Republican and Democratic foes of abortion are so worried about taxpayers footing the bill for terminated pregnancies under a health care overhaul that they are starting to see signs of encroachment on abortion limitations where they don't exist -- at least not yet.
Jill Stanek
The clearest instance is a hypercharged reaction to the absence from the Senate's annual Financial Services spending bill of a ban on abortion coverage under the
Federal Employee Health Benefits Program.
"The text of S 1432 has just been made available online, with a startling revelation: The Smith Amendment tagged on the bill in the House, and prohibiting taxpayer subsidized abortions through the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program has been deleted," anti-abortion activist Jill Stanek wrote on her blog Thursday. The blog post is making the electronic rounds on Capitol Hill and ended up in Notepad's inbox last night.
But the long-standing law -- "No funds appropriated by this act shall be available to pay for an abortion, or the administrative expenses in connection with any health plan under the Federal employees health benefits program which provides any benefits or coverage for abortions" -- has always been a House provision (note the reference in Stanek's blog to Rep. Christopher H. Smith of New Jersey).
Typically in recent years -- as is the case this year -- the Senate bill has been silent on the matter and the House provision has been included in the final law. Neither chamber has voted directly on the issue in years. When they have, abortion opponents have won consistently.
Still, an aide to a conservative senator said that fears about the larger health care overhaul providing for taxpayer-funded abortions, either through subsidized health insurance for individuals or coverage by a government-backed plan, are likely to bring heat on the Senate's omission of FEHBP ban.
"It won't come to senate floor without a fight," the aide said. "Taxpayers don't want to pay for abortions for federal employees."