Ray Odierno's Baghdad Trick-or-Treat

| | Comments (2)

Tell me Ray Odierno is pulling a Halloween stunt.

He can't be serious: Does the general really think that by shouting "Boo!" in The Washington Post that Iran and its agents in Baghdad are going to run away?

The joke's on him. Baghdad politicians have gone into high Inspector Renault mode over the U.S. commander's charge that some Iraqi politicians are on the payroll of Iran.

Well, what a shock. Next you'll tell us mullahs wear turbans.

Ray, Ray, Ray: Think this through.  Bribes are beside the point. Most Iraqi Shia politicians don't need to be paid. That's just hummus.

Many of them, including our handpicked Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki, welcome what sometimes looks like a slow-motion anschluss by their Iranian co-religionists.

Others say the Iraqis -- Arabs -- will never forfeit their patriotism to the Persian-Iranians in the interest of advancing shia hegemony. The two fought each other to a bloody pulp for most of the 1980s.

Still, it's a powerful force. To many shia, it's 1,400 years overdue: The Sunnis kept them down for centuries. Now the Shiites finally have the Sunni boot off their necks, thanks in no small measure to us, and they're not going to lie down under it again.

Iran is going to have a powerful say in Iraqi affairs, no less than we have a say in Mexico's -- and probably a lot more. 

Too bad for you, General, that Maliki & Co. were made a "sovereign" power by the Bush administration. Now they're taking it seriously. They're threatening to throw us out if we don't drop our insistence on prohibiting the Iraqi prosecution of Americans accused of criminal wrongdoing.

Odierno, in response, threatened that $6.3 billion in U.S. bilateral aid and $10 billion worth of military sales could be cut off without a finalized status-of-forces agreement by the end of the year.

Another big "boo." The Iraqis could call Odierno's bluff without breaking a sweat.

What a mess. The current kerfuffle is just the latest manifestation of the Bush administration's strategic blunder in so quickly toppling Iran's archenemy, the Sunni dictator Saddam Hussein, after chasing the Sunni Taliban from power in Afghanistan.

Now the Iranians are poised to make Baghdad into their satrap via their U.S.-backed mates.  Does that define terrible irony or what?

And there's not much Ray Odierno can do about it. Like King Canute, he's shouting at the incoming tide.

    Comments

  1. Ray'd better be careful before he starts running his mouth about a cut in military aid. The boys and girls in the U.S. defense industries, who get paid to make that $10 Billion worth of stuff before we pack it up and send it to Iraq, might not like that kinda talk.

    Posted by: JimBob Author Profile Page | October 28, 2008 8:18 PM

  2. One has to look back at the early, disastrous tactics of the Army after 'Mission Accomplished' was declared to see what's coming now. Many of them were committed by those commanded under Odierno (read 'Fiasco' by Ricks). There was good reason Petraeus had success with the 101st (classic counter-insurgency tactics, initiating public works projects, etc.) and was promoted over Odierno to command the Iraq mission. Just to be clear, I'm in complete agreement with the late Gen. William Odom on Iraq (...the greatest strategic blunder in the history of U.S. foreign policy). But, like him or not, Petraeus was smart enough to realize the bull-in-a-china-shop methods won't work here. Ray O is the definition of the bull, unfortunately for us.

    Posted by: le0pard13 Author Profile Page | October 28, 2008 11:18 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)