Justice Department Asserts State Secrets Privilege...Again

| | Comments (1)

The Justice Department has invoked the state secrets privilege in a bid to get a California federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit against National Security Agency electronic surveillance.

Department lawyers filed a memorandum to U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker last Friday urging him to dismiss the lawsuit, Jewel v. NSA. It argued that litigating the case would require disclosure of classified information protected by the privilege.

The plaintiffs in the case, represented by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, are alleging that the NSA has surveilled not only the communications of suspected terrorists, but the telephone calls and emails of millions of Americans.

But the Justice Department -- buttressed by public and classfied declarations from Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair and NSA Chief of Staff Deborah A. Bonnani -- said the case shouldn't proceed

"Attempting to demonstrate that the (Terrorist Surveillance Program) was not the content dragnet plaintiffs allege, or that the NSA has not otherwise engaged in the alleged content dragnet, would require the disclosure of highly classified NSA intelligence sources and methods about the TSP and other NSA activities," the Justice Department told Walker.

The Obama administration hasn't been shy about invoking state secrets to defend its predecessor's controversial counterterrorism policies. In February, the Justice Department cited state secrets in asking Walker to dismiss another lawsuit against NSA surveillance. Also in February, the Justice Department maintained the Bush administration's state secrets privilege defense in a 9th Circuit appeal of a lawsuit against a company allegedly involved in the CIA "rendition" program of transferring suspected terrorists to other countries, allegedly to be tortured.

"President Obama promised the American people a new era of transparency, accountability, and respect for civil liberties," said Kevin Bankston, an EFF attorney. "But with the Obama Justice Department continuing the Bush administration's cover-up of the National Security Agency's dragnet surveillance of millions of Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping program is still a 'secret' that cannot be reviewed by the courts, it feels like deja vu all over again."

    Comments

  1. I think in some instances we do have to have "State Secrets". Not everything can be open.. there are just some things that we don't need to know in government, and I believe that as journalists you are trying to push the open and transparent too far.

    Sometimes, we just have to trust that some people know more than we do. Pres. Obama and AG Holder are NOT the Bush Administration .. that says all I need to know right there.

    Posted by: Annette Author Profile Page | April 6, 2009 2:03 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)