Giuliani's Crisis Worse Than Clinton's

| | Comments (323)

What a lousy week it was for New Yorkers in the presidential campaign. Once the unquestioned frontrunners for their party nominations, Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Rudy Giuliani took a beating from the polls, media commentaries and especially from their encouraged rivals.

Is this buyer’s remorse among primary voters or just a natural tightening of the numbers in the early states? Clinton’s situation seems more like what would be expected in the closing days for a frontrunner, while Giuliani’s candidacy seems to be truly losing favor among many GOP voters.

Even in Florida, where Giuliani plans a big comeback in the state’s Jan. 29 primary to offset probable losses in the first round of states, a new Rasmussen Reports survey shows the former New York mayor losing his lead and now behind Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney.

Clinton has not yet seen this sort of slippage in later states. The Rasmussen poll in Florida shows her still 28 percentage points ahead of Barack Obama. And, unlike Giuliani, the New York senator is still in contention for first place in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina.

So it is no wonder that Giuliani, not Clinton, is the one heralding a re-launch of his campaign today -- in Florida. While both have lost the air of invincibility they once enjoyed, Giuliani is in the worst shape.

 

    Comments

  1. Woo-hoo!

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:04 PM

  2. Reposting...

    These 'problems' keep cropping up, and they really worry me...how elections go to the loser....

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/15/us/15ohio.html?th&emc=th

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 12:04 PM

  3. How are you feeling this morning, Corey?

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 12:05 PM

  4. Hey Craig-
    Is this a surprise to anyone? What reason is there to vote for Rudy- I don't think anyone would really trust him on the right or the left.
    Take away the glory days post 9/11 where he was the face of the crisis- what's left?
    I think about how my friends are arguing over Clinton and Obama's experience- Rudy seems to have no experience and only ethical problems.

    Posted by: Kathy | December 15, 2007 12:05 PM

  5. More fodder for thought about who's honorable and who should be our next prez...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/15/opinion/15sat3.html?th&emc=th

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 12:08 PM

  6. The media and their faux use of the national polls propped up the Plunger. If Shrub hadn't been awol (again) on 911 rudee would have been a has been a long time ago.

    This is what you get when your standard for approval is your candidate got the "pee smell" off of NYC street corners

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:12 PM

  7. Mitt will be the repug nominee, he'll lose the general election and get to call himself and elder statesman of the party. Rudy will go on to making sleazy business deals on behalf of oil rich sheiks. Huckabee will be Mitt's running mate, they will run under a "party of god" banner. They will lose in a major landslide, perhaps getting 35% of the vote in the general. The role now being played by the ChristoFascists within the GOP will be brought to an end and perhaps, and I only mean perhaps some sense of sanity will return to the GOP.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:12 PM

  8. The CF's would do better to sit out the election and let the goopers lose on their own, it would guarantee their power in the party. They should let the Dole wing of the party be responsible for the lose.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:21 PM

  9. I can live with your scenario, Brian, though I still worry about the 'what ifs'. WHAT IF something happens near next November that 'scares the country' and throws the election toward the right again? WHAT IF Romney/Huckabee were elected? No pun intended...God forbid!

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 12:22 PM

  10. Bill tells Charlie Rose: "It would be a miracle if Hillary wins in Iowa, and I'm not just low-balling you."

    So do they want to lose so Edwards will win? I find it difficult to believe for Clinton to be so frank if he thought Hillary had screwed up in Iowa.

    Posted by: dnd | December 15, 2007 12:27 PM

  11. dnd
    that's a bizarre conspiracy theory floated by true nutjobs

    Edwards was always going to win in Iowa.\
    Obama will be third.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:33 PM

  12. the same people floating that theory are the same people who said Biden is surging and terra will make Rudee the candidate.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:35 PM

  13. Hillary will come in third in both Iowa and NH, Brian predicts! Guess what folks, it's going to be a while before we know who will win the Dem nod. Edwards will win Iowa, Obama will win NH, the two of them will be battling it out for SC. I have a lot of doubts a black man can win in the deep south. SC is going to be interesting to watch.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:41 PM

  14. The primary stats are much different than the genera
    In the SC being black makes you a favorite. 53% of the SC primary voters are black.

    Obama will be out after NH

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:43 PM

  15. Obama wona't be a serious contenter after NH but the money will keep him in. Young people aren't enough of a constituency to put you in the WH

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 12:44 PM

  16. i watched that entire Rose interview, dnd (a Bill Clinton tour de force, btw) and there was some interesting context to the "miracle if Hillary wins Iowa" line. His point was that he claims to have told her before she announced that she would not win Iowa, that Edwards already had the organizational advantage and Obama had a leg up as neighboring state pol. So his point was that it was a miracle that she is doing so well -- spin, perhaps, but the analysis behind it made sense. Some of the coverage is trying to fit that "miracle" line into the narrative that she's in trouble, but his point was just the opposite -- that it is a sign of her strength that she has any chance to win Iowa.

    Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:46 PM

  17. my prob with your analysis Brian is that I don't see how Edwards winning Iowa propels Obama to first place in New Hampshire

    Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:50 PM

  18. Obama is going to win NH, you are so wrong KC.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:51 PM

  19. seems to me that Obama has to win Iowa in order to win New Hampshire, that not winning Iowa will burst his bubble

    Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:52 PM

  20. one thing i've noticed about the Edwards campaign in NH is that he is working upstate harder than i've ever seen a Democrat do -- it's the most conservative and rural part of NH, but if it works could provide him a margin for surprise off an Iowa victory

    Posted by: Craig Crawford Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:55 PM

  21. I think Obama will take the Inds in NH.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 12:57 PM

  22. ron paul and mccain are the only two side of the road signs I've seen so far in SC

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 15, 2007 12:59 PM

  23. only the very small but rich coastal area that I've seen, I mean

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 15, 2007 1:00 PM

  24. The only yard sign up in my neighborhood is for Kucinich

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:00 PM

  25. regarding your comment about how hard Edwards is working NH. I know every weekend there is at least one bus load of New Yorkers going up to work in NH for Edwards. The loyalty of Edwards base is his ace in the hole.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:01 PM

  26. The independents in NH are not liberals. Edwards has a better chance at them then Obama.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:02 PM

  27. Exactly KC, and Edwards run left to Obama. Edwards needs to come in second in NH, which will bring him into head to head with Obama.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:04 PM

  28. Obama is to the left of Edwards. in terms of voting records

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:07 PM

  29. KC Edwards is the liberal of the top tier Dems. Nobody is looking at senate voting records. It's all about message and the "vision" thing right now

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:09 PM

  30. to a degree it's hair splitting about who is more liberal but Obama except for Skinny Dennis probably has the most progressive voting record --maybe Dodd.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:09 PM

  31. Also southerners don't do well in NH.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:10 PM

  32. Among the more competitive candidates, Barack Obama is seen as furthest to the left. Thirty-four percent (34%) of Democratic voters see the Illinois Senator as politically liberal (see crosstabs). Twenty-nine percent (29%) say the same about Hillary Clinton, and 26% hold that view of John Edwards. Joe Biden is seen as politically liberal by 25% while 18% say the same about Bill Richardson
    rasmussen poll

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:12 PM

  33. Craig,

    Bill's interview really makes sense if you look back to the assets Hillary originally put into Iowa -- basically enough to finish well, but not looking for a win. It wasn't until the polls really showed her with a solid lead that the campaign started pouring money into the state.

    I think this may have actually worked against her since when the tightening came, the added money and people looked like that "desperation" scenario so many of the punditry were spitting out in their we hate Hillary scenarios.

    BTW, Matthews did a strange toss off yesterday totally out of context. In a whole hour of Clinton bashing, he inserted one sentence right after showing her commercial, "That's what HIllary is like in person".

    Why would someone who spends hours practically slandering the woman insert a throwaway line that seems to say that all the negatives are just hot air?

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 1:20 PM

  34. Bill Clinton was
    the only candidate in the last seven
    presidential elections to lose both the
    Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire
    primary and still go on to win his
    party’s nomination.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:24 PM

  35. EVERYONE should read the link below. dog's eye view posted this yesterday. It's about the possibility of a DEPRESSION next year. It also predicts the death of the Republican party.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op-fraser9dec09,0,3815304.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:25 PM

  36. "I'm melting. What a world. What a world."
    - The Wicked Witch of the West Wing (1993-2000)

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:30 PM

  37. Now would be a good time for Moveon to do something to mix it up. ...they could just quote Hucksterbee who said Shrub has a bunker mentality.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:36 PM

  38. Rudy's campaign to date, as far as I could see, was based on the fact that, on 9/11, he wandered around the streets of NYC with no clue what had happened or what to do about it. It was the police and fire chiefs and the other city bureaucrats who led the rescue & recovery effort that he later took credit for.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:38 PM

  39. Oh I don't think anyone on the left wants to hamper Huckabee's rise to the top, come on he's a dream come true candidate to run against.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:38 PM

  40. KGC: Yeah, I heard that. Huckabee called the Bush admin "internationally isolated & incompetent."

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:39 PM

  41. Nash, in Rudy's defense he did rise to the occasion on 9/11, unlike George Bush who was hiding in a bunker.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:43 PM

  42. I'm feeling better , although I still have an upset stomach. I'm no longer white as a ghost in the face. I tried to do some shopping today. I got myself some things at the grocery store , but I didn't last long. I'm back home to stay for the day.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:49 PM

  43. Notice how when repugs speak it's "Islamic terrorism" when Dems speak it's just "terrorism" . Says a lot about who the two parties are.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:50 PM

  44. Glad you're feeling better corey, the flu sucks.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:52 PM

  45. Brian: You're a New Yorker so you probably know all this. After the first World Trade Center bombing, Rudy got some recommendations, which he ignored.
    Rudy...
    * Never got the police & fire depts the right sort of radios so they could talk to each other.
    * He placed his emergency response center in the Trade Center, which was the WORST possible place to put it.
    * After 9/11 he did nothing to protect city workers at ground zero and they are now all getting sick from respiratory disease.

    In what weird universe can one run on this record? Even the Republican base isn't that stupid.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:54 PM

  46. Corey: Do you have Flu?

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:55 PM

  47. The Republicans are better off with the Huckster as a candidate. It keeps the evangelical movement in place, old style republicans are not going to stay home and if they continue to whip up hatred ..they have an anti gay measure on the ballot in Fla and of course immigration.

