What Will Bayh and the Senate Blue Dogs Bark About?

| | Comments (8)

On Wednesday morning, Senator Evan Bayh, an Indiana Democrat, announced he has formed a bloc of centrist Democrats in the Senate who meet every two weeks, and soon after that I was asked to appear on Hardball to discuss the rise of the Blue Dogs of the US Senate. The clip is below. But here are some thoughts.

* Though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has played down Bayh's move, it was certainly something of a disloyal action, a dissing of Reid. In announcing the formation of the group on MSNBC's Morning Joe, Bayh brayed, "We want to make sure legislation is crafted in a practical way that will actually solve people's problems." Doesn't that imply that Reid--and President Barack Obama, too--aren't trying to do that? At a time when the economy is in the middle of various economic crises and the White House is working with Democrats in the House and the Senate to develop policies, did Bayh really have to declare that he was concerned his fellow Democrats were not getting it right? Also, he could have informally convened a group of like-minded legislators for periodic gab sessions. Nothing wrong with that. But by unveiling this bloc as a bloc, he suggested he was going to lean on the White House and the Senate's Democratic leadership.

* This may have more to do with politics than policy. Bayh is up for reelection in 2010. He shouldn't have a tough reelection contest. But shoring up his middle-of-the-road credentials probably won't hurt him in the Hoosier state. Moreover, Bayh is a fellow who has considered going for the big prize--the White House. If the president's economic agenda ends up crashing and burning, Obama could be vulnerable to a Democratic primary challenge. Bayh has been positioning himself as a Democratic deficit hawk worried about government spending. (He was one of three Dems to vote against the earmarks-loaded omnibus spending bill that Obama recently signed.) And there's always 2016. He'll only be 60.

* MOR is always popular. Lots of politicians like to show off centrist credentials--whether they are or not. The Democratic Leadership Council started off as truly a bunch of more conservative Democrats. Then lots of Ds joined, and the group became less ideologically defined as it had once been. The senators who have jumped on Bayh's bandwagon include those who are indeed conservative--for Democrats--such as Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska, but others might be going along mostly for the ride.

* What's a centrist these days? The political center has shifted so much this past year. Dumping the Bush tax cuts, getting out of Iraq, spending trillions on bailouts and stimulus--that's all middle-ground politics now. So what will Bayh and his Senate Blue Dogs bark about? Perhaps card check. Maybe they'll grouse about some of the spending, though they did vote for the recovery package.

* Bayh is no Mr. Excitement. It's true that political reporters relish conflict and will gobble up any soundbite from Bayh that contains a hint of a jab against Obama or the Senate Democratic leaders. But he's hardly a rousing personality who can inspire millions across the country to question the president's decisions.

Jim Hightower likes to say that all you find in the middle of the road are yellow stripes and dead armadillos. To that not-so-stirring list, add Evan Bayh.

You can follow my postings and media appearances via Twitter by clicking here.

    Comments

  1. I wonder it these 15 will end up cleaving themselves from the pack.

    They may have formed a block more than a bloc.

    Will people support the effort? I doubt it but time will tell.

    Watch for the finger in the air pols reading the poils - that will make or break them.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 12:57 PM

  2. "If the president's economic agenda ends up crashing and burning,"

    I think you mean if his efforts fail to repair what was crashed and burned when he took office?

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 1:04 PM

  3. Is this the "DLC-Lite" trying to retain some relevance in the policy discussions?

    Posted by: Antidote Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 1:13 PM

  4. If Rahm isn't PO'ed I might be tempted to think it is a little staged kabuki theater.

    Some conflict is good but there are some DINO's - they will be more exposed vote by vote.

    I think the DLC is an old notion for a past in politics. If they want to stay relevent they need to do something good. I don't see this as a way to make themselves any better.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 1:29 PM

  5. Maybe Sen. Bayh sensed this AIG debauchle. However, GOP are blaming Dems for putting in loophole to allow bonuses, but will not pass bill to allow Congress to tax these bonuses, thereby allowing people to get back most of the bonus money. What hypocrisy, when all of this began under GOP/Bush/Paulson rule who would not allow any restrictions at all. However, there were some restrictions put in by Dems' insistence, but not enough. At least the Dems are trying to resolve this boo boo short term, and long term to put regulaitons on the greedy wall street and Washington Club gang. Funny, how banks are now saying they do not need further stimulus money due to the regulations and restrictions inforced by the Obama Administration now going forward!

    Posted by: bacaangel Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 2:18 PM

  6. more *left vs. right - libs vs. conservs*?
    what the fuck is wrong with you so-called *journalist/pundits*!
    countless people are dying and/or merely being freedomized (brutally oppressed).
    hey check out these cops beating a helpless 15 y/o girl here in america:
    http://tinyurl.com/cjqg98
    are these so-called cops liberal or conservative?
    you suck corn and so do every one of your peers.

    by the way, thank you for allowing unfettered comments on this pathetic blog.

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 6:00 PM

  7. Was the Bailout Itself a Scam?

    Professor Michael Hudson (CounterPunch, March 18) is correct that the orchestrated outrage over the $165 million AIG bonuses is a diversion from the thousand times greater theft from taxpayers of the approximately $200 billion “bailout” of AIG. Nevertheless, it is a diversion that serves an important purpose. It has taught an inattentive American public that the elites run the government in their own private interests.

    http://tinyurl.com/c5p8og

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 10:03 PM

  8. Ex-Bush admin official: Many at Gitmo are innocent

    Many detainees locked up at Guantanamo were innocent men swept up by U.S. forces unable to distinguish enemies from noncombatants, a former Bush administration official said Thursday. "There are still innocent people there," Lawrence B. Wilkerson, a Republican who was chief of staff to then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, told The Associated Press. "Some have been there six or seven years."

    http://tinyurl.com/d4eusy

    ""unable to distinguish enemies from noncombatants""

    unable? right. they know damn well who is a real combatant and who is not.

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | March 19, 2009 10:11 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)