Last week, we noted Sen. John McCain's shift to running almost entirely negative ads.
But Marc Ambinder notes the downside: "One worry for Republicans is that McCain has already gone
too negative too quickly; you never pull out the strongest punches
against your opponent until the very end; it's hard to get tougher than
the kindergarten ad... or over-the-top statements about Obama not being
fit to lead."
Did McCain Go Negative Too Early?
By Taegan Goddard | October 5, 2008 11:11 AM | Permalink | Comments (1)
Categories: 2008 Presidential Election
CQ Politics Blog Network
- Bringing together unique voices from across the political spectrum.
- Poll Tracker
- SpyTalk
- David Corn
- Craig Crawford
- Taegan Goddard
- Politics (Un)Seriously
- David Nather
- Web Picks
- Report Card
Recent Posts
Posts by month
Search this blog
Links
- Political Wire
- First Read
- The Hotline
- The Page
- Washington Wire
- The Politico
- Roll Call
- The Hill
- Daily Kos
- Craig Crawford
- Stu Rothenberg
- Marc Ambinder
- Charlie Cook
- Robert Novak
- Josh Marshall
- Andrew Sullivan
- The Swamp
- The Fix
- ABC Political Radar
- CNN Political Ticker
- Washington Whispers
- Wonkette
- Instapundit
- Huffington Post
- Drudge Report
- Real Clear Politics
- Politics1
- Fish Bowl DC
- Political Books
- Political Stuff
Comments
Its too early because with 2 Presidential debates left, he's almost certain to get asked about it in a way that is unfavorable. The first response to a negative attack from the target is to ask what it says about the attacker, and especially at the town hall, its likely to be asked by a moderator. That could be the moment McCain either punches through and puts the race back into play or falls off the map.
Posted by: desmoulins
| October 5, 2008 6:05 PM
Post A Comment