Results tagged “Cuba” from SpyTalk

The arrest of a northwest Washington couple on charges of spying for Cuba has put a spotlight on the career of Kendall Myers, a senior State Department intelligence analyst.
 
But if the charges are true, it's Myer's wife, Gwendolyn, a computer specialist at now-defunct Riggs National Bank, who could well have been in far better position to supply Cuba with sensitive information than her husband.

The Guantanamo Officers' Club

| | Comments (2)

About 20 years ago I had the privilege to interview Gen. George L. Mabry, the second most decorated soldier in the history of the U.S. Army, at his home in Columbia, S.C.

Mabry had been awarded the Medal of Honor for his heroics in World War Two. The young captain had already earned a chestful of ribbons for his "Saving Private Ryan" performance at Utah Beach on June 6, 1944. Only the legendary Audie Murphy earned more medals.

But five months later, in the Huertgen Forest near Schevenhutte, Germany, Mabry, 27, raced past his forward observers to cut through some mine-rigged Concertina wire

Clearing a path for his soldiers, and he then captured three enemy bunkers in succession, killing three German soldiers, disabling another with his rifle butt and another with his bayonet. He captured nine other Germans.

You can read the entire citation at the Medal of Honor site, here.

What you will not read in his citation is what he told me in his quiet study, only months before he died in 1990.
The feds finally got their hombre.

This week's indictment of the famously elusive anti-Castro terrorist Luis Carriles Posada, a onetime CIA agent and professional counterrevolutionary, is the legal equivalent of driving a wooden stake into his heart.

But maybe it's wrong.

Spy Swap With Cuba May Be Off the Table

| | Comments (0)

The political momentum toward détente with Cuba may be moving so fast that the idea of a spy swap as the first step in a thaw may already be passé.

New Twist in an Iran-Contra Era Murder Plot

| | Comments (0)

If there's a political murder with more twists than the Kennedy assassination, it's got to be the plot to kill Eden Pastora, a charismatic Nicaraguan rebel leader who barely escaped a bomb meant for him during a press conference in 1984.

As in the Kennedy assassination, the CIA has long been suspected of having a hand in the explosion in La Penca, Costa Rica, that seriously wounded Pastora but killed three journalists, an American and two Costa Ricans. About a dozen more people at the event were seriously injured when the bomb, hidden in a camera case by a man posing as a photographer, ripped through the hut where the group had gathered.

The finger of blame was quickly pointed at the CIA. No proof was ever found, but interlocking evidence of CIA connections to the case have fascinated Latin American observers for decades.

Lies, Damn Lies . . .

| | Comments (1)

And statistics.  Yesterday's numbers showing the skewed priorities of the Treasury Department in throwing more investigative resources at petty violations of the Cuba embargo than uncovering illicit financial channels to Iran and al Qaeda were incomplete.

It turns out that the data, as presented by Ann Louise Bardach in an opinion piece  in Sunday's Washington Post that I cited approvingly, was not quite up to date.
 
Bardach rightly noted a 2007 government study which found that 61 percent of the investigations carried out by the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) since 2000 had "been aimed at just one target: Cuba," and that "between 2000 and 2005, OFAC penalties for violations of the Cuban embargo represented more than 70 percent of all the penalties the office imposed."

As Max Baucus, the Montana Democrat who chairs the Senate Finance Committee wondered out loud at a hearing last year,  "Is the office setting its priorities correctly?"

"In 2003, the Committee learned that two employees were assigned to go after Saddam's missing funds. And two employees were assigned to go after Osama Bin Laden's money. But 21 employees were assigned to go after those who violate Cuba sanctions," Baucus noted caustically.

His questions were directed mainly at Stuart A. Levey, Treasury's Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. 

In written answers to Baucus's queries - which I just discovered yesterday, thanks to Andrew Cochran and Douglas Farah at The Counterterrorism Blog - a more complete picture of Treasury's efforts emerged.

The statistics Levey produced show the department has begun to shift its priorities to where they belong. Partly that's because of  bureaucratic changes at the department, which in 2004 created the Terrorism and Financial Intelligence section.

As Farah informed me, the TFI office brought over the terrorism experts and their cases from the Office of Foreign Assets Control, including the Iran account. Since OFAC only designates terrorist entities and doesn't actually investigate cases anymore, its stats showed skewed and wasted resources spent on Cuba. 

Or, as Levey put it to Baucus:

"OFAC has adopted new strategies with respect to sanctions violations in recent years that have resulted in a significant reduction in Cuba penalty cases. Enforcement resources committed to Cuba are being reduced and enforcement efforts are being targeted in a more effective way by concentrating on those facilitating illegal travel to Cuba."

 The number of OFAC cases against Cuba violations, Levey said, had dropped from a peak of 587 in 2004 to 32 in 2007.

