Instead, I was surprised to find the actual ratio to be quite different. Though the party was largely filled with McCain supporters, there were several undecided Democrats in attendance. Here are a few snapshots from the scene. A Clinton supporter being interviewed by CNN's ace reporter Ed Hornick:
Some McCain volunteers doing their best to sway the undecided Democrats:
![[RSS]](http://67.192.49.194/templates/images/rss_icon.gif){kind=icon}
Comments
Don't know what's more pathetic, the press, the McCain people, or your attempt at reporting.
Based on what do you ascertain that the "undecided Democrats" were either Democrats, or undecided.
I'm not saying with any certainty that they were not. But you seemingly say they were.
How so?
And how many "undecided Democrats" were in attendance? When you say several, do you mean two, three, or more than ten, and how is that a significant turnabout from the 50:1 ration you joked about?
Posted by: TrueBlueCT
| August 26, 2008 3:55 AM
Were the drinks free? If so, that could explain the presence of a few Dems. Richard Scaife, Ted Stevens, Randy Cunningham, 'Widestance' Craig, and the Koch brothers aren't the only beggers who lust after freebies.
Posted by: xrepublican
| August 27, 2008 6:20 AM
Post A Comment