<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Ground Game</title>
        <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/</link>
        <description>Ground Game looks at the emerging stories and ideological debates happening in the blogosphere and the larger world of online politics</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:34:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Progressive Reporting vs. Punditry</title>
            <description><![CDATA[With so much attention on how much more successful the netroots has been compared to their conservative counterparts, I thought it would be interesting to compare the traffic and trends of three of the biggest progressive web operations: Huffington Post, Talking Points Memo and Daily Kos. <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="huffingtongraph.jpg" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/huffingtongraph.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="201" width="494" /></span><br /><br />Everyone says they want to read more reporting on partisan outlets. But out of the three sites compared here (via <a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/talkingpointsmemo.com+huffingtonpost.com+dailykos.com/?metric=uv">Compete.com</a>), TPM actually has the lowest readership, with 364,633 readers over the past month and a 7.9 percent upswing in total readers. In comparison, DailyKos.com is often cited as the most influential political blog, but is focused on activism and analysis. DailyKos had 655,577 readers last month, with a 2 percent drop in traffic. Finally, Huffington Post has by far the largest monthly haul of the three, with 2,523,545 readers. While initially launched as a counter to the Drudge Report, HP has expanded its focus to include reporting, commentary and analysis. They also acknowledge that half of their traffic upswing has come from newly implemented entertainment and lifestyle news posts.&nbsp;<br /><br />The bottom line: In the great traffic wars, it's clear the public would rather be entertained than informed. <br /><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/progressive-reporting-vs-pundi.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/progressive-reporting-vs-pundi.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:34:07 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Where are the Conservative Journalists?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Over at the <i>Politico</i>, Jonathan Martin <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/12008.html">writes</a>, "GOP losing the new-media war." The article is generating some thoughtful discussion from conservative tech folks inside the Beltway, even though it has already been addressed by <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb5244/is_200606/ai_n19651769">mainstream outlets</a> (yours truly on more than one occasion) and <a href="http://www.blogpi.net/whats-the-matter-with-conservative-journalism">other conservative bloggers</a>.&nbsp;<br /><br />In his piece, Martin writes:<br /><br /><blockquote>While conservatives are devoting much of their Internet energy to
analysis, their counterparts on the left are taking advantage of the
rise of new media to create new institutions devoted to unearthing
stories, putting new information into circulation and generally
crowding the space traditionally taken by traditional media. And it
almost always comes at the expense of <a title="U.S. Republican Party" href="http://search.politico.com/results.cfm?subject=U.S.+Republican+Party">GOP</a> politicians.<br /></blockquote><br />Very similar to a point <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/ackerman-to-firedoglake.html">I made yesterday</a>, while discussing recent moves by Matthew Yglesias and Spencer Ackerman. I also think it's worth noting that Martin himself worked briefly at <i>National Review</i>, and for Republican Rep. Christopher Shays before being hired by the <i>Politico. </i>So, he's a firsthand observer of the dilemma he's writing about. But it also calls into question this quote from David Brooks in the article:<br /><br /><blockquote>"In the past 60 years, only one employee of the National Review, Weekly
Standard or any conservative magazine has actually been hired as a
reporter for a newspaper," says Brooks, who researched the question a
few years ago.<br /></blockquote><br />With apologies to the crack research team Brooks enjoys at <i>The New York Times</i>, I can offer two examples within the past three years of employees of <i>National Review</i> being hired as reporters for mainstream publications: Jonathan Martin and myself. Yeah.<br /><br /><i>The Weekly Standard</i> also employs at least four top reporters and editors: Stephen F. Hayes, Matt Labash, Matthew Continetti and Jonathan V. Last. With the exception of Continetti, these guys don't get a lot of attention from conservative bloggers, but that doesn't negate the insightful and often groundbreaking reporting they do. <br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/where-are-the-conservative-jou.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/where-are-the-conservative-jou.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reactions</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:42:44 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Arab Cartoonists on Obama</title>