    It was smart of him to attack Shrubco. What does he have to lose. I wonder if this is the first advice from Ed Rollins.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 1:56 PM

  48. I'm pretty sure it was the flu. Although I heard that some people got sickm after our Christmas dinner at work a few nights ago. But , I doubt it was food poisoning for me.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 1:59 PM

  49. Nash I know all that, that's not my point. On that day he rose to the occassion, that's all I'm saying.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:00 PM

  50. KCG,
    Bill Clinton didn't really lose the Iowa Caucuses...he didn't really compete here as a deference to Senator Harkin who ran that year. Bill came in third to Harkin and uncommitted. It was also a very different time and I don't think you can compare anything that happened then to the compressed schedule of this cycle

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:03 PM

  51. Corey: What to do for flu...
    * bundle up
    * drink cocoa
    * watch old movies (30s-50s)

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:03 PM

  52. Corey: I had the flu once. I was so weak, i couldn't get out of bed for four days. I didn't feel bad, just WEAK.
    I was also floating in a dreamy state of consciouness.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:06 PM

  53. Here is something, the local ION network is running an hour and a half show entitiled "Understanding the Mormon Religon."

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:07 PM

  54. Zoey

    All true. One of the interesting things about this race is Obama and Cinton both have a lot of money so even with losses they can stay in. They are not depending on wins to increase fundraising.

    And pretty much everything is true in politics until someone defies the convention wisdom. It's been my experience that guts win out over caution almost everytime.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 2:11 PM

  55. Brian: I now how emtional new Yorkers get about 9/11 but it seemed to me that Rudy was just going around getting good photo ops, cynically exploiting the situation to make himself look like a leader. He should have gone back to his office: that's were he would have been more effective at coordinating the response.

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:12 PM

  56. Zoey: According to Huckabee, Mormons think that Jesus and Satan were brothers. I don't know if this is true but it shows the potential for animosity between Mormons and fundamentalist Christians who take this sort of thing VERY seriously. Personally, I find the issue about as silly as the medieval scholars who debated how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.

    America 2007: where medieval theological arguments can decide a presidential debate. (How far we have come.)

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:17 PM

  57. I don't see it that way nash, and just because I don't support him don't think credit should be withheld from where it's due. And in all candor you have no idea what the feeling was here in NYC as we watched our city going up in flames and our fellow New Yorkers jumping out of an 80 story window, nobody was thinking about photo ops that day. You're being unfair.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:18 PM

  58. By the way, SEVEN angels can dance on the head of a pin, and anyone who says different goes on the rack!
    -Archbishop Nash

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:19 PM

  59. Oh you christian and your silly Satan issues.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:23 PM

  60. Do we have a poll this week? I missed a lot of posts this week, so if there was word on it, I didn't see it.

    I tried to link from here at Craig's cq site, and got "page not available."

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:25 PM

  61. No poll that I know about Ed

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:29 PM

  62. What the HELL. (Chuckle). This is getting interesting. I should just announce my candidacy and get into the Republican primary race.
    -Satan
    (At least I know what to do after you lose a war.)

    Posted by: nash Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:33 PM

  63. Thanks, Brian

    Archbishop Nash,

    You must be using Archangels. The numbers increase exponentially if you use Cherubs, although I have to agree the Archangels are better dancers.

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:34 PM

  64. FYI...Obama is on C-Span live right now.

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 2:35 PM

  65. The poll is on the right under "links". I don't know if Ran has reset from the last run through, so will have to wait for a message for him when to do another go ahead.

    If everyone wants they can put up their picks for the 1, 2, 3 finish in Iowa and New Hampshire. I can do a table, and we will see who the great prognosticators are.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 2:50 PM

  66. I'm not ready to call the repugs, but I'm ready to call the Dems,

    Iowa:
    Edwards
    Obama
    Hillary
    (there's reason Bill is out there down playing Iowa. I'm betting they are getting some bad internal poll numbers)

    NH
    Obama
    Edwards
    Hillary

    Hillary's campaign is in a lot of trouble, they are being crushed by the weight of hubris and never conceived on things turning sour for her and every attempt at a repair job just digs them in deeper. It's amazing to watch. Too many chefs do spoil the soup ya know.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 2:59 PM

  67. But oh look at the momentum Hillary could receive if she won Iowa after effectively downplaying expectatons.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:07 PM

  68. Dream on zoey and pass me whatever your smokin! One thing that the press hasn't reported on yet but something I'm getting a sense of, there is a lot anger coming at Hillary from a lot of party people. Obama's newest commercial with the former Hillary delegate is really very telling.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:12 PM

  69. Jamie,

    You left-coasters must get a different screen than I do. I got to the old poll address by clicking "blogroll" under links on Craig's cq page, but all that stuff is on the left on my screen.

    That's where I got the page not available. Then went to ran's blog but didn't find anything there either.

    Time to run now. Do some shopping, watch the NFL game in a bar on the hated NFL network, then get home and hope I beat the blizzard that's supposedly on its way.

    Posted by: EdVB Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:13 PM

  70. Craig,
    Thanks for providing some context to the Charlie Rose interview. That plays well with what Zoey said about downplaying expectations.

    Posted by: dnd | December 15, 2007 3:14 PM

  71. Trippe tapped into it the other day when he went after Mark Penn over Obama! Somethings brewing.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:15 PM

  72. Brian,
    I didn't say she was going to win or even that I want her to win so get off your high horse. It has been proven many times that candidates who meet or exceed expectations are rewarded with momentum.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:15 PM

  73. Clinton won't lose both IA and NH.

    Edwards won't win NH,will finish 3rd in NH.

    Clinton wins NH, SC, and Nevada.

