Transition Fever: Holbrooke, Holder, and Gorelick, Oh My!

| | Comments (15)

Transition fever strikes! In Washington that means: who is going to get what?

The town is full of anxious and curious people. Some are wondering what posts they may end up with in the new Obama administration. Others are merely engaged in the rampant speculation that began about 17 seconds after CNN called the election for Barack Obama. At brunches and dinner parties, on the Metro and street corners--folks are talking about jobs. And I don't mean jobs for the middle class.

It's an interesting phenomenon to observe. I've talked to several Washingtonians who profess not to want a position, but if it should happen that they are asked to take one, well then....After all, it's not considered good form to lobby for yourself. It's much better if someone else champions you. (See Joe Klein making the case that his friend Richard Holbrooke ought to be named secretary of state.) Plus, no one wants to be publicly humiliated by being explicitly rejected. If Holbrooke is passed over at State--for Senators John Kerry, Chuck Hagel, Richard Lugar, or Chris Dodd, or retired General James Jones, or career diplomats Nicholas Burns or Chris Hill--it won't enhance his standing.

An aside: I'd be interested in Hill. He toiled on the Bosnia peace talks in the 1990s (with Holbrooke) and since 2005 has been in charge of the tricky negotiations with North Korea concerning its nuclear activities. He's also well-versed in Chinese matters, having worked closely with Beijing on the North Korea business. He's energetic and 56 years old. Putting a fresh face in charge of US foreign policy would send a signal. Talk about a reset.

Back to Washington: the town is flooded with handicapping. Might Eric Holder, who was the No. 2 in the Clinton Justice Department, be in the lead for attorney general? Well, he has that Marc Rich pardon problem. ("That could be overcome," says a Holder friend). Maybe Jamie Gorelick, another past Clinton Justice No. 2? She, though, has a Fannie Mae problem. She worked at the recently bailed-out mortgage company from 1998 to 2003, netting about $25 million in salary. With Democrats decisively in control of the Senate, she probably could be confirmed. But would Obama want to hand the Senate Republicans--diminished though their numbers are--a piñata?

The guessing game will continue in the days ahead. (What about Treasury?) It's a sport in Washington, but an important one--because, as the saying goes, policy is personnel. But it all will be sorted out--and rather quickly, I assume. A big mess awaits Obama. He will need lots of people with shovels to start working on January 20 (if not, unofficially, sooner). The early signs are that he and his team will soon be putting an end to all the speculation.

    Comments

  1. there is still plenty of time for bushco to fuck things up even worse.

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 1:10 PM

  2. Yeh, as_if he's done and his desk is boxed away. Still plenty to do like leases for drilling in the Grand Canyon. Two years ago they said impeachment was off the table. Too close to an election. If the man still has the job on 01/19/09 he will still manage to f**k something up.

    No mas de Arbusto!

    David, why does Obama have to pick from the hasbeens and wannabes?

    I sent out a resume on Friday (not to Washington) and they made it clear that I should rat myself out if I had ever been indicted, even if I was found innocent, as it would have a bearing on the position. So 40 years after I put it on the line to end the draft for future generations, I won't be allowed to teach those generations because the government indicted me and then dropped the charges.

    I can live with that, it was a matter of consicence and it doesn't back down. Obama should have the highest standards as well, and he has 300 million or more people to chose from.

    Posted by: geof01 Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 1:29 PM

  3. DC,

    "No Cabinet announcements this week," Stephanie Cutter, a spokeswoman for the Obama transition team, told Reuters."

    So Vacation time! (kiddin)

    I fully expect a few clunkers - just as it is likely Barack will make a few poorly received choices.

    I think it is more exciting inside the beltway on this one. Most people care less about the names and resumes and more about the results.

    Barack will hit the road running but that is still 70 days away +/- then we start the first hundred days of Obamanation.

    If Barack doesn't or can't deliver something by mid April the names and appointments will not help him nor bear any blame.

    Thanks

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 2:52 PM

  4. WOW!

    70 days to set up the first 100 days of the first 365 days of the 1461 days of the first term in America's Obama Era!

    I'll say it again...WOW!

    -T

    Posted by: Hajji Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 3:08 PM

  5. 70 days for bushco to pull some kind of stunt that keeps them in office and effs things up even worse.

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 3:45 PM

  6. Documents linking Iran to nuclear weapons push may have been fabricated

    The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has obtained evidence suggesting that documents which have been described as technical studies for a secret Iranian nuclear weapons-related research program may have been fabricated.

    The documents in question were acquired by U.S. intelligence in 2004 from a still unknown source -- most of them in the form of electronic files allegedly stolen from a laptop computer belonging to an Iranian researcher. The US has based much of its push for sanctions against Iran on these documents.

    http://tinyurl.com/6ggjtt

    -------
    "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb iran!"
    .....Sen. John McBlinky

    Posted by: as_if! Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 3:59 PM

  7. US Documents on Iran Nukes Forged?

    I'm shocked, shocked that allegations are emerging at the International Atomic Energy Agency that US-supplied "documents" from a laptop acquired in 2004 indicating a secret Iranian weapons program were probably forgeries.

    The IAEA clearly hopes that the Obama administration will stop trying to undermine it and will stop the Washington habit of using forged documents as a basis for aggressive military responses to nuclear programs and instead will opt for diplomacy.

    JuanCole.com

    *****

    The documents were forged - I'm certain. I remember the "laptop" BS and thought it was a set up from the get go.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 4:50 PM

  8. I hope Bunnypants is tired and wants a nap.

    Now Cheney? We need to undisclose him to GITMO for about 71 days of R&R.

    lol

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 4:52 PM

  9. Bush Spy Revelations Anticipated When Obama Is Sworn In

    http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2008/11/obama_wiretap

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 5:57 PM

  10. PNAC: Palin’s Pentagon In Waiting?

    It looks like Bill Kristol may be making good on his threat to revive the Project for the New American Century. Since May, visitors to PNAC’s website were informed that “this account has been suspended,” but now the website is back up, though it does not seem to have been updated with any new material.

    http://tinyurl.com/5vwp2k

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 5:59 PM

  11. Capt,

    With Palin's brain-power...PNAC could REALLY be sumpthin' ooh, yeah, dontchknoo...

    I mean, seriously, what possible damage could a small group of well-connected malicious, war-mongering, assholes with a direct pipeline to the seats of power in Washington DC, do?

    -T

    Posted by: Hajji Author Profile Page | November 10, 2008 9:01 PM

  12. I got here by accident from over at Craig Crawford's.
    Personally, I find the naming of staff and experts to be rather thrilling. It seems to me there are a lot of new names with good credentials.

    Posted by: bethyboo Author Profile Page | November 11, 2008 3:24 AM

  13. Cooper sums it all up fra better than I ever could:

    MarcCooper.com

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 11, 2008 8:30 AM

  14. While Bush and Cheney should be packed off to the Hague, Obama needs to look for progressives who know the ins and outs of DC but have never been in. Established Insiders tend to slide into a groove that will never benefit this nation.

    Remember that any bureaucracy become more important than its mission thirty seconds after it is born. Established Bureaucrats jockey for power far more ardently than completing their assigned tasks.

    Posted by: kalpal Author Profile Page | November 11, 2008 8:42 AM

  15. Um, FAR better not fra

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | November 11, 2008 8:55 AM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)