Levey conceded that in 2003, OFAC had 21 fulltime employees administering and implementing cases against violations of the Cuba trade sanctions. Since 2004, though, "most of OFAC's Cuba-related work has been centered in its Licensing Division ... processing applications for travel to Cuba to market and sell agricultural products."

Of the office's 155 fulltime employees, he said, six in Washington and five in Miami "are devoted full-time to the Cuba program."

To me, that's still about 10 too many, 10 financial sleuths who should be working on al Qaeda instead of this relic of the cold war, Cuba.

But the numbers don't lie -- or do they?

Are Terror-Finance Tracking Priorities Screwed Up?

| | Comments (1)

A scatttering of dots spilled in two seemingly unconnected stories over the weekend adds up to a dispiriting conclusion about one of the most important programs in the our post-9/11 national security arsenal: tracking the movement of money through banks and charities to terrorist groups may be way out of whack.

The first dots fell out of an interesting piece by Ann Louise Bardach in the Sunday Washngton Post's "Outlook" section, about prospects for changes in U.S. policy toward Cuba in the Obama administration. 

One of the "losers" under the new regime, Bardach speculates, will be the Cuban program in the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

"OFAC's chief mandate is to enforce sanctions against countries harboring terrorists," writes Bardach, author of "Cuba Confidential" and the forthcoming "Without Fidel: A Death Foretold in Miami, Washington and Havana."

"But a 2007 government study found that 61 percent of the office's investigations since 2000 had been aimed at just one target: Cuba," Bardach reports. "Between 2000 and 2005, OFAC penalties for violations of the Cuban embargo represented more than 70 percent of all the penalties the office imposed."

Hello? Can anyone here spell I-r-a-n?

Bardach notes that a 2004 congressional hearing revealed that tax dollars earmarked for the war on terrorism were spent on tracking unauthorized travelers to Cuba.

"At the hearing, OFAC acknowledged that it had just four employees searching for the funds of Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, as opposed to more than 20 full-time investigators charged with hunting down suspected violators of the embargo."

Among the uses of your taxpayer dollars: "OFAC's prosecution of a 75-year-old grandmother from San Diego who took a bicycling trip to Cuba, an Indiana teacher who delivered Bibles and the son of missionaries who traveled to the island to spread his parents' ashes at the site of the church they'd founded 50 years before."

Good lord.  

Now turn to a story in yesterday's New York Times, in which reporters Vikas Bajaj and John Eligion report that:

"Iranian banks illegally shifted billions of dollars through American financial institutions in recent years, and authorities suspect some of the money may have been used to finance Iran's nuclear and missile programs."

Oh, really?  Maybe the feds were too busy tracing Grandma's purchase of a Cuban postcard to notice. 

The main culprit, the Lloyds TSB Group, in Britain, was so darn tricky, prosecutors told the the reporters.

"It 'stripped' information that would have identified the transfers in order to deceive American financial institutions, which are barred from doing business with Iranian banks ..."

According to Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney, "money in one transaction was used to buy a large amount of tungsten, an ingredient for making long-range missiles. He said he suspected that other funds might have been used to finance Iran's nuclear program."

Our friend Doug Farah says that the ongoing investigation suggests that the Iranians have learned much from the nuclear smuggling ring organized by Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan. 

"This is the pipeline at its best. One simply has to shift addresses, at least on paper, the companies go again, and the pipeline is unclogged and continues to carry its vital products. The flexibility of the pipeline and its ability to adapt and reroute itself in a very short period of time is one of its greatest strengths." 

As for terrorist finance investigations, Farah concludes: "Iran, with years of experience in the game, is unlikely to be knocked much off its stride in the acquisitions game."

Especially when OFAC is spending time so much time and effort looking at Cuba, methinks.
I'm a little late getting to this, what with everything else going on in the intelligence world, but an investigation by Mexico-based U.S. freelance reporter Kristin Bricker on the American contractors caught on video teaching torture techniques to police in Leon deserves belated attention.

Bricker has identified one of the men, Gerardo "Jerry" Arrechea as a "high-ranking member of the Comandos F4,"  a Miami based anti-Castro exile group that has vowed to carry out armed attacks on Cuba as well as Venezuela. 

Cuban exile groups long ago perfected the p.r. stunt of inviting TV cameras to "secret locations" in the Everglades to show their masked men crawling through mud with guns and vowing to overthrow Castro. But it's also true that the CIA has intermittently intrigued with such groups for half a century. 

Meanwhile, the rest of the connections Bricker turned up on Arrechea and his sidekick Jerry Wilson (AKA Orlando, AKA Andrew Wilson), last seen dragging a Mexican police trainee through his own vomit, are yet another sign that U.S. private security contractors are out of control. 

(Take a peek at my recent review of Tim Shorrock's Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Intelligence Outsourcing, in The Washington Post, then read the rest of Bricker's comprehensive take.)