Results tagged “spies” from SpyTalk

Spies Vs. Spies: How the ACLU Got the Photos

| | Comments (0)

Someday somebody will make a thriller about human rights counterspies turning tables on the CIA, tracking down its interrogators and supplying dossiers on them to defense lawyers for the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.

According to reports in The Washington Post and New York Times, the Justice Department has launched an investigation of the attorneys and human rights sleuths, who even secretly photographed interrogators outside their homes and supplied pictures for the detainees to identify.

The Justice Department's implication, of course, is that something illegal was done by the John Adams Project, a collaborative effort by the American Civil Liberties Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

But was it?

Spy Agencies Hid True Number of Employees

| | Comments (0)

It took only a couple months and about 100 CIA operatives and Special Forces troops, supported by U.S. air power, to chase the Taliban out of Kabul in 2001.

In contrast, the only thing the four-year-old Directorate of National Intelligence seems to be accomplishing is hiring more Washington bureaucrats.

Meanwhile, the Senate Intelligence Committee has found that at least some of the spy agencies under DNI's purview have not been reporting their true numbers of employees.

Ensign Affair: It's Not About the Sex

| | Comments (0)

Embattled Sen. John Ensign's admission of an affair with the wife of a staff aide made him vulnerable to blackmail by hostile spy services or other interests eager to pry secrets from his position on sensitive national security committees, veteran counterintelligence officials say.

Ensign is a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, including its Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, giving him and his staff access to extremely sensitive national defense information.

It sounds like a sequel to "The Italian Job": a band of ex-CIA operatives sets up a consulting firm to investigate corporate fraud -- then gets ripped off in a con job by one of their own.

But the facts surrounding a suit filed in D.C. Superior Court this week are all too true.

The partners of TD International, led by a former CIA agent expelled from France in a 1995 spy scandal, have filed suit against a partner who they say embezzled over a million dollars out of them through a false billing scam.
The Justice Department's decision to drop espionage charges against two pro-Israel lobbyists will certainly pour jet fuel on conspiracy theories burning up the blogosphere over the Jane Harman wiretap controversy.

Spy Swap With Cuba May Be Off the Table

| | Comments (0)

The political momentum toward détente with Cuba may be moving so fast that the idea of a spy swap as the first step in a thaw may already be passé.
What makes a good spook tick?

For almost 20 years, Dr. David L. Charney, 66, has seen a parade of CIA personnel come to his Alexandria, Va., office, looking for help with their emotional problems.

Many of them come from the Directorate of Operations, recently renamed the National Clandestine Service (although most CIA people still call it the "D.O.").

These are the people who are commonly - and mistakenly - called "spies." But in reality they're the people who recruit foreigners to commit treason or turn on their terrorist buddies.

Despite such an exotic trade, their problems tend to be the same ones that bedevil ordinary people, Charney said: conflicts at work or at home.
The headline was boring, but not the material. 

"Intelligence Boosters,"  the headline read, at the bottom of page 11 of the Sunday New York Times' "Week in Review" section.

"This is the article I never intended to write," began Art Brown, a 25-year CIA veteran and head of the Asia division of the agency's clandestine service from 2003 to 2005.

But then Brown went on to excoriate his former employer's performance in its main mission: human intelligence.

"If the CIA's human spy arm was operating as a private business, it would be running at a loss. Think Detroit, not 007," Brown wrote.

"In my years in the agency, I cannot recall a single case where anyone was fired for failing to perform. I cannot even remember anyone being demoted. There is simply no job-threatening penalty for mediocrity."

CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano suggested that Brown was out of touch with the agency.

"Because a constant drive for improvement is a defining feature of American intelligence," Gimigliano said by e-mail. "I wouldn't assume that Art's piece--drawn in part from his service here, which ended a few years ago--reflects what's going on at CIA today. Intelligence work can change quickly, and it has."

But Brown had anticipated the CIA would question the currency of his information about the agency's performance.

"How can I know this, three years out of touch with the secret stuff?" he asked in his piece. "The answer is rather simple: because Osama bin Laden is still the head of Al Qaeda. And no one has been held accountable for failing to catch him."

Brown also sprinkled the piece with a couple of embarrassing tidbits.

* "Despite their reputation as plugged-in experts on other countries, many C.I.A. officers do not even have Internet access at their desks. Worse yet, they don't think they need it."

* "C.I.A. spies reported on several occasions that Al Qaeda had plans to attack American military bases overseas -- in countries that a quick Web search would have shown had no such bases."

Brown's prescription for Obama's CIA? Get outside help.

"If you want to find answers to the hardest questions, why not reach broadly into the expertise of the country and assemble the best spy team possible?"

To analyze rogue nuclear programs, for example, "it would probably mean including a few engineers who build our own bombs. They could make sure you understand the missing parts of the puzzle and how those parts may be hidden."

Brown also suggested the CIA dust off some tools it had used during the Cold War (which came under harsh criticism when they were revealed by the left-wing muckraking Ramparts magazine in the 1970s).

