Rove for Rubio

| | Comments (2)

If you're Marco Rubio and you're counting on generating millions of dollars in contributions for your Florida Senate primary contest against a sitting governor of your own party -- a guy you're trying to paint as a big-spending, President Obama-loving liberal -- do you think it helps you, or hurts you, to have the support of George W. Bush's right-hand man?

To many inside-the-Beltway conservative leaders, Karl Rove was one of the architects of the disaster that was the Bush administration:

Rove was the one behind the establishment of Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit (read: the biggest expansion of the federal government since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society);

Rove was the one pushing for comprehensive immigration overhaul (read: amnesty for illegal immigrants);

Rove was the one pushing Bush to sign McCain-Feingold (read: Rove wanted to lock in John McCain's support for Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, and was willing to trash the First Amendment if necessary);

Rove was the one who drove federal spending to new heights (read: Rove was the one who drove federal spending to new heights).

So you're sitting there in your campaign headquarters one day and out of the blue, the phone rings, and the guy on the other end says, "Marco, it's Karl. Long time, no talk. Happy to see you're still leading the GOP outreach to the Hispanic community. Glad you're running against that big-spending, Obama-loving liberal [Charlie] Crist. I'm sending you a grand."

Do you say: a) "Why, that's terrific, Karl, I can't wait to share that with Chuck Todd over at NBC. He'll get a kick out of it," b) "Karl, that's very gracious of you. Could you bring it in a brown paper bag and leave it at the door?" or c) "Karl who?"

On first glance, it appears the answer is something close to a) -- because NBC's Chuck Todd reported it earlier today.

But "close to" and "is" are not the same thing. Because I'm not Chuck Todd (dammit), I'm not sure how Chuck Todd came by the information he reported, and I can think of at least three ways he got his hands on that scoop: a) Team Rubio gave it to him in hopes its publication would be a positive to the Rubio campaign; b) Team Crist found out about it and gave it to Todd, in hopes its publication would be a negative to the Rubio campaign; c) Rove himself, or an agent of Rove, gave the information to Todd, in hopes its publication would be a positive to Rove.

*(These three alternatives necessarily do not include option d) Someone who knew about the contribution was out drinking with Chuck Todd and inadvertently let it slip somewhere between his fourth and fifth Grey Goose and Tonic.)

If Team Rubio thinks knowledge that he got a contribution from Karl Rove will help him with conservatives, one of two things is true: a) Team Rubio does not know what inside-the-Beltway conservative leaders think of Rove these days; b) Team Rubio knows perfectly well what inside-the-Beltway conservative leaders think of Rove, and yet believes that those negatives are outweighed by the positives still felt for Rove by outside-the-Beltway grass-roots conservatives whose information level is far lower -- and who take their cues from the likes of Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, where Rove is still held in much higher regard.

If the former is true, Rubio is about to find out what inside-the-Beltway conservative leaders think of Rove these days.

If the latter is true, Rubio is still about to find out what inside-the-Beltway conservative leaders think of Rove these days. He's just not going to care as much.

Follow me on Twitter!

    Comments

  1. For Charlie Crist, Pinellas has become his firewall against Rubio's straw ballot insurgency.

    http://bit.ly/8AU3k

    Posted by: saintpetersblog Author Profile Page | October 6, 2009 7:41 AM

  2. I'm not sure how Chuck Todd came by the information he reported

    One quickly notices that the fifth option, that Chuck Todd is good at his job and has good sources is conspicuoulsy absent from this goober's article.

    But I guess if Bill Pascoe wrote that a reporter knew what he was doing his credibility with conservatives would tank.

    Posted by: Robert Chapman Author Profile Page | October 7, 2009 5:27 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)