Results tagged “counterinsurgency” from SpyTalk

The Other Half of Krulak's Letter to Geo. Will

| | Comments (1)

What do you call a tsunami that falls on a deserted island?

A seismic event.

George Will's call for troop withdrawals from Afghanistan, which surfaced on Aug. 31, seems to fit that category. It hit Washington when the chattering classes were at the beach, toughing out stay-cations or busy putting their kids in school.

So let's take another look.

Liberals Deserting Obama on Afghanistan

| | Comments (0)

A new poll says liberal support for President Obama's war strategy in Afghanistan is "cratering" -- down 20 points since he took office in January.

The yawning rift has potentially lethal political consequences for a White House already struggling to shore up liberal Democratic support for its health care overhaul.
Last September, when the military-media complex was all-atwitter with Bob Woodward's revelations of a revolution in counterterrorism methods, I found myself talking with a confidante of Gen. David Petraeus at an off-the-record cocktail hour.

Petraeus was then commander of coalition forces in Iraq, and was generally being credited with developing a breakthrough technology to find and track terrorist suspects that was so secret that Woodward couldn't reveal the details.

But according to my interlocutor, Petraeus, whom he had talked to hours earlier, gave complete credit for the counterterror revolution to Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan, for developing and running the program, which is still shrouded in mystery.
In the continuing cacophony over what torture is and whether it "works," an important point has gone missing, say current and former counterterrorism operatives.

The CIA's reliance on repeated, and brutal, "enhanced" interrogation techniques shows how few spies the spy agency had before and after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

That made the agency's reliance on squeezing new information out of captured terrorist suspects all the more desperate, many say.
Ever since the CIA's counterterrorism chief in 2001 was famously quoted by a CIA agent as saying, "Capture Bin Laden, kill him and bring his head back in a box on dry ice,"  no one from President Bush on down has denied that U.S. agencies have full latitude to kill suspected terrorists. 
 
President George W. Bush himself said he wanted Osama Bin Laden and his cronies "dead or alive." Vice President Dick Cheney talked about going over to "the dark side" to get al Qaeda operatives. And during his campaign for the White House, Barack Obama declared, "We must take out Osama Bin Laden and his lieutenants."
 
But when famed investigative reporter Seymour Hersh talked a few weeks ago about "targeted assassinations" ordered up by an "executive assassination wing" centered in Cheney's office and carried out by the Joint Special Operations Command, much of the news media went into a tizzy.
Special Forces troops tend to think they carry the fate of the world in their rucksacks.

In Pakistan, they may be right.

Years from now we may look back at the "secret" deployment of some 70 U.S. military advisers to Pakistan as a turning point in the global war on terrorism, the moment when a daring idea and brilliant execution snatched victory from a looming disaster.

Or the opposite: a Pakistani version of Ia Drang, the 1965 battle when North Vietnamese regulars showed they could go toe-to-toe with American troops, signaling a long, devastating and -- in that case -- losing war.

Make no mistake about it: Pakistan hangs in the balance.

President Obama suggested as much in his speech to Congress Wednesday night, when he said, "We will forge a new and comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat al Qaeda and combat extremism.  Because I will not allow terrorists to plot against the American people from safe havens half a world away." 
The increasingly bold attacks on NATO supplies in Pakistan should be cause for serious worry, U.S. counterterrorism operatives are saying.

The attacks mean that Islamic extremist fighters in the region are adopting the tactics that their fathers and uncles employed more than a quarter century ago -- with CIA backing - to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan.

The objective: to choke off supplies to occupying troops on the ground.

"The bad guys understand our operations and what our lifelines are all about," said an analyst with counterterror experience in the region.

CIA Man's Vietnam Revelations to HBO

| | Comments (0)

A former CIA operative's account of how the spy agency wreaked vengeance on him for his unauthorized expose of American bungling during the fall of Saigon is heading to the flat screen.

Former CIA analyst Frank Snepp told me last week that a docudrama based on his 1999 memoir, Irreparable Harm: A Firsthand Account of How One Agent Took on the Agency in an Epic Battle Over Free Speech, will be helmed by Eugene Jarecki, known for the muckraking documentaries Why We Fight and The Trials of Henry Kissinger, for HBO. 

Emmy Winner Paula Weinstein, lately of Recount, HBO's recent docudrama on the 2000 Florida presidential ballot battle, will produce, says the trade mag Variety

The CIA took Snepp, now a producer at Los Angeles TV station KNBC, to court over his searing expose, Decent Interval: An Insider's Account of Saigon's Indecent End, Told by the CIA's Chief Strategy Analyst in Vietnam. The Supreme Court agreed with the agency that Snepp did not have the right to publish his memoir without first submitting it for review. The court heard no oral arguments, but agreed with then-CIA chief Adm. Stansfield Turner that Decent Interval  had "caused the United States irreparable harm and loss."