"Good freelance reporters know how to find sources to fill in a hard story," Brown wrote. 

"The expertise of academia, where decades of insight often go untouched, could be balanced with a seasoned detective or tough prosecutor adept at turning a crook. The more military the topic, the more military folks you would want on its pursuit."

But for God's sake, don't hire these people, Brown advised. Make them temps. Otherwise, they'll just turn into more of the brown-nosing bureaucrats the agency is already infected with.
It's not every day that a traitor writes a memoir.  

Kim Philby, the notorious Soviet agent in the senior ranks of the British secret service, did. But that was from the safety of his Moscow apartment. 

John Walker ranks himself above Philby, not to mention American turncoats Aldrich Ames, Robert Hanssen and Jonathan Pollard, in a new memoir, "My Life as a Spy."

And he may be right. A chief warrant officer in the Navy, in 1968 Walker began selling the Russians communications codes that allowed Moscow to track U.S. warships, including nuclear submarines. Eventually, he dragged his wife, brother, son and best friend into the scheme.

Walker was arrested in 1985, the so-called "Year of the Spy," and is serving a life sentence at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, in Springfield, Mo.

Why did he do it?

"I cannot classify myself as a visionary or idealist, but just a simple citizen who became angry by the government lies," he writes.

"I did conclude that the US system of government was broken, so I felt justified in breaking some rules in order to help save it.... Why did I feel responsible or qualified to end the pattern of perpetual war? I cannot answer my own questions. But then, my insane stunt seemed to have worked. By the admission of both the US and the USSR, I provided the most extensive intelligence ever to the Soviets.

"With my material in hand, the Soviet government eventually realized the US planned no attack upon them, so my actions have contributed greatly to the Soviet Union's decision to end the Cold War."   

Or so he says.

I figured my friend Pete Earley would be in a good position to evaluate Walker's claims. A former reporter at The Washington Post, Earley is the author of "Family of Spies: Inside the John Walker Spy Ring,"  the definitive work on the case, which became a New York Times bestseller and much-watched TV miniseries.

Here's what he had to say.
 
"If nothing else, John Walker Jr. is consistent.

"More than 20 years ago when I interviewed him, he argued that Time magazine and other U.S. media regularly revealed top secrets and damaged our nation's security, so why should he be blamed for damage he did by selling the KGB classified information for nearly eighteen years?

"After making the same tired excuse of, "We were not at war with the Soviet Union" and the "Cold War is a game played by politicians and generals," Walker explains that he simply decided to cash in and do what anyone with any sense was doing.

"He takes delight in bragging how "K-Mart had better security than the U.S. Navy," and proudly describes how his policy of K.I.S.S. - Keep It Simple Stupid - enabled him to steal the keylists and schematics for every major code machine used by the U.S. military and deliver them to our enemies during the height of the Cold War.

"Just as he did in his jail house interviews with me, he blames his alcoholic and emotionally distraught wife, Barbara, for driving him into the KGB arms, and claims that he was simply trying to help out his hapless brother, Arthur, his hollow best friend, Jerry Whitworth, and his own dim-witted son, Michael, by drawing them into what became our nation's most damaging spy ring.

"In a mean-spirited final chapter, he claims his brother Arthur would have gone free if he had not cowed to his wife and had insisted that they sell their house to pay for a better defense team, concluding that Arthur has only himself to blame.

"The only new revelations in this autobiography are a sympathetic portrait that he attempts to draw of himself by claiming his life would have been markedly different - though nevertheless just as exciting - if he had married better.

"He also drops names, such as the great Soviet Cold Warrior, Gen. Boris Solomatin, and former KGB great and Soviet leader, Yuri Andropov.

"Walker makes it sound as if they sought him out personally for advice when, in fact, during our interviews, he chuckled when I asked him if he knew any of his KGB handlers, explaining that he had no idea who they were and stating that one didn't ask for resumes when committing treason. At the time, he had no idea who Andropov was and, in his own words, he explained that he did not see himself as an intelligence source, but simply as a thief. 

"'Look, I don't know why people make such a big deal of me committing espionage,'" he told me. "'If I had worked in a bank, I would have stolen money. If I had access to drugs, I would have sold them.'"

Earley says Walker thinks he did us a favor.

"In what has to be the most revealing rationalization of all, Walker explains that his treachery actually did the U.S. a huge favor. By sharing vital military secrets with the KGB, Walker argues that the Kremlin realized just how badly it was losing the arms race and how pitiful Soviet forces would be if challenged by the U.S. It was one of the key reasons, he insists, the Cold War ended."

"My Life as a Spy" was published to little notice on Oct. 28.
A court date is finally looming for a top former Central Intelligence Agency official and others accused of conducting a dirty tricks campaign against a freelance writer on behalf of the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey circus.   

In the latest chapter in one of the most bizarre stories in the annals of espionage,  a District of Columbia judge ruled yesterday that a civil suit filed against former CIA operations chief Clair E. George and others accused of conspiring to derail the career of local writer Jan Pottker could proceed to trial.