            <description><![CDATA[While the American media has taken a largely positive view of Barack Obama's overseas trip this week, cartoonists in the Arab world have a decidedly different take on the situation. Obama's candidacy may have indeed brought some hope for change to those in the Middle East who feel White House policy has been too tilted towards Israel over the past 30 years. But after Obama's comments about an undivided Jerusalem, and his meetings this week with Israeli leaders, that view may be quickly changing.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="obamaegg.jpg" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/obamaegg.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="287" width="396" /></span><blockquote><font face="Arial"><font size="2"><em>Al-Ghad</em>, June 9, 2008<br />Headline: "Obama, the American Candidate."</font></font></blockquote><br />The Anti-Defamation League has <a href="http://www.adl.org/main_Arab_World/as_cartoons_candidates.htm">compiled a series of cartoons</a> that portray Obama and John McCain as being puppets of, or unfairly favoring, Israeli policies. Some of the images are fairly benign, while others have a clear anti-Semitic bent, and a few portray Obama in a racially insensitive fashion. For what it's worth, McCain isn't treated any better. From the ADL release:<br /><br /><blockquote><font face="Arial" size="2">The American elections have provided an
excuse for the Arab media to promulgate perverse, bigoted and age-old
conspiracy theories that portray Israelis and Jews as controlling the
candidates. </font><br /></blockquote> <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/arab-cartoonists-on-obama.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/arab-cartoonists-on-obama.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Media</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:17:12 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Can McCain Catch a Break?</title>
            <description>It&apos;s not too often that a presidential election features a contest between two media darlings. Nonetheless, John McCain&apos;s campaign is still pretty upset about the press advantage that appears to be swinging Barack Obama&apos;s way. I&apos;ll be discussing this unusual argument on MSNBC today from 12:-12:30pm EST. </description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/can-mccain-catch-a-break.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/can-mccain-catch-a-break.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Media</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:21:28 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Novak Hits Pedestrian</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The story bloggers are <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/23/politics/politico/main4286279.shtml">following most</a> right now according to <a href="http://memeorandum.com/">Memeorandum</a> has nothing to do with the presidential election, but is instead about political reporter Robert Novak. Novak admitted to striking a pedestrian on a bicycle while driving his black Corvette, but said he was unaware of the incident until another pedestrian informed him. It's been a long week for Novak, who appears to have been taken for a ride by sources claiming John McCain would announce his vice presidential running mate this week. <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="BobNovak.gif" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/BobNovak.gif" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="229" width="150" /></span>The Moderate Voice's <a href="http://themoderatevoice.com/media/21267/close-encounter-for-wannabe-boy-racer/">Shaun Mullen</a> alleges Novak wasn't following traffic laws:<br /><br /><blockquote>Novak, 77, has earned a reputation around the capital as an aggressive
driver and has said that his secret desire is to be king of . . . er, a
race-car driver.<br /></blockquote><br />Not a lot of Novak sympathy out there, especially from Jane Hamsher, who <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2008/07/23/ace-reporter-robert-novak-doesnt-see-pedestrian-splayed-onto-the-windsheild/">speculates</a> of Novak's motivation:<br /><br /><blockquote>Trying desperately to get home before sunrise, no doubt.<br /></blockquote><br />Talk Left <a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/7/23/135254/629">links</a> to a Politico piece, which interviews the intervening pedestrian. The details are rough:<br /><br /><blockquote><p>As he traveled east on K Street, crossing 18th, Bono said a "black
Corvette convertible with top closed plowed into the guy. The guy is
sort of splayed onto the windshield."</p></blockquote>

<blockquote><p>Bono said that the pedestrian, who was crossing the street on a
"Walk" signal and was in the crosswalk, rolled off the windshield and
that Novak then made a right into the service lane of K Street. "The
car is speeding away. What's going through my mind is, you just can't
hit a pedestrian and drive away," Bono said.</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>CQ Politics colleague Jonathan Allen just noted on MSNBC that Bono is a former editor of the <i>Harvard Law Review</i>. <br /> </p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/novak-hits-pedestrian.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/novak-hits-pedestrian.