Steele: "I'm the Gift That Keeps on Giving"

| | Comments (14)

This past weekend at the White House Correspondents Association dinner and the pre- and post- parties and events, I had several interesting moments with Hollywood and DC celebrities: Mike Myers, Peter Orszag, Richard Belzer, David Axelrod ("Isn't Robert Gibbs doing a great job?"), Goldie Hawn, Valerie Jarrett, Todd Palin, Rahm Emanuel, Matthew Modine, Senator Amy Klobuchar, Val Kilmer, Desiree Rogers, Carole King, Eric Holder.

I never saw ex-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who was supposed to be at the dinner, and I did have a couple of questions for him.

I nearly asked Sting if he remembered me interviewing him 30 years ago in the locker room of Rhode Island Junior College--right after he was screaming at Stewart Copeland, "you can't keep a beat!" But I elected not to; Sting was deep in conversation with Kevin Bacon. (Fill in your own degrees-of-separation joke.)

And I passed up the opportunity to elbow my way through the admiring throng surrounding Colin Powell at the Newsweek pre-dinner reception to ask if he believes he owes an apology to the American public for having enabled the Bush-Cheney administration. After all, everyone around him looked so happy to be there. Why spoil it all? Through all of this, perhaps my most telling exchange came with Michael Steele, the Republican Party chairman.

I had just passed through the metal detectors to enter the cavernous ballroom of the Washington Hilton--hey, look, it's Tom and Katie!--and I turned around to spot Steele right behind me. He shot me a big smile and exclaimed, "Hey, man!" And he shook my hand heartily, clasping my arm with his other hand. Just like we were BFFs.

I don't know if we've ever met. But certainly I've discussed him and his exploits on television--and not usually in a flattering manner.

Good evening, Chairman, I said, how are you doing these days?

"Just great," he said, up-beat all the way.

"Well, I have to say, thank you," I said. "You've been good for business." I was, of course, referring to all the not-so-smart things he has said or done that have become fodder for political journalists and cable news pundits.

He leaned back, pulling himself to his full height, and, laughing, proclaimed, "I'm the gift that keeps on giving." Almost as if he were proud of that. Certainly, he was was just engaging in that self-deprecating humor that pols are taught to deploy. But it struck me as odd that he would beam so much as he said that. I wondered about the guy.

"I've always been of the view," I said, "that party chairs ought not to be seen or heard but should stick to managing the party mostly behind the scenes." Hint, hint.

"That's what I keep telling them," he said. Them? I wasn't sure who "them" was. But it seemed as if he meant Republican insiders. And that was odd. Was Steele suggesting that he would prefer not to be in the public light as much but that "them" wanted him in front of the television cameras and microphones representing the GOP--rather than doing all that inside work? (Days earlier, The Washington Times had reported that Steele had signed a secret pact with his critics within the Republican National Committee that placed constraints on how he could spend the party's millions of dollars.)

I was just about to ask him about this puzzling remark. Did he really want to be out of the limelight and toiling at his desk at party HQ on the nitty-gritty of field operations and the like? That didn't seem to be his forte--or cup of tea. But someone caught his attention--Cruise? Axelrod? I couldn't tell--and Steele went bounding off. And, besides, there's Forest Whitaker!

Oh, back to Steele: I couldn't help thinking that this guy is not a serious fellow. But he is indeed the gift that keeps on giving--especially to the Democrats. And he sure did look like he was having fun.

TALKING FISH WITH TODD PALIN. Yes, really. At a pre-dinner brunch. You can get the run-down on that here.

This was first posted at MotherJones.com. You can follow my postings and media appearances via Twitter by clicking here.

    Comments

  1. Maybe Steele can lead his party into new and uncharted waters (the future) so far he has been funny and doesn't seem to take himself too seriously.

    Will 2010 be a make it or break it for him?

    Will the GOP change their chair if it looks like another drubbing in the polls?

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 12:53 PM

  2. If you go the buzzflash.com mailbag for May11th, you'll see my letter on Health Care reform - specifically for mental health care reform.

    http://blog.buzzflash.com/mailbag/844

    Posted by: flan Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 1:44 PM

  3. Perhaps the Republicans believe that having an African-American face prominently displayed (as a counter to President Obama) as their spokesman outweighs his numerous gaffes and contradictory statements.

    Posted by: Antidote Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 2:24 PM

  4. Flan,

    Excellent letter - too important a point to be glossed over.

    Not just that "all mentally ill patients can recover enough to live independently is false." But the simple truth that "up to a third of all prison inmates suffer some form of severe mental illness" - SEVERE not mild.

    Thanks for sharing

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 2:49 PM

  5. Michael Steele like Howard Dean is a clown!

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:04 PM


  6. Our view on the federal budget: Obama, Congress go AWOL on fiscal responsibility

    USA Today

    Only thing sorrier than president’s ‘cuts’ is reaction on Capitol Hill.

    When it comes to federal spending, there's a pattern emerging with President Obama, and it's not a flattering one. The president says all the right things about the importance of getting the deficit under control, but his actions don't come close to matching his rhetoric.


    An early sign of the disconnect was his heavily publicized demand last month that his Cabinet secretaries shave $100 million from their administrative budgets. Obama said the cuts would "send a signal that we are serious about how government operates" and would help close the "confidence gap" with skeptical Americans. Those cuts amounted to a less-than-confidence-inspiring 0.003% of the 2009 budget, or about 3 cents out of every $1,000.

