Richard Cohen's latest Washington Post column compares the two candidates' records and finds Obama an unknown quantity, while conversely listing McCain's legislative and personal accomplishments, particularly those that run counter to party orthodoxy.
Matthew Yglesias says Cohen is playing favorites and that Obama is not a blank slate if you look at his policy positions:
Now in an ideal world candidates for office might release statements, speeches, documents, etc. about their policy ideas. People could scrutinize these ideas.
But NRO's Mark Hemingway questions Yglesias' standards of judgment:
So why again is Yglesias insisting Cohen give Obama credit for his stated intentions rather than his comparaitively small record of achievement?
Ed Morrissey says Obama is deliberately vague:
That doesn't make Obama an "unknown", as Cohen's headline reads, but a cipher. Obama deliberately obfuscates his positions in order to make his outlook as opaque as possible.
Post A Comment