Army Spy Posed as Anarchist

| | Comments (4)

An Army civilian from a Fort Lewis, Wash., "force protection division" infiltrated a Seattle-area antiwar group posing as an anarchist who could steal classified information for the organization, according to little-noticed news reports.

A member of the antiwar group said documents obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request revealed that his friend and fellow activist "John Jacob" was actually military spy John Towery.

A Fort Lewis spokesman confirmed that Towery was employed on the base but would offer no additional information because he "performs sensitive law enforcement work with the installation law enforcement community." 


Activist Brendan Maslauskas Dunn said he met Towery, who called himself John Jacob, in 2007, "through community organizing and antiwar organizing I was involved with in Tacoma and Olympia with other anarchists and other activists."

"He said he was an anarchist" and "really interested in Students for a Democratic Society. He wanted to start a chapter of Movement for a Democratic Society, which is connected to SDS," Dunn told Democracy Now, the liberal radio show that first reported on the spying this week. 

Jabob/Towery had apparently infilrated many antiwar groups in the Seattle-Tacoma area, Dunn said.

"He got involved with Port Militarization Resistance, with Iraq Vets Against the War. He was--you know, (he) knew a lot of people involved with that organization." 

Another member of the group, Drew Hendricks, told radio host Amy Goodman that  Jacob/Towery "approached me as somebody who claimed to have base access, which turned out to be true.

"He did admit that he was a civilian employee for the Army. And what he was offering me were observations and inside knowledge of operations on Fort Lewis."

Hendricks said he rebuffed the offer, which could have led to his arrest and prosecution.

"I let him know that I wasn't willing to have any classified information from him and that I wasn't engaged in espionage," Hendricks said on the show.

"I was looking for open source information and looking for insight into movements of military materials over the public roads, so that people other than myself could organize protests or organize blockades, as they might see fit, and it wasn't appropriate for me to be involved in their plans. It was only appropriate for him let me know things that I could confirm from open ground, from public spaces."

Hendricks added, "He abided by those rules, for the most part."

E-mails obtained by Hendricks revealed that Jacob was actually John Towery, a member of the Fort Lewis "Force Protection" unit, and that his reports on antiwar groups were going to the Washington Joint Analytical Center, a partnership of local and state police, the FBI and the federal Department of Homeland Security.

The center is one of more than 70 DHS-backed intelligence "fusion centers" around the country.  

According a DHS official who discussed the issue only on terms of anonymity, many, but not all, fusion centers have a military representative.

"Membership is a state's decision," the official said.

Base spokesman Joesph Piek told Tacoma News-Tribune reporter Jeremy Pawloski that "The Fort Lewis Force Protection Division, under the Directorate of Emergency Services, consists of both military and civilian employees whose focus is on supporting law enforcement and security operations to ensure the safety and security of Fort Lewis, soldiers, family members, the workforce and those personnel accessing the installation."

Piek added that, "In support of that focus, the Force Protection Division executes Force Protection (FP), Anti-terrorism (AT), and Criminal Intelligence collection, processing, analysis, reporting and dissemination."

Spokesmen at the Pentagon and Army could not immediately say whether placing undercover operatives in antiwar groups was permissible under military counterintelligence procedures.

From 2002 until it was shuttered late last year, the Pentagon collected domestic intelligence through its Counterintelligence Field Activity, or CIFA, which created controversy when news reports revealed it was spying on antiwar groups.

Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates ordered it closed in 2008, after a review "found the office's functions could be performed more effectively by another agency," Reuters reported.

According to Lt. Col. Eric Butterbaugh, a Pentagon spokesman, CIFA's functions were assumed by the Defense Counterintelligence and HUMINT (human intelligence) Center, a unit of the Defense Intelligence Agency.

Former FBI domestic intelligence undercover agent Mike German called the Ft. Lewis revelations "shocking."

"It's disturbing that military units are involved in any domestic law enforcement activity," said German, now an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who coauthored critical studies of the fusion centers in 2007 and 2008.

"It's unclear whether officials in D.C. understand what the military is doing in domestic law enforcement," German told SpyTalk.

Update: "Fort Lewis is aware of the claim with regard to the individual," an Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Lee Packnett said in a July 31 e-mail. "To ensure all regulatory guidelines were followed, the command has decided that an inquiry is prudent, and an officer is being appointed to conduct the inquiry. In the meantime, we cannot provide any information
regarding this issue while the inquiry is under way."

    Comments

  1. Isn't the DHS watching "rightwing" groups that they consider threats? Is it only DHS's domain for monitoring internal threats or additional agencies?

    Posted by: Mark Eichenlaub Author Profile Page | July 30, 2009 10:31 PM

  2. He was a civilian; not a member of the military; therefore there was no violation of posse commitatus. Second, he was not CI or intel - he was likely a civilian staff member of the planning staff (Directorate of Plans and Training) under which the Force Protection element normally falls on most Army posts. Therefore, there was no intel violation. Third, most liberal lefties forget that posse commitatus was designed to protect the military from being used as the law of the land on the lawless frontier, *not* to protect the civil population from the military! Fourth, the "we have nothing to hide" organization did surveillance of this man to show he was using a false ID -- want to talk about invasion of privacy? I think the individual doing the inquiry has a complaint against this group for their violation of HIS privacy!!!!!

    Posted by: mousestealth Author Profile Page | July 31, 2009 11:11 AM

  3. Once again, rather than monitor real threats to national security (from the collapse of the global finance system to climate change to foreign terrorist networks), the spooks are using federal dollars to target people who disagree with the government.

    Domestic intelligence operations such as these damage fundamental civil liberties while doing nothing to keep people safe. It's only more disappointing to see military personnel (yes, the civilians operate under the Army's chain of command) infiltrate and spy on political groups since they claim to be on the front lines of defending freedom, democracy and the constitution.

    Port Military Resistance is to be lauded for their efforts to increase pressure to end the war, as well as for rooting out the government agent(s) threatening First Amendment activity.

    Posted by: libertybeat Author Profile Page | July 31, 2009 2:04 PM

  4. mousestealth covered the original story very well. Upshot -- no story here.

    I'm covering the additional crap that had nothing to do with this story.

    "Spokesmen at the Pentagon and Army could not immediately say whether placing undercover operatives in antiwar groups was permissible under military counterintelligence procedures.

    From 2002 until it was shuttered late last year, the Pentagon collected domestic intelligence through its Counterintelligence Field Activity, or CIFA, which created controversy when news reports revealed it was spying on antiwar groups."

    What a load. A Force Protection section is not a counterintelligence organization and has no CI authority, nor is it affiliated in any way with Military Intelligence. CI procedures are not applicable.

    CIFA never "spied" on anyone. It had no operational personnel; it was a staff organization to support the overall DoD CI enterprise. It had one tiny section that received and stored information for analysts, which was less than a tenth of what CIFA did for a living. It also was never on Fort Lewis.

    The original story didn't have enough drama for you, so you bring up already discredited information and throw it in gratituously?

    Mr. Stein, you claim to have been an Army Intelligence case officer. Really? A professional MI officer would have verified the source's credibility and the information's accuracy before submitting a report. You did neither.

    I'd evaluate your report as an E5 (source/info not credible), toss it into the circular file, then send you for some remedial training.

    Posted by: MAJ Arkay Author Profile Page | July 31, 2009 6:23 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)