    Huckabee breezes to a landslide win in IA, Romney stops the Huck-Express in NH...Huckabee wins in SC, McCain surfaces to capture Nevada.

    Sez me.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:20 PM

  74. I agree zoey, it's nice up here on my high horse. I think with Hillary though we've gone past the expectations game, I think we're seeing a revolt. God I'd love tap into Howard Dean's phone right now.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:22 PM

  75. The only thing trippi did was tap into the insane blatherings of tweety..

    tweety was all set to attack Clinton over the fundraising charge until he was informed it was Obama doing the fundraising. He is an uninformed nutjob and the only one who believes this crap.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:24 PM

  76. Edwards is the candidate who has no money and the most vulnerable to damage from early losses.
    The public funding issue is a real problem is terms of being competitive with the goopers

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:26 PM

  77. I'm sorry KC, Trippi was brilliant, major score.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:27 PM

  78. I think if one really believes Senator Clinton's campaign is in ruin then why say third place..why not put in her fouth or lower...after all since you believe all that other happy horsepucky why not subscribe to the Biden is surging meme too.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:28 PM

  79. KC the matching fund does not weigh on the emotions of the primary voters and caucus goers doe. Take money from lobbyists does.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:29 PM

  80. Clintons loyal base will keep her in third.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:30 PM

  81. The Charlie Rose interview of Bill Clinton is on youtube:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=_45KK8jwJR0

    I love the experience argument as there is no one in the dems second tier that doesn't have more experience than Hillary and Obama put together.

    Posted by: dnd | December 15, 2007 3:31 PM

  82. dnd as Iraq and Iran weight less on the publics mind expierence becomes a smaller issue. Bad for both Hillary and Rudy, they both are counting on capturing a slice of the "fear" vote.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:33 PM

  83. Brian
    IMoney is part of the electibility discussion.
    Clinton will not lose her base of support in the Democratic party. These are the folks who vote in the primaries and attend caucuses.
    In virtually every state her supporters are the Democratic Party.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:40 PM

  84. I said she'd hold her base, her base isn't big enough to win, and her base is too heavily loaded with beltway types.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:42 PM

  85. You see KC i really think we're at the start of populist voting cycle. That goes against Hillary. Hillary has peaked.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:44 PM

  86. She has Democratic party types
    people who put together slate cards and gtov drives
    she has a big base of party regulars in each state.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:44 PM

  87. Despite the analysis to the contrary, the Hucksters surge is not due to his "populist" stands. A title he does not deserve. More media baloney

    Hucksterbee is a result of none of the above.
    The apparent success of the war should help Clinton and McCain.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:47 PM

  88. I've told you what I thought is happening. Time will prove me either right or wrong.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:48 PM

  89. I can't speak for NH but there is a lot of talk around here right now about Edwards and the matching funds not beng able to compete with a money machine like Mitt. Personally, I think there will be other Dem groups who would take up the slack should Edwards be the nominee but there is definite concern.

    Concern about lobbyist money...not so much. Most of my activist friends believe we are lobbyists too. I don't know anyone who does not have an agenda or issue that is important to them. This is how they pick the candidate they will support, volunteer for, or donate to.

    Besides in my circles it has backfired in the past when Edwards brings up the subject of lobbyists. He has taken money from trial lawyers and they are the biggest lobbying group out there. They definitely have an agenda.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:48 PM

  90. Having had to sue an insurance company to get my benefits, I'm grateful every day for trial lawyers.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:50 PM

  91. Just picked up my mail today, flyers from Hillary, Edwards, Obama, and Richardson. I was beginning to wonder where Richardson was since I haven't heard much about him lately.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:51 PM

  92. How much campaign lit do you recieve a week zoey?

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:52 PM

  93. Brian
    Thank goodness it is coming to an end. Democrats need to finish the primary season united and not harboring grudges.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:53 PM

  94. I certainly expect us all to unite after the primary season.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:54 PM

  95. KC there is nothing more important than a Democrat winning the white house. And it never has been more important than it is now.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:57 PM

  96. Again as usual Brian you missed the point of my comment. Maybe I should just write in bullet points so you can understand it more easily. I did not say anything bad about trial lawyers. In fact, there are several I call friends, But at least the ones I know would be the first to say they have an agenda and support the candidate that fits that agenda the best.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:57 PM

  97. I predict Obama and his supporters will be sore losers.

    Everyone on the gooper side will be a sore loser.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 3:58 PM

  98. Well we all have our favorite special interest groups. I just think the entire "trial lawyer" is just a bull shit repug talking point to help protect their fat cat supporters from being sued.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 3:58 PM

  99. Trial lawyers are our protectors, the fact they make a lot of money doing it bothers me not.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:01 PM

  100. I get flyers everyday from one or more candidates. Most of it comes from Hillary, Edwards, and Obama. Sometimes I also get hand-delivered pieces of literature. Besides snail mail I also get numerous emails and phone calls.

    I feel sorry for my mailman because there is so much political lit being sent out in addition to regular catalogs, personal Christmas cards, and political Christmas cards from the party and local candidates I have volunteered for in the past year.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:03 PM

  101. EdvB

    I clicked on the poll and it seems to have been taken down. I sent Ran an email the other day and it bounced. So I'll do it the old fashioned way.

    For the first three races: IA, NH, SC

    Who will come in first second and third both Dem and Rep contenders.