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reactions</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bob Novak</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:20:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ackerman to Firedoglake</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Two days ago I mentioned Matthew Yglesias <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/yglesias-moves-again.html">moving</a> from <i>Atlatnic</i> to the CAP. I also recently noticed Yglesias' colleague Spencer Ackerman moving his <a href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/">Attackerman</a> blog from <i>The <a href="http://www.prospect.org/cs/blogs">American Prospect</a> </i>to Jane Hamsher's <a href="http://firedoglake.com/">Firedoglake</a>. Their passionate discussions might better suit the 20 something "hardcore punk" fan. After all, his top Google search return is his now-dormant "<a href="http://toohotfortnr.blogspot.com/">Too Hot for TNR</a>" blog, referencing his former employer, <i><a href="http://tnr.com/">The New Republic</a>.</i> His blog's new url is his fourth Google search return. <br /><br />The Yglesias and Ackerman moves to more grassroots organizations helps illustrate a broader truth that while progressive bloggers substantially lead in the partisan tech race, readership tends to be focused more on activism. Conversely, conservative bloggers often establish themselves at more traditional media outlets, offering punditry and analysis of current events. <br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/ackerman-to-firedoglake.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/ackerman-to-firedoglake.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reporting</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:42:58 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Coburn/bloggers talk Energy</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="drilling.jpg" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/drilling.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="160" width="160" /></span>Sen. Tom Coburn took part in a blogger conference call today organized through the Senate Republican Communications Senator. The call covered topics including Coburn's <a href="http://digg.com/politics/Obstruct_This_Tom_Coburn_Harry_Reid_s_Coburn_Omnibus_bill">showdown</a> with Harry Reid and the <a href="http://interestrateroundup.blogspot.com/2008/07/housing-bill-finally-getting-passed.html">housing bill</a>. But Coburn opened his remarks talking about Republican efforts on energy, specifically their desire to open up more <a href="http://www.communityinvestmentnetwork.org/nc/single-news-item/lexis-single-news-item/article/mccain-pushes-offshore-drilling-plan-we-have-to-do-it-to-ward-off-energy-crisis-republican-says/?tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=1684&amp;cHash=69403330d1">offshore drilling</a>. <br /><br /><br />Corburn returned to the topic when answering a question on <font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="">"Reid's attempt to
     push through bills Sen. Coburn objected to," by saying he and other Republicans were pushing a stalemate. "I don't think Republicans will be ready to move on anything until we have energy," he said. Coburn added, "If we don't, we will have failed the American people."&nbsp;</span></font><br /><br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/coburnbloggers-talk-energy.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/coburnbloggers-talk-energy.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Energy</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Tom Coburn</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:48:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>When Should a TV Host Hat Tip?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A blog post by <a href="http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2008/07/not-a-gaffe-a-f.html">Ilan Goldenberg</a> is getting a lot of attention today over at Democracy Arsenal. It's about John McCain's possibly false understanding of the Sunni Awakening in Iraq. Goldenberg uses a series of examples, (<a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/hindsight-and-foresight-in-iraq/">Katie Couric/CBS</a>, <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/23/hindsight-and-foresight-in-iraq/"><i>NY Times</i></a>, <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20080701faresponse87413/colin-h-kahl-william-e-odom/when-to-leave-iraq.html"><i>Foreign Affairs</i></a> magazing and fellow blogger <a href="http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2008/07/22/macfarlandknowsbetterthanmccain/">Spencer Ackerman</a>) including quotes from Col. Sean McFarland, stating that the awakening happened before President Bush first announced the surge.<br /><br />Also, The <a href="http://www.jedreport.com/">Jed Report</a> has put together this video which adds some information from a Keith Olbermann segment on the same story. For what it's worth, Olbermann doesn't hat tip either, at least not in the video provided.<br /><br /><br /><br />

<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EDIAsS9VXiM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EDIAsS9VXiM&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></object>
<br /><br /><br /><br />