Ringling Bros. owner Ken Feld had asked the court for a summary dismissal of the charges against him, George and others who allegedly ran a "con game," in the words of D.C Superior Court Judge Brook Hedge, to derail Pottker's planned book on the Feld family and circus. 

Court documents show that Feld had been angered by a 1990 magazine piece that Pottker wrote revealing intimate details about the Feld family patriarch, Irvin, who had bought the struggling Ringling Bros. for $8 million in 1967 and turned it into a multi-billion dollar global entertainment business.   

Hedge's Aug. 14 decision described an elaborate scheme carried out by George (who had retired after being convicted of perjury in the so-called Iran-Contra, arms-for-hostges scandal) and Robert Eringer, a sometime informant for the FBI, to approach Pottker under the guise of being a book packager and distract her from the Feld project.

Pottker is seeking $10 million in compensatory damages and $60 million in punitive damages for her alleged psychological distress and damage done to her writing career.

In 2006 a jury cleared Feld of similar accusations in a suit brought by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, which charged him with spying on the organizaiton. 

On a separate legal track, detailed by the San Francisco Bay Guardian's Steven T. Jones, a suit by three animal welfare groups and a former Ringling Bros elephant handler is scheduled to be heard Oct. 7 in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.

The Ringling Bros espionage operations first surfaced in my two-part article for the online magazine Salon in August 2001. 

"We are estatic," said Pottker's attorney, Roger C. Simmons. "It is actually a win on all the big money issues that sweeps away all side issues and makes trial easier."

No date has been set yet for that trial. 

Julia Childs' Spy File

| | Comments (0)

The National Archives has opened the books on the OSS, America's World War Two spying and sabotage agency. 

On Thursday the Archives released 750,000 pages of records, including the intimate personnel files of future super-chef Julia Childs, Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg, screen star Sterling Hayden and Boston Red Sox catcher Moe Berg

Child's file shows that in her OSS application, she included a note expressing regret she left an earlier department store job hastily because she did not get along with her boss, said William Cunliffe, an archivist who has worked extensively with the OSS records at the National Archives.

Other notables identified in the files include John Hemingway, son of author Ernest Hemingway; Quentin and Kermit Roosevelt, sons of President Theodore Roosevelt; and Miles Copeland, father of Stewart Copeland, drummer for the band The Police, according to The Associated Press.

The OSS -- formally, the Office of Strategic Services -- recruited so many blue bloods and Ivy Leaguers that lesser Washington mortals cracked that its initials stood for "Oh, So Social."  But in its short, six-year life span it spent a fraction of today's spy budgets with far better results, many critics say.

It's hard to imagine the CIA recruiting such worthies today -- without inciting congressional investigations and demands for Michael Hayden's scalp. 

Another China Blackberry Spy Incident

| | Comments (0)

U.S. security officials are worried that China's spy services will have a Olympics field day next month stealing the Blackberrys of  American officials and businessman.

Yet another e-spy case has surfaced in the London Times, which detailed the seduction of a top aide to Prime Minister Gordon Brown by a "Chinese temptress." They met at a discotheque last January, according to the Times. When she left his room, his Blackberry was gone.

Chinese hacking expert Shawn Carpenter told me the newspaper's acccount rings all too true.

"I wouldn't be surprised in the least if this senior aide was targeted. . .The PRC Ministry of State Security / PLA (Peoples Liberation Army) have very high technical capabilities in the realm of hardware hacking and reverse engineering."

Iran Captures U.S. Spies

| | Comments (0)

David Ignatius has the gem down low in today's Washington Post column, which describes a half-hearted, even feckless U.S. covert action program to send operatives from Iraq into Iran.

"The danger of these cross-border activities was explained to me by one intelligence source," Ignatius writes.

He said the Iranians had recently captured several dissident Iranian operatives who had been recruited by U.S. military officers inside Iraq and then sent into Iran. The Iranians, whose intelligence network inside Iraq is pervasive, surveilled the meeting, then followed the agents across the border and seized them.

The Bush administration's covert action program against Iran includes American special operations troops dispatched into the country, according to Seymour Hersh's blockbuster in The New Yorker last weekend.

Current and former American military and intelligence officials said that Air Force planning groups are drawing up lists of targets, and teams of American combat troops have been ordered into Iran, under cover, to collect targeting data and to establish contact with anti-government ethnic-minority groups.

Over at the Christian Science Monitor, meanwhile, Shlomo Ben-Ami and Trita Parsi argue that "serious diplomacy, not military action, will bring regional security" to the Middle East.

Even the most successful bombing raid would leave Iran with some nuclear capability. At best, proponents of this option admit, bombing would set back the [nuclear] program five years. During that time the [White House] expectation is that the Iranian people miraculously would unseat the country's ruling clergy and dismantle the nuclear program permanently.

Ben-Ami is a former foreign minister of Israel. Parsi is the author of Treacherous Alliance -- The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran and the U.S.