Add one more to the list of Democratic factions President Obama will have to keep happy.
Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Tom Carper of Delaware and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas have formed a group of 15 centrist Senate Democrats who will push for fiscal conservatism and a variety of centrist domestic policies. The Moderate Dems Working Group, which will meet every other Tuesday, will be able to form a strong enough bloc that they can cause trouble for Obama and the Democratic leadership if they think the policies are veering too far to the left.
Their list of issues includes the deficit, health care, climate change, education, and energy policy. In other words, any health care plan they think is too expensive — or a cap-and-trade plan they consider too costly — could be at risk of dissenting votes at a critical time.
Moderates being moderates, they insist they’re not looking for fights. “The point is that we want to talk about these concerns,” Lincoln said this afternoon, “and make sure that a conversation takes place about those concerns so we can make sure we have more people on board, rather than less.”
Still, the release from Bayh’s office is full of references to “practical” and “sensible” solutions. In case anyone still didn’t get the message, Bayh lays it on the line: “It’s going to take all of us working together in the Senate to get the 60 votes necessary to deliver the change the American people deserve.”
The other members of the group are Mark Udall and Michael Bennet of Colorado, Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Bill Nelson of Florida, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, and Mark Warner of Virginia. Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut — an independent who’s still sort of a Democrat despite his support of Republican John McCain in the presidential race — is part of the group too.
Liberal groups are already outraged. In a statement, Robert Borosage, co-director of Campaign for America’s Future, said the various groups of centrist Democrats — which also include the House “Blue Dogs” — provide “more treacherous opposition” to Obama’s agenda than even the Republicans. He hinted that the centrists were making themselves vulnerable to opposition in their next Democratic primaries, noting that “Blue Dog Democrats who support conservative special interests over the voters who elected them should be challenged.”
“Sen. Bayh’s group wants to be called ‘moderate,’ but their complaints about President Obama’s policies are conservative complaints,” Borosage said. “The timing of this announcement makes it obvious that the group’s first priority seems to be to join with conservatives to weaken President Obama’s reforms.”
Whether that threat becomes real, of course, depends on how much trouble the centrists cause Obama in the coming months. But it’s telling that, for most of George W. Bush’s presidency, Democrats and their supporters mostly called a cease-fire between progressives and centrists so they could unite against all the damage they saw being done during those years.
Now that the Democrats are in charge and the Republicans are mostly powerless, the cease-fire seems to be ending.
Comments
When did we move from majority to super-majority rules as the standard for the Senate? I know about filibusters, but I thought that there was an agreement to set them aside except in extraordinary circumstances. This seems to me to be a failure of Harry Reid to effectively lead the Senate
Posted by: Derek Fields
| March 18, 2009 4:59 PM
So now some democrats calling some of their colleagues bad Americans and un-patrtiotic - just as Fox news called so many of us not too long ago. Hmmm. What gave them the idea that Obama got all those votes from only the far-left? This is tiresome - Obama was elected by a broad coalition which consisted of people who agree with the centrists!
The radicals need to start living in the real world.
Posted by: bethyboo
| March 18, 2009 8:14 PM
Post A Comment