsi:
I think the bitter partisan battle that would be fought against Hillary in the general would be bad for this country. People would sound like they do on this board all day. And it get even uglier with the Republicans. It will be like the freaking Haldey's and McCoy's. I think it is great that Hillary is a woman - and she is exceptional - but she is also a Clinton and I want my country back.
On foreign policy:
The presidential debates will be important for this country. I want the Democratic candidate to be able to articulate the reasons why this war should be ended - not explaining away why it was authorized.
And I think it will make an important statement to the world for an overwhelming majority of Americans (not about half of them) to elect a true anti-war candidate.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:44 PM
Dog's Eye
There is an old joke about the Clintons where Hillary intoduces Bill to an old boyfriend who is now working in a service station. Bill says, "Well look how it turned out, you married me and became First Lady" to which she replied, "Yes dear, but if I had married him, he would have been President."
You look at Senator Clinton and see someone who got where they are because of being married to a particular man. I look at Senator Clinton and see a woman who would have gotten there sooner, but she took time out to support her husband.
As far as I'm concerned, she has no baggage. She has a husband who misbehaved, but lots of women have had one of those. I'll let her handle that, and I believe that if she campaigned that way she would get the independents.
There is no way she will get the super conservative haters but no Democrat is going to get them. Their own candidate this year may not get their vote.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 10:44 PM
"BUT she is able to run for president due to her visibility and contacts as a former first lady; no way she could have parachuted into the NY Senate seat without that connection."
But you have no way of really knowing that. I could just as easily say that if Barack were a white man with his woeful experience (winning his one national election agaist Alan Keyes, for one) he would have been laughed out of this contest.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 10:45 PM
Mitt is the best choice....
Need someone to pull the ditto votes.
Crist is not known - I think he is OK, but I do not see him as a President.
Huckster does not bring votes - his will all go to McCain so no gain.
Mitt got skills - brings votes and will get the talkers back. In fact based on the comment he made when he "suspended" his campaign... The war on terror and support for John.... There you go... it is a done deal
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:45 PM
Patsi:
Your analogies are way off.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:49 PM
BHO is the most contrast to McCain - stonger is not a word to use.
BHO can claim the weakest support for the war. Hillary is a flip. McCain - clear to all.
And at the rate of improvement in Iraq - the war will not be as big of issue.
The Economy will be the lead story and Healthcare.
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:50 PM
McCain does not like Romney and he will select someone he respects far more. Governor Crist from FL may be a possibility.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:51 PM
White guys are not that charismatic... So Patsi I think he goes further if white and all other things stay the same - as some bias is still out there
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:52 PM
If Obama was white where would he be?
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:53 PM
Crist is a nice guy and I like him as my gov. But he is not strong enough.....
Lets see if McCain and Mitt can kiss and make up.
But you do bring up one of the neg of McCain... McCain gets an attitiude
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:54 PM
"White guys are not that charismatic"
Dont make me laugh, this is the most racist comment I have seen on this blog.
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 10:56 PM
You people are kidding yourselves if you do not think the Iraq War will be at the center of this election. McCain will also drive the issue as he did the primary. And if it is Hillary - he will drive flip-flopping just like he did with Romney. Those are McCain's strengths and Hillary's weaknesses.
Not to mention McCain can claim change by ending the Clinton-Bush dynasties.
The Republicans are scrambling - just like the Clintons - for arguments against Obama. I have heard them raise his liberal voting record - which will not play with anyone outside the core of the GOP. And they will argue we don't know him - just as the Clinton supporters are trying - and failing. Distortions of his record don't hold any water as people learn more and more.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:56 PM
Tom Lantos. Any memories, Katy Crack?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/12/washington/12lantos.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Posted by: Dexter
| February 11, 2008 10:57 PM
They will own the South against Hillary. According to a Republican friend of mine.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 10:58 PM
By the way, to change the subject just a bit....
I told Sturge I'd tell what I know about the great Hillary/Tammy smackdown. I knew Tammy Wynette well. One day BEFORE the phone call where they made nice, Tammy said to me, "I guess I understand her using the 'Stand By Your Man' line -- but why the hell did she have to call me "that little OLD Tammy Wynette"?????????
Of course, I'm sure most of you know that Tammy never stood by a man in her life unless he was standing by HER, and was in the process of dumping a second loser husband when she co-wrote and recorded "Stand By Your Man"...
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 10:59 PM
burrito..... this is not racist...
Fax are fax
Warren - Obama speaks and lots listen... Problem is they like what they hear but have little understanding of fiscal policy and the liberal nature....
I like his book, like his visions, just do not think BIG GOVERNMENT is the way.
Lots more to learn about the man...
and HRC sees the writing on the wall....
Posted by: Ping Pong
| February 11, 2008 10:59 PM
Warren - I think the IRAQ WAR should be and will be the center of this campaign. We need to resolve it in order to fund everything else that needs to be accomplished
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 11:00 PM
Ping
Sounds like a great ticket.
