In the latest sign Sen. Hillary Clinton "isn't yet preparing to bow out of the presidential race," her campaign is "launching a new television ad Monday that highlights her claim she is beating Barack Obama in the popular vote," according to CNN.
The only problem is that it's not true.
Clinton's claim to winning the popular vote count includes counting the primary results in Michigan, where Sen. Barack Obama's name was not even
on the ballot. In addition, her count doesn't include some caucus states won by Obama -- Iowa, Nevada, Maine and Washington state -- where the popular vote was never reported. And she also includes the results from Florida, where none of the Democratic candidates campaigned.
Furthermore, even using her methodology, the low turnout over the weekend in Puerto Rico likely guarantees she will not end up winning the popular vote anyway.
Of course, there's one other major factor to consider: Democratic party rules never consider the popular vote as a benchmark for winning the party's nomination. It's the delegates that count.
Clinton's Popular Vote Claim Stretches the Truth
By Taegan Goddard | June 2, 2008 9:26 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Categories: 2008 Presidential Election
CQ Politics Blog Network
- Bringing together unique voices from across the political spectrum.
- Poll Tracker
- SpyTalk
- David Corn
- Craig Crawford
- Taegan Goddard
- Politics (Un)Seriously
- David Nather
- Web Picks
- Report Card
Recent Posts
Posts by month
Search this blog
Links
- Political Wire
- First Read
- The Hotline
- The Page
- Washington Wire
- The Politico
- Roll Call
- The Hill
- Daily Kos
- Craig Crawford
- Stu Rothenberg
- Marc Ambinder
- Charlie Cook
- Robert Novak
- Josh Marshall
- Andrew Sullivan
- The Swamp
- The Fix
- ABC Political Radar
- CNN Political Ticker
- Washington Whispers
- Wonkette
- Instapundit
- Huffington Post
- Drudge Report
- Real Clear Politics
- Politics1
- Fish Bowl DC
- Political Books
- Political Stuff
Post A Comment