    Then, when he unveiled his 2010 budget last week, Obama made a big deal of his demand for $17 billion in cuts, insisting that the cuts "even by Washington standards ... are significant" and that $17 billion is "real money."

    The president got it backward. Out in the rest of the world, $17 billion is a ton of money. But in Washington, where the president is proposing to spend $3.6 trillion next year, $17 billion looks puny — a little less than half a percent of the budget, or the equivalent of cutting a $100 grocery bill by handing back a 50-cent pack of gum.

    If the president wants to cut outmoded or wasteful programs, more power to him. But it's disappointing that Obama's repeated pledges to hunt line-by-line through the budget for excess spending didn't produce more than this. Even George W. Bush, who never made a serious effort to balance the budget during his eight years in office, was more ambitious: He proposed $18 billion in similar cuts last year.

    ~~~~

    Ouch!

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:05 PM

  7. Wanada Sykes wishes she could be this funny!

    CBS Sports golf analyst David Feherty apologized Sunday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for a morbid joke that went bad in a Dallas magazine.

    Feherty, one of the most popular golf analysts for his sharp wit and self-deprecating humor, was among five Dallas residents who wrote for "D Magazine" on former President George W. Bush moving to Dallas.

    "From my own experience visiting the troops in the Middle East, I can tell you this though," Feherty wrote toward the end of his column.

    "Despite how the conflict has been portrayed by our glorious media, if you gave any U.S. soldier a gun with two bullets in it, and he found himself in an elevator with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Osama bin Laden, there's a good chance that Nancy Pelosi would get shot twice, and Harry Reid and bin Laden would be strangled to death."

    ~~~~

    Now that's funny!

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:09 PM

  8. "A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents."

    ~ Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (1742 - 1799)

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:20 PM

  9. Thanks Capt!

    Posted by: flan Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:36 PM

  10. Here's one joke that's not so funny!


    US red ink rising even higher, to $1.8T
    US red ink to top $1.8 trillion, 4 times record; gov't borrows 46 cents for every dollar spent

    Andrew Taylor, Associated Press Writer
    On Monday May 11, 2009, 3:29 pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (AP) -- The government will have to borrow nearly 50 cents for every dollar it spends this year, exploding the record federal deficit past $1.8 trillion under new White House estimates.

    Budget office figures released Monday would add $89 billion to the 2009 red ink -- increasing it to more than four times last year's all-time high as the government hands out billions more than expected for people who have lost jobs and takes in less tax revenue from people and companies making less money.

    The unprecedented deficit figures flow from the deep recession, the Wall Street bailout and the cost of President Barack Obama's economic stimulus bill -- as well as a seemingly embedded structural imbalance between what the government spends and what it takes in.

    As the economy performs worse than expected, the deficit for the 2010 budget year beginning in October will worsen by $87 billion to $1.3 trillion, the White House says. The deterioration reflects lower tax revenues and higher costs for bank failures, unemployment benefits and food stamps.

    Just a few days ago, Obama touted an administration plan to cut $17 billion in wasteful or duplicative programs from the budget next year. The erosion in the deficit announced Monday is five times the size of those savings.

    For the current year, the government would borrow 46 cents for every dollar it takes to run the government under the administration's plan. In 2010, it would borrow 35 cents for every dollar spent.

    ~~~~~~~

    Obamas math and science for Dummies class~

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 3:59 PM

  11. Jake Tapper notes that the Congressional Budget Office has some revised numbers on the budget deficit, if by revised we mean completely different than first reported. The deficit projection has increased 50% since January, and CBO director Douglas Elmendorf blames “enactment of recent legislation.”

    Gee, do you think he means Porkulus and the omnibus spending bill?

    The director of the Congressional Budget Office today updated his projections for the budget and economic outlook and is now anticipating a $1.8 trillion deficit this year, and $1.4 trillion in 2010.

    This is up from CBO director Douglas W. Elmendorf’s January 2009 projection of a $1.2 trillion deficit this year. In short, the US government is borrowing 50 cents for every dollar it spends.

    The new projected deficit is four times the 2008 deficit, which was a record high for its time.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~

    Hey Antidote, Clint,

    How ya gunna blame Bush for this blunder?

    Ya want to own it yet?

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 4:08 PM

  12. President Laughs at Wanda Sykes Joke About Rush Limbaugh: 'I Hope His Kidneys Fail'...


    White House Finally Rebukes: 9/11 is not 'comedy'...

    What was Obama thinking?

    ~~~~
    "A person reveals his character by nothing so clearly as the joke he resents."

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 4:12 PM

  13. Polling shows independents aren't buying Obama’s promises of prosperity through Big Government

    The Libertarian Party ^ | 5/11/09 | The Libertarian Party
    Poll: Independents reject Obama, agree with Libertarian PartyPolling shows independents aren't buying Obama’s promises of prosperity through Big Government WASHINGTON -- Despite a deep financial crisis and the election of a left-wing president, political independents still see “big government” as a greater than “big business” by an unchanged two-to-one margin, America’s third-largest party notes today. “Independent voters believed Candidate Obama when he said he would be mainstream. Their trusting votes gave him a narrow victory,” said Donny Ferguson, Libertarian National Committee Communications Director. “But now that the real Barack Obama has revealed himself, they’re not following his bootlegger turn toward...

    Posted by: freddie Author Profile Page | May 11, 2009 7:31 PM

  14. Yes, it was a narrow victory for Obama: 365 to 173 electoral votes. Oooh...just barely won.

    Posted by: Antidote Author Profile Page | May 12, 2009 12:21 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)