US Puts Limits on Police Advisers in Afghanistan (Updated)

| | Comments (0)

American civilian advisers to Afghanistan's National Police, considered the linchpin in any successful effort against the Taliban, say restrictions on their movements are making their efforts basically worthless.

The advisers are not permitted to stay overnight in Afghan police installations or even go out on raids with their charges, two former CIA operatives who worked with the police in the past year say.


"They aren't allowed to set foot outside to go out on a raid," said Gary Berntsen, a career CIA officer who led one of its first teams into Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. 

Berntsen went back to Afghanistan in an advisery role with the Army's 173rd Airborne Brigade last year, and maintains contact with his former comrades there.

"We're not letting our civilian advisers stay with the police on their base," Berntsen added. 

"We won't let them. And the Afghans think we're afraid," he said.

Berntsen maintained that the restrictions were designed to reduce the chances for casualties and the political effect they might have back home.

 "We want to win the war with zero casualties," he said.           

Another former CIA adviser backs up Berntsen's story, saying "restrictions on his movements" were such that he could not get any work done.

"Almost all" of  his time was spent "sitting on a base, eating five meals a day and watching DVDs," said this former CIA employee, who could not be named because he still does sensitive work with the government.

"Two days of meetings and paperwork [were needed] to get permission to move outside the wire," he said, which restricted his time and movement to such a degree "that there was no point in showing up," he said.

A spokesman for the Defense Department could not be immediately reached for comment.

UPDATE: On Feb. 18, a Defense Department spokesman, Lt. Col Mark Wright, said, "There are no prohibitions against what you described."

But Berntsen stuck to his version of the story:

"I am not surprised that some Pentagon spokesman would provide such an answer. The reality in the field is completely at odds with his statement. Police advisers are blocked from any effort to accompany the police on operations. I have seen it with my own eyes, and spoken to dozens, repeat dozens, of police advisors that complained bitterly about not being able to do their jobs."   

The Afghan police, some 45,000 strong, are notorious for corruption and ineffectiveness. In 2007 the U.S. spent $2.5 billion on police training programs and took over from a German effort that failed.

"Corruption remains a central challenge and, some believe, requires nuanced expectations, like the broader effort of training forces here," according to a Christian Science Monitor report last year.

"One American officer draws a distinction between a police commander who might steal in order to provide for the men under his command, and another commander, who might tip off the Taliban in advance of a particular coalition operation," wrote CSM staff writer Gordon Lubold. "That kind of corruption, he insists, can't be tolerated."

"There is functional corruption," he says, "and then there is dysfunctional corruption."

This just in: Read a U.S. Army sergeant's scathing, classified fitness report on an Afghan police commander, obtained by Wikileaks, here.   

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)