On the Bad Jobs Numbers, Advantage Obama

| | Comments (5)

It's no happy July 4th for the economy. According to the latest government stats, several tens of thousands of Americans lost their jobs in June. Of course, that's news that the presidential candidates have to respond to. Look at their statements.

Barack Obama:

As we head into the 4th of July weekend, today's report that our economy has lost another 62,000 jobs is a stark reminder that far too many Americans will spend this holiday out of work and struggling to provide for their families because of the failed policies of the last eight years.
Our economy has now shed 438,000 jobs over the past six months, while workers' wages fail to keep pace with the skyrocketing cost of gas, groceries and healthcare. The American people are paying the price for the failed economic policies of the past eight years, and we can't afford four more years of more of the same. That is the essential issue of this campaign because Senator McCain has fully embraced the Bush economic agenda. I believe it has to change.
But, as these numbers demonstrate, the American people can't wait another six months. We need action now. That's why I'm calling on Congress and the President to enact real, immediate relief with energy rebates for working families this summer, a fund to help families avoid foreclosure, extended benefits for the long-term jobless, and assistance to states that have been hard-hit by the economic downturn.
As President, I'll move us in a new direction with policies to restore broad-based, bottom up growth that benefits all Americans. I will provide working families with a middle-class tax cut; fight for affordable health care and college tuition; work to help raise workers' wages, and invest in infrastructure, education and a clean energy future to create millions of new jobs. That's the change the American people need."

John McCain:

Americans across this country are hurting and today's job numbers are just the latest indication. From rising gas prices to home foreclosures, families are struggling to meet economic challenges that become greater every day. Washington can no longer abdicate its responsibility to act. Our focus must be clear: enact policies to create jobs today.
To get our economy back on track, we must enact a jobs-first economic plan that supports job creation, provide immediate tax relief for families, enact a plan to help those facing foreclosure, lower health care costs, invest in innovation, move toward strategic energy independence and open more foreign markets to our goods.
The American people cannot afford an economic agenda that will take our country in the wrong direction and cost jobs. At a time when our small businesses need support from Washington, we cannot raise taxes, increase regulation and isolate ourselves from foreign markets. These are the same old siren songs that have failed the American people time and time again.

Notice anything? Obama is in a position to blast current federal policies (i.e., George W. Bush) and to remind voters that over 400,000 jobs have been lost in the past six months of Bush's watch. Thus, change is needed. And who represents change? Well, you know.

McCain, though, bemoans the consequences of the faltering economy but he does not hold any specific player accountable. He merely swings at a generic target: Washington. Of which he has been a part of for decades. His target is not the Bush administration but the "economic agenda" of his unnamed political foe.

Summing up, Obama surveys the economic troubles, and he says that ongoing policies (Bush's policies) are wrongheaded and a new course--his course--must be plotted. McCain looks at the economic mess (which is associated with an administration he supports) and says let's stick with the general approach of the past seven years and don't trust that other guy's solutions. Which message do you think has the better chance of resonating with voters? After all, what's the real problem: "old siren songs" or present policies?

MORE BLOGGINGHEADS.TV. See me and Jim Pinkerton tussle once more on Bloggingheads.tv. On this edition, we ponder whether the Supreme Court is in play in the 2008 election. Is Wes Clark out of play? Has Obama put religion in play? And have the Taliban put Afghanistan in play? And there's more: Pinkerton explains why you should worry about China and India in space--and not global warming. By the way, he wants to build a giant pipeline across the United States--not to carry oil, but water, from East to West. Check it out.

FIRE UP THE BARBECUE. Enjoy your Fourth and all that potato salad. (Hmmmm, potato salad.) I'll be back next week.

    Comments

  1. But, but, but...the Headline in our USA Today said that McCain went to South America and freed some hostages!

    Really, said so on the front page!

    Posted by: Hajji Author Profile Page | July 3, 2008 1:58 PM

  2. A giant pipeline to carry water from East to West is pretty much a "lets drill for more oil and make lots more SUVs," approach to America's economy. In essence it is as bad a notion as can possibly be tendered by someone whose future is without a future.

    Posted by: kalpal Author Profile Page | July 4, 2008 8:42 AM

  3. From my POV I can't see where gramps has any advantage except age?

    lol

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | July 4, 2008 10:42 AM

  4. http://www.electoral-vote.com

    Obama's gotta a narrow lead based on tiny margins in swing states that are all within the margin of error.

    The average of the nationwide head-to-head matchups do exceed the margin of error...barely.

    It still boggles my mind to think McCain could possibly win, but I sure wish we had a candidate with a little more fire in the belly... Instead of Mr. Cool and Languid...

    Since Hillary dropped out of the race, the "excited about the election" reading among Democrat voters has been consistently sliding...

    And at least for me, Obama's shift to the right, especially on FISA, isn't exactly stimulating...

    And to come here and read his supporters' comments...

    ....unrelenting negative campaigning against the opposition, BUT NOT ONE single concrete or specific progressive platform plank that might actually engender some enthusiasm...

    Do you think you can really "lead" into the future, by just trashing the past?

    Posted by: Diff Author Profile Page | July 5, 2008 2:08 AM

  5. Analysis: McCain struggles to regain footing


    WASHINGTON (AP) — John McCain calls himself an underdog. That may be an understatement. The GOP presidential candidate trails Democrat Barack Obama in polls, organization and money while trying to succeed a deeply unpopular fellow Republican in a year that favors Democrats. McCain also doesn't seem to have a coherent message let alone much of a strategy despite securing the nomination three months earlier than Obama.

    "This is a tough race. We are behind. We are the underdog. That's what I like to be," the GOP nominee-in-waiting frequently tells donors these days, keenly aware not only of his woes but also his proven comeback ability: He won his party's nomination despite the implosion of his campaign last summer.

    http://tinyurl.com/5ltc2t

    ****

    "Regain?" What the three month advantage that McCain wasted? The M$M narrative is always a chuckle. I guess he is suppose to regain his sanity?

    lol

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | July 5, 2008 4:14 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)