    I'll put your guesses in a table. Final day for submission the day before the IA Caucus

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 4:10 PM

  102. The DSM Register will be posting their endorsements online sometime tonight for tomorrow's paper. They endorsed Edwards last time.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:25 PM

  103. Tweety thinks they will do it again, what do you think zoey?

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:26 PM

  104. not if the girl gang conspiracy has anything to do with it...

    "The newspaper's editorial board, which makes the endorsements, operates separately from the newsroom. Even David Yepsen, the Register's esteemed political columnist, claims not to know what will happen. In a town that consumes political information like popcorn, this is the best-kept secret around.

    Those sifting for clues make hay out of the fact that Sen. Hillary Clinton's camp publicly feted the paper's editorial staff at a local eatery recently and that Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware was called in twice for interviews. David Axelrod, chief strategist for the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, sat in for his candidate's interview with the board a week or so ago. "It went well -- or at least I think it did," he said. "They're absolutely inscrutable."

    Political operatives credit the paper's endorsement with raising the campaign of then-obscure North Carolina Sen. John Edwards in 2004. He went on to place a strong second in the Iowa caucus and won a spot on the presidential ticket. But history may not repeat itself. Even Edwards aides say it is unlikely he will win the prize this time around.

    Since 2004, the paper's editorial board has undergone heavy turnover. That six of the seven in the group are women hasn't been lost on political observers, who wonder if this might give Mrs. Clinton an edge.

    But speculation tilts heavily toward Mr. Obama, who opposed the Iraq war from the beginning. Some think the Register prefers to back candidates who aren't establishment favorites, a description that may apply more to Mr. Obama. After all, everyone likes to play kingmaker."

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 4:30 PM

  105. Modify slightly.

    Everyone have your IA both Dem and Rep picks in before the Caucus. Then we will do NH but you can put them in at anytime. Then we will do NC. That will take care of the earliest contests.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 4:30 PM

  106. Jamie, here are my predictions so that I may be on the record to eat crow later. Incidentally, the entrails of chickens were involved in this process…

    IA D's:
    Obama
    Edwards
    Clinton

    IA R's:
    Huckabee
    Romney
    Thompson

    NH D's:
    Obama
    Clinton
    Edwards

    NH R's:
    Romney
    McCain
    Giuliani

    SC D's:
    Obama
    Clinton
    Edwards

    SC R's:
    Huckabee
    Romney
    Thompson

    Posted by: MadMustard Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:33 PM

  107. Dexter and everyone else, Please make your picks according to format with as many of the picks as you want to do now.

    Dem IA, first second and third

    Rep IA First Second Third

    Dem NH First SEcond Third

    Rep NH first second third

    Dem NC First Second Third

    Rep NC First Second Third

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 4:35 PM

  108. Are people really showing up to see Chuck Norris?

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:42 PM

  109. I would not be suprised if the Register picks Obama and Huckster but I really don't have any idea. I had a mole in the room last time but not this time. If I hear anything concrete before it is posted I will let you know.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:49 PM

  110. I could also see the Register picking someone from the 2nd tier of Dem candidates. They like an underdog...it sells more papers.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 4:57 PM

  111. The History channl is re-running 1968 now if you missed it before.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:02 PM

  112. "I could also see the Register picking someone from the 2nd tier of Dem candidates. They like an underdog...it sells more papers" zoey

    the Biden surprise

    I think the register will endorse mcCain.for the goopers an Clinton for the Democrats.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 5:05 PM

  113. Ah, I just throw in when I feel like it...I can't predict anything but the obvious, like Huckabee winning in IA.

    With pundits saying "Webb could emerge at the Convention..." and "Thompson is a viable threat...", well...I'd rather just wait and see.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Oh...and I ain't so happy today...those "Dexter" episodes from ShoTime Channel on AOL TV?
    Pay per view.
    Fuhgeddaboudditt.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:06 PM

  114. Great post, as always, Craig.

    BTW, how on earth can you stand to be in the same room with Chris Matthews, the Archie Bunker of Lazy-Boy Chair journalism?

    Posted by: JoeCHI Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:09 PM

  115. KCG,
    You may be right about McCain...they seem to have a soft spot for him. He doesn't have much support though and hasn't really done the hard work of campaigning in the state which the Register likes to reward.

    I wonder how badly it could hurt Hillary if they endorsed her. It raises those expecttions back up and I don't know if that would help or hurt. I will be interested to hear what the non-activist (but possible and likely caucus-goers) have to say when I get back to work on Monday.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:11 PM

  116. Pat Buchanan drives a Lincoln Navigator.
    I pulled up beside a Lincoln Navigator today here in town, and glanced over , which I never do...and the driver was a dead ringer for Pat Buchanan. I did a cartoon-like double take...the Navigator had Virginia plates...really weird! A celebrity look-alike in the same model vehicle...odd.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    But don't ever be surprised to see Britney Spears at the gas station at 3 in the morning...that WILL be her!

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:12 PM

  117. Dexter,

    If you have an itunes subscription, you can download the Dexter Show.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 5:14 PM

  118. I spoke to tweety in person in January of 2004...what an absolute jerk. It was hard to get close to him,his head was so big. I met Craig the same night and there was no comparison. Craig was perfectly charming and well, cuddly, I guess.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:16 PM

  119. Zoey
    I guess historically the odds are against Clinton since they endorsed Bradley and previously Paul Simon.

    They might endorse Thompson instead of McCain but I don't think it's going to be either Romney or Huckster.
    I guess they could really go out on a limb and support Ron Paul.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 5:17 PM

  120. awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Craig you old teddy bear!

