McCain: No Straight Talk on Bush's Tax Cuts

| | Comments (15)

John McCain keeps insisting he's Mr. Straight Talk. But like all politicians, he ducks inconvenient truths when he can. A good example of this came during Wednesday night's CNN debate. About halfway through, Janet Hook of The Los Angeles Times put this query to McCain.

You're talking about making the [George W. Bush] tax cuts permanent. And as Governor Romney pointed out before, you opposed the Bush tax cuts the first time around. Now, more recently you've been saying that the reason why you opposed the tax cuts at first was because they weren't offset by spending cuts. But back when you actually voted against the tax cuts in Congress, you said you opposed them because they favored the wealthy too much. So which is it? And if they were too skewed to the wealthy at first, are they still too skewed to the wealthy?

If ever a question called for straight talk, this was it. The debate was taking place at the Ronald Reagan presidential library. McCain was surrounded by rivals and Reagan-lovers who would go crazy on him if he dared to suggest that a tax cut was unfair because it disproportionately benefited the rich. He was in the middle of Trickle-Down Country.

The senator replied:

I was part of the Reagan revolution. I was there with Jack Kemp and Phil Gramm and Warren Rudman and all these other fighters that wanted to change a terrible economic situation in America with 10 percent unemployment and 20 percent interest rates. I was proud to be a foot soldier, support those tax cuts, and they had spending restraints associated with it. I made it very clear when I ran in 2000 that I had a package of tax cuts which were very important and very impactful, but I also had restraints in spending. And I disagreed when spending got out of control. And I disagreed when we had tax cuts without spending restraint.
And guess what? Spending got out of control. Republicans lost the 2006 election not over the war in Iraq, over spending. Our base became disenchanted.
If we had done what I wanted to do, we would not only have had the spending restraint, but we'd be talking about additional tax cuts today. I'm proud of my record. I'm proud of my record as a foot soldier in the Reagan revolution, and now I'm prepared to lead in restraining spending.

Did McCain answer the question? No, he threw up chaff about his love of Reagan and refused to repeat his initial criticism to the Bush tax cuts. Why? Because he would be crucified if he acknowledged that he had opposed the tax cuts because they were skewed toward the rich. McCain is fond of saying that he speaks his mind on Iraq because he would rather lose an election than a war. When it comes to unfair tax cuts beloved by Republicans, he's a bit more circumspect.

    Comments

  1. You're making the same point conservative talk radio is harping on. Yes, he is dancing around the question but he has stated that he wants to make the tax cuts perm.

    Compare that to Hillary who wants to take away the tax cuts (raise taxes) and spend money like crazy. She said herself that America can't afford all of her ideas.

    Then comes Bill and say's we need to slow down the economy to help global warming. Hillary is the perfect canidate for this high tax, high spending, slow the economy policy.

    Posted by: LBH Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 2:37 PM

  2. LBH, are you ever going to get tired of coming here just to mislead by repeating incomplete, out of context quotes?
    "And maybe America, and Europe, and Japan, and Canada -- the rich counties -- would say, 'OK, we just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions 'cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren.' We could do that.

    "But if we did that, you know as well as I do, China and India and Indonesia and Vietnam and Mexico and Brazil and the Ukraine, and all the other countries will never agree to stay poor to save the planet for our grandchildren. The only way we can do this is if we get back in the world's fight against global warming and prove it is good economics that we will create more jobs to build a sustainable economy that saves the planet for our children and grandchildren. It is the only way it will work.

    (people in the comments section give a better analysis than the original blogger)

    Bill was saying slowing the economy is an option, but a bad one. Instead it needs to be shown that going green can be good economics.

    Posted by: eyes_open Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 3:20 PM

  3. John "Crazy talk Express" McCain.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 3:23 PM

  4. "We cannot forever hide the truth about ourselves, from ourselves."
    ~ John McCain

    Grandpa John on his return to the truth?

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 3:31 PM

  5. Wingnuts hate McCain... so don't worry about getting hate mail for revealing tht the straight talk express is neither straight talk nor express.

    Want some hate mail? Write about Mitt Romney's conservative bona fides.

    Posted by: Neil Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 3:58 PM


  6. Compare that to Hillary who wants to take away the tax cuts (raise taxes) and spend money like crazy. She said herself that America can't afford all of her ideas.


    Funny, that's what McCain said about Hillary and nobody believed it then either.

    Hillary's husband left a budget surplus. Bush went through it in no time.

    Bush will leave the biggest budget defecit ever, as well as the largest national debt ever, and all to fund a war of choice over fraudulent WMD in Iraq on the national credit card. Over $600,000,000,000 (that's billion) for the Bush Cheney Iraq fiasco.

