Republicans to Obama: This Isn't Bipartisanship

| | Comments (1)

Talk about mixed messages. On the same day that President Obama met with four Senate Republicans to hear their concerns on the health care bill, his team has been arguing that it doesn’t really matter if the bill gets any Republican votes, since they can call it a bipartisan bill as long as it has some Republican ideas in it.

CQ Photo
Susan Collins: Best not to rush. (Getty Images/Chip Somodevilla)

Administration officials have been trotting out this line all day, but perhaps the most forceful advocate has been White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. He told Bloomberg that “at the end of the day, the test isn’t whether they voted for it. The test is whether the final product represented some of their ideas.” That might explain why Obama, at a White House event today, made such a big deal of the fact that the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee health care bill — which didn’t get a single Republican vote when it was approved today — included 160 Republican amendments.

Well, yes, but they were all technical amendments, Republicans say — nothing of any significance. So the new talking points brought a bit of a chill to Obama’s meeting this afternoon with Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, and Bob Corker of Tennessee. Their main message: Don’t rush through something this big. Take the time to get more people on board.

“Senator Collins believes that the administration would be best served if it did not rush health care reform,” Collins spokesman Kevin Kelley said after the meeting. “Clearly, this is a major challenge and it’s important that Congress work to get it right, otherwise the process will be divisive.”

Murkowski took a similar line in her own statement after the meeting: “We raised a number of issues, including how quickly the Senate is moving on a health bill that would raise taxes on small businesses, and modeling a new federal health plan on our broken Medicare system.”

CQ Photo
Lisa Murkowski: Raised a number of issues. (Getty Images/AFP/Karen Bleier)

At his White House speech today, Obama called the 160 Republican amendments to the HELP Committee bill “a hopeful sign of bipartisan support for the final product, if people are serious about bipartisanship.” But Craig Orfield, a spokesman for ranking Republican Mike Enzi of Wyoming, noted that “every substantive Republican amendment offered over the course of the 13 day mark-up was rejected by the Democrats.” And guess what? Republicans say you can’t exactly call it a bipartisan bill when no Republicans vote for it.

Of course, the mixed messages could just be Obama’s way of sending Republicans a message: Get on board now, because we can do this without you. And they can. They can also argue, with some justification, that many of the Republicans complaining about the bill now probably never had any intention of voting for it anyway.

But the talking points aren’t likely to help them with the handful of Republicans they could win over, such as Olympia J. Snowe of Maine. She wasn’t at the White House meeting today, but she’s supposed to meet with Obama on Thursday, and her reaction to the new argument was along the same lines. Medicare, she said, took more than a year and a half of work in Congress before Lyndon B. Johnson was able to sign it into law.

And, when told of Emanuel’s comments, she got a look of puzzlement and annoyance on her face. “What is going on?” she asked. The answer, most likely, is that the train is leaving the station — for better or for worse.

    Comments

  1. I'd rather see a good end product than worry about it being bipartisian. The stimulus was watered down for the sake of bipartisianship -to the point of it making it less effective. And I suspect the same to be true for the health care bill - the repubs have to protect the interests of big pharma and the insurance companies.

    The heck with bipartisianship, just produce a good bill.

    Posted by: NotFooledByDistractions Author Profile Page | July 16, 2009 3:13 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)