Don't Tell Anyone, But Cantor Got an Idea in the Stimulus

| | Comments (1)

So what Republican ideas, exactly, did Democrats include in that stimulus bill that got no Republican votes in the House yesterday? Oddly enough, the one the White House keeps mentioning was an idea that came from House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia.

Yes, that Eric Cantor. Otherwise known as, the guy whose job was to make sure no Republicans voted for it.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs has given Cantor credit for suggesting that the spending in the stimulus bill be made as transparent as possible, with all of the details posted on the Internet so the public can track where the money is going. (He just told the same story again at today’s press briefing.)

And unlike other cases, where Republicans say Democrats have been attributing stimulus ideas to them when the ideas weren’t actually theirs, Cantor’s aides confirm that he suggested the transparency measures to Obama when congressional leaders from both parties met with him on Capitol Hill at the beginning of the year.

But it’s a telling example, because it’s not like it would be any great sell to get Obama to agree to transparency measures. Open government has been perhaps the one most consistent theme of his political career, from the “Google for government” law he co-authored with Republican Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma in 2006 — setting up a database that tracks federal grants and loans — to the open-records directives he issued on his first full day as president.

The story is consistent with the observation state Sen. Kirk Dillard of Illinois, one of Obama’s most frequent Republican partners on legislation in the Illinois Senate, once made about Obama’s bipartisan work: It usually came on issues that don’t split along traditional party lines, like open government.

Gibbs mentioned other stimulus provisions he claimed were suggested by Republicans, such as reducing taxes for businesses with net operating losses. But the way Cantor and other Republican leaders have talked, those won’t win their support unless there are more significant changes Republicans can cite as victories.

“You’ll have to have key Republican concepts embedded in the legislation” to get a significant number of Republican votes in the Senate, Minority Whip Jon Kyl of Arizona told reporters today.

And if not, Republicans can always keep casting “no” votes and bragging about their unity.

    Comments

  1. Didn't the Democrats take out the family planning money at the request of the Republicans?

    Posted by: Casey Ann Author Profile Page | January 29, 2009 9:34 PM

Post A Comment


(for verification only; will not be published with your comment)