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:23 PM

  121. http://desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=mobile

    the register will be happy to text you the endorsement if you want to be among the first to know

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 5:26 PM

  122. Sorry Craig. I have a thing for men in flannel shirts I guess, but only in the winter. Flannel in the summer is just too weird.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:27 PM

  123. I see lots of Fred 2008 bumper stickers here in Nashville....but the only yard signs I see are Ron Paul.....

    Posted by: Patsi | December 15, 2007 5:30 PM

  124. Any Grant is my new hero....She was on Paula Deen's holiday special and told a story of once when her family had 75 guests for a holiday dinner. She threw together a pan of cheese grits without much close attention. When it was baked, she noticed that there were black specs throughout. One of her sisters (or someone) told her the grits had to have had bugs. She said, "Well, I'm gonna throw some cracked pepper on the top and serve it anyway."

    Posted by: Patsi | December 15, 2007 5:33 PM

  125. The boy who delivers chinese food is about to become my hero!

    Posted by: Brian In NYC Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:35 PM

  126. What time is the register supposed to release the endorsement?

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 5:42 PM

  127. They haven't said what time they will announce the endorsements.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 5:52 PM

  128. At Jamie's suggestion, John Tanner (DoJ, racist) has been added to The Culture of Corrupters List.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 6:30 PM

  129. Iowa dem: Edwards, Clinton, Obama
    Iowa rep: McCain, Huckerbee, Ron Paul

    NH dem: Clinton, Edwards, Obama
    NH rep: McCain, Romney, Ron Paul

    SC dem: Clinton, Edwards, Obama
    SC rep: Romney, McCain, Huckrabee

    sheer guesswork......

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 15, 2007 6:38 PM

  130. Thick slices of pumpernickel slathered in butter.
    Smoked sausage.
    Sauerkraut.

    Achtung!

    Dinner.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 7:21 PM

  131. Careful, after a dinner like that you might have the urge to invade Poland.

    Posted by: Brian In NYC | December 15, 2007 7:27 PM

  132. Are we placing bets?

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 7:27 PM

  133. I'm really getting to like the young guy in red on the top right.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 7:28 PM

  134. more about the huckleberry kid and animal abuse.

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/78241

    yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: horsedooty | December 15, 2007 7:47 PM

  135. Dexter: "Thick slices of pumpernickel slathered in butter.
    Smoked sausage.
    Sauerkraut.
    Achtung!"

    Oh my gawd that sound fabulous!

    Posted by: Patsi | December 15, 2007 7:59 PM

  136. Politics = 'Everybody lies'.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 8:01 PM

  137. *L* @ tt...So what do you think? Will his ideas change the world?

    Posted by: harborwoman | December 15, 2007 8:14 PM

  138. Tip Toe

    Not sure where Ran is so I'm putting everyone's guesses about IA, NH, and SC in a chart.

    You can do them all now, or just do IA before the Caucus and the others later before those elections.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 8:16 PM

  139. Evening all.

    Corey: so glad you are on the mend.

    Dex: yum. Sauerkraut on the side or with the sandwich? Will you share?

    Was out at Arlington Cemetery today to lay wreaths for friends and family; place was packed with pedestrians scooting about placing wreaths donated by a charity. Two truckfuls of wreaths.

    Think I saw Joe Louis (boxer's) grave. If so, he has Clark Clifford as a nearby eternal neighbor.

    Have to catch up with your posts. Ciao for now.

    Posted by: dog's eye view Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 8:17 PM

  140. Globe also endorses mccain

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 15, 2007 8:50 PM

  141. Dog:
    I yelled Achtung! to alert everyone to the kraut & stuff!
    Just sausage and kraut on a plate with a platter of pumpernickel , all smeared up with butter. Of course you can have some! ---Store-bought apple jam-filled cookies for a last course...I was bad and ate all the homemade chocolate chip cookies. My wife brained me with a cast-iron skillet for that caper! No problem, we have lawyers in Crawford's house here!
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    If you follow dog's lead and go to Arlington National Cemetery,chances are you'll visit the Kennedy gravesite.
    Just a few steps away lies Vance Hartke, my fave all-time US Senator.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 8:59 PM

  142. Forgive me for this very tired joke:

    "You say they buried Nixon twelve feet down? "

    Yes, because deep down, he is a very good president.

    Ok...I twisted it...it is really about "lawyers". But I don't wanna get banned!

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:03 PM

  143. Kathy...I suspected that.
    Just as I suspect Clinton will win the whole thing.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:05 PM

  144. for dog: This is Joe Louis's fist...It is outside JLA in Detroit.
    And yes, it has been very controversial.

    http://www.rivalfish.com/rivalroom/uploaded_images/JoeLouisFist-783792.jpg

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:13 PM

  145. Dex , remember when someone threw white paint all over the fist a few years ago? I am crashed out on the couch tonight.

    Posted by: Corey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:21 PM

  146. Yep...and that sculpture has been catching hell ever since it appeared there.

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:30 PM

  147. waiting to hear who Des Moines Register endorses.

