Illinois Rep. Mark Steven Kirk spent his Friday shooting down a story that said he was pulling out of the 2010 Senate race to succeed retiring Democrat Sen. Roland W. Burris.
After the Washington Post reported Friday afternoon -- shortly after Burris announced that he would not seek election in 2010 -- that Kirk would not run, the congressman told allies that the story was not true.
Kathy Lydon, the chief of staff to Illinois Rep. Judy Biggert, said that Biggert called Kirk after the Post item appeared and that Kirk told her it was incorrect. Biggert is backing Kirk for the Senate.
Lee Roupas, the Republican chairman in Cook County, said that Kirk sounded like a Senate candidate in a conference call Thursday night with county GOP chairmen.
"He more than strongly indicated that he was going to be entering the primary for the U.S. Senate race," Roupas said.
According to an Illinois GOP source sympathetic to Kirk, the congressman was hammered on the call for his vote last month for a climate change bill that most Republicans believe will result in unbearable costs for working and middle class families.
"It was a brutal call," the source said. "He kind of shot himself in the head not the foot" with the climate change vote.
But an Illinois Republican operative who spoke with some county chairmen about that call disagreed with that assessment. "They want to win, and I think that's the message that was said last night," the operative said. "My understanding is that it was even folks from southern Illinois who were saying that, and that's a very conservative part of the state."
Roupas said that the conference call included a "lively discussion" but he declined to give details, though he did say that Kirk addressed his vote on the climate change bill.
Kirk could still face opposition in the February 2010 primary from state Republican chairman Andy McKenna, though several Republican sources said they thought it unlikely that the two men would run against one another.
McKenna, who lost a Republican primary for the Senate in 2004, could also choose to run to succeed Kirk in Illinois' 10th District, a collection of suburbs north of Chicago that Kirk has represented since 2001.
The Democratic primary will include state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias and could also include businessman Chris Kennedy and Chicago Urban League president Cheryle Jackson.
Jonathan Allen contributed to this report. To see how the 2010 Senate races are shaping up, check out the CQ Politics' election map.
Comments
Where did this Washington Post story come from then???? Out of thin air?
I hope, as someone said earlier, that Kirk didn't think he was going to run against Burris. LOL
Posted by: NObama
| July 10, 2009 8:05 PM
There are also two other candidates with some good ideas running for the Republican nomination for Senate in Illinois.
Eric Wallace (http://www.wallaceforillinois.com) - Co Chair of the Cook County Republican Party and the former Chairman of the African American Republican Council of Illinois
Robert Zadek (http://www.robertzadek.com/) - Businessman
Posted by: ILVotes
| July 10, 2009 9:49 PM
I live in the Northern part of Illinois in DuPage County, but I also have a home in Southern Illinois, and I can say with 100% certainty that they would NOT vote for Mark Kirk. That is coal country, there is still a lot of coal to be mined and they certainly do not need to loose any more jobs down there. My family all lived there at one time, many still do, and they were all miners. So I know that his vote on Cap and Trade most certainly did hurt him. I for one will make sure that I let everyone I know down there why they should vote for someone else. And as the previous post by ILVotes stated there are going to other candidates running.
Posted by: the2falbos@sbcglobal.net
| July 10, 2009 11:29 PM
Mark Kirk is making a circus out of Illinois poltiics. Kirk is the Republican Party's answer to Al Franken.
Andy Martin
Republican for U. S. Senator
www.AndyforUSSenaor.com
Posted by: Andy Martin
| July 10, 2009 11:50 PM
Post A Comment