Health Protesters Starting To Sway Converts

| | Comments (2)

Protesters at town hall meetings who oppose plans to change the health care system have caught the public's attention and starting to win support, according to a USA Today/Gallup poll conducted Aug. 11

Sixty-nine percent of those surveyed said they pay close attention to news accounts of the protests, and 34 percent say they are more sympathetic to the arguments raised by the protesters. Those paying the most attention are most likely to agree with the protesters, the poll found.

But that doesn't mean they sympathize with the behavior of some of the protesters who seem to have checked their manners at the door.

Fifty-nine percent of those responding to the survey said protesters shouting down their opponents at these meetings was an abuse of democracy. But 51 percent said angry attacks on a healthcare bill and its possible effects were acceptable. Booing is not nice, with 47 percent calling it an abuse of democracy and 41 percent seeing it as democracy in action.

The survey was based on telephone interview with 1,000 adults nationwide and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. Gallup pointed out that one-day polls such as this one may have higher error rate than those conducted over several days.

    Comments

  1. I've always found in a discussion of profound meaning or impact, in business meetings, with my children, in church, etc., that angry attacks always contribute so much to finding a good solution.

    And, I've always found people so much more accepting of my ideas when screamed at them. It just seems to enable them to better assess the content of what I'm saying instead of the distraction of how I'm saying it.

    I think these disruptive attendees can teach us all a lot. I know I've certainly learned a lot about them.

    Posted by: Griff Author Profile Page | August 14, 2009 11:00 AM

  2. Putting Griff's sarcastic post aside I think these tactics have gotten the attention of people. Now I want to read more regarding the end-of-life provision to pay physicians for counseling. On a personal note I wish my sisters and I had an earlier counseling session with my mother's attending physician during her last days.
    I also think the fear among seniors needs to be addressed. My hope is that after all the sound and fury, legislators will return to Washington with less ideological driven ideas about health care reform and work on costs reduction with better treatment outcomes. Who could argue with that? And if the Republicans continue to obstruct based on political self-interest than go-ahead with a party-line vote and pass health care reform (even with a public option) if it really, really reduces costs, and provides better treatment outcomes.
    Finally, I am represented by Shelia Jackson-Lee and she is one of those carreer politicians that assume she can stay in office as long as she wishes.
    I hope the flack and bad publicity she received for taking a cell-phone call while a constituent was trying to express her concerns motivates a serious challenge for her in 2012.

    Posted by: Prisilla Author Profile Page | August 14, 2009 11:51 AM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)