Several high-profile bloggers, including <a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/07/mccain_disputes_obama_account.php">Marc Ambinder</a> and <a href="http://www.eschatonblog.com/2008_07_20_archive.html#7373244195897542659">Atrios</a>, have cited CBS and the Obama campaign instead of Democracy Arsenal. So, it's not an argument that Democracy Arsenal "broke" the story. But during his show last night, Anderson Cooper did a segment on the story that <a href="http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0807/22/acd.01.html">paraphrased</a> Golodenberg's post, while using several of the same sources (CBS, <i>Foreign Affairs</i>, <i>NY Times</i>) without citing Goldenberg. They're even cited in the same sequence. It's all public information, so this isn't an accusation of content theft. But shouldn't Cooper or the AC360 producers at least given a <a href="http://www.blogossary.com/define/hat-tip/">hat-tip</a>?<br /><br />You can compare/contrast the post vs. Cooper's script after the jump...<br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/when-should-a-tv-host-hat-tip.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/when-should-a-tv-host-hat-tip.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Theories</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:24:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bush: &quot;I do know about You Tube&quot;</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A You Tube video of President Bush speaking at a Houston fundraiser for Republican House candidate Pete Olson began making the rounds last night because of comments the president made saying, "Wall Street got drunk." <br /><br /><br /><br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eXj4-PFuMLc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eXj4-PFuMLc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br /><br /><br />
But also interesting, is the fact that Bush prefaced his remarks by asking that all cameras and recording devices be turned off before he made the "drunk" remarks. This comes about a week after making a <a href="http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/07/21/bush-fears-youtube/">similar request</a> before a Tuscon fundraiser, in which he told donors, <span class="greycopy">"I don't know a lot about technology, but I do know about YouTube."<br /><br /><br /></span> 
<br /><br /><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/bush-i-do-know-about-you-tube.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/bush-i-do-know-about-you-tube.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">President Bush</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:13:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Iraqi Bloggers on Obama&apos;s Trip</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The consensus, including on this blog, is that Obama's overseas trip has been a boon to his campaign. Here are some dissenting takes.<br /><br />While appearing on MSNBC's Hardball yesterday, Andrea Mitchell <a href="http://chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/according-to-andrea-mitchell-the-obama-camp-has-restricted-the-medias-access-to-the-senator-and-only-fake-news-is-coming-out-of-his-visit/">complained</a> that Barack Obama has been giving "fake interviews" during his visits to Afghanistan and Iraq. Mitchell says they are fake, because no independent journalists were allowed to interview Obama, with the footage instead being provided by the U.S. military and the Obama campaign:<br /><br /><br /><br />

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMIez0A-kcI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMIez0A-kcI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br /><br /><br />

A pair of Iraqi bloggers have weighed in on the trip as well. <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-fact-fudging-mission-in-iraq/?print=1">Omar and Mohammed Fadhil </a>say Obama is basing his travels on electoral politics and is benefiting from Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki being in a campaign fight of his own:<br /><br /><blockquote>This visit, for Obama, is just a necessary evil -- part of an electoral
campaign and not a sincere fact-finding mission. The fact that Obama
made Afghanistan his first stop (after arriving in Kuwait, just next
door to Iraq) suggests that it's his electoral campaign that sets his
priorities when it comes to the war on terrorism, not the actual map
and course of the war.<br /></blockquote><br />The Talisman Gate blog also <a href="http://talisman-gate.blogspot.com/2008/07/what-obama-needs-to-learn-fast.html">weighs in</a> on the trip, saying Obama needs to better explain his goals for the country and the larger Middle East region.<br />
<br /><br /><br /><br />
]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/iraqi-bloggers-on-obamas-trip.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/iraqi-bloggers-on-obamas-trip.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reactions</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:54:59 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Nation/Daily Kos Win Time Article Correction</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="joeklein.jpg" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/joeklein.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="172" width="172" /></span><i>The Nation's </i><a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/338118/em_time_em_and_hillary_s_hostile_netroots">Ari Melber </a>and Daily Kos' <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/21/133419/145/631/554653">Markos Moulitsas</a> have <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/notion/338192/em_time_em_corrects_clinton_netroots_story">won a battle</a> against <i>Time</i> magazine and its reporter/columnist/blogger Joe Klein. <br /><br />Klein produced a story on last year's Netroots Nation in which he described Hillary Clinton being booed at the event. Trouble is, Melber and Kos say Clinton wasn't booed by the audience. Klein's inaccurate description was included in a version of a story covering this year's Netroots National event in Austin, Texas. <i>Time </i>initially rejected calls for a correction to Klein's piece, leaving Kos understandably agitated:<br /><br /><blockquote>I already fired off an email to Time asking for corrections to that and
