Sabrina DeSousa, an alleged CIA agent charged with kidnapping in Italy, says that a Justice Department decision to pay her legal costs is much too little, much too late.
"Unbelievable! The United States Department of Justice just 'approved' an attorney to defend me, a month after the trial ended,
knowing full well that an attorney at this stage will make little or no
difference to the outcome or verdict," DeSousa said via e-mail Friday.
CIA Woman Outraged by Belated U.S. Legal Help
In a sudden reversal this week, the Justice Department informed DeSousa, one of more than two dozen CIA officers charged with kidnapping in connection with the "rendition" of an al Qaeda suspect from Milan in 2003, that it would pay her legal costs.
DeSousa had sued the government in May after years of unsuccessfully pressing her case in private.
Justice Department spokeswoman Beverley Lumpkin declined to say whether the U.S. would pay the legal expenses of other defendants in the controversial case.
"The decision to authorize payment of fees to Ms. De Sousa is public," Lumpkin said by e-mail. "If we approve payment of fees, that becomes public. But we cannot comment about other parties who may or may not have sought the same."The decision on DeSousa came nearly simultaneously with a report in The Washington Post that CIA Director Leon Panetta had told employees that the spy agency would pay the legal fees of those caught up in investigations of interrogation abuses at secret sites overseas.
De Sousa, 53, was listed as an American diplomat in Italy on Feb. 17, 2003, when U.S. agents snatched an al Qaeda suspect, known as Abu Omar, off a Milan street and secretly flew him out of the country for interrogation.
Following an investigation by Italian police, 25 alleged CIA personnel and a U.S. Air Force officer were charged with kidnapping.
Their trial in absentia is essentially over. Prosecutor Armando Spataro will be presenting his closing arguments Sept. 23, with a guilty verdict expected in October.
"I had nothing to do with the planning, and nothing to do with the kidnapping, of this guy," DeSousa said in a May interview with SpyTalk.
As for her alleged CIA employment and activities in Milan at the time of the "rendition," as the spy agency calls it, De Sousa answered, "I can't really comment."
"You can keep hammering away at me, but all I will say is I was a former federal employee," she added. "I worked for the State Department. I was second secretary at the American embassy in Rome and the consulate in Milan."As such, she maintains, the government was obligated to defend her.
De Sousa filed suit on May 13 to force the State Department to invoke diplomatic immunity, halt the Italian prosecution, provide her with legal counsel in Italy and pay her legal bills and other costs associated with the case.
On Wednesday, Aug. 26, the government finally relented. The Justice Department's Director of Foreign Litigation, Robert M. Hollis, notified DeSousa that it would compensate the Italian lawyer defending her in Milan.
But DeSousa was far from happy with the decision.
"I had hoped that the Obama leadership in the Departments of Justice and State would step in to do the right thing and ensure I was provided the immunity to which I was entitled rather than sacrifice me to protect the high-level officials who presumably sanctioned the incident," she told SpyTalk.
"This sends a terrible message to those in our military and diplomatic corps who risk their lives overseas to protect the interests of our country," she said.The attorney representing DeSousa in her lawsuit against the State Department was equally caustic about the delay.
"What happened in Italy was not a rogue operation, and we should not be treated as if it were."
"One of the remedies we sought in the litigation, which was filed in May, was for the U.S. government to provide Ms. DeSousa legal counsel in Italy," said Mark S. Zaid, a Washington lawyer who specializes in the grievances of intelligence agency employees.
Zaid noted that U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Romano, also charged in the case, "had been given both U.S. military counsel and private Italian counsel, at the courtesy of the U.S. government."
He added: "For three years Ms. DeSousa requested counsel. Rather than provide counsel, the U.S. government forbade her from cooperating with or even speaking to her court appointed counsel.
"Now, three and a half years after the lawsuit was filed, and just weeks away from a verdict, out of the blue (and on the eve of the State Department's motion to dismiss her suit,) this letter arrives from the Justice Department granting our request. This is too little, too late. The criminal trial is essentially over. This is equivalent to being finally appointed the captain of an ocean liner after years of effort, but it happens to be April 14, 1912."A Justice Department spokesman was not immediately available Friday night to respond to the complaints of DeSousa and Zaid.
The other alleged CIA defendants are being represented by Italian public defenders, according to ABC-TV reporter Matthew Cole, who is writing a book on the Milan case.