    Not to mention, Bush is in charge, the Decider as it were, and the economy is tanking. This "cycle" is a direct result of a housing bubble brought on by the Bush Administration's deregulating of the mortgage industry and not accounting for risk in CDOs while mortgage companies raked in millions. Mortgage industry business practices will make Enron look like childs play.

    Republicans can longer claim fiscal responsibility as their unique possession. In fact, Clinton had it, Bush did not. That must piss off the Clinton haters.

    George Bush, worst president ever.

    Posted by: Neil Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 4:12 PM

  7. "That must piss off the Clinton haters"

    Nail on the head - I think.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 4:56 PM

  8. Clinton had it because the majority house Republicans, who were in charge of spending bills, were very hard on spending back then. But kudos to both, they cut back spending at a time when there was still a lot of "cold war" surplus to play with. Bush had a majority in the House for most of his two terms and neither of them could resist the need to outspend the other. Sad indeed.

    McCain claims to have been a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution. There is one bit of truth in that statement. He was a soldier.

    Posted by: tytandanmar Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 5:45 PM

  9. BUCHANAN: Here's a guy, basically, what does he say? The jobs are never coming back, the illegals are never going home, but we're gonna have a lot more wars.


    SCARBOROUGH: We're gonna start a lot of wars! He has promised, for the record Keith, John McCain's platform -- and it certainly looks inviting for the fall -- he has promised less jobs and more wars. Now that's something we can all rally behind.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 5:47 PM

  10. "He was a soldier."

    And an honorable one.

    How times have changed.

    Posted by: capt Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 5:49 PM

  11. McCains got you corn nuts running like scared little girls.

    Hillary should be the one you're afraid of look what she's doing to Obama~

    You're right Bill left us a surplus because he was moved from the left to the center and worked with republicans. Hillary's no Bill.

    You corn nuts should be praising McCain since the conservatives think he's one of you. Nice to see capt quoting Buchanan of all people. Finally got some sense in that noggin hey!

    Posted by: LBH Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 6:00 PM

  12. Heres Clintons contribution to global warming:

    After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton

    By JO BECKER and DON VAN NATTA Jr.

    Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

    Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

    Upon landing on the first stop of a three-country philanthropic tour, the two men were whisked off to share a sumptuous midnight banquet with Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent.

    Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy. Mr. Clinton’s public declaration undercut both American foreign policy and sharp criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, Mr. Clinton’s wife, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

    Within two days, corporate records show that Mr. Giustra also came up a winner when his company signed preliminary agreements giving it the right to buy into three uranium projects controlled by Kazakhstan’s state-owned uranium agency, Kazatomprom.

    The monster deal stunned the mining industry, turning an unknown shell company into one of the world’s largest uranium producers in a transaction ultimately worth tens of millions of dollars to Mr. Giustra, analysts said.

    Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

    Posted by: LBH Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 6:02 PM

  13. Oh wait, theres more:

    Archived Profile: Frank Giustra
    Doug Ward, Vancouver Sun
    Published: Thursday, June 21, 2007

    VANCOUVER - Frank Giustra, a super-rich Vancouver mining and movie mogul with a midas touch, has used his wealth to become a friend of Bill -- Bill being former U.S. President Bill Clinton.

    As such, Giustra has placed his private jet at Clinton's disposal, flying with the former president on trips to Asia and Africa during the past two years.

    The former Howe Street wunderkind is a member of the board of trustees of the Clinton Foundation, the charitable and activist vehicle established by Clinton during his post-presidency.

    Font:****Giustra organized a recent 60th birthday bash for Clinton at Toronto's Fairmont Royal York, which raised $21 million for the Clinton Foundation.

    Clinton spoke in Victoria and Kelowna Friday. Whether Giustra had any role in Clinton's visit here is unknown. Giustra has preferred to fly under the media's radar and declined an interview request for this story.

    Posted by: LBH Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 6:05 PM

  14. This "cycle" is a direct result of a housing bubble brought on by the Bush Administration's deregulating of the mortgage industry and not accounting for risk in CDOs while mortgage companies raked in millions. Mortgage industry business practices will make Enron look like childs play.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    It was Congress that deregulated the mortgage industry to make home ownership for those less fortunate. In fact it goes back to Clinton and his housing secretary that started it. Not that Bush isn't to blame as well. Enron started under Clinton also, but who really cares about the silly little facts.

    Posted by: LBH Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 6:28 PM

  15. McCain will be trounced in the general election. The reason the MSM is singing his praises is because they know he will be easy to beat. Watch for the indicator of this after Super Tuesday. If McCain wins big and is the obvious nominee, the MSM will not cover him or the repub primaries until he picks a running mate. Then they will begin the process of bringing them both down. If the dems primary remains close, McCain will not even be mentioned except for which dem the MSM believes can beat him.

    Posted by: tytandanmar Author Profile Page | January 31, 2008 8:08 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)