several other glaring errors in that terrible piece. But as we've
learned with Joe Klein, Time considers itself and its writers
infallible, so there's slim chance of any corrections.<br /></blockquote><br />But with Melber and Kos bringing attention to the erroneous piece, the <i>Time</i> editors have <a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1824631,00.html">since abdicated</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>The original version of this story said that Hillary Clinton's
appearance at a 2007 Netroots Q&amp;A session was greeted by boos. The
writer confused that event with accounts of another Clinton appearance
that had taken place earlier. Clinton was not booed at the Netroots
event.<br /></blockquote><br /><br /> UPDATE: Another Netroots Nation story <a href="http://www.statesman.com/search/content/news/stories/local/07/22/0722editorsnote.html">bites the dust</a>. This time an attempted humor piece, apparently, from the Austin American-Statesman. <br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/nationdaily-kos-win-time-artic.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/nationdaily-kos-win-time-artic.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reporting</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:48:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Ethics of a VP Selection</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="mccainromney.jpg" src="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/mccainromney.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="193" width="322" /></span>With <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=27630">rumors circulating</a> that a McCain vice presidential pick could come as early as this week, The Ethics Guy, aka Bruce Weinstein, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/jul2008/ca20080715_484365.htm">outlines </a>some of the ethical considerations of picking a VP. Weinstein argues that the pick should go beyond simple electoral vote calculations:<br /><br /><blockquote>With so many critical issues before us, including a flagging economy,
rising food and energy prices, a housing crisis, almost 50 million
citizens without health-care insurance, and the ever-present danger of
terrorism, it's reasonable to think that the next President may
continue in the tradition of having a Vice-President who plays a
significant role in determining the direction of our country.<br /></blockquote><br />I still think Novak's story was a <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/07/mccains-vp-anno.html">distraction</a> from the McCain campaign to put a dent in Obama's overwhelming, and overwhelmingly positive, blanket news coverage from overseas this week. But if the news is accurate, this would be a foolish decision on team McCain's part. <br /><br />Unless, of course, you buy into my theory that McCain has already resigned himself to losing the election and is going to <a href="http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,700245094,00.html">select Mitt Romney</a> as his running mate because his dislikes Romney so much that he wants to critically damage his chances of being the 2012 nominee by putting him on a losing ticket this year. Zing.<br /><br />Get all the latest on VP chatter by checking out CQ Politics' <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/vpwatch/">VP Watch</a>.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/the-ethics-of-a-vp-selection.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/the-ethics-of-a-vp-selection.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reactions</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mitt Romney</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vice President</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:17:50 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Obama/Media Love Song</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The McCain campaign sent an email to supporters this morning <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com/video/love.htm">asking them to vote</a> on their favorite song to exemplify how "the media is in love" with Barack Obama. The accompanying You Tube video shows clips of the news media, particularly MSNBC, either making positive comments about Obama, or commenting on how other members of the media favor his campaign.<br /><br />From the McCain campaign email:<br /><br /><blockquote><font style="font-size: 13px;" face="Arial, Verdana, Geneva" size="2">It's pretty obvious that the media has a bizarre fascination with Barack Obama. Some may even say it's a love affair. </font><br /></blockquote><br />The video is pretty funny, even if it uses examples like Chris Matthews that has already been hashed out by media critics for some time. Still, it's another good example of the McCain campaign's <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/mccains-new-energy-ad.html">increasing media sophistication</a>. When the progressive blogger reaction does hit, expect them to point out the hypocrisy of a man who has joked, "the media is my base," now complaining about positive press coverage of his opponent.<br /><br /><br /> 