    Posted by: dog's eye view Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 9:59 PM

  148. Well Jake Rienhart's rodeo is over for this year. Tonight he tied with two other fellows for second and third and fourth with a time of 4.8 seconds for his run. That will pay him $16,923.07.

    he came in to the rodeo winning $55,264.98 and with this week he has won $72,188.05. Things could have been better but they could have been a lot worse.

    yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: horsedooty | December 15, 2007 10:03 PM

  149. GD.

    Des Moines Register endorses Hillary Clinton.

    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Presidential-Endorsements.html

    Posted by: dog's eye view Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 10:09 PM

  150. OK, follow up question:

    how many times has Des Moines Register Endorsement been predictive of the Iowa caucus winner?

    And yes, plead guilty to sheer laziness for not looking it up myself. (But Jamie and KGC have such atomic age research skills!)

    Posted by: dog's eye view Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 10:17 PM

  151. The Des Moines Register endorsement proved a key boost for Edwards in 2004, resulting in a second-place finish. Additionally, the Register's endorsement has proved influential in three of the last four cycles; they backed caucus winner Walter Mondale in 1984 and second-place winner Paul Simon in 1988. In 2000, the Register's endorsed Bill Bradley who lost to Al Gore.

    Posted by: zoey Author Profile Page | December 15, 2007 10:32 PM

  152. Just finished watchin "American Perspectives" on C-SPAN with Michael Dukakis as the guest. It was very thoughtful and interesting on a whole host of subjects.

    One pleasant remark: "Romney is a fraud and he was a lousy Governor".

    Posted by: Jamie | December 15, 2007 10:39 PM

  153. well when I wrote the last update about the daughters friend they had not updated for tonights rodeo. Jake won $23,886.21this week and total for the year $79,151.19. Not bad for a WNFR rookie.

    yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: horsedooty | December 16, 2007 12:03 AM

  154. Jamie, I'll do my prediction after the caucus.

    Ah, Peter Maxx, what an artist.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 16, 2007 12:20 AM

  155. "after the caucus"

    20/20 Hindsite?

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 12:25 AM

  156. Make that Hind Sight

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 12:25 AM

  157. another example of Gov Huckleberry Hound's judgment with funny looking parole and clemency hearings.

    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2007/12/15/519110.aspx

    yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: horsedooty | December 16, 2007 12:27 AM

  158. The Register endorsed John McCain, too.
    Jamie...did you know what Dukakis reported? NIXON tried to get Universal Health Care in 1971...passed the House , like 330-70 of the voters on the floor that day...sent to Senate...and the southern Senators filibustered it to death! NIXON!! I was in the Army then and never heard a damn thing about it.

    Dukakis also said Bush43 is the worst prez in his lifetime.

    AND I say EVER !!

    Posted by: Dexter Author Profile Page | December 16, 2007 1:34 AM

  159. Posted by: Julia | December 16, 2007 2:27 AM

  160. Yes, Jamie and then I can say I knew it all along.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 16, 2007 3:07 AM

  161. That's a HUGE turkey.

    I've learned of the Turducken since I moved here.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turducken

    Not quite as fancy.

    tt

    Posted by: tiptoe Author Profile Page | December 16, 2007 3:11 AM

  162. just looking at that gives me gas.

    yo soy Horsedooty!

    Posted by: horsedooty | December 16, 2007 4:33 AM

  163. John's dad with some rye whiskey:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05E91pgKCx0

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 16, 2007 6:21 AM

  164. Posted by: sturgeone | December 16, 2007 6:56 AM

  165. Lehrer on songs satire and boosh:

    Lehrer has commented that he doubts his songs had any real effect on those not already critical of the establishment: "I don't think this kind of thing has an impact on the unconverted, frankly. It's not even preaching to the converted; it's titillating the converted... I'm fond of quoting Peter Cook, who talked about the satirical Berlin cabarets of the '30s, which did so much to stop the rise of Hitler and prevent the Second World War."[1] In 2003 he commented that his particular brand of political satire is more difficult in the modern world: "The real issues I don't think most people touch. The Clinton jokes are all about Monica Lewinsky and all that stuff and not about the important things, like the fact that he wouldn't ban landmines... I'm not tempted to write a song about George W. Bush. I couldn't figure out what sort of song I would write. That's the problem: I don't want to satirise George Bush and his puppeteers, I want to vaporise them."[2]

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 16, 2007 7:08 AM

  166. the beatles and the press about "bigger than jesus" flap with a dash of viet nam and sho biz........

    disc jockey Tommy Charles.......B'ham, right Pogo? Doug Leyton and Tommy Charles........

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1CidMWUfbw&feature=related

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 16, 2007 7:51 AM

  167. Dex: have you seen the U-tube "F'ing Short Version of the Big Lebowski" ?

    Posted by: sturgeone | December 16, 2007 8:01 AM

  168. Good Morning Gang.....

    I'm housebound today.... along with my eastern brethren.... BIG blizzard going on..... supposed to get ice on top of lots of snow this afternoon..... hope our power holds out for the Patriots game.....

    I'm predicting that Clinton will be the Dem nominee......
    don't want to go state by state...... want to enjoy the show without any emotional baggage......

    looks like I might watch some of the Sunday shows...... Rick and I can't get out for our usual Sunday brunch...... but then.... I could always stick my nose in a book...... currently reading "Pillars of the Earth" (Oprah book).... having lots of fun with it...... at almost 600 of it's 900+ pages..... set back in the 1100s..... oh the subterfuge and politics that went on back then!