Prosecutor Spataro said in May that the defendants could face "not less than five years" in prison if they are convicted. Cole estimated some of the senior operatives on trial, such as the CIA chiefs in Rome and Milan, could theoretically face as much as 14 or 15 years in prison.
Since they are being tried in absentia, however, a guilty verdict would have no practical effect - as long as they remain in the United States.
The likelihood that the Obama administration would honor an extradition request from Italy -- in the unlikely event the pro-U.S. Berlusconi government issued one -- is unimaginable, observers say.
Wanted notices, however, are posted throughout Europe, as well as other states that are members of Interpol, which could trigger the arrest of any defendant who tries to enter them.
Spataro, whose office has also successfully prosecuted scores of terrorists, has been accused of trampling on diplomatic immunity and waging an anti-U.S. vendetta.
But the career prosecutor rejects both charges.
"Consular officers can be arrested or placed in preventive detention ... in case of serious crimes and as a result of a ruling issued by the judicial authority," he says, quoting the Vienna Convention of 1963, ratified by Italy in 1967.
Abu Omar (real name: Hassan Mustafa Osama Nasr), the victim of the Milan abduction, which the CIA arranged with the aid of Italian intelligence officials, was flown to Cairo for interrogation -- and torture, he said upon surfacing years later. He remains in Egypt.

Comments
Bless you Ms. DeSouza and thank you for your service to our country. Typical, leftist-Obama tearing down of our American intelligence and military capabilities and leaving, loyal American employees hanging in the wind. Watch, Justice Commissar Holder will likely indict her for conspiracy with the soon-to be-martyred CIA interrogators and analysts who have kept this country safe from terrorist attacks since 9/11. Shame on the "Justice" Department and Obama and Foreign Affairs Commissar H. Clinton.
Posted by: Felix335
| August 29, 2009 2:09 AM
Felix,
Take a deep breath and read the article again.
Specifically "DeSousa had sued the government in May after years of unsuccessfully pressing her case in private."
Another deep breath. And read.
"After YEARS of unsuccessfully pressing her case in private."
The Obama administration is eight months old.
Posted by: pantysnatcher
| August 30, 2009 5:18 AM
Yes, both the Bush and Obama Administration deserve blame for this travesty of justice. Those who have operated in secret on behalf of our nation, accept the possibility that on rare occasion, our government may leave them to rot in a foreign jail. It is just the cost of doing business in a dangerous world. This is not however, the expected outcome when serving with diplomatic status in conjunction with host country officials. Whether DeSousa was involved or not, our officials acted in accordance with accepted protocol, and this case was a politically motivated witch-hunt by a prosecutor who had his toes stepped on and his feelings hurt. Whether you agree with the extraordinary rendition program or not, DeSousa and her colleagues didn’t just wake up one morning and decide, “Let’s go kidnap us a terrorist! Give Gustavo a call and see if he’ll drive the van.” This operation was a joint effort, green-lighted at the highest levels of the U.S. Government and I dare to say, the Italian Government as well. Why then have DeSousa and Company been left to fend for themselves for the entirety of this case? Why wasn’t DeSousa’s immunity invoked and why was she prevented from defending herself? Why, indeed. Blowback can be a bitch and maybe this operation didn’t go down as smoothly as it should have, but at the very least, pressure should have been exerted on the Italian government to prevent this prosecution. As was asked in the Wall Street Journal in 2007, “What good is NATO if allies indict Americans after a joint operation?” Should DeSousa and others pay the price because the Italian left hand didn’t know what the Italian right hand was up to?
The sad reality is that the Bush Administration didn’t have the cojones to act to prevent Sabrina and her colleagues from being branded international fugitives from justice. I fear that the Obama Administration will do worse. Rest assured that my friend, Sabrina DeSousa, will be convicted by the Italians. This latest Justice Department action does nothing to prevent that from happening. I hope, but I don’t expect that this Administration will protect her any more than the last one did. Sabrina is a naturalized U.S. Citizen, soon to be convicted of an international crime. Would it be of any surprise to find her the victim of an Elian Gonzalez style raid to ship her off to an Italian prison? Paranoid delusions of a Right-Wing nut job? Maybe. Perhaps someone will ask Eric Holder. I understand he’s big supporter of the CIA rank-and-file.
Posted by: slowjoe
| September 2, 2009 1:06 PM
Post A Comment