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jfogMFL7UJo&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jfogMFL7UJo&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/the-obamamedia-love-song.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/the-obamamedia-love-song.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:56:42 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>What the Netroots are Thinking</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The Campaign for Americas Future and Democracy Corps have released the results of a new polls this morning taken at the Netroots Nation conference of online progressive activists in Austin, Texas over the past weekend. <br /><br />Several interesting trends emerged from the more than 2,000 activists who attended the conference. Of those who participated in the survey, 19 percent said "Energy and global warming" was their top concern, with "The war in Iraq" garnering 11 percent for a fourth place finish. However, when asked which issues should be the top priority of the next administration, the top choice was Iraq, getting 23 percent of the vote. Energy and global warming was a close second, with 20 percent of the vote.<br /><br />The views of Congress were quite dim, with 68 percent saying Congress had accomplished "Not too much," and just 2 percent saying "A great deal." In fairness, 16 percent did say "A good amount," but that's still barely over 10 percent. 12 percent said "Nothing at all."<br /><br /><p class="answeroptioncxsplast" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span new="" times=""><span style="color: black;"></span></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><O:P></O:P></span></font></font></p><O:P></O:P><p class="answeroptioncxspmiddleCxSpMiddle" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in;"><br /><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><span new="" times=""></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"></span></font></font><span style="color: black;">"This 
straw poll was designed to help us understand a little more about who our 
netroots activists are and where they stand," said <strong>Toby 
Chaudhuri</strong>, communications director for the Campaign for 
<ST1:COUNTRY-REGION u1:st="on"><ST1:PLACE u1:st="on"><ST1:COUNTRY-REGION w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">America</ST1:PLACE></ST1:COUNTRY-REGION></ST1:PLACE></ST1:COUNTRY-REGION>'s 
Future. "There's a sea change happening in American politics and it's growing on 
the Internet. Progressives are gaining popularity, strength, capacity and 
political sophistication, far outpacing conservatives 
online."</span><O:P></O:P><O:P></O:P><br /> </p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/what-the-netroots-are-thinking.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/what-the-netroots-are-thinking.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Influence</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Reactions</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Polls</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:33:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>NRO Offers McCain Advice</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<i>National Review </i><a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YmMxYTUyYzA1YTk2YzE5NGVmNjc0OGFjYWJmNzMzNjI=&amp;p=1">endorsed</a> Mitt Romney in the Republican primary and hasn't been a big fan of John McCain since his 2000 primary run against then-Gov. Bush. Nonetheless, editors Rich Lowry and Ramesh Ponnuru o<a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NWM1ZmQ1NjcxYzE2ZWY2OWZiMmVlMzQ5ODI5ZjUwM2I=&amp;w=MA==">ffer some strategic vision </a>to the main campaign. The main lesson: Copy the Hillary Clinton from the second half of the Democratic primaries and go after Obama <i>hard</i>. To Some extent, I think the McCain campaign has already <a href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/mccains-new-energy-ad.html">warmed up</a> to this message and is incorporating it into their strategy. Nonetheless, Lowry/Ponnuru say the hard-hitting strategy might work better for McCain than it did for Clinton:<br /><br /><blockquote>McCain is in a better position to use this strategy against Obama than
Clinton was. She was never wholly convincing in her adopted role as a
working-class warrior. McCain, on the other hand, has the warrior part
of the persona in his genes. Nor does McCain face the constraints
Clinton did. Going negative in a primary makes party loyalists deeply
nervous, and explicitly attacking cultural liberalism in a Democratic
primary is unthinkable. Obama has more evident weaknesses than he did
when the Democratic primaries started and he was freshly on the scene.
His core audience, finally, is a smaller proportion of the general than
of the Democratic-primary electorate.<br /></blockquote><br />Over at Talk Left, Big Tent Democrat <a href="http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/7/21/13340/4430">actually agrees</a> with Lowry/Ponnuru's advice, but still isn't shaken:<br /><br />

<blockquote><p>The good news is that McCain is an inept campaigner and his campaign
is also inept. The other good news is that the Media does not want to
play along. ... It is because McCain is so weak a campaigner that Obama seems a shoo
in to me. A better Republican candidate could have a chance. McCain is
not that candidate.</p></blockquote><br /><p><br /></p><p>UPDATE: I'll be on <a href="http://www.sirius.com/siriusleft">Sirius Satellite Radio</a> at 5:30pm EST tonight on "Make it Plain with Mark Thompson," discussing Obama's overseas trip.<br /></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/nro-offers-mccain-advice.html</link>
            <guid>http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/groundgame/2008/07/nro-offers-mccain-advice.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Blogger Theories</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John McCain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:44:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