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee | December 16, 2007 8:20 AM

  169. Wait! DSR's editorial board can be bought for a free dinner? Ain't politics grand!

    I know newspaper's endorsements carry weight, but it baffles me why they do.

    Posted by: dnd | December 16, 2007 8:36 AM

  170. Dexter,

    Though I knew about Truman by name because at the time my dad was in the Army, I first became aware of politics enough to have an opinion with the 52 election. That is how long I've heard about universal healthcare.

    Virtually everyone coming out of WW II thought it was a good idea and it was at that time that England first adopted the NHS, so it doesn't surprise me that Nixon was for it. Unfortunately Eisenhower coming on the heels of Roosevelt and Truman owed his presidency to the money men and they hated the idea of "Socialized Medicine". This then became part of the Republican ethos as the cold war deepened.

    It has taken us until now to finally convince the American public that it might be a good idea to consider again. The rubric of "best medicine in the world" has started to fall on deaf ears now that the public has been exposed to having the most expensive health care with the poorest results for the money.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 8:47 AM

  171. oh..... I forgot to say who I think the Repug nominee will be....

    ok..... after much consideration.... they will decide none of the current bozos fits the bill and nominate Reagan's ghost..... and Gomer Plye will be VP.....

    seriously..... I don't know.... none of them appeals to me..... and apparently, there's no consensus on which one appeals to them.....

    I'm just gonna watch and see what happens......
    and of course..... as always..... I'll enjoy the ride...... :0)

    Posted by: RebelliousRenee | December 16, 2007 8:48 AM

  172. Oh great....here we go again....

    HuffingtonPost:

    Florida4Marriage sounds like the worst boy band of all time, but it turns out it's not. It's a Republican front group, run by a personal injury lawyer, to lure gay-hating boobs into the voting booths next November.

    Florida4Marriage, and its chairman, John Stemberger (a recognized leader in rental car accident law) are the people behind Florida's new Marriage Protection Amendment, and yesterday they finally got the signatures they need to put it on the 2008 ballot.

    So come on down! And while you're in there, marking the magic X that proves you're not a homo -- and that your life wasn't a squalid waste of everyone's time, because at least you got yerself hitched -- why not also vote for a Republican president?

    Something for you. Something for the GOP. It's a get-out-the-vote win/win.

    Anti-gay amendments are the Happy Meal toy of Republican politics.

    Posted by: Patsi | December 16, 2007 8:50 AM

  173. Julia,

    $800 per person Christmas dinner is a bit outside my budget.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 8:50 AM

  174. So here's what we have so far for Iowas

    Brian Edwards Obama Clinton
    Jamie Clinton Obama Edwards Romney McCain Huckabee

    Mad Mustard Obama Edwards Clinton Huckabee Romney Thompson

    Sturgeone Edwards Clinton Obama
    McCain Huckerbee Ron Paul

    Renee Clinton Final Nominee
    Tiptoe Just gets To Be Right

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 8:57 AM

  175. Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:07 AM

  176. Actor singer Floyd Red Crow Westerman also passed away.

    http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_7724819?nclick_check=1

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:09 AM

  177. dnd

    "I know newspaper's endorsements carry weight, but it baffles me why they do." Many voters who consider it their duty to vote, but who are not particularly caught up in politics enough to analyze the candidates depend on a trusted source for a recommendation.

    This is why the far right started distributing cards to the church goers as their "religious" duty to go to the polls. It has given them a leg up for years though has less force now that so many people have caught on that it was a fund raising source for the groups putting out the cards.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:25 AM

  178. My favorite Tom Lehrer wasn't political

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXx2VVSWDMo&feature=related

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:36 AM

  179. Jamie,
    You of course are correct. But my feeling is that one's duty is not only to vote, but take a few minutes to see where candidates and ballot measures stand on issues, and see how they agree with one's own opinions. Otherwise one is vulnerable to being duped into voting for someone who's ideas you generally wouldn't support.

    Posted by: dnd | December 16, 2007 9:40 AM

  180. Ok, I'm climbing off my soapbox now...

    Posted by: dnd | December 16, 2007 9:41 AM

  181. dnd,

    At that's how we got George. There are a lot of people voting who shouldn't be allowed out of doors much less into a voting booth, but up until now, the system usually manages to be self correcting.

    I'm not completely convinced that we will get past this presidency without something almost permanently destructive happening.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:46 AM

  182. and my other favorite Lehrer - The rather licentious Alma

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgTL71yZ3Mo

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:46 AM

  183. as usual tweety continues his anti hillary campaign and I guess they did the promotion for it before Clinton got the Register endorsement. Now he looks like a spoiled child who is throwing a tantrum.

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 16, 2007 9:50 AM

  184. Obama also bought dinner .
    DND you are joinging Tweety in your irrational hate of Clinton

    Posted by: Katherine Graham Cracker | December 16, 2007 9:51 AM

  185. Renee

    When you finish the 900 pages of The Pillars of the Earth, you still have another 900 to go with the sequel "World Without End". I'm about a fourth of the way through and I'm starting to think of it as "book without end". It's really good, but rather impinging on my life.

    Posted by: Jamie | December 16, 2007 9:58 AM

  186. dnd: "Otherwise one is vulnerable to being duped into voting for someone who's ideas you generally wouldn't support."

    That's what's happening with a lot of the Ron Paul supporters....people only hear no income tax and get out of Iraq....

    Posted by: Patsi | December 16, 2007 10:01 AM

  187. <