Results tagged “Marines” from SpyTalk

How many anonymous sources add up to a fact?

In the case of Dennis Blair, it looks like about a half dozen.

It's now all but official that the former Navy admiral and CIA official has been tapped to be Mike McConnell's successor as director of national intelligence.

Reuters reported Thursday that "President-elect Barack Obama has chosen retired Navy Adm. Dennis Blair as the top U.S. intelligence official and could make an announcement as early as Friday."

Its source was, of course, anonymous, someone " familiar with the nomination."

"We expect the announcement tomorrow," the source said.

The Reuters report follows on similar formulations by the Wall Street Journal, Newsweek, The New York Times, Washington Post and the Associated Press  and other media outlets over the past two weeks.

Two sources who know Blair well tell me they are "hearing the same thing," but profess to be otherwise in the dark. 

Blair isn't talking, publicly.

"He won't upset the boat," said one source, a leading candidate to run the CIA in the Obama administration -- and thus tight-lipped himself.   

If Blair gets the titular top job in U.S. intelligence, he is likely to be a colorful departure from the current, smooth-talking DNI -- as befits a lifelong sailor.

Speaking of the threat of North Korean missiles back in 2000, for example, the Pacific Fleet commander growled, "I think an ICBM with a return address and its signature is not a very good recipe for regime survival by a rogue regime like North Korea." 

But Blair was far less on target when he dismissed the threat of Somali pirates to oil lanes, in an essay entitled  "Smooth Sailing: The World's Shipping Lanes Are Safe," only last year. 

"[In] reality the risks to maritime flows of oil are far smaller than is commonly assumed," Blair and Kenneth Lieberthal wrote in the May/June issue of Foreign Affairs. 

"First, tankers are much less vulnerable than conventional wisdom holds. Second, limited regional conflicts would be unlikely to seriously upset traffic, and terrorist attacks against shipping would have even less of an economic effect. Third, only a naval power of the United States' strength could seriously disrupt oil shipments."

The editors of the rival Foreign Policy magazine called that one of "The 10 Worst Predictions for 2008.

Somali pirates seized a Saudi oil tanker in the Indian Ocean on Nov. 15 carrying 2 million barrels of crude.

"Hopefully," Foreign Policy's editors sniffed, "Blair will show a bit more foresight if, as some expect, he is selected as Barack Obama's director of national intelligence."

Blair also made some controversial judgments on the state of North Korea's nuclear program.

During a 2002 Pentagon meeting chaired by the neocon Undersecretary for Intelligence Stephen Cambone, who was insisting that North Korea had nukes, Blair said that the Navy's surveillance and monitoring teams had still detected nothing, according to an account by Newsweek.

"According to a participant who would speak only if he was not identified, that led Cambone to stalk over to Blair after the meeting, jab his finger into his chest and declare that he expected more out of him," Newsweek said.

NBC's Norah O'Donnell calls Blair a "brainiac." 

Blair may indeed be that, but such intelligence judgments (an art, not a science) may cause the admiral some heartburn in confirmation proceedings. 

Blair may also face a squall over his conduct as president of the influential Institute for Defense Analysis from 2003 to 2007.

According to the Center for Defense Information, a Washington think tank populated by reform-minded former military officers:

"Blair worked on a report that helped the Air Force decide to pursue a multiyear contract for F-22 Raptor fighter jets. At the same time, he was on the board of EDO Corp., a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin on the F-22 project. After news reports about the apparent conflict of interest, Blair resigned as the head of IDA and his board seat at EDO."

He's also on the boards of the scandal-scarred Tyco International as well as Iridium Satellite, which has extensive Defense Department business.

At the CIA in 1995, Blair was put in charge of clandestine military operations.

No doubt Blair will get help navigating the confirmation process from his friend James Jones, the retired Marine general whom Obama drafted to be his White House national security advisor.

Blair and Jones served together at the Project for National Security Reform, which only last week issued a report recommending a "massive" overhaul of the government's national security system -- including congressional oversight. (See a video of Blair's presentation here.)

And, as might be expected, he has other good friends in influential places, starting with former Marine and Virginia Democratic Senator Jim Webb, a 1968 classmate at the U.S. Naval Academy. 

He was also a Rhodes Scholar and a White House fellow (in 1975-76 Ford White House) -- just Obama's type, you might say.
The Marines stationed at Beirut airport in 1983 could have had plenty of time to prepare for the suicide bomber that struck with devastating consequences 25 years ago this week, their commander says.

But the eavesdropping National Security Agency's intercept of an Iranian telephone call that gave the order got stuck "in the intelligence pipeline."

In all, 241 Marines, soldiers and sailors died in the Oct. 23, 1983 attack.

"Unknown to us at the time, the National Security Agency had made a diplomatic communications intercept on 26 September ...  in which the Iranian Intelligence Service provided explicit instructions to the Iranian ambassador in Damascus (a known terrorist) to attack the Marines at Beirut International Airport," says Marine Col. Colonel Timothy J. Geraghty, writing in the latest issue of Proceedings, a publication of the U.S. Naval Institute.

"The suicide attackers struck us 28 days later, with word of the intercept stuck in the intelligence pipeline until days after the attack."

The two bombings - French paratroopers would be struck two minutes later, with the loss of 58 lives  - will be marked with a candlelight vigil at dawn Thursday in North Carolina, where a Beirut memorial is etched with the names of the fallen.

A different kind of ceremony will mark the bombings in Tehran, writes Geraghty, who also spent seven years in the CIA's Special Operations Group.

"In the Iranian Behesht-E-Zahra cemetery in southern Tehran, there will also be a ceremony at a monument erected in 2004 to commemorate the Beirut suicide bombers. In attendance will likely be some dressed as suicide bombers, chanting the standard 'death to America' and 'death to Israel.'"
In paying solemn tribute to the fallen men of his 24th Marine Amphibious Group, Geraghty also rues that President Ronald Reagan had abandoned America's military neutrality in the raging Lebanese civil war.

"It is noteworthy that the United States provided direct naval gunfire support -- which I strongly opposed for a week -- to the Lebanese Army at a mountain village called Suq-al-Garb on 19 September and that the French conducted an air strike on 23 September in the Bekaa Valley," he writes.
"American support removed any lingering doubts of our neutrality, and I stated to my staff at the time that we were going to pay in blood for this decision."

The attacks, which went unanswered by U.S. military action, "became a turning point in the unbounded use of terrorism by radical Islamic fanatics worldwide," Geraghty writes.