But then I'm a Democrat. It doesn't bother me a bit if a third of the Republican base sits home in November.
The VP will have to be someone with Religious right creds. It could be Huckabee except he has major problems with inserting his foot in his mouth. If Brownback was from a state like Ohio he would be perfect.
jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 11:02 PM
People just want a government that works together instead of engaging in political theater on MSNBC and Fox News.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 11:03 PM
Ping - maybe that is your life experience, not mine
Posted by: unlikely_burrito | February 11, 2008 11:03 PM
Feinstein was considered for veep spot with Mondale but due to her three marriages was thought to be unacceptable as a candidate not too mention her husband's business dealings.
Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | February 11, 2008 11:04 PM
Burrito: exactamundo!
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 11:04 PM
I just think the problems we face as a country are to big for one party to handle. Especially with a divded nation. Obama has the greatest potential to bring us together.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 11:14 PM
" why is HRC the first major Dem female candidate? (Shirley Chisholm, RIP.) Why are we not seeing presidential candidate Feinstein or Boxer or a university president or governor?
I think a lot of it is access to money from WJC's donors and visibility.
It's just hard to get away from that."
Yep....hubby takes care of things....that's just so buying into the frame.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 11:16 PM
Dog's Eye
Virtually every female office holder got there because they had the time and energy to devote to politics. Usually that meant that some man was paying the bills while they made the social, business, and political contacts. Most men got there because they had a wife to handle the social schmoozing climb up the ladder.
That's just the way things have worked until recently. It's why so many widows end up in their deceased husband's Congressional seat and often end up doing the job better than their husband.
No one including Obama, McCain, and anybody else who shows up on the scene got into the competition without knowing somebody who knows somebody who has access to a whole lot of money, contacts, and foot in the right doors. It goes with the territory.
Hillary Clinton is just another chapter in the same old story and she is more honest, talented and brilliant than 99% of her cohorts.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 11:17 PM
"Yeah, Tammy Wynette stayed glamorous to the end, didn't she?"
Dog...I'm not sure if you were making a little joke or being serious...
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 11:22 PM
Jamie:
"[Obama] got there because [he] had the time and energy to devote to politics. [ ] That meant that some [wo]man was paying the bills while [he] made the social, business, and political contacts."
Meet Michelle Obama!! Talk about a change!
I thought she was pretty impressive on Larry King. Strong woman.
Posted by: warren | February 11, 2008 11:23 PM
OK
I've got it the perfect VP for McCain. This is the year.
JC Watts former Congressman from Oklahoma.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.C._Watts
A real African -American not some wanabe and a religious conservative to the core.
Perfect LOL
Also he and McCain are friends.
Jack
Posted by: whskyjack | February 11, 2008 11:26 PM
Warren,
"I think it will make an important statement to the world for an overwhelming majority of Americans (not about half of them) to elect a true anti-war candidate."
Most of the world wants Hillary. When it comes to the debate, I doubt she will have any trouble articulating why and how we should get out no matter how we got in. If she is debating McCain, it will be no contest. The most exciting thing will be watching the vein in his forehead throb.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 11:27 PM
NEW THREAD
Posted by: Craig Crawford
| February 11, 2008 11:29 PM
Warren,
You made my point for me. There is no difference between the Senators. Except that Clinton was the breadwinner for her family and Michelle Obama was the breadwinner for hers.
It's not baggage to climb the business, social, and political ladder as a couple.
At some point, the networks are going to make salsa of anyone who goes in that office. It might as well be someone who has been through the chopper and shredder already.
"she was pretty impressive on Larry King" Someone must have gotten to her. She was all sweetness and light tonight. Nice change from her usual take no prisoners eat them alive right here attitude.
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 11:36 PM
dog's eye --No, unfortunately, Tammy didn' t stay glamorous. When I first met her in 1983 she truly was one of the most beautiful women I'd ever met. And a complete sweetheart....funny, a LOT smarter than people would think....I just loved her.
But she had serious health problems. For one thing, every time she had any surgery, scar tissue started to grow internally. It caused horrible pain. Then another surgery would remove the scar tissue and the cycle would start all over again. Then more surgery to remove THAT scar tissue. Her life started to revolve around pain management. Somewhere during the last five or so years of her life her face started to show the results of years of pain. Horribly so, and seemingly overnight.
She aged maybe 15 years within a couple of years and it made her sick to look in a mirror. But I am so glad that you didn't know that! She would LOVE that some in the public thought she went ut as glamorous as she was in the early '80s.
Posted by: Patsi | February 11, 2008 11:40 PM
RELOAD NEW THREAD
Posted by: Jamie | February 11, 2008 11:42 PM
I'd like to get Craig's perspective on the NY Times article.
Posted by: Wendy!
| February 11, 2008 11:49 PM
Post A Comment